The Experts below are selected from a list of 264 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Jos Winnink - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Twenty-first century macro-trends in the institutional fabric of science: bibliometric monitoring and analysis
Scientometrics, 2016Co-Authors: Robert J. W. Tijssen, Jos WinninkAbstract:Some say that world science has become more ‘applied’, or at least more ‘Application-oriented’, in recent years. Replacing the ill-defined distinction between ‘basic research’ and ‘applied research’, we introduce ‘research Application Orientation’ domains as an alternative conceptual and analytical framework for examining research output growth patterns. To distinguish possible developmental trajectories we define three institutional domains: ‘university’, ‘industry’, ‘hospitals’. Our macro-level bibliometric analysis takes a closer look at general trends within and across some 750 of the world’s largest research-intensive universities. To correct for database changes, our time-series analysis was applied to both a fixed journal set (same research journals and conference proceedings over time) and a dynamic journal set (changing set of publication outlets). We find that output growth in the ‘hospital research Orientation’ has significantly outpaced the other two Application domains, especially since 2006/2007. This happened mainly because of the introduction of new publication outlets in the WoS, but also partially because some universities—especially in China—seem to have become more visible in this domain. Our analytical approach needs further broadening and deepening to provide a more definitive answer whether hospitals and the medical sector are becoming increasingly dominant as a domain of scientific knowledge production and an environment for research Applications.
-
Scientometrics - Twenty-first century macro-trends in the institutional fabric of science: bibliometric monitoring and analysis
Scientometrics, 2016Co-Authors: Robert J. W. Tijssen, Jos WinninkAbstract:Some say that world science has become more `applied', or at least more `Application-oriented', in recent years. Replacing the ill-defined distinction between `basic research' and `applied research', we introduce `research Application Orientation' domains as an alternative conceptual and analytical framework for examining research output growth patterns. To distinguish possible developmental trajectories we define three institutional domains: `university', `industry', `hospitals'. Our macro-level bibliometric analysis takes a closer look at general trends within and across some 750 of the world's largest research-intensive universities. To correct for database changes, our time-series analysis was applied to both a fixed journal set (same research journals and conference proceedings over time) and a dynamic journal set (changing set of publication outlets). We find that output growth in the `hospital research Orientation' has significantly outpaced the other two Application domains, especially since 2006/2007. This happened mainly because of the introduction of new publication outlets in the WoS, but also partially because some universities--especially in China--seem to have become more visible in this domain. Our analytical approach needs further broadening and deepening to provide a more definitive answer whether hospitals and the medical sector are becoming increasingly dominant as a domain of scientific knowledge production and an environment for research Applications.
Annelise Mark Pejtersen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
INTERACT (2) - Virtual Teams and Human Work Interaction Design - Learning to Work in and Designing for Virtual Teams
Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2009, 2009Co-Authors: Rikke Ørngreen, Torkil Clemmensen, Annelise Mark PejtersenAbstract:The boundaries and work processes for how virtual teams interact are undergoing changes, from a tool and stand-alone Application Orientation, to the use of multiple generic platforms chosen and redesigned to the specific context. These are often at the same time designed both by professional software developers and the individual members of the virtual teams, rather than determined on a single organizational level. There may be no impact of the technology per se on individuals, groups or organizations, as the technology for virtual teams rather enhance situation ambiguity and disrupt existing task-artifact cycles. This ambiguous situation calls for new methods for empirical work analysis and interaction design that can help us understand how organizations, teams and individuals learn to organize, design and work in virtual teams in various networked contexts.
