The Experts below are selected from a list of 51 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Sarah Ansari - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
from subjects to Citizens Society and the everyday state in india and pakistan 1947 1970
Modern Asian Studies, 2011Co-Authors: Taylor C. Sherman, William Gould, Sarah AnsariAbstract:This special issue of Modern Asian Studies explores the shift from colonial rule to independence in India and Pakistan, with the aim of unravelling the explicit meanings and relevance of ‘independence’ for the new Citizens of India and Pakistan during the two decades after 1947. While the study of postcolonial South Asia has blossomed in recent years, this volume addresses a number of imbalances in this dynamic and highly popular field. Firstly, the histories of India and Pakistan after 1947 have come to be conceived separately, with many scholars assuming that the two states developed along divergent paths after independence. Thus, the dominant historical paradigm has been to examine either India or Pakistan in relative isolation from one another. While a handful of very recent books on the partition of the subcontinent have begun to study the two states simultaneously, very few of these new histories reach beyond the immediate concerns of partition. Of course, both countries developed out of much the same set of historical experiences. Viewing the two states in the same frame not only allows the contributors to this issue to explore common themes, it also facilitates an exploration of the powerful continuities between the pre- and post-independence periods.
-
From Subjects to Citizens: Society and the Everyday State in India and Pakistan, 1947–1970
Modern Asian Studies, 2010Co-Authors: Taylor C. Sherman, William Gould, Sarah AnsariAbstract:This special issue ofModern Asian Studiesexplores the shift from colonial rule to independence in India and Pakistan, with the aim of unravelling the explicit meanings and relevance of ‘independence’ for the new Citizens of India and Pakistan during the two decades after 1947. While the study of postcolonial South Asia has blossomed in recent years, this volume addresses a number of imbalances in this dynamic and highly popular field. Firstly, the histories of India and Pakistan after 1947 have come to be conceived separately, with many scholars assuming that the two states developed along divergent paths after independence. Thus, the dominant historical paradigm has been to examine either India or Pakistan in relative isolation from one another. While a handful of very recent books on the partition of the subcontinent have begun to study the two states simultaneously, very few of these new histories reach beyond the immediate concerns of partition. Of course, both countries developed out of much the same set of historical experiences. Viewing the two states in the same frame not only allows the contributors to this issue to explore common themes, it also facilitates an exploration of the powerful continuities between the pre- and post-independence periods.
Taylor C. Sherman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
from subjects to Citizens Society and the everyday state in india and pakistan 1947 1970
Modern Asian Studies, 2011Co-Authors: Taylor C. Sherman, William Gould, Sarah AnsariAbstract:This special issue of Modern Asian Studies explores the shift from colonial rule to independence in India and Pakistan, with the aim of unravelling the explicit meanings and relevance of ‘independence’ for the new Citizens of India and Pakistan during the two decades after 1947. While the study of postcolonial South Asia has blossomed in recent years, this volume addresses a number of imbalances in this dynamic and highly popular field. Firstly, the histories of India and Pakistan after 1947 have come to be conceived separately, with many scholars assuming that the two states developed along divergent paths after independence. Thus, the dominant historical paradigm has been to examine either India or Pakistan in relative isolation from one another. While a handful of very recent books on the partition of the subcontinent have begun to study the two states simultaneously, very few of these new histories reach beyond the immediate concerns of partition. Of course, both countries developed out of much the same set of historical experiences. Viewing the two states in the same frame not only allows the contributors to this issue to explore common themes, it also facilitates an exploration of the powerful continuities between the pre- and post-independence periods.
-
From Subjects to Citizens: Society and the Everyday State in India and Pakistan, 1947–1970
Modern Asian Studies, 2010Co-Authors: Taylor C. Sherman, William Gould, Sarah AnsariAbstract:This special issue ofModern Asian Studiesexplores the shift from colonial rule to independence in India and Pakistan, with the aim of unravelling the explicit meanings and relevance of ‘independence’ for the new Citizens of India and Pakistan during the two decades after 1947. While the study of postcolonial South Asia has blossomed in recent years, this volume addresses a number of imbalances in this dynamic and highly popular field. Firstly, the histories of India and Pakistan after 1947 have come to be conceived separately, with many scholars assuming that the two states developed along divergent paths after independence. Thus, the dominant historical paradigm has been to examine either India or Pakistan in relative isolation from one another. While a handful of very recent books on the partition of the subcontinent have begun to study the two states simultaneously, very few of these new histories reach beyond the immediate concerns of partition. Of course, both countries developed out of much the same set of historical experiences. Viewing the two states in the same frame not only allows the contributors to this issue to explore common themes, it also facilitates an exploration of the powerful continuities between the pre- and post-independence periods.
