The Experts below are selected from a list of 1035 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Nelson Poynter Memorial Library. - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Collection Assessment : Digital media studies, USFSP, 2010
2020Co-Authors: Nelson Poynter Memorial Library.Abstract:Contains two files describing library resources that support the Digital Media Studies courses.
-
Collection Assessment : College of Education, USFSP, 2006
2020Co-Authors: Nelson Poynter Memorial Library.Abstract:Contains as Assessment of the library's Collections in support of the College of Education, USFSP.
-
Collection Assessment : Physics Minor Proposal, USFSP, 2014
2014Co-Authors: Nelson Poynter Memorial Library., Patricia C. PettijohnAbstract:Contains an Assessment of the library's Collections and services in support of a proposed new minor in Physics.
-
Collection Assessment : College of Education, USFSP, 2011
2011Co-Authors: Nelson Poynter Memorial Library.Abstract:Contains an Assessment of library Collections in support of the USFSP College of Education.
-
Collection Assessment : GLOBAL BUSINESS MAJOR, USFSP, 2011
2011Co-Authors: Nelson Poynter Memorial Library.Abstract:Contains an Assessment of the library's resources in support of the Global Business program.
Patricia Cossard - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Research Guides: Collection Assessment: Definitions
2013Co-Authors: Patricia CossardAbstract:methods for qualitative and quantitative Assessment and evaluation of Collections across all disciplines and in all formats and make recommendations for standard Assessment reporting
-
Research Guides: Collection Assessment: Introduction
2013Co-Authors: Patricia CossardAbstract:methods for qualitative and quantitative Assessment and evaluation of Collections across all disciplines and in all formats and make recommendations for standard Assessment reporting Membership; Charge
-
Research Guides: Collection Assessment: Tools & Techniques
2013Co-Authors: Patricia CossardAbstract:methods for qualitative and quantitative Assessment and evaluation of Collections across all disciplines and in all formats and make recommendations for standard Assessment reporting
-
Research Guides: Collection Assessment: Resource Links
2013Co-Authors: Patricia CossardAbstract:methods for qualitative and quantitative Assessment and evaluation of Collections across all disciplines and in all formats and make recommendations for standard Assessment reporting
-
Research Guides: Collection Assessment: Library Contacts
2013Co-Authors: Patricia CossardAbstract:methods for qualitative and quantitative Assessment and evaluation of Collections across all disciplines and in all formats and make recommendations for standard Assessment reporting
Karen Harker - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A Voice of Their Own—Letting Library Collections Tell Their Story: The UNT Libraries Collection Map
2018Co-Authors: Karen Harker, Janette KleinAbstract:This chapter describes the development and use of a unique Collection Assessment tool, the Collection Map, to track the needs of academic disciplines and their fulfillment.
-
Collection Assessment & ARL Libraries Summary Results from ARL SPEC KIT #352
2016Co-Authors: Karen Harker, Janette KleinAbstract:This poster summarizes results from the Association of Research Libraries SPEC Kit #352: Collection Assessment.
-
Multiplying by Division: Mapping the Collection at University of North Texas Libraries
Where Do We Go From Here? Charleston Conference Proceedings 2015, 2016Co-Authors: Karen Harker, Janette Klein, Laurel CrawfordAbstract:Presentation given at the Charleston Conference on November 7, 2015 This presentation focuses on the University of North Texas Libraries' Collection Map, a Collection Assessment tool used to provide additional data and increased flexibility. The presentation centers on "an Assessment-based future" for UNT Libraries and details an improved system in which Collections are proactively assessed.
-
Charting New Territory: Mapping the UNT Libraries Collections
2016Co-Authors: Karen Harker, Janette KleinAbstract:Presentation given at the Cross Timbers Library Collaborative (CTLC) Conference on July 22, 2016. This presentation describes the components and creation of the Collection Map, a Collection Assessment tool developed by the University of North Texas.
