Cultural Policy

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 223755 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Geir Vestheim - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Cultural Policy and democracy
    2016
    Co-Authors: Geir Vestheim
    Abstract:

    1. Cultural Policy and democracy: an introduction Geir Vestheim 2. Democratic Cultural Policy: democratic forms and Policy consequences Clive Gray 3. Autonomy or democratic Cultural Policy: that is the question Roger Blomgren 4. Cultural Policy-making: negotiations in an overlapping zone between culture, politics and money Geir Vestheim 5. UNESCO and Cultural diversity: democratisation, commodification or governmentalisation of culture? Miikka Pyykkonen 6. Post-Soviet transformation of Lithuanian state Cultural Policy: the meanings of democratisation Egle Rindzeviciute 7. Democratising the popular: the case of pop music in France and Britain David L. Looseley 8. Cultural democratisation in the struggle between public intellectuals and the state: the debate on the 'Theatre of the People' in France (1895-1905) Vincent Dubois

  • Cultural Policy and democracy: an introduction
    International Journal of Cultural Policy, 2012
    Co-Authors: Geir Vestheim
    Abstract:

    Departing from reflections on the terrorist attack in Oslo 22 July 2011 as an attack on democracy as a political system, the author discusses the premise for the special issue on ‘Cultural Policy and Democracy' of the International Journal of Cultural Policy. Then follows a short presentation of the transition from autocracy to liberal democracy and different models of Cultural Policy within the frames of liberal democracies. Four principal democratic dimensions of Cultural Policy are defined and discussed, and the article ends with a short editorial comment to all other articles published in this issue.

  • Norwegian Cultural Policy : a civilising mission: An interesting English dissertation about Norwegian Cultural Policy
    2010
    Co-Authors: Geir Vestheim
    Abstract:

    Recension av Norwegian Cultural Policy, A Civilising Mission? PhD thesis. Centre for Cultural Policy Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, av Egil Bjornsen

  • Nordic Cultural Policy
    International Journal of Cultural Policy, 2008
    Co-Authors: Per Mangset, Anita Kangas, Dorte Skot-hansen, Geir Vestheim
    Abstract:

    The rationale for publishing a special Nordic issue of the IJCP might be to throw into relief a specific Nordic model of Cultural Policy that deserves international academic interest. It might also...

Linnéa Lindsköld - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Diversity in Swedish Cultural Policy 1975-2016
    2017
    Co-Authors: Linnéa Lindsköld
    Abstract:

    The aim of this paper is to trace the conceptual history of diversity in Swedish Cultural Policy. Earlier research on diversity in Swedish Cultural Policy has mainly been devoted to the period 1995 ...

  • Contradicting Cultural Policy : A comparative study of the Cultural Policy of the Scandinavian radical right
    2015
    Co-Authors: Linnéa Lindsköld
    Abstract:

    Culture is a central concept for the Scandinavian radical right parties, but little research has been done on the Cultural Policy of these parties. This article is a comparative overview of the party programs of three Scandinavian radical right parties published during the latest decade. It relates the Cultural policies of the radical right to the predominantly welfare-based corporatist Cultural Policy of the Scandinavian countries. Through a discursive Policy analysis two problem representations have been identified: The view of multiCulturalism as a threat to national culture and the view that public funding is a threat to freedom. The parties share a common understanding of Cultural Policy, with minor differences. There is an underlying conflict in the discourse: While the parties argue that the political governance of art needs to be limited, they are, at the same time, deeply involved in how Cultural expressions and Cultural life should be defined. By shedding light on the radical right Cultural Policy agenda it may be possible to politicize the Cultural Policy discourse overall and acknowledge the ideological dimension of Cultural Policy.

  • Contradicting Cultural Policy : A comparative study of the Cultural Policy of the Nordic radical right.
    2014
    Co-Authors: Linnéa Lindsköld
    Abstract:

    Culture is a central concept for the Nordic radical right parties, but little research has been done on the Cultural Policy of the parties. This article is a comparative overview of the party progr ...

