The Experts below are selected from a list of 327 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Zhong Jue - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Synchronization Trigger System Design of the Thermosonic Flip-chip Bonding
2005 Conference on High Density Microsystem Design and Packaging and Component Failure Analysis, 2005Co-Authors: Li Jianping, Wang Fu-liang, Han Lei, Huo Jun-ya, Zhong JueAbstract:The stability and the delay time of the scan Working Model trigger system and the interrupt Working Model trigger system were compared and studied by the experiment of synchronization trigger of the thermosonic flip-chip bonding. It is found that the interrupt Working Model trigger system's stability was better than the scan Working Model trigger system's. It's biggest delay time, average delay time and the standard deviation of the delay time were all shorter than the scan Working Model trigger system's, especially the standard deviation just as small as 0.5mus. The result indicates that the delay time of the interrupt Working Model trigger system is 9mus less than a time cycle of the thermosonic and it's every time's delay time is invariableness. The interrupt Working Model trigger system is superior to the scan Working Model trigger system. It is also confirmed that the interrupt Working Model trigger system can used as a precise synchronization trigger system by triggering the thermosonic flip-chip bonding's data acquisition system, the press measure system and the polytec vibration measure system
-
Synchronization trigger system design of thermosonic flip-chip bonding
2005Co-Authors: Zhong JueAbstract:The stability and the delay time of the scan Working Model trigger system and the interrupt Working Model trigger system were compared and studied by the experiment of synchronization trigger of the thermosonic flip-chip bonding. It is found that the stability of the interrupt Working Model trigger system is better than that of the scan Working Model trigger system. The biggest value, average value and the standard deviation of the delay time are all smaller than those of the scan Working Model trigger system, especially the standard deviation is just as small as 0.5μs. The result indicates that the delay time of the interrupt Working Model trigger system is 9 μs, which is less than a cycle of the thermosonic and invariableness. The interrupt Working Model trigger system is superior to that of the scan Working Model trigger system. It is also confirmed that it can be used as a precise synchronization trigger system by triggering the thermosonic flip-chip bonding’s data acquisition system and polytec vibration measure system.
Ryo Mizuhashi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Influence of Working Model angle on the formation of a pressure-formed mouthguard.
Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology, 2017Co-Authors: Fumi Mizuhashi, Kaoru Koide, Ryo MizuhashiAbstract:Custom-made mouthguards are fabricated on Working Models. However, the influence of the Working Model to the mouthguard characteristics has not been clearly established. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of the angle of the Working Model on the formation of a pressure-formed mouthguard. Mouthguard sheets of 3.8 mm ethylene vinyl acetate were pressure-formed onto Working Models. The angle of the Working Model formed by the labial surface of the central incisor and the base of the Working Model was set at 85°, 90°, and 95°. The thickness of the mouthguard was measured at the labial surface of the central incisor, and the buccal and occlusal surfaces of the first molar. Differences in the thickness of the mouthguards were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance. Mouthguard thickness varied among the measured regions of the central incisors and first molars (P < 0.01). The thickness at the labial surface of the central incisor and buccal surface of the first molar was greatest for mouthguards formed using the Working Model with the angle set at 85° (P < 0.01). The angle of the Working Model at the labial surface of the central incisor and the base of the Working Model should be maintained at an acute angle (e.g., 85°) to control the thickness at the central incisors and the first molars of pressure-formed mouthguards. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
-
Influence of Working Model position on the formation of a pressure-formed mouthguard.
Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology, 2016Co-Authors: Fumi Mizuhashi, Kaoru Koide, Ryo MizuhashiAbstract:BACKGROUND/AIM Custom-made mouthguards are fabricated on Working Models. However, the influence of the Working Model to the mouthguard characteristics has not been clearly established. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of the angle of the Working Model on the formation of a pressure-formed mouthguard. MATERIALS AND METHODS Mouthguard sheets of 3.8 mm ethylene vinyl acetate were pressure-formed onto Working Models. The angle of the Working Model formed by the labial surface of the central incisor and the base of the Working Model was set at 85°, 90°, and 95°. The thickness of the mouthguard was measured at the labial surface of the central incisor, and the buccal and occlusal surfaces of the first molar. Differences in the thickness of the mouthguards were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance. RESULTS Mouthguard thickness varied among the measured regions of the central incisors and first molars (P < 0.01). The thickness at the labial surface of the central incisor and buccal surface of the first molar was greatest for mouthguards formed using the Working Model with the angle set at 85° (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The angle of the Working Model at the labial surface of the central incisor and the base of the Working Model should be maintained at an acute angle (e.g., 85°) to control the thickness at the central incisors and the first molars of pressure-formed mouthguards.
María Luisa Pertegal-felices - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A collaborative Working Model for enhancing the learning process of science & engineering students
Computers in Human Behavior, 2020Co-Authors: Higinio Mora, María Teresa Signes-pont, Andrés Fuster-guilló, María Luisa Pertegal-felicesAbstract:Abstract Science and engineering education are mostly based on content assimilation and development of skills. However, to adequately prepare students for today's world, it is also necessary to stimulate critical thinking and make them reflect on how to improve current practices using new tools and technologies. In this line, the main motivation of this research consists in exploring ways supported by technology to enhance the learning process of students and to better prepare them to face the challenges of today's world. To this end, the purpose of this work is to design an innovative learning project based on collaborative work among students, and research its impact in achieving better learning outcomes, generating of collective intelligence and further motivation. The proposed collaborative Working Model is based on peer review assessment methodology implemented through a learning web-platform. Thus, students were encouraged to peer review their classmates' works. They had to make comments, suggest improvements, and assess final assignments. Teaching staff managed and supervised the whole process. Students were selected from computer science engineering at the University of Alicante (Spain). Results suggested greater content assimilation and enhanced learning in several scientific skills. The students' final grade exceeded what any student could produce individually, but we cannot conclude that real collective intelligence was generated. Learning methodologies based on the possibilities of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) provide new ways to transmit and manage knowledge in higher education. Collaborating in peer assessment enhances the students' motivation and promotes the active learning. In addition, this method can be very helpful and time saving for instructors in the management of large groups.
