The Experts below are selected from a list of 44754 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Julie Bebak - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • The effects of Aquaculture Production noise on the growth, condition factor, feed conversion, and survival of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss
    Aquaculture, 2009
    Co-Authors: John Davidson, Julie Bebak, Patricia Mazik
    Abstract:

    AbstractIntensive Aquaculture systems, particularly recirculating systems, utilize equipment such as aerators, air and water pumps, blowers, and filtration systems that inadvertently increase noise levels in fish culture tanks. Sound levels and frequencies measured within intensive Aquaculture systems are within the range of fish hearing, but species-specific effects of Aquaculture Production noise are not well defined. Field and laboratory studies have shown that fish behavior and physiology can be negatively impacted by intense sound. Therefore, chronic exposure to Aquaculture Production noise could cause increased stress, reduced growth rates and feed conversion efficiency, and decreased survival. The objective of this study was to provide an in-depth evaluation of the long term effects of Aquaculture Production noise on the growth, condition factor, feed conversion efficiency, and survival of cultured rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Rainbow trout were cultured in replicated tanks using two sound treatments: 117 dB re 1 μPa RMS which represented sound levels lower than those recorded in an intensive recycle system and 149 dB re 1 μPa RMS, representing sound levels near the upper limits known to occur in recycle systems. To begin the study mean fish weights in the 117 and 149 dB tanks were 40 and 39 g, respectively. After five months of exposure no significant differences were identified between treatments for mean weight, length, specific growth rates, condition factor, feed conversion, or survival (n=4). Mean final weights for the 117 and 149 dB treatments were 641±3 and 631±10 g, respectively. Overall specific growth rates were equal, i.e. 1.84±0.00 and 1.84±0.01%/day. Analysis of growth rates of individually tagged rainbow trout indicated that fish from the 149 dB tanks grew slower during the first month of noise exposure (p

  • Effects of Aquaculture Production noise on hearing, growth, and disease resistance of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss
    Aquaculture, 2007
    Co-Authors: Lidia Eva Wysocki, Patricia Mazik, John W. Davidson, Michael E. Smith, Adam S. Frankel, William T. Ellison, Arthur N. Popper, Julie Bebak
    Abstract:

    AbstractIntensive Aquaculture Production often utilizes equipment (e.g., aerators, air and water pumps, harvesters, blowers, filtration systems, and maintenance machinery) that increases noise levels in fish culture tanks. Consequently, chronic exposure to elevated noise levels in tanks could negatively impact cultured species. Possible effects include impairment of the auditory system, increased stress, and reduced growth rates. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of sound exposure on the hearing sensitivity, growth, and survival of cultured rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Two cohorts of rainbow trout were cultured for 8 months in replicated tanks consisting of three sound treatments: 115, 130, or 150 decibels referenced at 1 micropascal (dB re 1 μPa root mean square [RMS]) levels. Auditory evoked potential (AEP) recordings revealed no significant differences in hearing thresholds resulting from exposure to increased ambient sound levels. Although there was no evident noise-induced hearing loss, there were significant differences in hearing thresholds between the two fish cohorts examined. No statistical effect of sound treatment was found for growth rate and mortality within each fish cohort. There was no significant difference in mortality between sound treatments when fish were exposed to the pathogen Yersinia ruckeri, but there was significantly different mortality between cohorts. This study indicated that rainbow trout hearing sensitivity, growth, survival, stress, and disease susceptibility were not negatively impacted by noise levels common to recirculating Aquaculture systems. These findings should not be generalized to all cultured fish species, however, because many species, including catfish and cyprinids, have much greater hearing sensitivity than rainbow trout and could be affected differently by noise

Patricia Mazik - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • The effects of Aquaculture Production noise on the growth, condition factor, feed conversion, and survival of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss
    Aquaculture, 2009
    Co-Authors: John Davidson, Julie Bebak, Patricia Mazik
    Abstract:

