The Experts below are selected from a list of 21255 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Architectural Firm - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
University of Toledo Trailer Park, Architectural Drawing, 1945
2021Co-Authors: Britsch And Munger, Architectural FirmAbstract:An Architectural for a trailer park commissioned by the University of Toledo and created by Britsch and Munger, an Architectural firm of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawing is pencil on tracing paper, the commission number for the project is 749, and it was created in 1945. The Drawing depicts the staking and trailer setting plan along with the information on the drainage system in the park. It has not been determined if these plans were executed or not
-
Sylvania Athletic Field, Architectural Drawing, 1948
2021Co-Authors: Britsch And Munger, Architectural FirmAbstract:An Architectural Drawing for Sylvania Athletic Field commissioned by the Sylvania Exempted School District Board of Education and created by the Britsch and Munger Architectural firm of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawing is pencil on tissue paper, the commission number for the project is 942, and the Drawing was created in 1948 . The Drawing depicts the site plan for the entire project including a football field, baseball diamonds, tennis courts, badminton courts, volleyball courts, and a swimming pool. A park still exists in the same location as shown in the Drawing, though it is configured differently in its current form
-
Barrett Battery Company Station, Architectural Drawing, 1928
2021Co-Authors: Jokel And Lange, Architectural FirmAbstract:An Architectural for a battery station commissioned by the Barrett Battery Company and created by Jokel and Lange, an Architectural firm of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawing is pencil on tracing paper, the commission number for the project is 797J, and it was created in 1928. The Drawing depicts all four exterior elevations of the building as well as a cross section. As of 2021 this building has been demolished and this section of Ontario Street no longer exists
-
Mr. and Mrs. William H. Searight Residence, Architectural Drawing, 1945
2021Co-Authors: Britsch And Munger, Architectural FirmAbstract:An Architectural Drawing of a residence commissioned by Mr. and Mrs. William H. Searight and created by Britsch and Munger, an Architectural firm of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawing is pencil on tracing paper, the commission number for the project is 748, and it was created in 1945. The Drawing depicts the front and right side exterior elevations as well as numerous construction details. It has not been determined if these plans were executed or not
-
Charles K. Friedman Store and Apartment Building, Architectural Drawing, 1927
2021Co-Authors: Jokel And Lange, Architectural FirmAbstract:An Architectural Drawing for a store and apartment building commissioned by Mr. Chas. K. Friedman and created by the Jokel and Lange Architectural firm of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawing is pencil on tracing paper, the commission number is 763-J, and the Drawing was created in 1927. The Drawing depicts the front exterior elevation, as well as a second unidentified exterior elevation. As of 2021 this building has been demolished
George B. Rheinfrank - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Carleton Shaw Residence, Architectural Drawing, 1920s
2021Co-Authors: George B. RheinfrankAbstract:An Architectural Drawing for a bungalow commissioned by Mr. Carleton Shaw and created by George B. Rheinfrank, an architect of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawing is pencil on tissue paper, the commission number for the project is 823, and the Drawing was created in approximately 1921 or 1922. The Drawing depicts all four exterior elevations, a cross section, and various wall section details. As of 2021 this building has not been demolished
-
Diehl Commercial Building, Architectural Drawing, 1916
2021Co-Authors: George B. RheinfrankAbstract:An Architectural Drawing for a commercial building commissioned by Chrisy and Albert Diehl and created by George Rheinfrank, an architect of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawing is black ink on linen, the commission number for the project is 689, and it was created in 1916. The Drawing depicts the front and rear exterior elevations of the building, as well as an interior section, front office partition, and upper roof plan. As of 2021 this building has been demolished
-
John H. Lloyd Residence, Architectural Drawing, 1908
2021Co-Authors: George B. RheinfrankAbstract:An Architectural Drawing for a dwelling commissioned by Mr. John H. Lloyd and created by George B. Rheinfrank, an architect of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawing is black ink on linen, the commission number for the project is 17, and the Drawing was created in 1908. The Drawing depicts all four exterior elevations of the residence. As of 2021 this building has been demolished
