Unconformity

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 16827 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Malcolm W Wallace - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • regional recognition of the neoproterozoic sturtian marinoan boundary northern and central adelaide geosyncline south australia
    Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2012
    Co-Authors: Thomas A Fromhold, Malcolm W Wallace
    Abstract:

    Stratigraphic and sedimentological investigation of the interglacial succession within the Cryogenian-aged Umberatana Group of the Northern and Central Flinders Ranges reveals a complex array of sedimentary successions lying between the Sturtian and Marinoan glacial deposits. The Sturtian–Marinoan Series boundary was first defined from the Adelaide area at the uppermost contact of the Brighton Limestone. In the Northern Flinders Ranges the Sturtian–Marinoan Series boundary has been positioned at the uppermost contact of the Balcanoona Formation, which is thought to correlate with the Brighton Limestone. In the Northern Flinders Ranges a major Unconformity separates the Sturtian and Marinoan-aged sedimentary successions (Nepouie–Upalinna Subgroups). In moderately deep marine depositional settings, this submarine Unconformity is located at the base of the Yankaninna Formation where erosion has deeply incised (up to 300 m) into the underlying Tapley Hill Formation. In shallower marine settings the unconformi...

  • nature and significance of the neoproterozoic sturtian marinoan boundary northern adelaide geosyncline south australia
    Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2011
    Co-Authors: Thomas A Fromhold, Malcolm W Wallace
    Abstract:

    The Cryogenian succession of the Northern Flinders Ranges reveals a complex sedimentary record between the Sturtian and Marinoan glacial deposits. A major Unconformity separates the Sturtian and Marinoan-aged sedimentary successions in the area. This forms a subaerial erosion surface with terrestrial and marginal marine infill directly above the Angepena and Balcanoona Formations in their respective localities. This exposure surface is here correlated with the previously documented submarine Unconformity between the Yankaninna Formation and the underlying deep marine Tapley Hill Formation. This erosional event provides a chronostratigraphic marker horizon that coincides approximately with the previously defined Sturtian–Marinoan Time Series boundary in the Northern Flinders Ranges. These stratigraphic relationships also constrain lateral facies relationships between the Oodnaminta Reef Complex (Balcanoona Formation) and the Angepena Formation. Similarly, the shallow-water Weetootla Dolomite is correlated with the deeper water carbonates of the Yankaninna Formation.

  • phosphate rich deposits associated with the mio pliocene Unconformity in south east australia
    Sedimentology, 2009
    Co-Authors: Julie A Dickinson, Malcolm W Wallace
    Abstract:

    Phosphates are present on the surface of the Mio-Pliocene Unconformity in the Otway, Port Phillip and Gippsland basins of south-east Australia. The phosphates occur as lenticular lag deposits and include reworked phosphatic intraclasts, vertebrate bone and teeth. In situ phosphatized burrows are also found in sediments of Late Miocene and Early Pliocene age. The phosphatic intraclasts on the Unconformity are interpreted as reworked phosphatized burrows derived from latest Miocene sediments (6 to 5 Ma). The phosphatization of these intraclasts is temporally related to the Unconformity. The timing of phosphogenesis coincides with a period of transgression across the south-east Australian margin following Late Miocene uplift. This transgression is responsible for initial marine erosion of the underlying Miocene sequence, creation of a period of very slow sedimentation that was favourable to phosphate formation and subsequent deposition of the latest Miocene through to Pliocene sediments. The continental weathering of the uplifted highlands adjacent to the sedimentary basins, global phosphorus enrichment in the Late Miocene oceans and localized upwelling may all have contributed to phosphatization in south-eastern Australia.

  • origin and timing of the miocene pliocene Unconformity in southeast australia
    Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2002
    Co-Authors: Julie A Dickinson, Malcolm W Wallace, G R Holdgate, Stephen J Gallagher, Lindsay Thomas
    Abstract:

    An Unconformity is present close to the Miocene-Pliocene boundary in the onshore and nearshore portions of the Otway, Port Phillip-Torquay, and Gippsland basins of southeast Australia. The Unconformity is angular (generally < 1-5° angularity), with the underlying Miocene units having been deformed (gentle folding and reverse faulting) and eroded prior to deposition of the Pliocene succession. The Unconformity also marks a change from Oligocene-Miocene deposition of cool-water carbonate sediments and brown coal-bearing successions to the accumulation of more siliciclastic-rich sediments in Pliocene time. The Miocene-Pliocene boundary therefore represents an interval of significant regional uplift in the southeast Australian basins. The amount of section removed is greatest around the Otway and Strzelecki ranges in Victoria, where up to a kilometer of section may have been removed. In most onshore sections of the Victorian basins hundreds of meters of section have been eroded. In distal offshore locations the boundary becomes conformable. The timing of uplift and erosion is best constrained in the Otway and Port Phillip basins, where late Miocene (N16 ∼ 10 Ma) sediments underlie the Unconformity and earliest Pliocene (∼ 5 Ma) sediments overlie it. This timing coincides with a change in the dynamics of the Australian plate, beginning at around 12 Ma. Southeast Australia is currently under a NW-SE compressional regime, and this has probably persisted since the late Miocene. In the basins (as opposed to the basement-dominated highland areas), the late Miocene uplift event is more significant than later Pliocene-Recent uplift.

