The Experts below are selected from a list of 7149 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Gerald Lebovits - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
drafting new york Civil Litigation documents part xliv motions for attorney fees continued
New York State Bar Association Journal, 2015Co-Authors: Gerald LebovitsAbstract:This article, the 44th part of a continuing series on drafting New York Civil-Litigation documents, continues the discussion on how to move for, and oppose motions for, attorney fees.
-
drafting new york Civil Litigation documents part xl in limine trial and post trial motions
New York State Bar Association Journal, 2015Co-Authors: Gerald LebovitsAbstract:This article, the 50th in a continuing series on drafting Civil-Litigation documents for New York State courts, discusses motions in limine and begins the discussion of trial motions.
-
drafting new york Civil Litigation documents part xxxix motions to vacate a default judgment continued
New York State Bar Association Journal, 2015Co-Authors: Gerald LebovitsAbstract:This article, the 39th in a continuing series on how to draft Civil-Litigation documents in New York, continues the discussion on vacating default judgments.
-
drafting new york Civil Litigation documents part xxxviii motions to vacate default judgments
New York State Bar Association Journal, 2015Co-Authors: Gerald LebovitsAbstract:This article, the 38th in a series on Civil-Litigation motion practice and drafting, covers motions to vacate default judgments.
-
drafting new york Civil Litigation documents part xxxv contempt motions continued
New York State Bar Association Journal, 2014Co-Authors: Gerald LebovitsAbstract:This article completes the discussion of contempt motions in the author's multi-part series on drafting Civil-Litigation papers for New York State courts.
Jiang Xin-peng - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Legislative Defects and Improving Ways of Civil Litigation Taking System of China——Learning from the Japanese Civil Litigation Taking System
Journal of Anhui Radio & TV University, 2020Co-Authors: Jiang Xin-pengAbstract:Civil Litigation taking is an important Civil Litigation system which has a mature theoretical foundation,and has been used widely in judicial practice,but the Civil Procedure Law of China has not made a specific legislation of it,its application scope is too limited and the procedure rules are lacking.Japan,which has a very similar legislating origin with China,has made a detailed provision in its New Code of Civil Procedure,which forms a scientific system with high practability.China should absorb the valuable legislative experience of Japan,to build and improve our Civil Litigation taking system from two aspects—the scope of Litigation taking and the procedural rules' construction.
Louis Visscher - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
New Trends in Financing Civil Litigation in Europe - New Trends in Financing Civil Litigation in Europe
2020Co-Authors: Mark Tuil, Louis VisscherAbstract:This unique and timely book analyses the problem of financing Civil Litigation. The expert contributors discuss the legal possibilities and difficulties associated with several instruments – including cost shifting, fee arrangements, legal expense insurance and group Litigation.
-
New trends in financing Civil Litigation in Europe: A legal, empirical, and economic analysis
2010Co-Authors: Mark Tuil, Louis VisscherAbstract:Contents: 1. Introduction Mark Tuil and Louis Visscher 2. A Law and Economics Approach to Cost Shifting, Fee Arrangements and Legal Expense Insurance Louis Visscher and Tom Schepens 3. No Cure, No Pay and Contingency Fees Michael Faure, Fokke Fernhout and Niels Philipsen 4. Financing and Group Litigation Sonja Keske, Andrea Renda and Roger van den Bergh 5. Financing Civil Litigation by the European Insurance Industry Willem H. van Boom 6. Financing Civil Litigation: The Case for the Assignment and Securitization of Liability Claims Andrea Pinna 7. The Empirical Analysis of Litigation Funding Paul Fenn and Neil Rickman 8. Financing Civil Litigation: The US Perspective Deborah R. Hensler 9. New Trends in Financing Civil Litigation in Europe - Lessons to be Learned Mark Tuil and Louis Visscher Index
C.h. Van Rhee - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Civil Litigation in a Globalising World - Civil Litigation in a globalising world
2020Co-Authors: Xandra E. Kramer, C.h. Van RheeAbstract:Civil Litigation in a globalising world - an introduction.- Fundamental principles of Civil procedure: order out of chaos.- Harmonisation of Civil procedure: a historical and comparative perspective.- A Law and Economics view on harmonisation of procedural law.- Harmonisation of Civil procedure - policy perspectives.- Harmonisation of Civil procedure and the interaction with private international law.- Harmonisation of Civil procedure and the interaction with substantive private law.- Procedural harmonisation in a European context.- Harmonised Civil procedure in a world of structural divergences? Lessons learned from the CEPEJ evaluations.- United States - Harmonisation and Voluntarism: The role of elites in creating an influential national model, the Federal Rules of Civil.- Switzerland - between cosmopolitanism and parochialism in Civil Litigation.- Globalisation and Scottish Law.- A Dutch perspective on Civil Litigation and its harmonisation.- The German approach to the globalisation and harmonisation of Civil procedure. Balancing national particularities and international open-mindedness.- Convergence of Civil procedure systems in Europe. Comments from a Belgian perspective.- The French approach to the globalisation and harmonisation of Civil procedure.- Romanian Civil procedure. The reform cycles.- Closing comments: harmonisation or globalisation of Civil procedure?
