The Experts below are selected from a list of 826263 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Mary H Parker - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
determining the utility of a student survey to provide valuable feedback on precepting skills of Pharmacy residents
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 2014Co-Authors: Cassie L Boland, Peter Koval, Mary H ParkerAbstract:Abstract Purpose American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) defines Pharmacy resident growth as preceptors as an objective for ASHP-accredited Pharmacy residencies. ASHP recognizes instructing, modeling, coaching, and facilitating as precepting roles necessary for effective teaching. Currently, there is no standard, validated tool for Pharmacy resident–preceptor evaluations. Student evaluations meet ASHP requirements for evaluating preceptor effectiveness. The purpose of this pilot study was to implement a process for utilizing student evaluations in developing and evaluating Pharmacy residents as preceptors. Methods Pharmacy students that completed advanced Pharmacy practice experiences (APPE) during 2010–2011 with Pharmacy resident co-preceptors were included. SurveyMonkey™ links were provided to evaluate residents as co-preceptors for the APPE. Residents’ evaluations were summarized and reviewed with them; residents were asked to complete resident response surveys and develop precepting strategies from the feedback. Results A total of 23 Pharmacy student evaluations were completed for eight Pharmacy residents, and eight residents completed the response survey. No residents received negative evaluations. All residents were recommended by the students to be future preceptors. Overall, 86% of the residents indicated the feedback was useful for preceptor growth and development. The students and residents mostly agreed on their abilities regarding modeling and coaching; their responses differed slightly regarding instructing and facilitating. Residents developed several tools to utilize for future precepting responsibilities and development based on their feedback. Preceptor training is noted as a desirable option. Conclusion Pharmacy student evaluation of Pharmacy residents may be an effective method for obtaining feedback for residents on their precepting skills to foster preceptor development.
-
short communication determining the utility of a student survey to provide valuable feedback on precepting skills of Pharmacy residents
2014Co-Authors: Cassie L Boland, Peter Koval, Mary H ParkerAbstract:Purpose: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) defines Pharmacy resident growth as preceptors as an objective for ASHP-accredited Pharmacy residencies. ASHP recognizes instructing, modeling, coaching, and facilitating as precepting roles necessary for effective teaching. Currently, there is no standard, validated tool for Pharmacy resident– preceptor evaluations. Student evaluations meet ASHP requirements for evaluating preceptor effectiveness. The purpose of this pilot study was to implement a process for utilizing student evaluations in developing and evaluating Pharmacy residents as preceptors. Methods: Pharmacy students that completed advanced Pharmacy practice experiences (APPE) during 2010–2011 with Pharmacy resident co-preceptors were included. SurveyMonkey ™ links were provided to evaluate residents as co-preceptors for the APPE. Residents’ evaluations were summarized and reviewed with them; residents were asked to complete resident response surveys and develop precepting strategies from the feedback. Results: A total of 23 Pharmacy student evaluations were completed for eight Pharmacy residents, and eight residents completed the response survey. No residents received negative evaluations. All residents were recommended by the students to be future preceptors. Overall, 86% of the residents indicated the feedback was useful for preceptor growth and development. The students and residents mostly agreed on their abilities regarding modeling and coaching; their responses differed slightly regarding instructing and facilitating. Residents developed several tools to utilize for future precepting responsibilities and development based on their feedback. Preceptor training is noted as a desirable option. Conclusion: Pharmacy student evaluation of Pharmacy residents may be an effective method for obtaining feedback for residents on their precepting skills to foster preceptor development.
Scott Knoer - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
advancing the Pharmacy practice model in a community teaching hospital by expanding student rotations
American Journal of Health-system Pharmacy, 2014Co-Authors: Osmel Delgado, William Kernan, Scott KnoerAbstract:Purpose The implementation, benefits, and outcomes of a layered learner model (LLM) using Pharmacy students as pharmacist extenders are described. Summary In 2011, Cleveland Clinic Florida (CCF) implemented a Pharmacy practice model change with the goal of providing all inpatients quality pharmaceutical care while still providing key specialty clinical Pharmacy services. An LLM was initiated in which pharmacists supervise Pharmacy residents and students in a team format in which students are used as pharmacist extenders. CCF partnered with local and regional colleges of Pharmacy to increase the number of advanced Pharmacy practice experience student rotations at CCF. Students are given accountability for a specific number of patient beds based on their rotation. They are required to perform medication histories, education on drug indication and adverse effects, discharge counseling, targeted disease counseling, and profile review for drug-related problems for their patients. After the implementation of this model, improvements were observed in Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores (58% versus 70%, respectively), Pharmacy interventions per patient per day (0.9 versus 1.4, respectively), and bedside medication delivery capture rate (48% versus 65%, respectively). Conclusion The implementation of an LLM and partnering with local colleges of Pharmacy have improved Pharmacy practice at CCF by allowing Pharmacy students to work as pharmacist extenders in providing comprehensive Pharmacy services to many patients who would not otherwise be reached. This approach has improved HCAHPS scores within the “communication of medication” domain, increased overall patient interventions, and allowed expansion of CCF’s discharge prescription program.
