The Experts below are selected from a list of 318 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Peter Miller - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
calculating failure the making of a calculative infrastructure for forgiving and forecasting failure
Business History, 2013Co-Authors: Liisa Kurunmaki, Peter MillerAbstract:This paper examines how the category of failure was economised and made calculable. It explores the preconditions for this shift in three stages. First, it explores how failure came to be ‘forgiven’ in both the US and the UK across the nineteenth century, how it came to be defined as something that is economic or financial, rather than personal or moral. Second, it explores the rapid growth of narrating and rating failure in the mid-nineteenth century, with particular attention to the formation of credit rating agencies from the 1840s onwards. We consider also the roles played in this process by two fortuitous technological developments: the typewriter and carbon paper for copying. Third, we examine the emergence of the calculative infrastructure, which has helped to establish an industry of attempts to forecast failure from the beginning of the twentieth century, initially on the basis of financial ratios, and more recently through the use of risk indexes. We use the term ‘calculating failure’ to describ...
-
calculating failure the making of a calculative infrastructure for forgiving and forecasting failure
LSE Research Online Documents on Economics, 2013Co-Authors: Liisa Kurunmaki, Peter MillerAbstract:This paper examines how the category of failure was economised and made calculable. It explores the preconditions for this shift in three stages. First, it explores how failure came to be ‘forgiven’ in both the U.S. and the U.K. across the nineteenth century, how it came to be defined as something that is economic or financial, rather than personal or moral. Second, it explores the rapid growth of narrating and rating failure in the mid nineteenth century, with particular attention to the formation of credit rating agencies from the 1840s onwards. We consider also the roles played in this process by two fortuitous technological developments – the typewriter, and carbon paper for copying. Third, we examine the emergence of the calculative infrastructure which has helped to establish an industry of attempts to forecast failure from the beginning of the twentieth century, initially on the basis of financial ratios, and more recently through the use of risk indexes. We use the term ‘calculating failure’ to describe this transformation and economisation of both the ideas and the instruments of failure, and suggest that this has significant implications for the study of strategy.
Liisa Kurunmaki - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
calculating failure the making of a calculative infrastructure for forgiving and forecasting failure
Business History, 2013Co-Authors: Liisa Kurunmaki, Peter MillerAbstract:This paper examines how the category of failure was economised and made calculable. It explores the preconditions for this shift in three stages. First, it explores how failure came to be ‘forgiven’ in both the US and the UK across the nineteenth century, how it came to be defined as something that is economic or financial, rather than personal or moral. Second, it explores the rapid growth of narrating and rating failure in the mid-nineteenth century, with particular attention to the formation of credit rating agencies from the 1840s onwards. We consider also the roles played in this process by two fortuitous technological developments: the typewriter and carbon paper for copying. Third, we examine the emergence of the calculative infrastructure, which has helped to establish an industry of attempts to forecast failure from the beginning of the twentieth century, initially on the basis of financial ratios, and more recently through the use of risk indexes. We use the term ‘calculating failure’ to describ...
-
calculating failure the making of a calculative infrastructure for forgiving and forecasting failure
LSE Research Online Documents on Economics, 2013Co-Authors: Liisa Kurunmaki, Peter MillerAbstract:This paper examines how the category of failure was economised and made calculable. It explores the preconditions for this shift in three stages. First, it explores how failure came to be ‘forgiven’ in both the U.S. and the U.K. across the nineteenth century, how it came to be defined as something that is economic or financial, rather than personal or moral. Second, it explores the rapid growth of narrating and rating failure in the mid nineteenth century, with particular attention to the formation of credit rating agencies from the 1840s onwards. We consider also the roles played in this process by two fortuitous technological developments – the typewriter, and carbon paper for copying. Third, we examine the emergence of the calculative infrastructure which has helped to establish an industry of attempts to forecast failure from the beginning of the twentieth century, initially on the basis of financial ratios, and more recently through the use of risk indexes. We use the term ‘calculating failure’ to describe this transformation and economisation of both the ideas and the instruments of failure, and suggest that this has significant implications for the study of strategy.