-
Civil Litigation in a globalising world
2012Co-Authors: Xandra E. Kramer, C.h. Van RheeAbstract:Civil Litigation in a globalising world - an introduction.- Fundamental principles of Civil procedure: order out of chaos.- Harmonisation of Civil procedure: a historical and comparative perspective.- A Law and Economics view on harmonisation of procedural law.- Harmonisation of Civil procedure - policy perspectives.- Harmonisation of Civil procedure and the interaction with private international law.- Harmonisation of Civil procedure and the interaction with substantive private law.- Procedural harmonisation in a European context.- Harmonised Civil procedure in a world of structural divergences? Lessons learned from the CEPEJ evaluations.- United States - Harmonisation and Voluntarism: The role of elites in creating an influential national model, the Federal Rules of Civil.- Switzerland - between cosmopolitanism and parochialism in Civil Litigation.- Globalisation and Scottish Law.- A Dutch perspective on Civil Litigation and its harmonisation.- The German approach to the globalisation and harmonisation of Civil procedure. Balancing national particularities and international open-mindedness.- Convergence of Civil procedure systems in Europe. Comments from a Belgian perspective.- The French approach to the globalisation and harmonisation of Civil procedure.- Romanian Civil procedure. The reform cycles.- Closing comments: harmonisation or globalisation of Civil procedure?
Rong Xiao-hong - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Theorizing the Civil Litigation Model of China
Journal of North China Electric Power University, 2020Co-Authors: Rong Xiao-hongAbstract:The argument of the research and contest about Chinas Civil Litigation model have been improved.The reason to have formed such a result is that most of the contestants have always been contesting and making their theories on the basis of Civil Litigation structure,they did not theorize by the means of recognizing the Civil Litigation model itself.We should make it clear that the Civil Litigation model is one theory skeleton and thoughts guidance on base of the Civil Litigation essential properties and our countrys economy societys present characteristics,which penetrates through each stage of the Civil Litigation and make the Civil Litigation start,develop and change.We should deal with the correct relations between impartialities and efficiency,(between)freedom and order,(between) rights and power,construct scientifically our countrys Civil Litigation model,make parties dominate the Civil Litigation and court(namely judges) assist,the procuratorates specially supervise as necessarily,with which to lead Chinas Civil judicial systems reform to the scientific direction.
-
Theorizing about China's Civil Litigation Structure
Journal of North China Electric Power University, 2020Co-Authors: Rong Xiao-hongAbstract:There exist some demerits in the theory research of China's Civil Litigation structure,and our correct recognization is needed.The Civil Litigation socialities swelling,the Civil Litigation model research's inspiring,as well as the limitation existing among China's Civil judicial environmental actualities,make it known as it should be that China's Civil Litigation structure about the ordinary procedure of first instance,should be made up on the base of cooperation and exchange activities between the courts and the litigants,along with the two parties,and should be made impersonal,impartial and effective with the procuratorates special supervising,it is just like a composition of actinomorphic picture in the process of the Litigation.This kind of Civil Litigation structure supplies us the correct theoretical guidance to recognize correctly the basic Litigation connections,to perfect our China's Civil Litigation systematical provisions and impulse our China's Civil prosecuting cause for the more.