The Experts below are selected from a list of 360 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Annette Nygårdh - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the nurse anesthetist perioperative dialog
BMC Nursing, 2020Co-Authors: Anna Abelsson, Annette NygårdhAbstract:Background: In the perioperative dialogue, pre-, intra- and postoperatively, the patient shares their history. In the dialogue, the nurse anesthetist (NA) gets to witness the patient's experiences and can alleviate the patients' suffering while waiting for, or undergoing surgery. The aim of this study was to describe the nurse anesthetist's experiences of the perioperative dialogue. Methods: The study had a qualitative design. Interviews were conducted with 12 NA and analyzed with interpretive content analysis. The methods were conducted in accordance with the COREQ guidelines. Results: In the result, three categories emerge: A mutual meeting (the preoperative dialogue) where the patient and the NA through contact create a relationship. The NA is present and listens to the patient, to give the patient confidence in the NA. In the category, On the basis of the patient's needs and wishes (the intraoperative dialogue), the body language of the NA, as well as the ability to read the body language of the patient, is described as important. In the category, To create a safe situation (the postoperative dialogue) the NA ensures that the patient has knowledge of what has happened and of future care in order to restore the control to the patient. Conclusion: The patient is met as a person with their own needs and wishes. It includes both a physical and a mental meeting. In a genuine relationship, the NA can confirm and unreservedly talk with the patient. When the patients leave their body and life in the hands of the NA, they can help the patients to find their inherent powers, which allows for participation in their care. Understanding the patient is possible when entering in a genuine relationship with the patient and confirm the patient. The perioperative dialogue forms a safety for the patients in the operating environment.
-
additional file 1 of the nurse anesthetist perioperative dialog
2020Co-Authors: Anna Abelsson, Annette NygårdhAbstract:Additional file 1 Interview Guide. Interview question: Would you like to describe your perioperative meeting with the patient?.Follow up questions: Can you give an example? Can you describe what you mean?.
Anna Abelsson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the nurse anesthetist perioperative dialog
BMC Nursing, 2020Co-Authors: Anna Abelsson, Annette NygårdhAbstract:Background: In the perioperative dialogue, pre-, intra- and postoperatively, the patient shares their history. In the dialogue, the nurse anesthetist (NA) gets to witness the patient's experiences and can alleviate the patients' suffering while waiting for, or undergoing surgery. The aim of this study was to describe the nurse anesthetist's experiences of the perioperative dialogue. Methods: The study had a qualitative design. Interviews were conducted with 12 NA and analyzed with interpretive content analysis. The methods were conducted in accordance with the COREQ guidelines. Results: In the result, three categories emerge: A mutual meeting (the preoperative dialogue) where the patient and the NA through contact create a relationship. The NA is present and listens to the patient, to give the patient confidence in the NA. In the category, On the basis of the patient's needs and wishes (the intraoperative dialogue), the body language of the NA, as well as the ability to read the body language of the patient, is described as important. In the category, To create a safe situation (the postoperative dialogue) the NA ensures that the patient has knowledge of what has happened and of future care in order to restore the control to the patient. Conclusion: The patient is met as a person with their own needs and wishes. It includes both a physical and a mental meeting. In a genuine relationship, the NA can confirm and unreservedly talk with the patient. When the patients leave their body and life in the hands of the NA, they can help the patients to find their inherent powers, which allows for participation in their care. Understanding the patient is possible when entering in a genuine relationship with the patient and confirm the patient. The perioperative dialogue forms a safety for the patients in the operating environment.
-
additional file 1 of the nurse anesthetist perioperative dialog
2020Co-Authors: Anna Abelsson, Annette NygårdhAbstract:Additional file 1 Interview Guide. Interview question: Would you like to describe your perioperative meeting with the patient?.Follow up questions: Can you give an example? Can you describe what you mean?.
