Uterine Cervix Cytology

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 918 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Longatto Filho Adhemar - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Recommendations on quality control and quality assurance in cervical Cytology
    'S. Karger AG', 2015
    Co-Authors: Branca Margherita, Longatto Filho Adhemar
    Abstract:

    Objective: We aimed to critically evaluate the importance of quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) strategies in the routine work of Uterine Cervix Cytology. Study Design: We revised all the main principles of QC and QA that are already being implemented worldwide and then discussed the positive aspects and limitations of these as well as proposing alternatives when pertinent. Results: A literature review was introduced after highlighting the main historical revisions, and then a critical evaluation of the principal innovations in screening programmes was conducted, with recommendations being postulated. Conclusions: Based on the analysed data, QC and QA are two essential arms that support the quality of a screening programme

Branca Margherita - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Recommendations on quality control and quality assurance in cervical Cytology
    'S. Karger AG', 2015
    Co-Authors: Branca Margherita, Longatto Filho Adhemar
    Abstract:

    Objective: We aimed to critically evaluate the importance of quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) strategies in the routine work of Uterine Cervix Cytology. Study Design: We revised all the main principles of QC and QA that are already being implemented worldwide and then discussed the positive aspects and limitations of these as well as proposing alternatives when pertinent. Results: A literature review was introduced after highlighting the main historical revisions, and then a critical evaluation of the principal innovations in screening programmes was conducted, with recommendations being postulated. Conclusions: Based on the analysed data, QC and QA are two essential arms that support the quality of a screening programme