The Experts below are selected from a list of 40065 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Niloofar Peykari - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A Proposed Strategy for Research Misconduct Policy: A Review on Misconduct Management in Health Research System
International journal of preventive medicine, 2016Co-Authors: Shirin Djalalinia, Parviz Owlia, Hossein Malek Afzali, Mostafa Ghanei, Niloofar PeykariAbstract:Background: Today, with the rapid growth of scientific production, research Misconduct has become a worldwide problem. This article is intended to introduce the successful experience on the management of research paper Misconducts in the field of health research. Methods: Our aim was to design and develop the strategy for research Misconduct policy. Focusing on the national regulatory system, we developed a hierarchical model for paper Misconduct policy in all the medical sciences universities and their affiliated research units. Results: Through our regulatory policy for paper Misconduct management, specific protocol was followed in the field of health research publications through which the capabilities of covering the four main elements of prevention, investigation, punishment, and correction have come together. Conclusions: Considering the proposed strategy, regarding the strengths and weaknesses, utilization of evaluation tool can be one of the best strategies to achieving the prospective of health research papers by 2025.
Timothy M. Maher - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Police Sexual Misconduct: Female Police Officers' Views Regarding Its Nature and Extent
Women & Criminal Justice, 2010Co-Authors: Timothy M. MaherAbstract:Sexual Misconduct among on-duty police officers has received little scholarly attention. Existing research that has attempted to provide police officers' views on this matter has been dominated by the male perspective. The present study focuses on female officers' perspectives and provides insight into the nature and extent of such behavior. The findings show that female officers report that police sexual Misconduct is common. Differences in perceptions about such behavior between female and male officers are identified. Theoretical explanations for police sexual Misconduct are explored. Policy implications of how police sexual Misconduct might be better controlled are discussed.
Shirin Djalalinia - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A Proposed Strategy for Research Misconduct Policy: A Review on Misconduct Management in Health Research System
International journal of preventive medicine, 2016Co-Authors: Shirin Djalalinia, Parviz Owlia, Hossein Malek Afzali, Mostafa Ghanei, Niloofar PeykariAbstract:Background: Today, with the rapid growth of scientific production, research Misconduct has become a worldwide problem. This article is intended to introduce the successful experience on the management of research paper Misconducts in the field of health research. Methods: Our aim was to design and develop the strategy for research Misconduct policy. Focusing on the national regulatory system, we developed a hierarchical model for paper Misconduct policy in all the medical sciences universities and their affiliated research units. Results: Through our regulatory policy for paper Misconduct management, specific protocol was followed in the field of health research publications through which the capabilities of covering the four main elements of prevention, investigation, punishment, and correction have come together. Conclusions: Considering the proposed strategy, regarding the strengths and weaknesses, utilization of evaluation tool can be one of the best strategies to achieving the prospective of health research papers by 2025.
Charles Gross - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Scientific Misconduct.
Annual review of psychology, 2015Co-Authors: Charles GrossAbstract:Scientific Misconduct has been defined as fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. Scientific Misconduct has occurred throughout the history of science. The US government began to take systematic interest in such Misconduct in the 1980s. Since then, a number of studies have examined how frequently individual scientists have observed scientific Misconduct or were involved in it. Although the studies vary considerably in their methodology and in the nature and size of their samples, in most studies at least 10% of the scientists sampled reported having observed scientific Misconduct. In addition to studies of the incidence of scientific Misconduct, this review considers the recent increase in paper retractions, the role of social media in scientific ethics, several instructional examples of egregious scientific Misconduct, and potential methods to reduce research Misconduct.
James W. Marquart - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Article Institutional Misconduct, Delinquent Background, and Rearrest Frequency Among Serious and Violent Delinquent Offenders
2016Co-Authors: Chad R. Trulson, Matt Delisi, James W. MarquartAbstract:This study examines the relationship of institutional Misconduct to postrelease rearrest, controlling for a battery of preincarceration variables typically found to influence recidivism among institutionalized delinquent offenders. Based on data from 1,804 serious and violent male delinquents released from a large southern juvenile correctional system, this research found limited support for institutional Misconduct as a determinant of recidivism. Of all measures of Misconduct, only the rate of total Misconduct infractions was related to postrelease rearrest, and this effect was generally small and found only in the rearrest frequency model, not the dichotomous rearrest model. Implications for research and practice are explored. Keywords institutional Misconduct; blended sentencing; serious and violent delinquents; recidivism; institutionalizatio
-
Institutional Misconduct, Delinquent Background, and Rearrest Frequency Among Serious and Violent Delinquent Offenders
Crime & Delinquency, 2009Co-Authors: Chad R. Trulson, Matt Delisi, James W. MarquartAbstract:This study examines the relationship of institutional Misconduct to postrelease rearrest, controlling for a battery of preincarceration variables typically found to influence recidivism among institutionalized delinquent offenders. Based on data from 1,804 serious and violent male delinquents released from a large southern juvenile correctional system, this research found limited support for institutional Misconduct as a determinant of recidivism. Of all measures of Misconduct, only the rate of total Misconduct infractions was related to postrelease rearrest, and this effect was generally small and found only in the rearrest frequency model, not the dichotomous rearrest model. Implications for research and practice are explored.