Fumi Mizuhashi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Influence of Working Model angle on the formation of a pressure-formed mouthguard.
Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology, 2017Co-Authors: Fumi Mizuhashi, Kaoru Koide, Ryo MizuhashiAbstract:Custom-made mouthguards are fabricated on Working Models. However, the influence of the Working Model to the mouthguard characteristics has not been clearly established. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of the angle of the Working Model on the formation of a pressure-formed mouthguard. Mouthguard sheets of 3.8 mm ethylene vinyl acetate were pressure-formed onto Working Models. The angle of the Working Model formed by the labial surface of the central incisor and the base of the Working Model was set at 85°, 90°, and 95°. The thickness of the mouthguard was measured at the labial surface of the central incisor, and the buccal and occlusal surfaces of the first molar. Differences in the thickness of the mouthguards were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance. Mouthguard thickness varied among the measured regions of the central incisors and first molars (P < 0.01). The thickness at the labial surface of the central incisor and buccal surface of the first molar was greatest for mouthguards formed using the Working Model with the angle set at 85° (P < 0.01). The angle of the Working Model at the labial surface of the central incisor and the base of the Working Model should be maintained at an acute angle (e.g., 85°) to control the thickness at the central incisors and the first molars of pressure-formed mouthguards. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
-
Influence of Working Model position on the formation of a pressure-formed mouthguard.
Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology, 2016Co-Authors: Fumi Mizuhashi, Kaoru Koide, Ryo MizuhashiAbstract:BACKGROUND/AIM Custom-made mouthguards are fabricated on Working Models. However, the influence of the Working Model to the mouthguard characteristics has not been clearly established. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of the angle of the Working Model on the formation of a pressure-formed mouthguard. MATERIALS AND METHODS Mouthguard sheets of 3.8 mm ethylene vinyl acetate were pressure-formed onto Working Models. The angle of the Working Model formed by the labial surface of the central incisor and the base of the Working Model was set at 85°, 90°, and 95°. The thickness of the mouthguard was measured at the labial surface of the central incisor, and the buccal and occlusal surfaces of the first molar. Differences in the thickness of the mouthguards were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance. RESULTS Mouthguard thickness varied among the measured regions of the central incisors and first molars (P < 0.01). The thickness at the labial surface of the central incisor and buccal surface of the first molar was greatest for mouthguards formed using the Working Model with the angle set at 85° (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The angle of the Working Model at the labial surface of the central incisor and the base of the Working Model should be maintained at an acute angle (e.g., 85°) to control the thickness at the central incisors and the first molars of pressure-formed mouthguards.
Paul Emery - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the ra map consortium a Working Model for academia industry collaboration
Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2018Co-Authors: Andrew P Cope, Michael R Barnes, Alexandra Belson, Michael Binks, Sarah Brockbank, Francisco Bonachelacapdevila, Claudio Carini, Benjamin A Fisher, Carl S Goodyear, Paul EmeryAbstract:Collaboration can be challenging; nevertheless, the emerging successes of large, multi-partner, multi-national cooperatives and research networks in the biomedical sector have sustained the appetite of academics and industry partners for developing and fostering new research consortia. This Model has percolated down to national funding agencies across the globe, leading to funding for projects that aim to realise the true potential of genomic medicine in the 21st century and to reap the rewards of 'big data'. In this Perspectives article, the experiences of the RA-MAP consortium, a group of more than 140 individuals affiliated with 21 academic and industry organizations that are focused on making genomic medicine in rheumatoid arthritis a reality are described. The challenges of multi-partner collaboration in the UK are highlighted and wide-ranging solutions are offered that might benefit large research consortia around the world.
-
The RA-MAP Consortium: a Working Model for academia–industry collaboration
Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2018Co-Authors: Andrew P Cope, Michael R Barnes, Alexandra Belson, Michael Binks, Sarah Brockbank, Claudio Carini, Benjamin A Fisher, Carl S Goodyear, Francisco Bonachela-capdevila, Paul EmeryAbstract:Large partnerships between academia and industry are emerging as a possible solution to the problems surrounding stratified medicine. In this Perspectives article, the members of the RA-MAP Consortium reflect on the challenges and benefits of Working in such a partnership. Collaboration can be challenging; nevertheless, the emerging successes of large, multi-partner, multi-national cooperatives and research networks in the biomedical sector have sustained the appetite of academics and industry partners for developing and fostering new research consortia. This Model has percolated down to national funding agencies across the globe, leading to funding for projects that aim to realise the true potential of genomic medicine in the 21st century and to reap the rewards of 'big data'. In this Perspectives article, the experiences of the RA-MAP consortium, a group of more than 140 individuals affiliated with 21 academic and industry organizations that are focused on making genomic medicine in rheumatoid arthritis a reality are described. The challenges of multi-partner collaboration in the UK are highlighted and wide-ranging solutions are offered that might benefit large research consortia around the world.
