The Experts below are selected from a list of 303 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Vicki C Petropoulos - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • dentist communication with the Dental Laboratory for prosthodontic treatment using implants
    Journal of Prosthodontics, 2006
    Co-Authors: Zahra Afsharzand, Behnoush Rashedi, Vicki C Petropoulos
    Abstract:

    Purpose: A questionnaire was sent to U.S. Dental laboratories to evaluate the level of communication between dentists and Laboratory technicians and to determine trends in procedures and materials used in fixed and removable implant restorations. Methods and Materials: Dental laboratories were randomly chosen from the National Association of Dental Laboratories for each of the 50 states. The questionnaire was mailed to the Laboratory directors for 199 Dental laboratories. One hundred fourteen Dental laboratories returned the survey, yielding a response rate of 57%. Of those laboratories, 37 indicated that they did not participate in the fabrication of fixed implant restorations, yielding a response rate of 39%. Forty-two Dental laboratories indicated that they did not participate in the fabrication of implant-retained overdenture prostheses, yielding a response rate of 36%. Results: Results from this survey show inadequate communication by dentists in completing work authorization forms. Custom trays are used more frequently for implant-retained overdenture impressions and stock trays for impressions of fixed implant prostheses. Poly(vinyl siloxane) is the material most commonly used for both fixed and removable implant-supported prostheses. Two implants with stud attachments are used more widely than those with bar attachments for implant-retained overdentures. Conclusions: Most laboratories working on implant prosthodontic cases report inadequate communication between the Laboratory and dentists related to materials and techniques used in fabrication of implant restorations.

Zahra Afsharzand - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • dentist communication with the Dental Laboratory for prosthodontic treatment using implants
    Journal of Prosthodontics, 2006
    Co-Authors: Zahra Afsharzand, Behnoush Rashedi, Vicki C Petropoulos
    Abstract:

    Purpose: A questionnaire was sent to U.S. Dental laboratories to evaluate the level of communication between dentists and Laboratory technicians and to determine trends in procedures and materials used in fixed and removable implant restorations. Methods and Materials: Dental laboratories were randomly chosen from the National Association of Dental Laboratories for each of the 50 states. The questionnaire was mailed to the Laboratory directors for 199 Dental laboratories. One hundred fourteen Dental laboratories returned the survey, yielding a response rate of 57%. Of those laboratories, 37 indicated that they did not participate in the fabrication of fixed implant restorations, yielding a response rate of 39%. Forty-two Dental laboratories indicated that they did not participate in the fabrication of implant-retained overdenture prostheses, yielding a response rate of 36%. Results: Results from this survey show inadequate communication by dentists in completing work authorization forms. Custom trays are used more frequently for implant-retained overdenture impressions and stock trays for impressions of fixed implant prostheses. Poly(vinyl siloxane) is the material most commonly used for both fixed and removable implant-supported prostheses. Two implants with stud attachments are used more widely than those with bar attachments for implant-retained overdentures. Conclusions: Most laboratories working on implant prosthodontic cases report inadequate communication between the Laboratory and dentists related to materials and techniques used in fabrication of implant restorations.

Behnoush Rashedi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • dentist communication with the Dental Laboratory for prosthodontic treatment using implants
    Journal of Prosthodontics, 2006
    Co-Authors: Zahra Afsharzand, Behnoush Rashedi, Vicki C Petropoulos
    Abstract:

    Purpose: A questionnaire was sent to U.S. Dental laboratories to evaluate the level of communication between dentists and Laboratory technicians and to determine trends in procedures and materials used in fixed and removable implant restorations. Methods and Materials: Dental laboratories were randomly chosen from the National Association of Dental Laboratories for each of the 50 states. The questionnaire was mailed to the Laboratory directors for 199 Dental laboratories. One hundred fourteen Dental laboratories returned the survey, yielding a response rate of 57%. Of those laboratories, 37 indicated that they did not participate in the fabrication of fixed implant restorations, yielding a response rate of 39%. Forty-two Dental laboratories indicated that they did not participate in the fabrication of implant-retained overdenture prostheses, yielding a response rate of 36%. Results: Results from this survey show inadequate communication by dentists in completing work authorization forms. Custom trays are used more frequently for implant-retained overdenture impressions and stock trays for impressions of fixed implant prostheses. Poly(vinyl siloxane) is the material most commonly used for both fixed and removable implant-supported prostheses. Two implants with stud attachments are used more widely than those with bar attachments for implant-retained overdentures. Conclusions: Most laboratories working on implant prosthodontic cases report inadequate communication between the Laboratory and dentists related to materials and techniques used in fabrication of implant restorations.

Steven Glassman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Digital impressions for the fabrication of aesthetic ceramic restorations: a case report.
    Practical procedures & aesthetic dentistry : PPAD, 2009
    Co-Authors: Steven Glassman
    Abstract:

    I mpressions for fixed prostheses, despite advances in the materials themselves, contain many variables and have consistently represented a challenge for both the restorative dentist and the Dental Laboratory. Many impressions are problematic (eg, unclear margin reproduction, distortion from improper handling prior to pouring, incomplete registration of finish lines, oral fluid contamination, tray movement during transfer) to some extent, and proper handling is fundamental to restorative success.

Julie Humphrey - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.