The Experts below are selected from a list of 12713622 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Jeremie Nicey - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • social media and the freedom of the press a long term perspective from within international news agencies afp reuters
    Essachess : Journal for Communication Studies, 2012
    Co-Authors: Michael Palmer, Jeremie Nicey
    Abstract:

    Abstract: Since the 1780s, discussions among news professionals on issues such as access to sources and the funding of “the media” are often at odds with issues debated by legislators, activists, the executive and the judiciary, in the USA, France and Britain. Is this the case today, with the debate on “social media”, the “Arab spring”, Internet, blogs, SMS, “Twitter” and the like? This is one issue that will be addressed. The authors have researched the history and present news-products and performance of AFP and Reuters (now Thomson-Reuters) for many years. The second issue addressed here is: how do news-professionals assess current geopolitical and technological “changes” with respect to their established canons and practices of news-reporting? How do they access, filter, and select from the apparent abundance of sources emerging from “civil society actors”, while respecting established practices of news-agency journalism? As the very notion of “mainstream media” encompasses an ever-growing number of actors (CNN is “mainstream”, Al-Jazeera has become ‘mainstream’…), is the issue of access to an ever-widening number of sources to be reassessed in terms not only of the freedom of the media but also to that of the resources available to “seasoned, reputable” news-professionals and their organizations to check, cross-check the “images”, “texts” and numbers emanating from these sources? Issues such as the freedom of the media are ever-more linked to that of the canons of international news-reporting. The authors argue that whereas the freedom of the media is still of central importance, the advent of communications technologies – and the commercial logics that underpin them – often linked to the Internet, radically modify how news-professionals go about their business, in an era of “globalization”, “social media” and “democratization”. Keywords: international news-flows, professional news-persons, citizens, democratization, “Arab spring”, media freedoms *** Resume : Depuis la fin du 18e siecle, les echanges entre les professionnels de l’information a propos de themes tels l’acces aux sources et le financement des « medias » abordent autrement, le plus souvent, les themes debattus a cet egard par les pouvoirs executif, legislatif, judiciaire et « citoyen » – et ce, aux Etats-Unis, en France et au Royaume-Uni. Est-ce encore le cas aujourd’hui, ou l’on debat, dans le desordre, des « medias sociaux », du « printemps arabe », de l’Internet, des blogs, des SMS, de Twitter et de leurs avatars? Cette interrogation sous-tend cet article. Ses auteurs explorent l’histoire des agences d’information, l’AFP et Reuters (devenue Thomson-Reuters), leurs produits et prestations depuis longtemps. Un deuxieme theme sous-tend egalement cet article. Comment les professionnels de “l’info” pensent-ils les consequences des mutations geopolitiques et techniques en cours par rapport a leurs criteres et pratiques de collecte et de traitement de l’information? Mots-cles : flux internationaux de nouvelles, professionnels des medias, citoyens, democratisation, « printemps arabe », libertes des medias

  • social media and the freedom of the press a long term perspective from within international news agencies afp reuters
    Social Science Research Network, 2012
    Co-Authors: Michael Palmer, Jeremie Nicey
    Abstract:

    Since the 1780s, discussions among news professionals on issues such as access to sources and the funding of “the media” are often at odds with issues debated by legislators, activists, the executive and the judiciary, in the USA, France and Britain. Is this the case today, with the debate on “social media”, the “Arab spring”, Internet, blogs, SMS, “Twitter” and the like? This is one issue that will be addressed. The authors have researched the history and present news-products and performance of AFP and Reuters (now Thomson-Reuters) for many years. The second issue addressed here is: how do news-professionals assess current geopolitical and technological “changes” with respect to their established canons and practices of news-reporting? How do they access, filter, and select from the apparent abundance of sources emerging from “civil society actors”, while respecting established practices of news-agency journalism? As the very notion of “mainstream media” encompasses an ever-growing number of actors (CNN is “mainstream”, Al-Jazeera has become ‘mainstream’…), is the issue of access to an ever-widening number of sources to be reassessed in terms not only of the freedom of the media but also to that of the resources available to “seasoned, reputable” news-professionals and their organizations to check, cross-check the “images”, “texts” and numbers emanating from these sources? Issues such as the freedom of the media are ever-more linked to that of the canons of international news-reporting. The authors argue that whereas the freedom of the media is still of central importance, the advent of communications technologies – and the commercial logics that underpin them – often linked to the Internet, radically modify how news-professionals go about their business, in an era of “globalization”, “social media” and “democratization”.

