Apollo Program

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 5523 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Tracey Minzenmayer - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Nasa - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Nasa Langley Research Center seventy-fifth anniversary publications, 1992
    2019
    Co-Authors: Nasa
    Abstract:

    The following are presented: The National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics Charter; Exploring NASA's Roots, the History of NASA Langley Research Center; NASA Langley's National Historic Landmarks; The Mustang Story: Recollections of the XP-51; Testing the First Supersonic Aircraft: Memoirs of NACA Pilot Bob Champine; NASA Langley's Contributions to Spaceflight; The Rendezvous that was Almost Missed: Lunar Orbit Rendezvous and the Apollo Program; NASA Langley's Contributions to the Apollo Program; Scout Launch Vehicle Program; NASA Langley's Contributions to the Space Shuttle; 69 Months in Space: A History of the First LDEF; NACA TR No. 460: The Characteristics of 78 Related Airfoil Sections from Tests in the Variable-Density Wind Tunnel; NACA TR No. 755: Requirements for Satisfactory Flying Qualities of Airplanes; 'Happy Birthday Langley' NASA Magazine Summer 1992 Issue.

  • Electrical power management survey manual
    2019
    Co-Authors: Nasa
    Abstract:

    Electrical Power Management Survey Manual provides procedures for management audit of NASA Apollo Program

  • Apollo Program Summary Report: Synopsis of the Apollo Program Activities and Technology for Lunar Exploration
    2014
    Co-Authors: Nasa
    Abstract:

    Overall Program activities and the technology developed to accomplish lunar exploration are discussed. A summary of the flights conducted over an 11-year period is presented along with specific aspects of the overall Program, including lunar science, vehicle development and performance, lunar module development Program, spacecraft development testing, flight crew summary, mission operations, biomedical data, spacecraft manufacturing and testing, launch site facilities, equipment, and prelaunch operations, and the lunar receiving laboratory. Appendixes provide data on each of the Apollo missions, mission type designations, spacecraft weights, records achieved by Apollo crewmen, vehicle histories, and a listing of anomalous hardware conditions noted during each flight beginning with Apollo 4.

  • Overviews of the Apollo Program and Its Management
    2013
    Co-Authors: Nasa
    Abstract:

    This special bibliography includes items individually selected by scientific and technical information professionals that provide an overview of the history, events, and results of the Apollo missions. Planning, scheduling, and management are also included.

  • NASA Technology Applications Team
    2013
    Co-Authors: Nasa
    Abstract:

    The contributions of NASA to the advancement of the level of the technology base of the United States are highlighted. Technological transfer from preflight Programs, the Viking Program, the Apollo Program, and the Shuttle and Skylab Programs is reported.

Rebecca Whitaker : Msfc - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Ashok Maharaj - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • European Participation in the Post-Apollo Program, 1969–1970: The Paine Years
    NASA in the World, 2013
    Co-Authors: John Krige, Angelina Long Callahan, Ashok Maharaj
    Abstract:

    The negotiations over European contributions to the post-Apollo Program concerned the biggest single attempt to integrate a foreign nation or region into the technological core of the American space Program during the first decades of NASA’s existence.1 These discussions were carried on for about three years, and engaged several NASA administrators: Thomas Paine, from October 1969 until he left NASA in September 1970; George Low, who temporarily led the organization while a successor was found; and then James C. Fletcher. They also engaged multiple arms of the administration: NASA of course, as the lead agency, but also the State Department, the Department of Defense, the Office of Telecommunications Policy, the National Security Council, and, hovering in the wings, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which assumed extensive powers in the Nixon administration.2 They were of deep concern to industry. And they were dominated by issues of technology transfer and launcher policy, here embedded in a framework that touched on matters of international diplomacy, national security, and American technological, commercial, and political leadership of the free world.

  • european participation in the post Apollo Program 1969 1970 the paine years
    2013
    Co-Authors: John Krige, Angelina Long Callahan, Ashok Maharaj
    Abstract:

    The negotiations over European contributions to the post-Apollo Program concerned the biggest single attempt to integrate a foreign nation or region into the technological core of the American space Program during the first decades of NASA’s existence.1 These discussions were carried on for about three years, and engaged several NASA administrators: Thomas Paine, from October 1969 until he left NASA in September 1970; George Low, who temporarily led the organization while a successor was found; and then James C. Fletcher. They also engaged multiple arms of the administration: NASA of course, as the lead agency, but also the State Department, the Department of Defense, the Office of Telecommunications Policy, the National Security Council, and, hovering in the wings, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which assumed extensive powers in the Nixon administration.2 They were of deep concern to industry. And they were dominated by issues of technology transfer and launcher policy, here embedded in a framework that touched on matters of international diplomacy, national security, and American technological, commercial, and political leadership of the free world.