Emilia Huret - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • sedimentary architecture depositional facies and diagenetic response to intracratonic deformation and climate change inferred from outcrops for a pivotal period jurassic cretaceous boundary paris basin france
    Sedimentary Geology, 2018
    Co-Authors: Benjamin Brigaud, Benoit Vincent, Maurice Pagel, Antoine Gras, Aurelie Noret, Philippe Landrein, Emilia Huret
    Abstract:

    Abstract The aim of this study is to decipher the respective influences of geodynamic and climate disturbances at the Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary on sedimentary facies and carbonate diagenesis in a stable intracratonic basin using isotopic geochemistry and subsidence quantification. Fourteen lithofacies were deposited in a (1) carbonate platform and (2) a delta plain environment. Climate change from cool and wet to warm and semi-arid conditions during the early Tithonian influenced the syn-sedimentary dolomitization process within the carbonate platform during the mid-Tithonian. Architecture and facies reconstructions well-constrained the Jurassic-Cretaceous Unconformity (JCU), which was an important local structural episode marked by (1) an 80 m uplift in the eastern Paris Basin and by (2) the formation of a NW–SE low wavelength 15 km-wide and 30 km-long flexure. This first tectonic event tended to maintain brine ponds and supratidal marsh environments in the platform during the late Tithonian and early Berriasian, forming Purbeckian facies and associated dolomitic facies. A major depositional change occurred between the early and late Berriasian from shallow carbonate platform environments to fluviatile-deltaic clastic deposits (Wealden facies). This facies change is underlain by a major Unconformity corresponding to the Ryazanian Unconformity. It is marked (1) by erosion processes, karstification of the carbonate substrate, and the development of ferruginous weathering products (goethite), followed by (2) incision processes in a fluvial-deltaic environment. This Unconformity is consecutive to a 40 m uplift in the eastern Paris Basin. The rifting phase in the Bay of Biscay, in the Pyrenean Zone, and in the Artic-North Atlantic together with the opening of the Ligurian Sea had a major influence on the northern part of France by causing uplifts (120 m from the Tithonian) and flexuring. Geodynamics played a major role in carbonate demise in the Paris Basin leading to exposure and karstification of the carbonate platform. Added to the generalized uplift, western Tethyan cool and humid conditions from the late Berriasian caused terrigenous influx into large-scale marine domains which was detrimental and unfavorable to carbonate growth.

Julien Moreau - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • lower palaeozoic unconformities in an intracratonic platform setting glacial erosion versus tectonics in the eastern murzuq basin southern libya
    International Journal of Earth Sciences, 2013
    Co-Authors: Jean-françois Ghienne, Lionel Degermann, Julien Moreau, Jean-loup Rubino
    Abstract:

    The stratigraphic record of the eastern Murzuq Basin has been importantly influenced by deformation resulting in angular and/or deeply erosional unconformities, though the overall context is intracratonic. Major transgressive events and the Ordovician glaciation are nevertheless documented, allowing the delineation of tectonic-, eustasy- or climate-driven unconformities. Lower Palaeozoic key events and related unconformities that characterize the North Gondwana platform have therefore a signature in the eastern Murzuq Basin. The basement/cover Unconformity, also known as the infra-Tassilian surface, truncates all the deformed and metamorphosed Lower Cambrian and older rocks. Above is a ?Middle Cambrian to Lower Ordovician megasequence (Murizidie and Hasawnah Fms.), which is in turn truncated by an intra-Ordovician, angular Unconformity. This megasequence is unconformably overlain by a Middle Ordovician (Hawaz Fm.) to Silurian (Tanzzuft and Akakus Fms) megasequence, which includes the Upper Ordovician glaciogenic unit (Mamuniyat Fm.), bounded at the base by a polygenic glacial erosion surface showing corrugated glacial lineations, tillites, and glaciotectonic structures. The Middle Ordovician to Silurian megasequence is finally truncated by a base-Devonian, angular Unconformity overlain by fluvial sandstones. Regarding the possibility that those fluvial deposits may be as younger as Late Devonian in the eastern Murzuq Basin based on palaeoflora, the so-called Caledonian Unconformity might be here a much younger (mid-Eifelian?) surface, and the occurrence of the Lower Devonian “Tadrart Fm.” is questioned. The Upper Ordovician glacial erosion surface, which is sometimes referred to as the Taconic Unconformity, usually truncates Middle Ordovician strata in the Murzuq Basin but reaches significantly deeper stratigraphic levels in places that have been previously involved in the intra-Ordovician deformation event. In the Murizidie (southeastern Murzuq Basin), the infra-Tassilian surface, the intra-Ordovician Unconformity, and the Upper Ordovician glacial erosion surface amalgamate together. Here, an estimate of the glacial erosion depth cannot be derived from the stratigraphic hiatus beneath the glacial incision, the main part of which relate to the intra-Ordovician tectonic event. The Upper Ordovician climate-related glacial erosion surface is not a valid Unconformity for a sequence hierarchy framework of the Lower Palaeozoic, although it presents most of the physical attributes of tectonic-driven unconformities.