William Gould - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
from subjects to Citizens Society and the everyday state in india and pakistan 1947 1970
Modern Asian Studies, 2011Co-Authors: Taylor C. Sherman, William Gould, Sarah AnsariAbstract:This special issue of Modern Asian Studies explores the shift from colonial rule to independence in India and Pakistan, with the aim of unravelling the explicit meanings and relevance of ‘independence’ for the new Citizens of India and Pakistan during the two decades after 1947. While the study of postcolonial South Asia has blossomed in recent years, this volume addresses a number of imbalances in this dynamic and highly popular field. Firstly, the histories of India and Pakistan after 1947 have come to be conceived separately, with many scholars assuming that the two states developed along divergent paths after independence. Thus, the dominant historical paradigm has been to examine either India or Pakistan in relative isolation from one another. While a handful of very recent books on the partition of the subcontinent have begun to study the two states simultaneously, very few of these new histories reach beyond the immediate concerns of partition. Of course, both countries developed out of much the same set of historical experiences. Viewing the two states in the same frame not only allows the contributors to this issue to explore common themes, it also facilitates an exploration of the powerful continuities between the pre- and post-independence periods.
-
From Subjects to Citizens: Society and the Everyday State in India and Pakistan, 1947–1970
Modern Asian Studies, 2010Co-Authors: Taylor C. Sherman, William Gould, Sarah AnsariAbstract:This special issue ofModern Asian Studiesexplores the shift from colonial rule to independence in India and Pakistan, with the aim of unravelling the explicit meanings and relevance of ‘independence’ for the new Citizens of India and Pakistan during the two decades after 1947. While the study of postcolonial South Asia has blossomed in recent years, this volume addresses a number of imbalances in this dynamic and highly popular field. Firstly, the histories of India and Pakistan after 1947 have come to be conceived separately, with many scholars assuming that the two states developed along divergent paths after independence. Thus, the dominant historical paradigm has been to examine either India or Pakistan in relative isolation from one another. While a handful of very recent books on the partition of the subcontinent have begun to study the two states simultaneously, very few of these new histories reach beyond the immediate concerns of partition. Of course, both countries developed out of much the same set of historical experiences. Viewing the two states in the same frame not only allows the contributors to this issue to explore common themes, it also facilitates an exploration of the powerful continuities between the pre- and post-independence periods.
Wang Fei-nan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
On the Baseline,Limitation and Surmounting of Political Ethicization——The Claims of Systematical Ecology in Citizens' Society
Journal of Aba Teachers College, 2007Co-Authors: Wang Fei-nanAbstract:The intrinsic value conflicts between politics and ethics decide the baseline and limitation of the realization of political ethicization.The primary demands like the survivals of individuals,community and species decide that the realization of political ethicization must assume the value consensus between the realization of individual virtues,social and environmental justices as a limitation.The value consensus requests us to establish and improve on systematical ecology for Citizens' Society.
-
Citizens Society: Logic Source of the Concept of Socialist Honor and Dishonor
Guihai Tribune, 2006Co-Authors: Wang Fei-nanAbstract:The concept of socialist honor and dishonor is the general exposition of socialist moral viewpoints and the contemporary annotation to Marxism's morals.It is the concept of moral value coming along with the development of market-economy and the improvement of socialism with Chinese charasteristics.It is not only the inevitable outcome of Chinese Citizens Society but also the objective request of the further development of Chinese Citizens Society.Either from the view of occurrence science or the fact-judgment and value-judgment,Citizens Society,to some extent,is the logic source of the concept of socialist honor and dishonor.
Izabela A. Stacewicz - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Anticipatory governance for social-ecological resilience
AMBIO, 2015Co-Authors: Emily Boyd, Björn Nykvist, Sara Borgström, Izabela A. StacewiczAbstract:Anticipation is increasingly central to urgent contemporary debates, from climate change to the global economic crisis. Anticipatory practices are coming to the forefront of political, organizational, and Citizens’ Society. Research into anticipation, however, has not kept pace with public demand for insights into anticipatory practices, their risks and uses. Where research exists, it is deeply fragmented. This paper seeks to identify how anticipation is defined and understood in the literature and to explore the role of anticipatory practice to address individual, social, and global challenges. We use a resilience lens to examine these questions. We illustrate how varying forms of anticipatory governance are enhanced by multi-scale regional networks and technologies and by the agency of individuals, drawing from an empirical case study on regional water governance of Mälaren, Sweden. Finally, we discuss how an anticipatory approach can inform adaptive institutions, decision making, strategy formation, and societal resilience.