Peter Koval - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
determining the utility of a student survey to provide valuable feedback on precepting skills of Pharmacy residents
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 2014Co-Authors: Cassie L Boland, Peter Koval, Mary H ParkerAbstract:Abstract Purpose American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) defines Pharmacy resident growth as preceptors as an objective for ASHP-accredited Pharmacy residencies. ASHP recognizes instructing, modeling, coaching, and facilitating as precepting roles necessary for effective teaching. Currently, there is no standard, validated tool for Pharmacy resident–preceptor evaluations. Student evaluations meet ASHP requirements for evaluating preceptor effectiveness. The purpose of this pilot study was to implement a process for utilizing student evaluations in developing and evaluating Pharmacy residents as preceptors. Methods Pharmacy students that completed advanced Pharmacy practice experiences (APPE) during 2010–2011 with Pharmacy resident co-preceptors were included. SurveyMonkey™ links were provided to evaluate residents as co-preceptors for the APPE. Residents’ evaluations were summarized and reviewed with them; residents were asked to complete resident response surveys and develop precepting strategies from the feedback. Results A total of 23 Pharmacy student evaluations were completed for eight Pharmacy residents, and eight residents completed the response survey. No residents received negative evaluations. All residents were recommended by the students to be future preceptors. Overall, 86% of the residents indicated the feedback was useful for preceptor growth and development. The students and residents mostly agreed on their abilities regarding modeling and coaching; their responses differed slightly regarding instructing and facilitating. Residents developed several tools to utilize for future precepting responsibilities and development based on their feedback. Preceptor training is noted as a desirable option. Conclusion Pharmacy student evaluation of Pharmacy residents may be an effective method for obtaining feedback for residents on their precepting skills to foster preceptor development.
-
short communication determining the utility of a student survey to provide valuable feedback on precepting skills of Pharmacy residents
2014Co-Authors: Cassie L Boland, Peter Koval, Mary H ParkerAbstract:Purpose: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) defines Pharmacy resident growth as preceptors as an objective for ASHP-accredited Pharmacy residencies. ASHP recognizes instructing, modeling, coaching, and facilitating as precepting roles necessary for effective teaching. Currently, there is no standard, validated tool for Pharmacy resident– preceptor evaluations. Student evaluations meet ASHP requirements for evaluating preceptor effectiveness. The purpose of this pilot study was to implement a process for utilizing student evaluations in developing and evaluating Pharmacy residents as preceptors. Methods: Pharmacy students that completed advanced Pharmacy practice experiences (APPE) during 2010–2011 with Pharmacy resident co-preceptors were included. SurveyMonkey ™ links were provided to evaluate residents as co-preceptors for the APPE. Residents’ evaluations were summarized and reviewed with them; residents were asked to complete resident response surveys and develop precepting strategies from the feedback. Results: A total of 23 Pharmacy student evaluations were completed for eight Pharmacy residents, and eight residents completed the response survey. No residents received negative evaluations. All residents were recommended by the students to be future preceptors. Overall, 86% of the residents indicated the feedback was useful for preceptor growth and development. The students and residents mostly agreed on their abilities regarding modeling and coaching; their responses differed slightly regarding instructing and facilitating. Residents developed several tools to utilize for future precepting responsibilities and development based on their feedback. Preceptor training is noted as a desirable option. Conclusion: Pharmacy student evaluation of Pharmacy residents may be an effective method for obtaining feedback for residents on their precepting skills to foster preceptor development.