Roger Blomgren - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Social engineering and Cultural Policy – theoretical and empirical reflexions from Swedish Cultural Policy in a historical perspective
    International Journal of Cultural Policy, 2017
    Co-Authors: Roger Blomgren
    Abstract:

    AbstractThis article explores the influence of social engineering in various forms within Swedish Cultural Policy, seen in a historical perspective. In social engineering Cultural Policy measures, reforms and projects are justified by scientifically based research rather than party based ideological arguments. Karl Popper’s classification of the utopian and the step-by-step engineering make up the starting point, redefined as paternalistic engineering, welfare state engineering and utilitarian engineering in order to apply these ideas to Cultural Policy. Social engineering was predominant in Swedish Cultural Policy mainly during the post war period. In the 1950s as well as in the 1970s this engineering takes on a paternalistic character, in the struggle against injurious culture, such as video violence. Current practice of paternalistic engineering is directed at revealing and identifying invisibles structures in the field of Cultural heritage. The welfare state engineering had its highlights in the plann...

  • Regional Cultural Policy in Sweden: Empirical Results, Theoretical Understandings and Consequences for Cultural Policy Research
    2014
    Co-Authors: Roger Blomgren, Jenny Johannisson
    Abstract:

    With this paper, we aim to instigate a discussion on the relevance of existing models and classifications in Cultural Policy research when wanting to explore regional Cultural Policy in Sweden. We assess the models and classifications that we deem to be most influential in English-speaking Cultural Policy research and find that although they have many benefits, they are not fully adequate when wanting to understand place-specific aspects and variation in regional Cultural Policy. We then move on to presenting findings from our own studies on Swedish regional Cultural Policy that make this critique relevant. We conclude with identifying the need not only for middle-range theories that are more apt when exploring local variation, but also for more empirical studies that from a comparative perspective can contribute to in-depth knowledge of the internal power structures of the Cultural Policy field.

  • Autonomy or democratic Cultural Policy: that is the question.
    International Journal of Cultural Policy, 2012
    Co-Authors: Roger Blomgren
    Abstract:

    This article argues that the concept of democracy, i.e. a political system that reflects the will of the people either directly or through representatives, is never or very seldom emphasised as an essential value in Cultural Policy debates or in Cultural Policy research. Instead the concept of autonomy is often put forward as the principal value when Cultural policies are debated. Autonomy is central to many democratic theories and in Cultural matters it is often described as the arm’s length principle. In this article, I will lean on institutional theories to discuss and explain why democracy in the classical sense never has been put forward as an important value and why autonomy usually is. I will also undertake a critical examination of the autonomy concept, as it has been defined in Cultural Policy.

Carl Grodach - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • urban Cultural Policy and creative city making
    Cities, 2017
    Co-Authors: Carl Grodach
    Abstract:

    Provides an historical understanding of creative city Policy formation Explains how creative city concepts descend from earlier urban Cultural Policy models Identifies and examines two emerging creative city Policy movements around the concept of “making” Identifies challenges for creative city making Policy.

  • The Politics of Urban Cultural Policy: Global Perspectives
    2012
    Co-Authors: Carl Grodach, Daniel Silver
    Abstract:

    Introduction: Urbanizing Cultural Policy Carl Grodach and Daniel Silver Part 1: Urban Cultural Policy as an Object of Governance 1. A Different Class: Politics and Culture in London Kate Oakley 2. Chicago from the Political Machine to the Entertainment Machine Terry Nichols Clark and Daniel Silver 3. Brecht in Bogota: How Cultural Policy Transformed a Clientelist Political Culture Eleonora Pasotti 4. Notes of Discord: Urban Cultural Policy in the Confrontational City Arie Romein and Jan Jacob Trip 5. Cultural Policy and the State of Urban Development in the Capital of South Korea Jon Youl Lee and Chad Anderson Part 2: Rewriting the Creative City Script 6. Creativity and Urban Regeneration: The Role of La Tohu and the Cirque du Soleil in the Saint-Michel neighborhood in Montreal Deborah Leslie and Norma Rantisi 7. City Image and the Politics of Music Policy in the "Live Music Capital of the World" Carl Grodach 8. "To Have and To Need": Reorganizing Cultural Policy as Panacea for Berlin's Urban and Economic Woes Doreen Jakob 9. Urban Cultural Policy, City Size, and Proximity Chris Gibson and Gordon Waitt Part 3: The Implications of Urban Cultural Policy Agendas for Creative Production 10. The New Cultural Economy and its Discontents: Governance Innovation and Policy Disjuncture in Vancouver Tom Hutton and Catherine Murray 11. Creating Urban Spaces for Culture, Heritage, and the Arts in Singapore: Balancing Policy-led Development and Organic Growth Lily Kong 12. Maastricht - From Treaty Town to European Capital of Culture Graeme Evans 13. Rethinking Arts Policy and Creative Production: the case of Los Angeles Elizabeth Currid-Halkett and Vivian Ho Part 4: Coalition Networks, Alliances, and Identity Framing 14. When Worlds Collide: The Politics of Cultural Economy Policy in New York Michael Indergaard 15. What's in the Fridge? Counter-mobilization in Post-industrial Urban "Cultural" Development Stephen Sawyer 16. Urban Cultural Policy in Spain: Governing the Entertainment Machine Clemente Navarro 17. Planned and Spontaneous Arts Development: Notes from Portland Samuel Shaw 18. Local Politics in the Creative City: The Case of Toronto Daniel Silver