    AbstractIntensive Aquaculture systems, particularly recirculating systems, utilize equipment such as aerators, air and water pumps, blowers, and filtration systems that inadvertently increase noise levels in fish culture tanks. Sound levels and frequencies measured within intensive Aquaculture systems are within the range of fish hearing, but species-specific effects of Aquaculture Production noise are not well defined. Field and laboratory studies have shown that fish behavior and physiology can be negatively impacted by intense sound. Therefore, chronic exposure to Aquaculture Production noise could cause increased stress, reduced growth rates and feed conversion efficiency, and decreased survival. The objective of this study was to provide an in-depth evaluation of the long term effects of Aquaculture Production noise on the growth, condition factor, feed conversion efficiency, and survival of cultured rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Rainbow trout were cultured in replicated tanks using two sound treatments: 117 dB re 1 μPa RMS which represented sound levels lower than those recorded in an intensive recycle system and 149 dB re 1 μPa RMS, representing sound levels near the upper limits known to occur in recycle systems. To begin the study mean fish weights in the 117 and 149 dB tanks were 40 and 39 g, respectively. After five months of exposure no significant differences were identified between treatments for mean weight, length, specific growth rates, condition factor, feed conversion, or survival (n=4). Mean final weights for the 117 and 149 dB treatments were 641±3 and 631±10 g, respectively. Overall specific growth rates were equal, i.e. 1.84±0.00 and 1.84±0.01%/day. Analysis of growth rates of individually tagged rainbow trout indicated that fish from the 149 dB tanks grew slower during the first month of noise exposure (p

  • Effects of Aquaculture Production noise on hearing, growth, and disease resistance of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss
    Aquaculture, 2007
    Co-Authors: Lidia Eva Wysocki, Patricia Mazik, John W. Davidson, Michael E. Smith, Adam S. Frankel, William T. Ellison, Arthur N. Popper, Julie Bebak
    Abstract:

    AbstractIntensive Aquaculture Production often utilizes equipment (e.g., aerators, air and water pumps, harvesters, blowers, filtration systems, and maintenance machinery) that increases noise levels in fish culture tanks. Consequently, chronic exposure to elevated noise levels in tanks could negatively impact cultured species. Possible effects include impairment of the auditory system, increased stress, and reduced growth rates. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of sound exposure on the hearing sensitivity, growth, and survival of cultured rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Two cohorts of rainbow trout were cultured for 8 months in replicated tanks consisting of three sound treatments: 115, 130, or 150 decibels referenced at 1 micropascal (dB re 1 μPa root mean square [RMS]) levels. Auditory evoked potential (AEP) recordings revealed no significant differences in hearing thresholds resulting from exposure to increased ambient sound levels. Although there was no evident noise-induced hearing loss, there were significant differences in hearing thresholds between the two fish cohorts examined. No statistical effect of sound treatment was found for growth rate and mortality within each fish cohort. There was no significant difference in mortality between sound treatments when fish were exposed to the pathogen Yersinia ruckeri, but there was significantly different mortality between cohorts. This study indicated that rainbow trout hearing sensitivity, growth, survival, stress, and disease susceptibility were not negatively impacted by noise levels common to recirculating Aquaculture systems. These findings should not be generalized to all cultured fish species, however, because many species, including catfish and cyprinids, have much greater hearing sensitivity than rainbow trout and could be affected differently by noise

Runar Unnthorsson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Taxonomy of Means and Ends in Aquaculture Production—Part 4: The Mapping of Technical Solutions onto Multiple Treatment Functions
    Water, 2016
    Co-Authors: Bjorgvin Vilbergsson, Gudmundur Valur Oddsson, Runar Unnthorsson
    Abstract:

    Designing Aquaculture Production units will require decisions on which treatment to include, e.g., the intensification of the system, and then a decision on a technical solution for each treatment function selected to implement. To complicate matters, each technical solution is not unique to each treatment function, but has a multiple effect on the system. This interaction of a technical solution to multiple treatment functions will play a part in the decision making process. Previous work by the authors has made a taxonomy of all technical solutions for the treatment function, and in this article, how technical solutions affect treatment functions is mapped. The article views the Aquaculture Production system as a transformation process with three sets of functions, input, treatment and output. Based on a comprehensive literature review where all technical solutions were found and categorized into a taxonomy, their effect on treatment function was mapped using a quality function deployment (QFD). The result is a matrix that gives an evaluation on the interaction. This work is a step towards an Aquaculture engineering design methodology.

