The Experts below are selected from a list of 16629 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Al Morton - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • TWAMP Burst Rate Measurement Features
    2014
    Co-Authors: Al Morton, Len Ciavattone
    Abstract:

    This memo describes two rate-measurement features for the Core Specification of TWAMP - the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol: an optional capability where the reflector host responds with a controlled burst of test-session packets (instead of a single packet), and an optional test mode that requires the responder to measure a burst of test packets and communicate the results in truncated packet(s). Both features add the ability to control packet size in the tested direction, enabling asymmetrical packet size testing. This draft defines the modes in terms of traditional UDP test packets. Use of TCP transport instead of UDP may be desirable, but is deferred to other work.

  • Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features
    2010
    Co-Authors: Al Morton, Len Ciavattone
    Abstract:

    This memo describes two closely-related features for the Core Specification of TWAMP - the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol: an optional capability where the responding host returns some of the command octets or padding octets to the sender, and an optional sender packet format that ensures equal test packet sizes are used in both directions.

  • TWAMP Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features
    2010
    Co-Authors: Al Morton, Len Ciavattone
    Abstract:

    This memo describes two closely-related features for the Core Specification of TWAMP - the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol: an optional capability where the responding host returns some of the command octets or padding octets to the sender, and an optional sender packet format that ensures equal test packet sizes are used in both directions.

  • Individual Session Control Feature for TWAMP
    2010
    Co-Authors: Al Morton, Murtaza Chiba
    Abstract:

    The IETF has completed its work on the Core Specification of TWAMP - the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol. This memo describes an OPTIONAL feature for TWAMP, that gives the controlling host the ability to start and stop one or more individual test sessions using Session Identifiers. The base capability of the TWAMP protocol requires all test sessions previously requested and accepted to start and stop at the same time.

  • Individual Session Control Feature for the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)
    2010
    Co-Authors: Al Morton, Murtaza Chiba
    Abstract:

    The IETF has completed its work on the Core Specification of TWAMP - the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol. This memo describes an OPTIONAL feature for TWAMP, that gives the controlling host the ability to start and stop one or more individual test sessions using Session Identifiers. The base capability of the TWAMP protocol requires all test sessions previously requested and accepted to start and stop at the same time.

Len Ciavattone - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • TWAMP Burst Rate Measurement Features
    2014
    Co-Authors: Al Morton, Len Ciavattone
    Abstract:

    This memo describes two rate-measurement features for the Core Specification of TWAMP - the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol: an optional capability where the reflector host responds with a controlled burst of test-session packets (instead of a single packet), and an optional test mode that requires the responder to measure a burst of test packets and communicate the results in truncated packet(s). Both features add the ability to control packet size in the tested direction, enabling asymmetrical packet size testing. This draft defines the modes in terms of traditional UDP test packets. Use of TCP transport instead of UDP may be desirable, but is deferred to other work.

  • Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features
    2010
    Co-Authors: Al Morton, Len Ciavattone
    Abstract:

    This memo describes two closely-related features for the Core Specification of TWAMP - the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol: an optional capability where the responding host returns some of the command octets or padding octets to the sender, and an optional sender packet format that ensures equal test packet sizes are used in both directions.

  • TWAMP Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features
    2010
    Co-Authors: Al Morton, Len Ciavattone
    Abstract:

    This memo describes two closely-related features for the Core Specification of TWAMP - the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol: an optional capability where the responding host returns some of the command octets or padding octets to the sender, and an optional sender packet format that ensures equal test packet sizes are used in both directions.

  • Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
    2010
    Co-Authors: Al Morton, Len Ciavattone
    Abstract:

    This memo describes two closely related features for the Core Specification of the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP): an optional capability where the responding host returns some of the command octets or padding octets to the sender, and an optional sender packet format that ensures equal test packet sizes are used in both directions.

Murtaza Chiba - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

G. Yashodha - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Bluetooth Enhanced Data Rate (EDR): The Wireless Evolution
    Wireless Communication, 2009
    Co-Authors: G. Yashodha
    Abstract:

    Bluetooth wireless technology is a short-range communication system intended to provide connectivity of voice and data between information appliances. Initially designed to operate with a peak data rate of 1 Mb/s, the Bluetooth Core Specification has evolved to support 2 Mb/s and 3 Mb/s peak data rates with the introduction of the enhanced data rate (EDR) feature. The Bluetooth Special Interest Group (SIG), chartered to advance and promote Bluetooth wireless technology, has defined a test Specification for conformance testing of the RF layer including the EDR mode. This article is intended for the Bluetooth EDR operation and test. Included is a brief discussion of the market needs that drove the evolution of the Core Specification from v1.0 to v1.2 and continuing on to v2.0+EDR. An in-depth examination of the Bluetooth EDR standard will be provided which includes new test cases for provisional testing of transmitter and receiver designs.