  • European Participation in the Post-Apollo Program, 1971: The United States Begins to Have Second Thoughts—And So Do the Europeans
    NASA in the World, 2013
    Co-Authors: John Krige, Angelina Long Callahan, Ashok Maharaj
    Abstract:

    On February 5, 1971, the Apollo XIV Lunar Module touched down on the surface of the moon. This was followed a few weeks later by the release of the President’s Report to Congress on Foreign Policy in the 1970s.1 The report used the successful completion of the Apollo XIV mission to reiterate that the achievement was not simply a reflection of American scientific and technological capability. “It is equally a measure of an older American tradition, the compulsion to cross the next mountain chain. The pressurized space suit is, in a very real sense, today’s equivalent of the buckskin jacket and the buffalo robe. Apollo XIV is the latest packhorse, and its crew the most recent in a long line of American pioneers.” It ingeniously introduced the international dimension by stressing that “mutual help and cooperation” was “essential to life on the American frontier.” In a reference to the new climate of detente it noted that NASA and the State Department had been instructed to pursue broader collaborative projects with Moscow “with the utmost seriousness.” Congress was also advised that while “substantial participation” was being sought in the post-Apollo Program, “the result is uncertain, for there are very real difficulties to be solved.”2 Two of those concerned the scope of NASA’s international commitments.

  • european participation in the post Apollo Program 1971 the united states begins to have second thoughts and so do the europeans
    2013
    Co-Authors: John Krige, Angelina Long Callahan, Ashok Maharaj
    Abstract:

    On February 5, 1971, the Apollo XIV Lunar Module touched down on the surface of the moon. This was followed a few weeks later by the release of the President’s Report to Congress on Foreign Policy in the 1970s.1 The report used the successful completion of the Apollo XIV mission to reiterate that the achievement was not simply a reflection of American scientific and technological capability. “It is equally a measure of an older American tradition, the compulsion to cross the next mountain chain. The pressurized space suit is, in a very real sense, today’s equivalent of the buckskin jacket and the buffalo robe. Apollo XIV is the latest packhorse, and its crew the most recent in a long line of American pioneers.” It ingeniously introduced the international dimension by stressing that “mutual help and cooperation” was “essential to life on the American frontier.” In a reference to the new climate of detente it noted that NASA and the State Department had been instructed to pursue broader collaborative projects with Moscow “with the utmost seriousness.” Congress was also advised that while “substantial participation” was being sought in the post-Apollo Program, “the result is uncertain, for there are very real difficulties to be solved.”2 Two of those concerned the scope of NASA’s international commitments.

Anthony Young - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Geological and Sample Collection Training for Missions
    The Apollo Lunar Samples, 2017
    Co-Authors: Anthony Young
    Abstract:

    Among the most influential scientists involved in lunar science and the establishment of astronaut training for their missions on the lunar surface was Eugene Shoemaker. He also established a support team of many qualified geologists and geophysicists to assist in the training of the Apollo astronauts. The Apollo Program drew to it, as if by some grand design, the finest engineering, scientific and management minds in the United States during the 1960s. Every one of them was vital to the success of the Apollo Program. Eugene Shoemaker ensured the astronauts exploring the lunar surface could identify and rapidly collect the lunar samples that would tell the history of the Moon and, by extension, expand our knowledge of the Earth.

  • Testing the F-1 engine and S-IC stage
    The Saturn V F-1 Engine, 2008
    Co-Authors: Anthony Young
    Abstract:

    The Apollo Program required NASA to develop engineering, manufacturing, testing and launching facilities on an awesome scale. The civil engineering and construction projects to support the Program transformed the industrial landscape of the United States.

  • MSFC, Boeing and the S-IC stage
    The Saturn V F-1 Engine, 2008
    Co-Authors: Anthony Young
    Abstract:

    The development of the F-1 engine and S-IC first stage of the Saturn V launch vehicle succeeded essentially because of sound Program management. As a whole, the Apollo Program was perhaps the most complex American engineering project of the 20th century.

Apollo Program - 15 days free trial to Access Experts & Abstracts