Hoenigl Martin Seidel Danila Carvalho Agostinho Rudramurthy Shivaprakash M - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the emergence of covid 19 associated mucormycosis analysis of cases from 18 countries preprint
    Social Science Research Network, 2021
    Co-Authors: Hoenigl Martin Seidel Danila Carvalho Agostinho Rudramurthy Shivaprakash M, Oliver A Cornely, John R Perfect
    Abstract:

    Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–associated mucormycosis (CAM) has recently been increasingly reported, particularly among patients with uncontrolled diabetes. Patients with diabetes and hyperglycemia often display an inflammatory state that may be potentiated by the activation of antiviral immunity to SARS-CoV-2, and thus may favor secondary infections. We analyze 80 published and unpublished cases of CAM, with a predominance (42/80) of cases from India. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus as well as systemic corticosteroid treatment represented major comorbid predisposing factors and rhino-orbital cerebral mucormycosis was the most frequent presentation of disease. Mortality was high at 49%, driven particularly by those with pulmonary or disseminated mucormycosis and those with cerebral involvement. Furthermore, a significant proportion of surviving patients suffered life-changing morbidities (loss of vision in 46% of survivors). Our review indicates that CAM may be a relevant complication of severe COVID-19, particularly in those with uncontrolled diabetes. Funding: Martin Hoenigl received funding from Astellas for two investigator initiated studies (ISR005824 and ISR005838), and was supported by the National Institutes of Health, Grant UL1TR001442. Agostinho Carvalho was supported by the Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) (UIDB/50026/2020 and UIDP/50026/2020), the Northern Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the Portugal 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000039), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 847507, and the “la Caixa” Foundation (ID 100010434) and FCT under the agreement LCF/PR/HR17/52190003. Declaration of Interest: MH received research funding from Gilead, Pfizer, Astellas, Scynexis and NIH. JPG received speaker and expert advice fees from Pfizer and Gilead. NK has received research grants or honoraria as a speaker or advisor from Astellas, Gilead, MSD, and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. KL received consultancy fees from SMB Laboratoires Brussels, MSD and Gilead, travel support from Pfizer, speaker fees from FUJIFILM WAKO, Pfizer and Gilead, a service fee from Thermo fisher Scientific. OAC is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Research and Education, is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy – CECAD, EXC 2030 – 390661388 and has received research grants from, is an advisor to, or received lecture honoraria from Actelion, Allecra Therapeutics, Al-Jazeera Pharmaceuticals, Amplyx, Astellas, Basilea, Biosys, Cidara, Da Volterra, Entasis, F2G, Gilead, Grupo Biotoscana, Immunic, IQVIA, Janssen, Matinas, Medicines Company, MedPace, Melinta Therapeutics, Menarini, Merck/MSD, Mylan, Nabriva, Noxxon, Octapharma, Paratek, Pfizer, PSI, Roche Diagnostics, Scynexis, and Shionogi. PLW performed diagnostic evaluations and received meeting sponsorship from Bruker, Dynamiker, and Launch Diagnostics; Speakers fees, expert advice fees and meeting sponsorship from Gilead; and speaker and expert advice fees 489 from F2G and speaker fees MSD and Pfizer. Is a founding member of the European Aspergillus PCR Initiative. ACh received funding support from educational grant of Pfizer, MSD Pharmaceutical Ltd, and Gilead. All other authors no conflicts. Ethical Approval: MISSING