Eleonora Redaelli - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Thinking Spatially in Cultural Policy
    Sociology of the Arts, 2019
    Co-Authors: Eleonora Redaelli
    Abstract:

    This book is an investigation of the arts in American cities and analyzes how Cultural Policy studies scholars and Policymakers have been thinking about this connection. In particular, I look at the urban Cultural Policy discourse through the lens of space, unpacking how academia and cities’ administrations have accounted for and acted upon the geographic configuration of the arts and their spatial relations. This chapter provides an overview of the debate within which this examination takes place starting with an illustration of Cultural Policy research and urban Policy studies focused on the creative city. After the contextualization of the discussion, this chapter structures the theoretical framework of the book that aims to contribute to the debate using the lens of thirdspace to help think spatially about urban Cultural Policy. The chapter concludes with an overview of the book that describes the intended audience, the overall organization I begin my exploration of the connection between arts and place with the concept of Cultural planning structure of each chapter.

  • Cultural Policy as Conventional Public Policy
    Arts Management and Cultural Policy Research, 2015
    Co-Authors: Jonathan Paquette, Eleonora Redaelli
    Abstract:

    There are many different research traditions that claim ownership of Cultural Policy as an object of study. The most conventional approach to Cultural Policy research used by these traditions consists of approaching Cultural Policy through the lenses of political scientists or public Policy researchers — meaning that Cultural Policy is given no specific status and is seen as a “Policy area or subfield” among others (environmental Policy foreign Policy immigration Policy, transport Policy fiscal Policy social Policy etc.). This approach builds on concepts, theories, and methods that rarely differ from those used to study other Policy areas — from environmental Policy to social Policy, regardless of how unique or different these Policy fields might be, the outlook and methods used to analyze them are often similar. This lens on Cultural Policy has been considerably influential in the development of the field and has contributed to a better understanding of national, regional, and local Cultural policies. Additionally, the tools developed by this approach for comparative analysis and program evaluation have led to a rich practice of collaboration and knowledge dissemination between academia, governments, think tanks, and the broader arts community. Of course, this conception of Cultural Policy falls short at times, and many Cultural Policy researchers who are interested in some of the more specific dynamics of culture may consider this conventional approach to be oblivious to a number of important debates in Cultural Policy research.

  • Cultural Policy Research: Ideas, Institutions, and Interests
    Arts Management and Cultural Policy Research, 2015
    Co-Authors: Jonathan Paquette, Eleonora Redaelli
    Abstract:

    In our attempts to situate and define Cultural Policy research in the previous chapter, we sided with political science and Policy studies to formulate what is often seen as a basic definition and understanding of Cultural policies. Cultural Policy is seen and defined as the outcome of a state-driven process. Needless to say this is only one of many ways of approach Cultural Policy. As there are no agreed upon definitions of what culture is in the humanities and social sciences, there is no unanimous definition of what Cultural Policy is. This is, however, common currency in any discussion about the nature of Cultural Policy research, and by stating this we are only reiterating what is in evidence for most of us. In this chapter, we illustrate how Cultural Policy research is subjected to a multidisciplinary account.