-
W. A. Gosline Residence, Architectural Drawing, 1919
2021Co-Authors: George B. RheinfrankAbstract:An Architectural Drawing for alterations to a residence commissioned by Mr. W. A. Gosline and created by George B. Rheinfrank, an architect out of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawing is pencil on tissue paper, the commission number for the project is 782, and it was created in 1919. The Drawing depicts plans and interior elevations for a bathroom and bookcase. As of 2021 this building has been demolished
-
Samuel J. Eckenrode Bungalow, Architectural Drawing, 1923
2021Co-Authors: George B. RheinfrankAbstract:An Architectural Drawing for a residence commissioned by Mr. Samuel J. Eckenrode and created by George B. Rheinfrank, and architect of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawing is pencil on tracing paper, the commission number for the project is 868, and it was created in 1923. The Drawing depicts all four exterior elevations of the dwelling along with various construction details. As of 2019 the building has not been demolished
Britsch And Munger - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Sylvania Athletic Field, Architectural Drawing, 1948
2021Co-Authors: Britsch And Munger, Architectural FirmAbstract:An Architectural Drawing for Sylvania Athletic Field commissioned by the Sylvania Exempted School District Board of Education and created by the Britsch and Munger Architectural firm of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawing is pencil on tissue paper, the commission number for the project is 942, and the Drawing was created in 1948 . The Drawing depicts the site plan for the entire project including a football field, baseball diamonds, tennis courts, badminton courts, volleyball courts, and a swimming pool. A park still exists in the same location as shown in the Drawing, though it is configured differently in its current form
-
Sylvania Methodist Church, Architectural Drawing, 1947
2021Co-Authors: Britsch And Munger, Architectural FirmAbstract:An Architectural Drawing of alterations and additions to Sylvania Methodist Church created by the Britsch and Munger Architectural firm of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawing is pencil on tracing paper, the project has no commission number, and it was created in 1947. The Drawing depicts the front elevation and transverse section of the building, as well as some construction details. As of 2021 this building has been demolished
-
Burnham High School Addition, Architectural Drawing, 1938
2021Co-Authors: Britsch And Munger, Architectural FirmAbstract:An Architectural Drawing for an addition to Burnham High School commissioned by the Sylvania Board of Education and created by the Britsch and Munger Architectural firm of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawing is pencil on tracing paper, the commission for the project is 506, and it was created in 1938. The Drawing depicts the Monroe Street, West, and North exterior elevations of the building, as well as details of typical wall sections. As of 2021 this building has been demolished and the lot is currently occupied by Maplewood Elementary School
-
Braden Methodist Church, Architectural Drawing, 1952
2021Co-Authors: Britsch And Munger, Architectural FirmAbstract:An Architectural Drawing for a proposed design of Braden Methodist Church created by the Britsch and Munger Architectural firm of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawing is pencil on tissue paper, the commission numbers for the project are 681 and 711, and the Drawing was created in 1952. The Drawing depicts the Belmont Avenue and City Park Avenue exterior elevations, as well as a cross sectional and longitudinal view of the interior. The identified address for the church has been drawn from a 1935 city directory, placing it at the corner of City Park Avenue and Belmont Avenue, however in 1952 the church moved to the corner of Woodruff Avenue and Lawrence Avenue. It is not believed this proposed design was ever used at either location
-
Mr. and Mrs. William H. Searight Residence, Architectural Drawing, 1945
2021Co-Authors: Britsch And Munger, Architectural FirmAbstract:An Architectural Drawing of a residence commissioned by Mr. and Mrs. William H. Searight and created by Britsch and Munger, an Architectural firm of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawing is pencil on tracing paper, the commission number for the project is 748, and it was created in 1945. The Drawing depicts the front and right side exterior elevations as well as numerous construction details. It has not been determined if these plans were executed or not
Costa Adrienne - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Seeing Architectural space in section : exploration of section in conception of modern space
