Broadcast Receiver

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 27 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Hidenori Muramatsu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Comparison of configurations for conducted emission measurement specified in CISPR 32 and CISPR 13
    2017 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (APEMC), 2017
    Co-Authors: Nozomi Miyake, Koichi Kakuda, Yoshiaki Hiratsuka, Hidenori Muramatsu
    Abstract:

    Configurations, such as the physical layout of the measurement setup and operation conditions of equipment under test (EUT) especially the complexity of the displayed image for conducted emission measurements specified in CISPR 32[1] differ from those in CISPR 13 [2]. CISPR 32 requires a typical system configuration but CISPR 13 does not require the system. After CISPR 32 was published, multimedia equipment (MME), which has Broadcast Receiver functions measured with the configuration in CISPR 13 shall be measured with that in CISPR 32. Therefore, effects of differences in configurations for conducted emission measurement have to be clarified to obtain equivalent results. From the results of investigations into asymmetric mode conducted emission measurements, more practical operations of EUT can be simulated with the physical layout in CISPR 32. Also, the conducted emissions did not significantly change due to the complexity of the images displayed on the monitor.

Neville J Meijers - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • retail proximity marketing
    2013
    Co-Authors: Kevin E Hunter, Stephen A Sprigg, Charles S Wurster, Neville J Meijers, Paul E Jacobs
    Abstract:

    Methods, systems and devices for presenting marketing information to a customer based on proximity to marketing areas. A wireless identity transmitter associated with the customer may periodically transmit wireless Broadcast messages that include obscured identifiers. A proximity Broadcast Receiver within a retail store, such as near a product display or aisle, may receive and relay the Broadcast messages to a server which may process the included information. Based on proximity information and other conditions, the server may transmit marketing information relevant to the customer and a proximate marketing area, such as coupons and offers. In an embodiment, the server may store data based on Broadcast messages that may indicate foot traffic and other information valuable to merchants. The server may also transmit messages based on stored permissions that indicate whether the customer desires to receive marketing information and whether the server is authorized to provide the customer's identity to merchants.

  • platform for wireless identity transmitter and system using short range wireless Broadcast
    2013
    Co-Authors: Stephen R Altman, Stephen A Sprigg, Liz Gasser, Joel Benjamin Linsky, Leif Woodahl, Jason B Kenagy, Jose R Menendez, Charles S Wurster, Paul E Jacobs, Neville J Meijers
    Abstract:

    Methods, systems and devices for locating a wireless identity transmitter with a central server connected with one or more proximity Broadcast Receivers, such as stationary Receivers or mobile devices operating as wireless Receivers. The wireless identity transmitter may be a compact device configured to Broadcast messages, such as through Bluetooth® advertisements, including an identification code. When within proximity, a proximity Broadcast Receiver may receive Broadcast messages from the wireless identity transmitter and relay location information along with the wireless identity transmitter's identification code to a central server as sighting messages. The proximity Broadcast Receiver's own location may provide an approximate location for the wireless identity transmitter. The central server may process sighting messages, which may include signal strength information, to accurately locate the wireless identity transmitter. The central server may transmit data to third-party devices and/or mobile devices of users in response to receiving sightings messages.

Seokgyu Park - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the 4 tier design pattern for the development of an android application
    International Conference on Future Generation Information Technology, 2011
    Co-Authors: Woonyong Kim, Seokgyu Park
    Abstract:

    Recently, increasing in demand for smart phone and related applications has changed people's life style rapidly. In particular, Apple's IPhone and Google's Android phone has been increased in demand, and the application development of those has become the necessary elements in the business area. But because the application of the smart phone has made in the special framework environment and the design of the application has made base on the user interface with domain area, the application complexity increases. For reduce the complexity, we propose the 4-Tire design pattern for the android application. In this design pattern, we separate the area of the executable components (Activities, Services, Broadcast Receiver, and Content Providers) and domain area for the low coupling. This structure can improve the ability of the maintenance and reduce the cost of the application development.

Nozomi Miyake - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Comparison of configurations for conducted emission measurement specified in CISPR 32 and CISPR 13
    2017 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (APEMC), 2017
    Co-Authors: Nozomi Miyake, Koichi Kakuda, Yoshiaki Hiratsuka, Hidenori Muramatsu
    Abstract:

    Configurations, such as the physical layout of the measurement setup and operation conditions of equipment under test (EUT) especially the complexity of the displayed image for conducted emission measurements specified in CISPR 32[1] differ from those in CISPR 13 [2]. CISPR 32 requires a typical system configuration but CISPR 13 does not require the system. After CISPR 32 was published, multimedia equipment (MME), which has Broadcast Receiver functions measured with the configuration in CISPR 13 shall be measured with that in CISPR 32. Therefore, effects of differences in configurations for conducted emission measurement have to be clarified to obtain equivalent results. From the results of investigations into asymmetric mode conducted emission measurements, more practical operations of EUT can be simulated with the physical layout in CISPR 32. Also, the conducted emissions did not significantly change due to the complexity of the images displayed on the monitor.

Quan Gan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.