Accountability Procedure - Explore the Science & Experts | ideXlab

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Accountability Procedure

The Experts below are selected from a list of 48 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Accountability Procedure – Free Register to Access Experts & Abstracts

David Antonioni – One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • THE EFFECTS OF FEEDBACK Accountability ON UPWARD APPRAISAL RATINGS
    Personnel Psychology, 1994
    Co-Authors: David Antonioni
    Abstract:

    Do subordinates feel and respond differently to upward appraisal Procedures depending on whether they are accountable or anonymous? Accountability requires subordinates to identify themselves on the upward appraisal questionnaires they complete. In an experimental field study, 38 managers and their subordinates from an insurance company were randomly assigned to use one of the appraisal Procedures. As hypothesized, managers who received feedback from specific individuals in the Accountability Procedure viewed the upward appraisal process more positively than did managers in the anonymity Procedure. However, subordinates felt more comfortable giving anonymous responses. As a result, subordinates who used the Accountability Procedure rated their managers significantly higher than the subordinates who responded anonymously. Therefore, the results of this study suggest that an upward appraisal Procedure in which individuals are accountable for their responses may produce inflated ratings of managers’ performance. Further research should compare the Accountability and anonymous upward appraisal Procedures to determine which Procedure produces more accurate ratings.

Cpc Taizhou – One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • The Status Quo, Defects and Improvement in the Building of the Administrative Accountability System in China
    Guihai Tribune, 2009
    Co-Authors: Xu Xiao-jun, Cpc Taizhou
    Abstract:

    China’s administrative Accountability system into the formal public eye has gone through five years.Administrative Accountability system has made many achievements,but is also faced with a series of realistic difficult problems and system defects such as the main Accountability to be single,Accountability object to be unclear,Accountability Procedure to be not standard,responsibility investigation to be ineffective,Accountability information to be not full,Accountability system to be imperfect.In order to solve the problems existing in the building of administrative Accountability system,we should complete the transformation of Accountability from the rule of people to the rule of law as soon as possible.

Lei Tang – One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • The Liability Immunity Scheme in the Administrative Accountability System of China
    Canadian Social Science, 2015
    Co-Authors: Lei Tang
    Abstract:

    The administrative Accountability system should not only function as punishment, but also guidance for government officials. The systematism of Accountability Procedure is surely the foundation, but it is also worth considering that how to promote the predictability of the result. China should construct the liability immunity system with good faith standard to offer government officials both legality and reasonableness standard. A liability immunity clause could function as guidance and protection in two circumstances, namely the circumstance of administrative decision making and when the rules are ambiguous.

Si Linb – One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Comparative Analysis on the Academic Ethics Text in Chinese Universities—Based on the survey of nine “985 project” universities in China
    Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering, 2013
    Co-Authors: Si Linb
    Abstract:

    Based on the comparative analysis of the academic ethics text of the “985 project” famous universities in China, it can be found that each university has common characteristics on the main content of the text, applicable objects,institutions, punishment Procedure and strength, and also has some differences. Especially, there are some problems in the academic ethic texts of these universities in some aspects such as in the applicable objects, the Accountability Procedure,operability, transparency, participation, the construction of the relief mechanism and so on. To improve the academic ethics text and strengthen the construction of style of study, these universities should strengthen the communication in the process of the establishment of academic ethics, sort out the form and category of academic misconduct from the theory,establish specific and scientific judgment standard of academic misconduct, strengthen the education on the academic ethics and integrity, formulate strict and normative Accountability Procedure, encourage the broad participation and supervision in the academic activities, promote third-party investigation and Accountability actively, establish a transparent Accountability mechanism, and improve Accountability relief mechanism, etc.

Xu Xiao-jun – One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • The Status Quo, Defects and Improvement in the Building of the Administrative Accountability System in China
    Guihai Tribune, 2009
    Co-Authors: Xu Xiao-jun, Cpc Taizhou
    Abstract:

    China’s administrative Accountability system into the formal public eye has gone through five years.Administrative Accountability system has made many achievements,but is also faced with a series of realistic difficult problems and system defects such as the main Accountability to be single,Accountability object to be unclear,Accountability Procedure to be not standard,responsibility investigation to be ineffective,Accountability information to be not full,Accountability system to be imperfect.In order to solve the problems existing in the building of administrative Accountability system,we should complete the transformation of Accountability from the rule of people to the rule of law as soon as possible.