Michael Palmer - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • social media and the freedom of the press a long term perspective from within international news agencies afp reuters
    Essachess : Journal for Communication Studies, 2012
    Co-Authors: Michael Palmer, Jeremie Nicey
    Abstract:

    Abstract: Since the 1780s, discussions among news professionals on issues such as access to sources and the funding of “the media” are often at odds with issues debated by legislators, activists, the executive and the judiciary, in the USA, France and Britain. Is this the case today, with the debate on “social media”, the “Arab spring”, Internet, blogs, SMS, “Twitter” and the like? This is one issue that will be addressed. The authors have researched the history and present news-products and performance of AFP and Reuters (now Thomson-Reuters) for many years. The second issue addressed here is: how do news-professionals assess current geopolitical and technological “changes” with respect to their established canons and practices of news-reporting? How do they access, filter, and select from the apparent abundance of sources emerging from “civil society actors”, while respecting established practices of news-agency journalism? As the very notion of “mainstream media” encompasses an ever-growing number of actors (CNN is “mainstream”, Al-Jazeera has become ‘mainstream’…), is the issue of access to an ever-widening number of sources to be reassessed in terms not only of the freedom of the media but also to that of the resources available to “seasoned, reputable” news-professionals and their organizations to check, cross-check the “images”, “texts” and numbers emanating from these sources? Issues such as the freedom of the media are ever-more linked to that of the canons of international news-reporting. The authors argue that whereas the freedom of the media is still of central importance, the advent of communications technologies – and the commercial logics that underpin them – often linked to the Internet, radically modify how news-professionals go about their business, in an era of “globalization”, “social media” and “democratization”. Keywords: international news-flows, professional news-persons, citizens, democratization, “Arab spring”, media freedoms *** Resume : Depuis la fin du 18e siecle, les echanges entre les professionnels de l’information a propos de themes tels l’acces aux sources et le financement des « medias » abordent autrement, le plus souvent, les themes debattus a cet egard par les pouvoirs executif, legislatif, judiciaire et « citoyen » – et ce, aux Etats-Unis, en France et au Royaume-Uni. Est-ce encore le cas aujourd’hui, ou l’on debat, dans le desordre, des « medias sociaux », du « printemps arabe », de l’Internet, des blogs, des SMS, de Twitter et de leurs avatars? Cette interrogation sous-tend cet article. Ses auteurs explorent l’histoire des agences d’information, l’AFP et Reuters (devenue Thomson-Reuters), leurs produits et prestations depuis longtemps. Un deuxieme theme sous-tend egalement cet article. Comment les professionnels de “l’info” pensent-ils les consequences des mutations geopolitiques et techniques en cours par rapport a leurs criteres et pratiques de collecte et de traitement de l’information? Mots-cles : flux internationaux de nouvelles, professionnels des medias, citoyens, democratisation, « printemps arabe », libertes des medias

  • social media and the freedom of the press a long term perspective from within international news agencies afp reuters
    Social Science Research Network, 2012
    Co-Authors: Michael Palmer, Jeremie Nicey
    Abstract:

    Since the 1780s, discussions among news professionals on issues such as access to sources and the funding of “the media” are often at odds with issues debated by legislators, activists, the executive and the judiciary, in the USA, France and Britain. Is this the case today, with the debate on “social media”, the “Arab spring”, Internet, blogs, SMS, “Twitter” and the like? This is one issue that will be addressed. The authors have researched the history and present news-products and performance of AFP and Reuters (now Thomson-Reuters) for many years. The second issue addressed here is: how do news-professionals assess current geopolitical and technological “changes” with respect to their established canons and practices of news-reporting? How do they access, filter, and select from the apparent abundance of sources emerging from “civil society actors”, while respecting established practices of news-agency journalism? As the very notion of “mainstream media” encompasses an ever-growing number of actors (CNN is “mainstream”, Al-Jazeera has become ‘mainstream’…), is the issue of access to an ever-widening number of sources to be reassessed in terms not only of the freedom of the media but also to that of the resources available to “seasoned, reputable” news-professionals and their organizations to check, cross-check the “images”, “texts” and numbers emanating from these sources? Issues such as the freedom of the media are ever-more linked to that of the canons of international news-reporting. The authors argue that whereas the freedom of the media is still of central importance, the advent of communications technologies – and the commercial logics that underpin them – often linked to the Internet, radically modify how news-professionals go about their business, in an era of “globalization”, “social media” and “democratization”.

