The Experts below are selected from a list of 26748 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Geert Duysters - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • negotiating innovation product renewal as the outcome of a complex Bargaining Process
    ERIM Article Series (EAS), 2005
    Co-Authors: Frank Wijen, Geert Duysters
    Abstract:

    textabstractIn this paper, it is argued that innovation can be the result of a repetitive, multi-actor negotiation Process. We present the case of an environment-related product innovation in a large multinational company which emerged as the outcome of a complex interaction Process in which numerous external and internal actors negotiated to safeguard their own interests. This negotiation perspective challenges conventional economic views of innovations, in which new products and Processes are regarded as exogenous variables, the outcomes of deliberately planned research, or the combination of technology (pushing) and market (pulling) inducements. Instead, innovation may be a non-linear, unpredictable Process which involves multiple actors with divergent interests and which leads to outcomes that are collectively acceptable but not necessarily (sub)optimal.

  • negotiating innovation product renewal as the outcome of a complex Bargaining Process
    Social Science Research Network, 2005
    Co-Authors: Frank Wijen, Geert Duysters
    Abstract:

    In this paper, it is argued that innovation can be the result of a repetitive, multi-actor negotiation Process. We present the case of an environment-related product innovation in a large multinational company that emerged as the outcome of a complex interaction Process in which numerous external and internal actors negotiated to safeguard their own interests. This negotiation perspective challenges conventional economic views of innovations, in which new products and Processes are regarded as exogenous variables, the outcomes of deliberately planned research, or the combination of technology (pushing) and market (pulling) inducements. Instead, innovation may be a non-linear, unpredictable Process that involves multiple actors with divergent interests and that leads to outcomes that are collectively acceptable but not necessarily (sub)optimal.

Frank Wijen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • negotiating innovation product renewal as the outcome of a complex Bargaining Process
    ERIM Article Series (EAS), 2005
    Co-Authors: Frank Wijen, Geert Duysters
    Abstract:

    textabstractIn this paper, it is argued that innovation can be the result of a repetitive, multi-actor negotiation Process. We present the case of an environment-related product innovation in a large multinational company which emerged as the outcome of a complex interaction Process in which numerous external and internal actors negotiated to safeguard their own interests. This negotiation perspective challenges conventional economic views of innovations, in which new products and Processes are regarded as exogenous variables, the outcomes of deliberately planned research, or the combination of technology (pushing) and market (pulling) inducements. Instead, innovation may be a non-linear, unpredictable Process which involves multiple actors with divergent interests and which leads to outcomes that are collectively acceptable but not necessarily (sub)optimal.

  • negotiating innovation product renewal as the outcome of a complex Bargaining Process
    Social Science Research Network, 2005
    Co-Authors: Frank Wijen, Geert Duysters
    Abstract:

    In this paper, it is argued that innovation can be the result of a repetitive, multi-actor negotiation Process. We present the case of an environment-related product innovation in a large multinational company that emerged as the outcome of a complex interaction Process in which numerous external and internal actors negotiated to safeguard their own interests. This negotiation perspective challenges conventional economic views of innovations, in which new products and Processes are regarded as exogenous variables, the outcomes of deliberately planned research, or the combination of technology (pushing) and market (pulling) inducements. Instead, innovation may be a non-linear, unpredictable Process that involves multiple actors with divergent interests and that leads to outcomes that are collectively acceptable but not necessarily (sub)optimal.

Tobias Linzert - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the role of real wage rigidity and labor market frictions for inflation persistence
    Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 2010
    Co-Authors: Kai Christoffel, Tobias Linzert
    Abstract:

    We analyze the transmission mechanism of wages to inflation within a New Keynesian business cycle model with wage rigidities and labor market frictions. Our main focus is on the channel of real wage rigidities on inflation persistence for which we find the specification of the wage Bargaining Process to be of crucial importance. Under the standard efficient Nash Bargaining, the feedback of wage rigidities on inflation is ambiguous and depends on other labor market variables. However, under the alternative right-to-manage Bargaining we find that more rigid wages translate directly into more persistent movements of aggregate inflation.

  • the role of real wage rigidity and labor market frictions for inflation persistence
    Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 2010
    Co-Authors: Kai Christoffel, Tobias Linzert
    Abstract:

    We analyze the transmission mechanism of wages to inflation within a New Keynesian business cycle model with wage rigidities and labor market frictions. Our main focus is on the channel of real wage rigidities on inflation persistence for which we find the specification of the wage Bargaining Process to be of crucial importance. Under the standard efficient Nash Bargaining, the feedback of wage rigidities on inflation is ambiguous and depends on other labor market variables. However, under the alternative right-to-manage Bargaining we find that more rigid wages translate directly into more persistent movements of aggregate inflation. Copyright (c) 2010 The Ohio State University.

Lee E Ohanian - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • new deal policies and the persistence of the great depression a general equilibrium analysis
    Journal of Political Economy, 2004
    Co-Authors: Harold L Cole, Lee E Ohanian
    Abstract:

    There are two striking aspects of the recovery from the Great Depression in the United States: the recovery was very weak, and real wages in several sectors rose significantly above trend. These data contrast sharply with neoclassical theory, which predicts a strong recovery with low real wages. We evaluate the contribution to the persistence of the Depression of New Deal cartelization policies designed to limit competition and increase labor Bargaining power. We develop a model of the Bargaining Process between labor and firms that occurred with these policies and embed that model within a multisector dynamic general equilibrium model. We find that New Deal cartelization policies are an important factor in accounting for the failure of the economy to recover back to trend.

Ahmad Ridhwan Abd Rani - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • When Law and Practice Collide: the Implementation of the Plea-Bargaining Process in Malaysia
    Asian Journal of Criminology, 2019
    Co-Authors: Zaiton Hamin, Mohd Bahrin Othman, Ahmad Ridhwan Abd Rani
    Abstract:

    The amendment of the Malaysian Criminal Procedure Code in 2010 formalised the plea-Bargaining Process and introduced two new sections, 172C and 172D. The new procedures are intended to reduce the backlog of cases in the criminal courts and as a swift alternative to a full criminal trial. However, the law in action does not appear to be in line with the law in the statute book because currently the actors involved in the Process are avoiding the use of the new procedural law. Instead, those actors are following the old informal practice of plea-Bargaining to achieve their personal goals which may be inconsistent with the organisational goals of the judiciary and prosecution. This paper adopts a qualitative methodology, in which the primary data is obtained from semi-structured interviews with twenty respondents comprising the stakeholders in the criminal justice system.

  • negotiating for justice judge s perception of the plea Bargaining Process in malaysia
    GATR Global Journal of Business Social Sciences Review, 2019
    Co-Authors: Zaiton Hamin, Ahmad Ridhwan Abd Rani
    Abstract:

    Objective - This paper aims to examine the role of judges and the reality of the plea-Bargaining Process from the perspective of the judiciary, focusing primarily on their perceptions on the new law and their role and the problems facing them in implementing the law. Methodology/Technique - This paper adopts a qualitative methodology, in which the primary data is obtained from semi-structured interviews with 20 respondents comprising of the stakeholders in the criminal justice system. The secondary data is obtained from analysing the CPC and other library-based sources. Findings - The research reveals that judges are facing some problems derived from the law itself which makes the new plea-Bargaining Process unappealing to them. Consequently, judges have invented their solutions either by reverting to the old practice or imposing on the parties their terms in disposing of the case through judge-prompted plea-bargain. Novelty - This paper is significant in providing some evidence of the procedural difficulties faced by judges in hearing plea-Bargaining application at the pre-trial stage.