Michael Hucka - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) Level 3 Package: Distributions, Version 1, Release 1.
    Journal of integrative bioinformatics, 2020
    Co-Authors: Lucian P. Smith, Stuart L. Moodie, Frank Bergmann, Colin S. Gillespie, Sarah M. Keating, Matthias König, Chris J. Myers, Maciek J. Swat, Darren J. Wilkinson, Michael Hucka
    Abstract:

    Biological models often contain elements that have inexact numerical values, since they are based on values that are stochastic in nature or data that contains uncertainty. The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) Level 3 Core Specification does not include an explicit mechanism to include inexact or stochastic values in a model, but it does provide a mechanism for SBML packages to extend the Core Specification and add additional syntactic constructs. The SBML Distributions package for SBML Level 3 adds the necessary features to allow models to encode information about the distribution and uncertainty of values underlying a quantity.

  • SBML Level 3 package: Groups, Version 1 Release 1.
    Journal of integrative bioinformatics, 2016
    Co-Authors: Michael Hucka, Lucian P. Smith
    Abstract:

    Biological models often contain components that have relationships with each other, or that modelers want to treat as belonging to groups with common characteristics or shared metadata. The SBML Level 3 Version 1 Core Specification does not provide an explicit mechanism for expressing such relationships, but it does provide a mechanism for SBML packages to extend the Core Specification and add additional syntactical constructs. The SBML Groups package for SBML Level 3 adds the necessary features to SBML to allow grouping of model components to be expressed. Such groups do not affect the mathematical interpretation of a model, but they do provide a way to add information that can be useful for modelers and software tools. The SBML Groups package enables a modeler to include definitions of groups and nested groups, each of which may be annotated to convey why that group was created, and what it represents.

  • SBML Level 3 package: Hierarchical Model Composition, Version 1 Release 3.
    Journal of integrative bioinformatics, 2015
    Co-Authors: Lucian P. Smith, Chris J. Myers, Michael Hucka, Stefan Hoops, Andrew Finney, Martin Ginkel, Ion I. Moraru, Wolfram Liebermeister
    Abstract:

    Constructing a model in a hierarchical fashion is a natural approach to managing model complexity, and offers additional opportunities such as the potential to re-use model components. The SBML Level 3 Version 1 Core Specification does not directly provide a mechanism for defining hierarchical models, but it does provide a mechanism for SBML packages to extend the Core Specification and add additional syntactical constructs. The SBML Hierarchical Model Composition package for SBML Level 3 adds the necessary features to SBML to support hierarchical modeling. The package enables a modeler to include submodels within an enclosing SBML model, delete unneeded or redundant elements of that submodel, replace elements of that submodel with element of the containing model, and replace elements of the containing model with elements of the submodel. In addition, the package defines an optional "port" construct, allowing a model to be defined with suggested interfaces between hierarchical components; modelers can chose to use these interfaces, but they are not required to do so and can still interact directly with model elements if they so chose. Finally, the SBML Hierarchical Model Composition package is defined in such a way that a hierarchical model can be "flattened" to an equivalent, non-hierarchical version that uses only plain SBML constructs, thus enabling software tools that do not yet support hierarchy to nevertheless work with SBML hierarchical models.

  • SBML Level 3 Package Proposal: Annotation
    Nature Precedings, 2011
    Co-Authors: Michael Hucka, Wolfram Liebermeister, Camille Laibe, Nick Juty, Sarah Keating, Catherine Lloyd, Christian Knuepfer, Goksel Misirli, Marvin Schulz, Dagmar Waltemath
    Abstract:

    The annotation of Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) models with semantic terms has been supported for a number of years. The prevalence of such annotated models is growing, with repositories such as Biomodels.net and an increasing number of software tools supporting and encouraging their use and development.With the increasing use of semantic annotations in the context of systems biology modeling has come the realization that the current Core SBML Specification defining their use contains limitations that reduce the scope of metadata that can be captured in such models.SBML Level 3 provides the facility to propose and develop optional extensions to the Core Specification. One such extension is described here, with an initial proposal of an Annotation package.This proposal extends the current Core annotation Specification to provide support for a richer set of semantic annotations while adhering more closely to the existing Specification of Resource Description Framework (RDF).