Michael D Bruce - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

John R Perfect - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the emergence of covid 19 associated mucormycosis analysis of cases from 18 countries preprint
    Social Science Research Network, 2021
    Co-Authors: Hoenigl Martin Seidel Danila Carvalho Agostinho Rudramurthy Shivaprakash M, Oliver A Cornely, John R Perfect
    Abstract:

    Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–associated mucormycosis (CAM) has recently been increasingly reported, particularly among patients with uncontrolled diabetes. Patients with diabetes and hyperglycemia often display an inflammatory state that may be potentiated by the activation of antiviral immunity to SARS-CoV-2, and thus may favor secondary infections. We analyze 80 published and unpublished cases of CAM, with a predominance (42/80) of cases from India. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus as well as systemic corticosteroid treatment represented major comorbid predisposing factors and rhino-orbital cerebral mucormycosis was the most frequent presentation of disease. Mortality was high at 49%, driven particularly by those with pulmonary or disseminated mucormycosis and those with cerebral involvement. Furthermore, a significant proportion of surviving patients suffered life-changing morbidities (loss of vision in 46% of survivors). Our review indicates that CAM may be a relevant complication of severe COVID-19, particularly in those with uncontrolled diabetes. Funding: Martin Hoenigl received funding from Astellas for two investigator initiated studies (ISR005824 and ISR005838), and was supported by the National Institutes of Health, Grant UL1TR001442. Agostinho Carvalho was supported by the Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) (UIDB/50026/2020 and UIDP/50026/2020), the Northern Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the Portugal 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000039), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 847507, and the “la Caixa” Foundation (ID 100010434) and FCT under the agreement LCF/PR/HR17/52190003. Declaration of Interest: MH received research funding from Gilead, Pfizer, Astellas, Scynexis and NIH. JPG received speaker and expert advice fees from Pfizer and Gilead. NK has received research grants or honoraria as a speaker or advisor from Astellas, Gilead, MSD, and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. KL received consultancy fees from SMB Laboratoires Brussels, MSD and Gilead, travel support from Pfizer, speaker fees from FUJIFILM WAKO, Pfizer and Gilead, a service fee from Thermo fisher Scientific. OAC is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Research and Education, is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy – CECAD, EXC 2030 – 390661388 and has received research grants from, is an advisor to, or received lecture honoraria from Actelion, Allecra Therapeutics, Al-Jazeera Pharmaceuticals, Amplyx, Astellas, Basilea, Biosys, Cidara, Da Volterra, Entasis, F2G, Gilead, Grupo Biotoscana, Immunic, IQVIA, Janssen, Matinas, Medicines Company, MedPace, Melinta Therapeutics, Menarini, Merck/MSD, Mylan, Nabriva, Noxxon, Octapharma, Paratek, Pfizer, PSI, Roche Diagnostics, Scynexis, and Shionogi. PLW performed diagnostic evaluations and received meeting sponsorship from Bruker, Dynamiker, and Launch Diagnostics; Speakers fees, expert advice fees and meeting sponsorship from Gilead; and speaker and expert advice fees 489 from F2G and speaker fees MSD and Pfizer. Is a founding member of the European Aspergillus PCR Initiative. ACh received funding support from educational grant of Pfizer, MSD Pharmaceutical Ltd, and Gilead. All other authors no conflicts. Ethical Approval: MISSING