The Experts below are selected from a list of 51 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Hein F M Lodewijkx - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • production blocking and idea generation does blocking interfere with cognitive processes
    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2003
    Co-Authors: Bernard A. Nijstad, Wolfgang Stroebe, Hein F M Lodewijkx
    Abstract:

    Production blocking (group members must take turns expressing their ideas) is an important cause of productivity loss in brainstorming groups. However, it is not yet clear why production blocking has this detrimental effect. We hypothesized that delays between the generation and articulation of ideas, arising when group members wait for their turns, interfere with the cognitive process of generating ideas. In three experiments, production blocking was simulated for individuals working at Computer Terminals. Production blocking interfered with idea generation in two ways. First, it disrupted the organization of idea generation when delays were relatively long. Second, it reduced the flexibility of idea generation when delays were unpredictable. Implications for group information processing are discussed.

M Jimenezvillarruel - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • risk factors for asthenopia among Computer terminal operators
    Salud Publica De Mexico, 1996
    Co-Authors: Francisco Raul Sanchezroman, C Perezlucio, C Juarezruiz, Nadia Mayola Velezzamora, M Jimenezvillarruel
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: To study the incidence of asthenopia among Computer terminal operators as compared to unexposed administrative workers and to identify the risk factors associated with this condition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample of 35 Computer terminal operators and 70 unexposed administrative workers from eight computing centers at an educational institution were included in the study. The risk factors studied were: lighting, contrast, type of lighting, screen type, electrostatic field, eye to monitor distance, time and number of hours worked, age, use of corrective lenses, seniority and overtime. Asthenopia was clinically identified as the presence of at least one sign and symptom present in a given workday. RESULTS: Asthenopia was found in 68.5% of the exposed group and in 47.7% of the unexposed group (p < 0.05). Among the risk factors studied, working for more than four hours at the video display terminal was shown to have a significant association with asthenopia (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A recommendation is made to take breaks during the workday at Computer Terminals in order to avoid visual fatigue. Also, more extensive studies should be carried out in our population to establish safety criteria and to standardize work activities using Computer Terminals.

Bernard A. Nijstad - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • production blocking and idea generation does blocking interfere with cognitive processes
    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2003
    Co-Authors: Bernard A. Nijstad, Wolfgang Stroebe, Hein F M Lodewijkx
    Abstract:

    Production blocking (group members must take turns expressing their ideas) is an important cause of productivity loss in brainstorming groups. However, it is not yet clear why production blocking has this detrimental effect. We hypothesized that delays between the generation and articulation of ideas, arising when group members wait for their turns, interfere with the cognitive process of generating ideas. In three experiments, production blocking was simulated for individuals working at Computer Terminals. Production blocking interfered with idea generation in two ways. First, it disrupted the organization of idea generation when delays were relatively long. Second, it reduced the flexibility of idea generation when delays were unpredictable. Implications for group information processing are discussed.

Francisco Raul Sanchezroman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • risk factors for asthenopia among Computer terminal operators
    Salud Publica De Mexico, 1996
    Co-Authors: Francisco Raul Sanchezroman, C Perezlucio, C Juarezruiz, Nadia Mayola Velezzamora, M Jimenezvillarruel
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: To study the incidence of asthenopia among Computer terminal operators as compared to unexposed administrative workers and to identify the risk factors associated with this condition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample of 35 Computer terminal operators and 70 unexposed administrative workers from eight computing centers at an educational institution were included in the study. The risk factors studied were: lighting, contrast, type of lighting, screen type, electrostatic field, eye to monitor distance, time and number of hours worked, age, use of corrective lenses, seniority and overtime. Asthenopia was clinically identified as the presence of at least one sign and symptom present in a given workday. RESULTS: Asthenopia was found in 68.5% of the exposed group and in 47.7% of the unexposed group (p < 0.05). Among the risk factors studied, working for more than four hours at the video display terminal was shown to have a significant association with asthenopia (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A recommendation is made to take breaks during the workday at Computer Terminals in order to avoid visual fatigue. Also, more extensive studies should be carried out in our population to establish safety criteria and to standardize work activities using Computer Terminals.

Wolfgang Stroebe - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • production blocking and idea generation does blocking interfere with cognitive processes
    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2003
    Co-Authors: Bernard A. Nijstad, Wolfgang Stroebe, Hein F M Lodewijkx
    Abstract:

    Production blocking (group members must take turns expressing their ideas) is an important cause of productivity loss in brainstorming groups. However, it is not yet clear why production blocking has this detrimental effect. We hypothesized that delays between the generation and articulation of ideas, arising when group members wait for their turns, interfere with the cognitive process of generating ideas. In three experiments, production blocking was simulated for individuals working at Computer Terminals. Production blocking interfered with idea generation in two ways. First, it disrupted the organization of idea generation when delays were relatively long. Second, it reduced the flexibility of idea generation when delays were unpredictable. Implications for group information processing are discussed.