Robert J. W. Tijssen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Twenty-first century macro-trends in the institutional fabric of science: bibliometric monitoring and analysis
Scientometrics, 2016Co-Authors: Robert J. W. Tijssen, Jos WinninkAbstract:Some say that world science has become more ‘applied’, or at least more ‘Application-oriented’, in recent years. Replacing the ill-defined distinction between ‘basic research’ and ‘applied research’, we introduce ‘research Application Orientation’ domains as an alternative conceptual and analytical framework for examining research output growth patterns. To distinguish possible developmental trajectories we define three institutional domains: ‘university’, ‘industry’, ‘hospitals’. Our macro-level bibliometric analysis takes a closer look at general trends within and across some 750 of the world’s largest research-intensive universities. To correct for database changes, our time-series analysis was applied to both a fixed journal set (same research journals and conference proceedings over time) and a dynamic journal set (changing set of publication outlets). We find that output growth in the ‘hospital research Orientation’ has significantly outpaced the other two Application domains, especially since 2006/2007. This happened mainly because of the introduction of new publication outlets in the WoS, but also partially because some universities—especially in China—seem to have become more visible in this domain. Our analytical approach needs further broadening and deepening to provide a more definitive answer whether hospitals and the medical sector are becoming increasingly dominant as a domain of scientific knowledge production and an environment for research Applications.
-
Scientometrics - Twenty-first century macro-trends in the institutional fabric of science: bibliometric monitoring and analysis
Scientometrics, 2016Co-Authors: Robert J. W. Tijssen, Jos WinninkAbstract:Some say that world science has become more `applied', or at least more `Application-oriented', in recent years. Replacing the ill-defined distinction between `basic research' and `applied research', we introduce `research Application Orientation' domains as an alternative conceptual and analytical framework for examining research output growth patterns. To distinguish possible developmental trajectories we define three institutional domains: `university', `industry', `hospitals'. Our macro-level bibliometric analysis takes a closer look at general trends within and across some 750 of the world's largest research-intensive universities. To correct for database changes, our time-series analysis was applied to both a fixed journal set (same research journals and conference proceedings over time) and a dynamic journal set (changing set of publication outlets). We find that output growth in the `hospital research Orientation' has significantly outpaced the other two Application domains, especially since 2006/2007. This happened mainly because of the introduction of new publication outlets in the WoS, but also partially because some universities--especially in China--seem to have become more visible in this domain. Our analytical approach needs further broadening and deepening to provide a more definitive answer whether hospitals and the medical sector are becoming increasingly dominant as a domain of scientific knowledge production and an environment for research Applications.
Rikke Ørngreen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
INTERACT (2) - Virtual Teams and Human Work Interaction Design - Learning to Work in and Designing for Virtual Teams
Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2009, 2009Co-Authors: Rikke Ørngreen, Torkil Clemmensen, Annelise Mark PejtersenAbstract:The boundaries and work processes for how virtual teams interact are undergoing changes, from a tool and stand-alone Application Orientation, to the use of multiple generic platforms chosen and redesigned to the specific context. These are often at the same time designed both by professional software developers and the individual members of the virtual teams, rather than determined on a single organizational level. There may be no impact of the technology per se on individuals, groups or organizations, as the technology for virtual teams rather enhance situation ambiguity and disrupt existing task-artifact cycles. This ambiguous situation calls for new methods for empirical work analysis and interaction design that can help us understand how organizations, teams and individuals learn to organize, design and work in virtual teams in various networked contexts.
Torkil Clemmensen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
INTERACT (2) - Virtual Teams and Human Work Interaction Design - Learning to Work in and Designing for Virtual Teams
Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2009, 2009Co-Authors: Rikke Ørngreen, Torkil Clemmensen, Annelise Mark PejtersenAbstract:The boundaries and work processes for how virtual teams interact are undergoing changes, from a tool and stand-alone Application Orientation, to the use of multiple generic platforms chosen and redesigned to the specific context. These are often at the same time designed both by professional software developers and the individual members of the virtual teams, rather than determined on a single organizational level. There may be no impact of the technology per se on individuals, groups or organizations, as the technology for virtual teams rather enhance situation ambiguity and disrupt existing task-artifact cycles. This ambiguous situation calls for new methods for empirical work analysis and interaction design that can help us understand how organizations, teams and individuals learn to organize, design and work in virtual teams in various networked contexts.