Cassie L Boland - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
determining the utility of a student survey to provide valuable feedback on precepting skills of Pharmacy residents
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 2014Co-Authors: Cassie L Boland, Peter Koval, Mary H ParkerAbstract:Abstract Purpose American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) defines Pharmacy resident growth as preceptors as an objective for ASHP-accredited Pharmacy residencies. ASHP recognizes instructing, modeling, coaching, and facilitating as precepting roles necessary for effective teaching. Currently, there is no standard, validated tool for Pharmacy resident–preceptor evaluations. Student evaluations meet ASHP requirements for evaluating preceptor effectiveness. The purpose of this pilot study was to implement a process for utilizing student evaluations in developing and evaluating Pharmacy residents as preceptors. Methods Pharmacy students that completed advanced Pharmacy practice experiences (APPE) during 2010–2011 with Pharmacy resident co-preceptors were included. SurveyMonkey™ links were provided to evaluate residents as co-preceptors for the APPE. Residents’ evaluations were summarized and reviewed with them; residents were asked to complete resident response surveys and develop precepting strategies from the feedback. Results A total of 23 Pharmacy student evaluations were completed for eight Pharmacy residents, and eight residents completed the response survey. No residents received negative evaluations. All residents were recommended by the students to be future preceptors. Overall, 86% of the residents indicated the feedback was useful for preceptor growth and development. The students and residents mostly agreed on their abilities regarding modeling and coaching; their responses differed slightly regarding instructing and facilitating. Residents developed several tools to utilize for future precepting responsibilities and development based on their feedback. Preceptor training is noted as a desirable option. Conclusion Pharmacy student evaluation of Pharmacy residents may be an effective method for obtaining feedback for residents on their precepting skills to foster preceptor development.
-
short communication determining the utility of a student survey to provide valuable feedback on precepting skills of Pharmacy residents
2014Co-Authors: Cassie L Boland, Peter Koval, Mary H ParkerAbstract:Purpose: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) defines Pharmacy resident growth as preceptors as an objective for ASHP-accredited Pharmacy residencies. ASHP recognizes instructing, modeling, coaching, and facilitating as precepting roles necessary for effective teaching. Currently, there is no standard, validated tool for Pharmacy resident– preceptor evaluations. Student evaluations meet ASHP requirements for evaluating preceptor effectiveness. The purpose of this pilot study was to implement a process for utilizing student evaluations in developing and evaluating Pharmacy residents as preceptors. Methods: Pharmacy students that completed advanced Pharmacy practice experiences (APPE) during 2010–2011 with Pharmacy resident co-preceptors were included. SurveyMonkey ™ links were provided to evaluate residents as co-preceptors for the APPE. Residents’ evaluations were summarized and reviewed with them; residents were asked to complete resident response surveys and develop precepting strategies from the feedback. Results: A total of 23 Pharmacy student evaluations were completed for eight Pharmacy residents, and eight residents completed the response survey. No residents received negative evaluations. All residents were recommended by the students to be future preceptors. Overall, 86% of the residents indicated the feedback was useful for preceptor growth and development. The students and residents mostly agreed on their abilities regarding modeling and coaching; their responses differed slightly regarding instructing and facilitating. Residents developed several tools to utilize for future precepting responsibilities and development based on their feedback. Preceptor training is noted as a desirable option. Conclusion: Pharmacy student evaluation of Pharmacy residents may be an effective method for obtaining feedback for residents on their precepting skills to foster preceptor development.
Mohd Shahezwan Abd Wahab - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Exploring Pharmacy students chosen career path: a year-on-year perspective
Higher Education, 2020Co-Authors: Mumtaz Hussain, Shariza Sahudin, Syahirah Mohd Fauzi, Nurshahirah Abdul Manaf, Mohd Shahezwan Abd WahabAbstract:There are many factors that motivate students to choose a particular academic major, whether it is due to interest, salary, or family. Government policies and the curriculum imposed on students may also have an impact. The education and training of future pharmacists offered in various universities should include the skill set necessary for fitness to practice in all the different areas of Pharmacy, and not focused on one particular area as this would adversely affect student’s perception or interests. In our study, we investigate Pharmacy students’ views to why they chose to study Pharmacy, their chosen future career path, and whether these choices change moving from years 1 to 4. Our results revealed key deciding factors for the profession of Pharmacy, include the desire to help improve the populations’ health and well-being, the desire to work within healthcare, and salary. These factors remain consistent going from first-year to fourth-year students. Career aspirations consistently highlight hospital Pharmacy, with community Pharmacy second, with a lower interest in academia and industry. As a conclusion, our data revealed Pharmacy students consistently prefer hospital and community Pharmacy as a chosen career path, with a stronger preference for hospitals. These figures remain consistent at all levels, and Pharmacy students remain committed to their chosen degree, with more than 85% of final year students continueing to look forward to a career in Pharmacy. These results are parallel with Pharmacy students’ applications to their pre-registration or pupillage training, which are predominantly in hospital Pharmacy. If this trend continues, the hospital sectors would soon be saturated, while other Pharmacy sectors sidelined.