Mary C Karlet - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
interprofessional education sessions involving doctor of pharmacy bachelor of science in nursing and nurse anesthetist students
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 2013Co-Authors: Catherine D Henderson, Amy E Broeseker, Cindy G Berry, Terri M Cahoon, D. Fort, Angela R. Thomason, Mary C KarletAbstract:Abstract Objectives To implement and assess the initial didactic interprofessional education (IPE) sessions in the health professions at our institution. Methods Volunteer pharmacy students met with senior bachelor of science in nursing students or graduate nurse anesthetist students for case discussion during three different sessions. Each session had a different pedagogical approach. A survey was administered at the completion of each session to ascertain students’ attitudes about these experiences. Results Overall, the results showed that the session involving pharmacy students and bachelor of science in nursing students was more favorable than those involving pharmacy students and nurse anesthetist students. At least 80% of all participants responded that it is important to have IPE sessions like this and they would participate in them again if the opportunity was available. Moreover, 100% of the pharmacy students in each session agreed that the discussions were relevant to them and they enjoyed these learning experiences. Conclusions This educational research showed that pharmacy and nursing students believed that the IPE sessions were beneficial for them. In the future, focused sessions may be the best pedagogical approach in order for these opportunities to be the most productive for everyone involved.
-
short communication interprofessional education sessions involving doctor of pharmacy bachelor of science in nursing and nurse anesthetist students
2013Co-Authors: Catherine D Henderson, Amy E Broeseker, Cindy G Berry, Terri M Cahoon, D. Fort, Angela R. Thomason, Mary C KarletAbstract:Objectives: To implement and assess the initial didactic interprofessional education (IPE) sessions in the health professions at our institution. Methods: Volunteer pharmacy students met with senior bachelor of science in nursing students or graduate nurse anesthetist students for case discussion during three different sessions. Each session had a different pedagogical approach. A survey was administered at the completion of each session to ascertain students’ attitudes about these experiences. Results: Overall, the results showed that the session involving pharmacy students and bachelor of science in nursing students was more favorable than those involving pharmacy students and nurse anesthetist students. At least 80% of all participants responded that it is important to have IPE sessions like this and they would participate in them again if the opportunity was available. Moreover, 100% of the pharmacy students in each session agreed that the discussions were relevant to them and they enjoyed these learning experiences. Conclusions: This educational research showed that pharmacy and nursing students believed that the IPE sessions were beneficial for them. In the future, focused sessions may be the best pedagogical approach in order for these opportunities to be the most productive for everyone involved. r 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
นวลหงษ เพชรด - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
การสำรวจทศนคต ความรความเขาใจ และวธการปฏบตของวสญญพยาบาล โรงพยาบาลมหาราชนครราชสมา ในการประเมนระดบความปวด และใหการระงบปวดแกผปวยหลงผาตดในหองพกฟน attitude knowledge and practice of nurse anesthetist maharat nakhon ratchasima hospital f
Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital Medical Bulletin- เวชสารโรงพยาบาลมหาราชนครราชสีมา, 2019Co-Authors: ธดารตน อรยานชตกล, นวลหงษ เพชรดAbstract:บทคดยอ ภมหลง: อาการปวดหลงผาตดเปนปญหาสำคญทพบในหองพกฟน แตการประเมนและการรกษาอาการปวดยงไมมแนวทางทชดเจน การศกษานเปนการศกษาทศนคต ความรความเขาใจ รวมถงวธการปฏบตในการดแลเรองความปวดของวสญญพยาบาล โรงพยาบาลมหาราชนครราชสมา เพอใชเปนแนวทางการพฒนางานระงบปวดหลงผาตดของโรงพยาบาลตอไป วสดและวธการ : ทำการสำรวจขอมลโดยใชแบบสอบถามกบวสญญพยาบาลในขอมลพนฐานของตนเอง ทศนคต ความรความเขาใจ และวธการปฏบตเกยวกบการระงบปวดโดยแสดงผลในรปรอยละ และวเคราะหขอมลโดยใชสถตเชงพรรณนา ผลการศกษา : วสญญพยาบาลทงหมด 34 คน สวนใหญมประสบการณในการทำงานดานวสญญวทยามานานกวา 15 ป (รอยละ 52.9) สวนใหญมระยะเวลาปฏบตงานในหองพกฟนเฉลย 1 วนตอสปดาห (รอยละ 64.7) วสญญพยาบาลสวนใหญมทศนคตทดตอการระงบปวด (รอยละ 88.2-97.1) มความรและเขาใจหลกการเกยวกบการระงบปวดเปนอยางดเกนกวารอยละ 60.0 ขณะทเชอวาสามารถดแลเรองความปวดไดเพยงพอเพยงรอยละ 32.4 วสญญพยาบาลทกคนเชอวาการมแนวทางการประเมนความปวด