Andrew M. Durbano - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Mesozoic rift to post-rift tectonostratigraphy of the Sverdrup Basin, Canadian Arctic
    Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016
    Co-Authors: Thomas Hadlari, Derrick Midwinter, Jennifer M. Galloway, Keith Dewing, Andrew M. Durbano
    Abstract:

    Abstract Jurassic-Cretaceous rift successions and basin geometries of the Sverdrup Basin are reconstructed from a review and integration of stratigraphy, igneous records, outcrop maps, and subsurface data. The rift onset Unconformity is in the Lower Jurassic portion of the Heiberg Group (approximately 200–190 Ma). Facies transgress from early syn-rift sandstones of the King Christian Formation to marine mudstones of the Jameson Bay Formation. The syn-rift succession of marine mudstones in the basin centre, Jameson Bay to Deer Bay formations, ranges from Early Jurassic (Pleinsbachian) to Early Cretaceous (Valanginian). Early post-rift deposits of the lower Isachsen Formation are truncated by the sub-Hauterivian Unconformity, which is interpreted as a break up Unconformity at approximately 135–130 Ma. Cessation of rift subsidence allowed for late post-rift sandstone deposits of the Isachsen Formation to be distributed across the entire basin. Marine deposition to form mudstone of the Christopher Formation throughout the Canadian Arctic Islands and outside of the rift basin records establishment of a broad marine shelf during post-rift thermal subsidence at the start of a passive margin stage. The onset of the High Arctic Large Igneous Province at approximately 130 Ma appears to coincide with the breakup Unconformity, and it is quite typical that magma-poor rifted margins have mainly post-rift igneous rocks. We extend the magma-poor characterization where rifting is driven by lithospheric extension, to speculatively consider that the records from Sverdrup Basin are consistent with tectonic models of retro-arc extension and intra-continental rifting that have previously been proposed for the Amerasia Basin under the Arctic Ocean.

Benjamin Brigaud - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • sedimentary architecture depositional facies and diagenetic response to intracratonic deformation and climate change inferred from outcrops for a pivotal period jurassic cretaceous boundary paris basin france
    Sedimentary Geology, 2018
    Co-Authors: Benjamin Brigaud, Benoit Vincent, Maurice Pagel, Antoine Gras, Aurelie Noret, Philippe Landrein, Emilia Huret
    Abstract:

    Abstract The aim of this study is to decipher the respective influences of geodynamic and climate disturbances at the Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary on sedimentary facies and carbonate diagenesis in a stable intracratonic basin using isotopic geochemistry and subsidence quantification. Fourteen lithofacies were deposited in a (1) carbonate platform and (2) a delta plain environment. Climate change from cool and wet to warm and semi-arid conditions during the early Tithonian influenced the syn-sedimentary dolomitization process within the carbonate platform during the mid-Tithonian. Architecture and facies reconstructions well-constrained the Jurassic-Cretaceous Unconformity (JCU), which was an important local structural episode marked by (1) an 80 m uplift in the eastern Paris Basin and by (2) the formation of a NW–SE low wavelength 15 km-wide and 30 km-long flexure. This first tectonic event tended to maintain brine ponds and supratidal marsh environments in the platform during the late Tithonian and early Berriasian, forming Purbeckian facies and associated dolomitic facies. A major depositional change occurred between the early and late Berriasian from shallow carbonate platform environments to fluviatile-deltaic clastic deposits (Wealden facies). This facies change is underlain by a major Unconformity corresponding to the Ryazanian Unconformity. It is marked (1) by erosion processes, karstification of the carbonate substrate, and the development of ferruginous weathering products (goethite), followed by (2) incision processes in a fluvial-deltaic environment. This Unconformity is consecutive to a 40 m uplift in the eastern Paris Basin. The rifting phase in the Bay of Biscay, in the Pyrenean Zone, and in the Artic-North Atlantic together with the opening of the Ligurian Sea had a major influence on the northern part of France by causing uplifts (120 m from the Tithonian) and flexuring. Geodynamics played a major role in carbonate demise in the Paris Basin leading to exposure and karstification of the carbonate platform. Added to the generalized uplift, western Tethyan cool and humid conditions from the late Berriasian caused terrigenous influx into large-scale marine domains which was detrimental and unfavorable to carbonate growth.