Aggelis Alexandros - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Designing, translation: learning and evaluation of a Greek/English writing to Braille
MISC, 2018Co-Authors: Aggelis AlexandrosAbstract:The “Greek/English Writing to Braille” translation software helps users during the conversion of every Greek writing (either toneless or polytonic) to Braille, as well as British or Ancient Greek writing to Braille. The translation is completed automatically, eliminating the mistakes risk even for an experienced Braille user. Software’s operators can also print the translated Braille texts, using the appropriate Braille machinery. There also the potential of self-learning, which concerns the second part of the software, by learning Greek and English writing to Braille using a PC instead of the manual typewriter that has been used up till now. The operator works out the Greek or English scripts on the software textboxes, typing a variety of combinations of Braille writing, while the software automatically displays the text directly to Braille form. The software also offers the ability to type Braille combinations and automatically appears Greek text. Finally, it is proposed for a self-teaching practice for the Braille writing
-
Designing, translation – learning and evaluation of a Greek/English writing to Braille
pedocs-Dokumentenserver DIPF, 2018Co-Authors: Aggelis AlexandrosAbstract:The “Greek/English Writing to Braille” translation software helps users during the conversion of every Greek writing (either toneless or polytonic) to Braille, as well as British or Ancient Greek writing to Braille. The translation is completed automatically, eliminating the mistakes risk even for an experienced Braille user. Software’s operators can also print the translated Braille texts, using the appropriate Braille machinery. There also the potential of self-learning, which concerns the second part of the software, by learning Greek and English writing to Braille using a PC instead of the manual typewriter that has been used up till now. The operator works out the Greek or English scripts on the software textboxes, typing a variety of combinations of Braille writing, while the software automatically displays the text directly to Braille form. The software also offers the ability to type Braille combinations and automatically appears Greek text. Finally, it is proposed for a self-teaching practice for the Braille writing. (DIPF/Orig.
National Park Service - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
NPS Form 10-900 (Oct. 1990) United n" "... ""rl"'-'"",V"IIt 01 the Interior
2016Co-Authors: National Park ServiceAbstract:This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x " in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented. enter "N/A " for "not appiicable. " For functions. architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance. enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. historic name ___ _ c_h_u_r_c_h _ _ o_f_t_h_e _ _ H_o_l-.:y~_T_r_i_n_l_ · _t.:-,y ______________________ _ _ other names/site number __________________________________ _ _ street & number _ _ 2 _ _ 07~S_._C_h_u_r_c_h_S_t_r_e_e_t ______________ _ ~_~~/~A- ~ not for publication city or town ___ _ H_e_r_t_f_o_r_d ____________________ _ N-o.:/_A _ [J vicinity state _ _ N_o_r_t_h_C_a_r_o_l_i_n_a _ _ _ code ~ county _ _ P_e_r----"o_u-"i_I!l_a_n_s-=--__ _ _ code ~ zip code 27944 As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act. as amended, I hereby certify that this ~ nomination o request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and profeSSional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property IR! meets 0 does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant o nationally 0 statewide iii locally. (0 See continuation sheet for additional comments.) (1 Signature of Date State of Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property 0 meets 0 does not meet the National Register criteria. (0 See continuation sheet for aCditional comments.) Signature of certifying officialfTitle State or Federal agency and bureau I hereby certify that the property is: o entered in the National Register. o See continuation sheet. o determined eligible for the National Register o See continuation sheet. o determined not eligible for the National Register. o removed from the Nationa
-
Signature...
2016Co-Authors: National Park ServiceAbstract:This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x " in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A " for "not applicable. " For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. historic name _R_a_l_e_l_ ' 9_h_B_a_n_k_i_n_9_a_n_d_T_r_u_s_t_C_o_m_p_a_n_y_B_u_i_ld_in_9 ____________ _ _ other names/site number _ _ R_a_l_e_i_9_h_B_u_i_l_d_i_n_9 _____________________ _ _ street & number __ _ 5_W_8_s_t_H_a_r_9~8_t_t_S_t_r_e_8_t ______________ _ n~not for publication city or town ____ _ R_a_l_8_i"""'9_h--'-_--'--__________________ _-----'n£a vicinity state North Carolina code ~ county "-W_a_k_8 ______ _ _ code ~ zip code 27601 As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this IXJ nomination o request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National R'egister of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property Dlcmeets 0 does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant o nationally l:Pstatewide ally. ( ee continuation sheet for additional comments.), J ~ I d· certifying offici Date State of Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property 0 meets 0 does not meet the National Register criteria. (0 See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying officialfTitie State or Federal agency and bureau I hereby certify that the property is: o entered in the National Register. o See continuation sheet. o determined eligible for the National Register o See continuation sheet. o determined not eligible for the National Register. o removed from the Nationa
North Caroll~a Depa - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
NPS Form 10"900 (Oct. 1990) United
2016Co-Authors: North Caroll~a DepaAbstract:This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x " in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A " for "not applicable. " For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 1 0-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. historic name __ _ Ma_i_n_S_t_r_e_e_t_H_i_s_t_o_r_l_ · c_D_i=s=t-=r-=i:..::c:...:t::..._ _ __________________ _ _ other names/site number_.;:;.._~----------------------------------by Blanton Alley on the north, Huntley Street on the south, Yarboro Street on the west, and Broadway NZA not tor publication street & number Street on the east. city or town Forect City N/18J vicinity state North Carol ina code ~ county Rutherford code __lQ__l _ zip code 28043 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the design~ted authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this XX nomination 0 request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property Qg meets 0 does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant 0 nationally 0 statewide}Qg locally. (0 See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying off ·
