The Experts below are selected from a list of 33 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
L Levinger - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
developing an Architecture Validation suite application to the powerpc Architecture
Design Automation Conference, 1999Co-Authors: L Fournier, Anatoly Koyfman, L LevingerAbstract:This paper describes the efforts made and the results of creating an Architecture Validation Suite for the PowerPC Architecture. Although many functional test suites are available for multiple Architectures, little has been published on how these suites are developed and how their quality should be measured. This work provides some insights for approaching the difficult problem of building a high quality functional test suite for a given Architecture. By defining a set of generic coverage models that combine program-based, specification-based and sequential bug-driven models, it establishes the groundwork for the development of Architecture Validation suites for any Architecture.
L Fournier - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
developing an Architecture Validation suite application to the powerpc Architecture
Design Automation Conference, 1999Co-Authors: L Fournier, Anatoly Koyfman, L LevingerAbstract:This paper describes the efforts made and the results of creating an Architecture Validation Suite for the PowerPC Architecture. Although many functional test suites are available for multiple Architectures, little has been published on how these suites are developed and how their quality should be measured. This work provides some insights for approaching the difficult problem of building a high quality functional test suite for a given Architecture. By defining a set of generic coverage models that combine program-based, specification-based and sequential bug-driven models, it establishes the groundwork for the development of Architecture Validation suites for any Architecture.
Itai Segall - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
automatic and continuous software Architecture Validation
International Conference on Software Engineering, 2015Co-Authors: Maayan Goldstein, Itai SegallAbstract:Software systems tend to suffer from architectural problems as they are being developed. While modern software development methodologies such as Agile and Dev-Ops suggest different ways of assuring code quality, very little attention is paid to maintaining high quality of the Architecture of the evolving systems. By detecting and alerting about violations of the intended software Architecture, one can often avoid code-level bad smells such as spaghetti code. Typically, if one wants to reason about the software Architecture, the burden of first defining the intended Architecture falls on the developer's shoulders. This includes definition of valid and invalid dependencies between software components. However, the developers are seldom familiar with the entire software system, which makes this task difficult, time consuming and error-prone. We propose and implement a solution for automatic detection of architectural violations in software artifacts. The solution, which utilizes a number of predefined and user-defined patterns, does not require prior knowledge of the system or its intended Architecture. We propose to leverage this solution as part of the nightly build process used by development teams, thus achieving continuous automatic Validation of the system's software Architecture. As we show in multiple open-source and proprietary cases, a small set of predefined patterns can detect architectural violations as they are introduced over the course of development, and also capture deterioration in existing architectural problems. By evaluating the tool on relatively large open-source projects, we also validate its scalability and practical applicability to large software systems.
Anatoly Koyfman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
developing an Architecture Validation suite application to the powerpc Architecture
Design Automation Conference, 1999Co-Authors: L Fournier, Anatoly Koyfman, L LevingerAbstract:This paper describes the efforts made and the results of creating an Architecture Validation Suite for the PowerPC Architecture. Although many functional test suites are available for multiple Architectures, little has been published on how these suites are developed and how their quality should be measured. This work provides some insights for approaching the difficult problem of building a high quality functional test suite for a given Architecture. By defining a set of generic coverage models that combine program-based, specification-based and sequential bug-driven models, it establishes the groundwork for the development of Architecture Validation suites for any Architecture.
Maayan Goldstein - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
automatic and continuous software Architecture Validation
International Conference on Software Engineering, 2015Co-Authors: Maayan Goldstein, Itai SegallAbstract:Software systems tend to suffer from architectural problems as they are being developed. While modern software development methodologies such as Agile and Dev-Ops suggest different ways of assuring code quality, very little attention is paid to maintaining high quality of the Architecture of the evolving systems. By detecting and alerting about violations of the intended software Architecture, one can often avoid code-level bad smells such as spaghetti code. Typically, if one wants to reason about the software Architecture, the burden of first defining the intended Architecture falls on the developer's shoulders. This includes definition of valid and invalid dependencies between software components. However, the developers are seldom familiar with the entire software system, which makes this task difficult, time consuming and error-prone. We propose and implement a solution for automatic detection of architectural violations in software artifacts. The solution, which utilizes a number of predefined and user-defined patterns, does not require prior knowledge of the system or its intended Architecture. We propose to leverage this solution as part of the nightly build process used by development teams, thus achieving continuous automatic Validation of the system's software Architecture. As we show in multiple open-source and proprietary cases, a small set of predefined patterns can detect architectural violations as they are introduced over the course of development, and also capture deterioration in existing architectural problems. By evaluating the tool on relatively large open-source projects, we also validate its scalability and practical applicability to large software systems.