-
No Dust In The Stacks: Creating a Customized Local Serials Collection On The Fly
New Library World, 2016Co-Authors: Derek Marshall, Laurel Crawford, Karen HarkerAbstract:The authors present analysis of journal evaluations in creating a customized serials Collection specific to veterinary medicine.,A review of research in journal evaluations and Collection Assessment was conducted with emphasis on veterinary medicine. This article provides a detailed critique of research on journal evaluations for academic libraries as well as the authors’ customized approach in creating a subject specific core journal list for a veterinary medicine library.,By utilizing the current research in evaluating library journal Collections, librarians can customize their own approach to create core journal lists specific to the academic departments they serve, allowing for a more effective serials Collection.,Collection Assessment and development differs according to user groups based on local needs. Librarians can develop Collection development plans specific to their subject areas by using national standards along with local qualitative and quantitative data.
Janette Klein - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A Voice of Their Own—Letting Library Collections Tell Their Story: The UNT Libraries Collection Map
2018Co-Authors: Karen Harker, Janette KleinAbstract:This chapter describes the development and use of a unique Collection Assessment tool, the Collection Map, to track the needs of academic disciplines and their fulfillment.
-
Collection Assessment & ARL Libraries Summary Results from ARL SPEC KIT #352
2016Co-Authors: Karen Harker, Janette KleinAbstract:This poster summarizes results from the Association of Research Libraries SPEC Kit #352: Collection Assessment.
-
Multiplying by Division: Mapping the Collection at University of North Texas Libraries
Where Do We Go From Here? Charleston Conference Proceedings 2015, 2016Co-Authors: Karen Harker, Janette Klein, Laurel CrawfordAbstract:Presentation given at the Charleston Conference on November 7, 2015 This presentation focuses on the University of North Texas Libraries' Collection Map, a Collection Assessment tool used to provide additional data and increased flexibility. The presentation centers on "an Assessment-based future" for UNT Libraries and details an improved system in which Collections are proactively assessed.
-
Charting New Territory: Mapping the UNT Libraries Collections
2016Co-Authors: Karen Harker, Janette KleinAbstract:Presentation given at the Cross Timbers Library Collaborative (CTLC) Conference on July 22, 2016. This presentation describes the components and creation of the Collection Map, a Collection Assessment tool developed by the University of North Texas.
Jennifer Dorner - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Collection Assessment for the Social Sciences at UC Berkeley
2014Co-Authors: Hilary Schiraldi, Jennifer DornerAbstract:Collection building is often described as more of an art than a science. Historically selectors relied upon basic usage statistics, the amount of money spent or volumes added, and anecdotal feedback to determine how well the Collection met the needs of their students and faculty. There is no readily available data to determine if different disciplines are equally supported, the mix of formats used by different disciplines, or even which journals are the most heavily used (since usage data doesn’t disaggregate by department). We believed that research methods from the social sciences could be used to gather meaningful (and actionable) data about our Collections. To this end we conducted a citation analysis of doctoral dissertations in political science, economics, business and history to help us understand how well our Collections are meeting our users’ needs, to identify gaps, and to make more informed decisions about how best to use our resources to support doctoral research.
-
Collection Assessment for the Social Sciences at UC Berkeley - eScholarship
2014Co-Authors: Hilary Schiraldi, Jennifer DornerAbstract:Collection building is often described as more of an art than a science. Historically selectors relied upon basic usage statistics, the amount of money spent or volumes added, and anecdotal feedback to determine how well the Collection met the needs of their students and faculty. There is no readily available data to determine if different disciplines are equally supported, the mix of formats used by different disciplines, or even which journals are the most heavily used (since usage data doesn’t disaggregate by department). We believed that research methods from the social sciences could be used to gather meaningful (and actionable) data about our Collections. To this end we conducted a citation analysis of doctoral dissertations in political science, economics, business and history to help us understand how well our Collections are meeting our users’ needs, to identify gaps, and to make more informed decisions about how best to use our resources to support doctoral research.