และการระงบปวดทชดเจนจะชวยเพมประสทธภาพการระงบปวดได มการประเมนระดบความปวดในหองพกฟนดวย verbal rating scale (VRS) และ numeric rating scale (NRS) เปนสวนใหญ รอยละ 38.2 และบนทกระดบความปวดรอยละ 44.1-50.0 ปจจยทเปนปญหาและอปสรรคตอการประเมนระดบความปวดและการใหการระงบปวดไดแก ผปวยยงไมรสกตวเตมท (รอยละ 91.2) ปญหาบคลากรไมเพยงพอ (รอยละ67.6) วสญญพยาบาลทกคนคดวาควรมแนวทางในการประเมนระดบความปวด และแนวทางในการใหการระงบปวดทชดเจน และควรมการประสานงานกบหอผปวยในการประเมน และใหการระงบปวดทเหมาะสมอยางตอเนอง สรป : วสญญพยาบาลมทศนคตทดตองานระงบปวด แมวาขณะนงานระงบปวดในหองพกฟนจะยงไมมแนวทางทชดเจนแตบคลากรทกคนกพรอมทจะมการพฒนางานดานน และเชอวาการกำหนดแนวทางในการประเมนระดบความปวด และการใหการระงบปวดทชดเจนจะชวยใหผปวยไดรบการระงบปวดทมประสทธภาพยงขน คำสำคญ : การประเมนระดบความปวด, การระงบปวด Abstract Background: Postoperative pain is a common postoperative problem in the recovery room. Assessment and treatment of patients having pain in recovery room remain a significant anesthetic service while there is no our pain algorithm in Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital. Objective: To survey an attitude, knowledge and practice of nurse anesthetist on pain assessment and treatment in recovery room. To improve the quality of pain management is our purpose. Materials & Methods: A descriptive study was conducted using a designed questionnaire. It was a self administered questionnaire, comprised of sections on attitude, knowledge and practice on pain assessment and treatment. Results: About 59.2% of nurse anesthetist had qualification more than 15 years working experience and 64.7% of them work in recovery room with an average of one day per week. Most of them had good attitude toward pain management (88.2-97.1%). Their understanding about principle of pain management was good (more than 60%). Only 38.2% of nurse anesthetists were using VRS (verbal rating scale) or NRS (numeric rating scale) for pain assessment and pain-severity level recording was done about 44.1-50.0%. Only 32.4% of them believed that the patients in recovery room received adequate narcotic treatment and all of them believed that pain algolithm has been implemented for more effective pain relief. Common factors that influenced pain management were as follows (1) patients were not fully recovered, (2) nurse anesthetist were inadequate (91.2 and 67.7%). Conclusion: Nurse anesthetist had good attitude toward pain management. Implementation of pain algolithm will be helpful in improvement of pain management. Key words: pain assessment, pain treatment
Nualhong Petchdee - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
attitude knowledge and practice of nurse anesthetist maharat nakhon ratchasima hospital for postoperative pain assessement and treatment in recovery room
Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital Medical Bulletin - เวชสารโรงพยาบาลมหาราชนครราชสีมา, 2011Co-Authors: Thidarat Ariyanuchitkul, Nualhong PetchdeeAbstract:Background: Postoperative pain is a common postoperative problem in the recovery room. Assessment and treatment of patients having pain in recovery room remain a significant anesthetic service while there is no our pain algorithm in Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital. Objective: To survey an attitude, knowledge and practice of nurse anesthetist on pain assessment and treatment in recovery room. To improve the quality of pain management is our purpose. Materials & Methods: A descriptive study was conducted using a designed questionnaire. It was a self administered questionnaire, comprised of sections on attitude, knowledge and practice on pain assessment and treatment. Results: About 59.2% of nurse anesthetist had qualification more than 15 years working experience and 64.7% of them work in recovery room with an average of one day per week. Most of them had good attitude toward pain management (88.2-97.1%). Their understanding about principle of pain management was good (more than 60%). Only 38.2% of nurse anesthetists were using VRS (verbal rating scale) or NRS (numeric rating scale) for pain assessment and pain-severity level recording was done about 44.1-50.0%. Only 32.4% of them believed that the patients in recovery room received adequate narcotic treatment and all of them believed that pain algolithm has been implemented for more effective pain relief. Common factors that influenced pain management were as follows (1) patients were not fully recovered, (2) nurse anesthetist were inadequate (91.2 and 67.7%). Conclusion: Nurse anesthetist had good attitude toward pain management. Implementation of pain algolithm will be helpful in improvement of pain management. Key words: pain assessment, pain treatment