The Experts below are selected from a list of 6696 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Emmanuel Bigand - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
mel cepstrum ann ova the difficult dialog between mir and music cognition
International Symposium Conference on Music Information Retrieval, 2012Co-Authors: Jean Julien Aucouturier, Emmanuel BigandAbstract:Mel is a MIR researcher (the audio type) who's always been convinced that his field of research had something to contribute to the study of music cognition. His feeling, however, hasn't been much shared by the reviewers of the many psychology journals he tried submitting his views to. Their critics, rejecting his data as irrelevant, have frustrated him the more he tried to rebut, the more defensive both sides of the debate became. He was close to give up his hopes of interdisciplinary dialog when, in one final and desperate rejection letter, he sensed an unusual touch of interest in the editor's response. She, a Cognitive Psychologist named Ann, was clearly open to discussion. This was the opportunity that Mel had always hoped for: clarifying what Psychologists really think of audio MIR, correcting misconceptions that he himself made about cognition, and maybe, developing a vision of how both fields could work together. The following is the imaginary dialog that ensued. Meet Dr Mel Cepstrum, the MIR researcher, and Prof. Ann Ova, the Psychologist.
Jean Julien Aucouturier - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
mel cepstrum ann ova the difficult dialog between mir and music cognition
International Symposium Conference on Music Information Retrieval, 2012Co-Authors: Jean Julien Aucouturier, Emmanuel BigandAbstract:Mel is a MIR researcher (the audio type) who's always been convinced that his field of research had something to contribute to the study of music cognition. His feeling, however, hasn't been much shared by the reviewers of the many psychology journals he tried submitting his views to. Their critics, rejecting his data as irrelevant, have frustrated him the more he tried to rebut, the more defensive both sides of the debate became. He was close to give up his hopes of interdisciplinary dialog when, in one final and desperate rejection letter, he sensed an unusual touch of interest in the editor's response. She, a Cognitive Psychologist named Ann, was clearly open to discussion. This was the opportunity that Mel had always hoped for: clarifying what Psychologists really think of audio MIR, correcting misconceptions that he himself made about cognition, and maybe, developing a vision of how both fields could work together. The following is the imaginary dialog that ensued. Meet Dr Mel Cepstrum, the MIR researcher, and Prof. Ann Ova, the Psychologist.
William Revelle - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the association for research in personality the home for psychological generalists
P: the ARP newsletter, 2008Co-Authors: William RevelleAbstract:I am honored to be elected President of the Association for Research in Personality. These are exciting times for those of us who study personality and I believe that ARP can play an important role in the development of the field. Brian Little, the editor of P, has asked me to comment briefly on what I do and where I see ARP going. “I am a personality Psychologist, I study personality and individual differences in affect, behavior, cognition, and motivation as they are affected by biological causes and environmental events.” That is the answer I give when people ask me what I do. I do not say that I am a Cognitive-Psychologist, a social-Psychologist, a neuro-Psychologist, a behavior geneticist, a psychometrician or a methodologist, for although I do those various hyphenated parts of psychology, by saying I study personality and individual differences, I have said I do all of those things. I believe that is true for all of us in ARP. We study personality and individual differences. We study individual patterns of coherence over time and space in what people feel, think, want, need, and do. We study how people are the same and we also study why people differ. We focus on the psychology of the individual. We focus on the psychology of individuality and of individual differences. We study personality. To me, the study of personality is the last refuge for the generalist in psychology. This is why I love to attend small and intimate meetings such as ARP to learn about the breadth of the field. Personality researchers need to in-
Joseph P Gone - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
conceptual self as normatively oriented the suitability of past personal narrative for the study of cultural identity
Culture and Psychology, 1999Co-Authors: Joseph P Gone, Peggy J Miller, Julian RappaportAbstract:A distinct conceptualization of cultural identity that is theoretically motivated by the classic taxonomies of the self developed by cultural anthropologist Irving Hallowell (1955) and Cognitive Psychologist Ulric Neisser (1988) is proposed. It is argued that Neisser's Conceptual Self, situated within Hallowell's Normative Orientation, affords a unique confluence of theoretical tradition that successfully transcends the problematic dualism between individual agency and cultural determinism. This Conceptual Self as Normatively Oriented is designated a cultural identity and defined as a form of conscious, reflexive and evaluative self-understanding pertaining to that facet of the self which knowingly commits itself to the shared values and practices of a particular cultural group. It is argued that past personal narrative is a privileged site for the investigation of cultural identity and its construction. The unique suitability of narrative analysis for the study of cultural identity is illustrated with an example from a Gros Ventre elder of the Fort Belknap Indian reservation in Montana.
Philip Yenawine - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Understanding Visual Literacy: The Visual Thinking Strategies Approach
Essentials of Teaching and Integrating Visual and Media Literacy, 2015Co-Authors: Dabney Hailey, Alexa Miller, Philip YenawineAbstract:This chapter makes the case for two aspects of visual literacy that the authors believe to be generally overlooked: (1) that visual literacy occurs by way of a developmental trajectory and requires instruction as well as practice, and (2) that it involves as much thought as it does visual awareness and is an integral component of the skills and beliefs related to inquiry. This chapter roots these ideas in the theory and research of Cognitive Psychologist Abigail Housen, coauthor of Visual Thinking Sttategies (VTS) with museum educator Philip Yenawine. Housen identified aesthetic stages that mark the development of skills helping to define visual literacy. Her research is also the basis of VTS, a method of engaging learners in deep experiences looking at art and discussing meanings with peers, a process that, this chapter posits, furthers visual literacy. This chapter presents that body of research and details the resulting VTS protocol. It reviews academic studies to date, subsequent to Housen, that document the impact of VTS interventions in various settings, and suggests beneficial areas for future research. In order to probe what development in visual literacy looks and sounds like on a granular level, two case studies of student writing from existing studies are presented and analyzed. Visual literacy skills enabled by VTS are briefly connected to broader educational concerns.