2020Co-Authors: Costa AdrienneAbstract:En partant de l’hypothèse que la coupe peut être un filtre épistémologique, la thèse a cherché à répondre à la question suivante :Comment -et dans quelle mesure- la coupe Architecturale contribue -t-elle à « la résolution du projet dans l’espace »?Les positions théoriques et hypothèses rassemblées et confrontées autour de ce débat ont montré sa singularité, son importance stratégique et ses diverses facettes. Si ce mot apparaît comme métonymie de ce qui a été coupé au XVIIe siècle, les traces de dessins d’intérieurs en élévation se dissociant peu à peu de la perspective remontent à la Renaissance italienne où ils sont normalisés par la lettre de Raphaël.En partant d’une relecture nécessaire de la thèse australienne de Christine Mc Carthy, la nature hybride et secrète de la représentation en coupe s’est peu à peu détachée de sa dimension voyeuriste qui décrit l’invisible, vide ou plein, du dedans au dehors.Débutant avec le spacato qui proviendrait de l’analyse des vestiges d’architecture monumentales antiques jusqu’à l’écorché qui fait le récit d’un monde intérieur fantasmé, en passant par la sciografia ou les formes extrudées découpent les ombres, et par le profil qui dicte la continuité de la matière et les rapports de proportions, de gravité et d’expansion ; avant qu’elle ne décrive l’espace, la coupe ouvre effectivement sur l’intimité d’un objet pour voir au-delà de ce qui est montré, au-delà de l’épiderme qui protège.Progress of digital technology allows hyper-developing of representation modes free from instruments which are more and more considered as obsolete to produce new spaces. However, referring to the spread which is given to the section when presenting projects, or in teaching practices, it is often described as a device for stimulating, designing and building.According to Jacques Guillerme and Hélène Vérin1, section appears within surveys and studies of antic ruins as a physic reality, the one of a building truncated by its own partial collapse. Many theorists, as Barbara Stafford2 and Robin Evans3, make a connection between section and dissection as opening modes on the inside and by the development of both practices during the Eighteenth century. Opening out the project, in order to disclose the inside, make the section analogous to a window on the intimacy of the project. It makes perceptible what results into cuts of filled: gravity, topography and shadows. It allows, across the space of the project, the description of tensions, motions and transformations, thresholds and the interpenetration of spaces. What Louis Kahn calls “the Secret Garden” is the secret kept by the section of the threshold, the clearing and the connection to the sky. According to Robin Evans, to reveal the essence of the building is the real function of Architectural Drawing. An observation of the designing process of modern houses conceived later than Adolf Loos’ “Resolving the project in space”4, shows an early establishment of the section in the conception process, and its strength against decisions which might induce modifications of the project
-
Voir l'espace Architectural en coupe : exploration du rôle de la coupe dans la conception de l'espace moderne
2020Co-Authors: Costa AdrienneAbstract:Thèse en cotutelle En vue de l’obtention du Doctorat en Architecture de l’Université de Toulouse Jean Jaurès/ Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture de Toulouse, Et du Ph.D. Individualisé en Architecture de l’Université de Montréal, Présentée à l’Ecole Doctorale TESC Université de Toulouse Jean Jaurès. Unités de Recherche : LRA – Laboratoire de Recherche en Architecture LEAP – Laboratoire d’Etude de L’Architecture PotentielleL’état du développement de la théorie sur les modes de représentation ne contient que peu de travaux sur la coupe Architecturale, notamment au XXe siècle, époque à laquelle la notion d’espace devient un enjeu Architectural propre à la modernité. Cette étude théorique établit les conditions du recours à la coupe dans l’élaboration d’une spatialité qui fournit du sens au projet. Elle propose au préalable sur une investigation des façons de voir un édifice ouvert, de la ruine à l’écorché, permettant d’extraire quelques ressorts disciplinaires de la coupe. L’exploration de sa contribution à « la résolution du projet dans l’espace » qui constitue le cœur de ce travail, est guidée par l’analyse approfondie de la fabrication d’un corpus de coupes d’espaces domestiques emblématiques du XXe siècle. Elle éclaire ainsi, in fine, sur son usage et la connaissance de son statut, au seuil de l’hyper-développement de la modélisation.Seeing Architectural space in section exploration of the section in the conception of modern space. Progress of digital technology allows hyper-developing of representation modes free from instruments which are more and more considered as obsolete to produce new spaces. However, referring to the spread which is given to the section when presenting