  • Taxonomy of Means and Ends in Aquaculture Production—Part 3: The Technical Solutions of Controlling N Compounds, Organic Matter, P Compounds, Metals, Temperature and Preventing Disease
    Water, 2016
    Co-Authors: Bjorgvin Vilbergsson, Gudmundur Valur Oddsson, Runar Unnthorsson
    Abstract:

    This is the third part of the taxonomy of technical solutions and treatment functions in Aquaculture. This article builds on the premiss that the Aquaculture Production system can be viewed as a transformation process with three sets of functions, input, treatment and output. This work creates an overview of all of the technical solutions of treatment functions for the purpose of both design and further research. This is done with a comprehensive literature review where all technical solutions are identified and then categorized into a taxonomy. The result is a visual taxonomy of the treatment functions controlling N compounds, organic matter, P compounds, metals, temperature and preventing disease. A total taxonomy is finally presented where the results from Part 2 and Part 3 (this part) have been combined.

  • Taxonomy of Means and Ends in Aquaculture Production—Part 2: The Technical Solutions of Controlling Solids, Dissolved Gasses and pH
    Water, 2016
    Co-Authors: Bjorgvin Vilbergsson, Gudmundur Valur Oddsson, Runar Unnthorsson
    Abstract:

    In engineering design, knowing the relationship between the means (technique) and the end (desired function or outcome) is essential. The means in Aquaculture are technical solutions like airlifts that are used to achive desired functionality (an end) like controlling dissolved gasses. In previous work, the authors identified possible functions by viewing Aquaculture Production systems as transformation processes in which inputs are transformed by treatment techniques (means) and produce outputs (ends). The current work creates an overview of technical solutions of treatment functions for both design and research purposes. A comprehensive literature review of all areas of technical solutions is identified and categorized into a visual taxonomy of the treatment functions for controlling solids, controlling dissolved gasses and controlling pH alkalinity and hardness. This article is the second in a sequence of four and partly presents the treatments functions in the taxonomy. The other articles in this series present complementary aspects of this research: Part 1, A transformational view on Aquaculture and functions divided into input, treatment and output functions; Part 2, The current taxonomy paper; Part 3, The second part of the taxonomy; and Part 4, Mapping of the means (techniques) for multiple treatment functions.

  • Taxonomy of Means and Ends in Aquaculture Production—Part 1: The Functions
    Water, 2016
    Co-Authors: Ragnheidur Bjornsdottir, Gudmundur Valur Oddsson, Ragnheidur Thorarinsdottir, Runar Unnthorsson
    Abstract:

    The Aquaculture sector has been increasing its share in the total fish Production in the world. Numerous studies have been published about Aquaculture, introducing a variety of techniques and methods that have been applied or could be applied in Aquaculture Production systems. The purpose of this study is to present a systemic overview of the functions of Aquaculture Production systems. Each function of an Aquaculture system is applied to carry out a certain purpose. The results are divided into three sets of functions: input, treatment, and output. Input functions deal with what happens before the rearing area, treatment functions are about what happens inside the rearing area, and output functions is what comes out of the system. In this study, five input functions, ten treatment functions, and five output functions are indentified. For each function the controlling parameters or indicators were identified and then a list of possible methods or technological solutions in order to carry out the function was compiled. The results are presented in a system map that aggregates all functions used in different types of Aquaculture systems along with their methods of solution. This is the first of four articles that together generate taxonomy of both means and ends in Aquaculture. The aim is to identify both the technical solutions (means) that solve different functions (ends) and the corresponding functions. This article is about the functions.

Lidia Eva Wysocki - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Effects of Aquaculture Production noise on hearing, growth, and disease resistance of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss
    Aquaculture, 2007
    Co-Authors: Lidia Eva Wysocki, Patricia Mazik, John W. Davidson, Michael E. Smith, Adam S. Frankel, William T. Ellison, Arthur N. Popper, Julie Bebak
    Abstract:

    AbstractIntensive Aquaculture Production often utilizes equipment (e.g., aerators, air and water pumps, harvesters, blowers, filtration systems, and maintenance machinery) that increases noise levels in fish culture tanks. Consequently, chronic exposure to elevated noise levels in tanks could negatively impact cultured species. Possible effects include impairment of the auditory system, increased stress, and reduced growth rates. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of sound exposure on the hearing sensitivity, growth, and survival of cultured rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Two cohorts of rainbow trout were cultured for 8 months in replicated tanks consisting of three sound treatments: 115, 130, or 150 decibels referenced at 1 micropascal (dB re 1 μPa root mean square [RMS]) levels. Auditory evoked potential (AEP) recordings revealed no significant differences in hearing thresholds resulting from exposure to increased ambient sound levels. Although there was no evident noise-induced hearing loss, there were significant differences in hearing thresholds between the two fish cohorts examined. No statistical effect of sound treatment was found for growth rate and mortality within each fish cohort. There was no significant difference in mortality between sound treatments when fish were exposed to the pathogen Yersinia ruckeri, but there was significantly different mortality between cohorts. This study indicated that rainbow trout hearing sensitivity, growth, survival, stress, and disease susceptibility were not negatively impacted by noise levels common to recirculating Aquaculture systems. These findings should not be generalized to all cultured fish species, however, because many species, including catfish and cyprinids, have much greater hearing sensitivity than rainbow trout and could be affected differently by noise

Bjorgvin Vilbergsson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Taxonomy of Means and Ends in Aquaculture Production—Part 4: The Mapping of Technical Solutions onto Multiple Treatment Functions
    Water, 2016
    Co-Authors: Bjorgvin Vilbergsson, Gudmundur Valur Oddsson, Runar Unnthorsson
    Abstract:

    Designing Aquaculture Production units will require decisions on which treatment to include, e.g., the intensification of the system, and then a decision on a technical solution for each treatment function selected to implement. To complicate matters, each technical solution is not unique to each treatment function, but has a multiple effect on the system. This interaction of a technical solution to multiple treatment functions will play a part in the decision making process. Previous work by the authors has made a taxonomy of all technical solutions for the treatment function, and in this article, how technical solutions affect treatment functions is mapped. The article views the Aquaculture Production system as a transformation process with three sets of functions, input, treatment and output. Based on a comprehensive literature review where all technical solutions were found and categorized into a taxonomy, their effect on treatment function was mapped using a quality function deployment (QFD). The result is a matrix that gives an evaluation on the interaction. This work is a step towards an Aquaculture engineering design methodology.

  • Taxonomy of Means and Ends in Aquaculture Production—Part 3: The Technical Solutions of Controlling N Compounds, Organic Matter, P Compounds, Metals, Temperature and Preventing Disease
    Water, 2016
    Co-Authors: Bjorgvin Vilbergsson, Gudmundur Valur Oddsson, Runar Unnthorsson
    Abstract:

    This is the third part of the taxonomy of technical solutions and treatment functions in Aquaculture. This article builds on the premiss that the Aquaculture Production system can be viewed as a transformation process with three sets of functions, input, treatment and output. This work creates an overview of all of the technical solutions of treatment functions for the purpose of both design and further research. This is done with a comprehensive literature review where all technical solutions are identified and then categorized into a taxonomy. The result is a visual taxonomy of the treatment functions controlling N compounds, organic matter, P compounds, metals, temperature and preventing disease. A total taxonomy is finally presented where the results from Part 2 and Part 3 (this part) have been combined.

  • Taxonomy of Means and Ends in Aquaculture Production—Part 2: The Technical Solutions of Controlling Solids, Dissolved Gasses and pH
    Water, 2016
    Co-Authors: Bjorgvin Vilbergsson, Gudmundur Valur Oddsson, Runar Unnthorsson
    Abstract:

    In engineering design, knowing the relationship between the means (technique) and the end (desired function or outcome) is essential. The means in Aquaculture are technical solutions like airlifts that are used to achive desired functionality (an end) like controlling dissolved gasses. In previous work, the authors identified possible functions by viewing Aquaculture Production systems as transformation processes in which inputs are transformed by treatment techniques (means) and produce outputs (ends). The current work creates an overview of technical solutions of treatment functions for both design and research purposes. A comprehensive literature review of all areas of technical solutions is identified and categorized into a visual taxonomy of the treatment functions for controlling solids, controlling dissolved gasses and controlling pH alkalinity and hardness. This article is the second in a sequence of four and partly presents the treatments functions in the taxonomy. The other articles in this series present complementary aspects of this research: Part 1, A transformational view on Aquaculture and functions divided into input, treatment and output functions; Part 2, The current taxonomy paper; Part 3, The second part of the taxonomy; and Part 4, Mapping of the means (techniques) for multiple treatment functions.