The Experts below are selected from a list of 1293 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Ed Tittel - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
scene of the Cybercrime computer forensics handbook
2002Co-Authors: Debra Littlejohn Shinder, Ed TittelAbstract:Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: The Rise of Cybercrime Chapter 3: Understanding the Cybercriminal Mindset Chapter 4: Understanding Computer and Networking Basics Chapter 5: Understanding Network Intrusions and Attacks Chapter 6: Understanding Cybercrime Prevention Chapter 7: Understanding Windows Security Features Chapter 8: Understanding Cybercrime Detection Chapter 9: Collecting and Preserving Digital Evidence Chapter 10: Building the Cybercrime Case Chapter 11: Conclusion
Michael Cross - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Building the Cybercrime Case
Scene of the Cybercrime, 2008Co-Authors: Littlejohn Shinder, Michael CrossAbstract:Building a Cybercrime Case is a complicated process, so it is true for some other types of criminal Cases. This is because special factors that present obstacles to prosecution must be considered and dealt with if the investigator is to successfully put together a winning Case. Understanding the complex system of laws which govern lives and how they interact with one another is essential to building a criminal Case. Investigators and those who work with them should be aware of the function of various bodies of law, understand the differences between different types of law, be aware of the existence of different levels of law, and learn the legal terminology necessary to communicate intelligently within the system. Jurisdictional issues are one of the biggest challenges to the Cybercrime investigator and to prosecutors who attempt to bring cybercriminals to justice. Law enforcement officers and IT personnel must work together as a team to prosecute Cybercrimes effectively, because each plays an essential role in building the Case. IT professionals understand the hacker mindset, know where to look for digital evidence, and understand what can and cannot be done with the technology. Law enforcement personnel know the law and investigative procedures that must be followed to preserve the integrity of evidence. Together, the two can fight Cybercrime effectively, but they must overcome the natural distrust and adversarial relationship that often hamper the cooperative process.
Debra Littlejohn Shinder - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
scene of the Cybercrime computer forensics handbook
2002Co-Authors: Debra Littlejohn Shinder, Ed TittelAbstract:Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: The Rise of Cybercrime Chapter 3: Understanding the Cybercriminal Mindset Chapter 4: Understanding Computer and Networking Basics Chapter 5: Understanding Network Intrusions and Attacks Chapter 6: Understanding Cybercrime Prevention Chapter 7: Understanding Windows Security Features Chapter 8: Understanding Cybercrime Detection Chapter 9: Collecting and Preserving Digital Evidence Chapter 10: Building the Cybercrime Case Chapter 11: Conclusion
Littlejohn Shinder - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Building the Cybercrime Case
Scene of the Cybercrime, 2008Co-Authors: Littlejohn Shinder, Michael CrossAbstract:Building a Cybercrime Case is a complicated process, so it is true for some other types of criminal Cases. This is because special factors that present obstacles to prosecution must be considered and dealt with if the investigator is to successfully put together a winning Case. Understanding the complex system of laws which govern lives and how they interact with one another is essential to building a criminal Case. Investigators and those who work with them should be aware of the function of various bodies of law, understand the differences between different types of law, be aware of the existence of different levels of law, and learn the legal terminology necessary to communicate intelligently within the system. Jurisdictional issues are one of the biggest challenges to the Cybercrime investigator and to prosecutors who attempt to bring cybercriminals to justice. Law enforcement officers and IT personnel must work together as a team to prosecute Cybercrimes effectively, because each plays an essential role in building the Case. IT professionals understand the hacker mindset, know where to look for digital evidence, and understand what can and cannot be done with the technology. Law enforcement personnel know the law and investigative procedures that must be followed to preserve the integrity of evidence. Together, the two can fight Cybercrime effectively, but they must overcome the natural distrust and adversarial relationship that often hamper the cooperative process.
Kristjan Kikerpill - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
work prey love a critical analysis of estonian Cybercrime Case law 2014 2019
Social Science Research Network, 2019Co-Authors: Kristjan KikerpillAbstract:The current study takes a closer look at the people behind the ‘Cybercrime’ moniker in Estonia. Following a socio-legal research approach, qualitative content analysis and systematic legal interpretation were used to analyse N=42 Estonian court judgements and decisions delivered between 01.01.2014 and 10.08.2019. The results show relative uniformity in crimes involving multiple perpetrators, where the primary distinguishing factor was the level of technical sophistication of the crimes. Crimes committed by individual perpetrators exhibited more variation, ranging from low-tech account takeovers perpetrated by broken-hearted ex-partners to active use of malware and signals jamming. The systematic legal analysis showed that the current system of Cybercrime provisions in the Estonian Penal Code is unnecessarily scattered, because the substantive differences between the provisions are insignificant and do not adequately reflect the inherent characteristics of Cybercrime. The article thus calls into question whether the legislator has taken the easy road by mechanically adopting international instruments (Council of Europe’s Convention on Cybercrime and Directive 2013/40/EU) into domestic criminal law.