projects, or in teaching practices, it is often described as a device for stimulating, designing and building. This theorical research observes the use and the status of section at the end of the twentieth century, at the dawning of modelling development. According to Jacques Guillerme and Hélène Vérin , section appears within surveys and studies of antic ruins as a physic reality, the one of a building truncated by its own partial collapse. Many theorists, as Barbara Stafford and Robin Evans , make a connection between section and dissection as opening modes on the inside and by the development of both practices during the Eighteenth century. According to Robin Evans, to reveal the essence of the building is the real function of Architectural Drawing. The approach is to explore the Drawing and the evolution of sections through traces of the designing process, in order to understand how section act as a “générateur” of the project. The research question may be : How, and to which spread, Architectural section has a generating dimension of space and it intervene in the elaboration process of modern houses designed after the “Resolving the project in space” ? Based on archives Drawings a reference corpus of six modern emblematic houses sections designed between twenties and sixties have been observed in their representation and space. Six other emblematic houses sections conceived from seventies to two thousand ten have been observed through a comparative analysis with the reference corpus. The expected results are to detect the spatial issues raised by the section, to extend its agreed definition as a representation tool to a designing tool and to settle a methodology for analysing cut space
Jokel And Lange - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Clay School, Architectural Drawing, 1928
2021Co-Authors: Jokel And Lange, Architectural FirmAbstract:An Architectural Drawing for an addition to the Clay School commissioned by the Oregon Township Rural School District and created by the Jokel and Lange Architectural firm of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawing is pencil on tracing paper, the commission number for the project is 800-J, and it was created in 1928. The Drawing depicts the left-side, front, rear court, and rear exterior elevations of the building, as well as elevations of blackboards inside the school. As of 2008 this building has been demolished
-
Charles K. Friedman Store and Apartment Building, Architectural Drawing, 1927
2021Co-Authors: Jokel And Lange, Architectural FirmAbstract:An Architectural Drawing for a store and apartment building commissioned by Mr. Chas. K. Friedman and created by the Jokel and Lange Architectural firm of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawing is pencil on tracing paper, the commission number is 763-J, and the Drawing was created in 1927. The Drawing depicts the front exterior elevation, as well as a second unidentified exterior elevation. As of 2021 this building has been demolished
-
Barrett Battery Company Station, Architectural Drawing, 1928
2021Co-Authors: Jokel And Lange, Architectural FirmAbstract:An Architectural for a battery station commissioned by the Barrett Battery Company and created by Jokel and Lange, an Architectural firm of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawing is pencil on tracing paper, the commission number for the project is 797J, and it was created in 1928. The Drawing depicts all four exterior elevations of the building as well as a cross section. As of 2021 this building has been demolished and this section of Ontario Street no longer exists
-
Dr. C. E. Eichman Residence, Architectural Drawing, 1931
2020Co-Authors: Jokel And Lange, Architectural FirmAbstract:An Architectural Drawing for a residence commissioned by Dr. C. E. Eichman and created by the Jokel and Lange Architectural firm of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawing is pencil on paper, the commission number for this project is 868-J, and the Drawing was created in 1931. Also contained in the commission but not available here are interior and exterior elevations, detail Drawings of various elements, and a site plan. This proposed design was never implemented and not constructed. The address associated with this commission was identified by the lot number included in the Drawings
-
Joe Willis Residence, Architectural Drawing, 1939
2020Co-Authors: Jokel And Lange, Architectural FirmAbstract:Architectural Drawing for a residence commissioned by Joe Willis and created by the Jokel and Lange Architectural firm of Toledo, Ohio. The Drawings are pencil on cream colored paper, the commission number for the project is 799-J, and the Drawing was created in 1928. This Drawing depicts the front elevation of the dwelling. Also included in this commission but not scanned are the interior and exterior elevations, floorplans, the site plan, and details of the woodwork. As of 2020 this building has not been demolished