The Experts below are selected from a list of 253176 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Bret Stancil - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
global law schools on u s models emerging models of consensus based internationalization or Markets based americanization models of global legal education
Revista de educación y derecho = Education and law review, 2011Co-Authors: Larry Cata Backer, Bret StancilAbstract:This article examines two substantially irreconcilable approaches to internationalization that are emerging in the United States. The first focuses on globalizing the law school curriculum through internationalization. This approach is congruent with emerging trends in legal education internationalization in Europe. The second approaches internationalization as a Market driven competition for influence among dominant domestic legal orders, that is, as nationalist globalization. Internationalization is understood as the extension of the influence of national law outside the national territory and is nicely illustrated by recent efforts to globalize the law school curriculum by internationalizing the conventional U.S. law school curriculum. The principle thesis is this: The global legal education community, led by the Europeans, has been constructing a vision of globalization of legal education that has as its basis the idea of harmonization and convergence of different systems and the development of a new institutional model grounded in harmonized global trends in law. The United States appears to be taking two approaches to this development. After an Introduction, Part II examines the internationalization efforts of U.S. law schools following one of five models: (1) integration; (2) segregation; (3) aggregation; (4) immersion; and (5) multi-disciplinary department models. This project seeks a newer framework for the construction of shared legal structures grounded in joint effort that is not dominated by the approaches off any one state. Part III then examines the ways in which American institutions are also working against this general trend by positing a form of nationalist globalization that has as its foundation the idea that national legal education can go global without globalizing the law taught. Nationalist globalization takes three forms: a focus on the training of lawyers for domestic service whose pedagogical methodologies can be exported, the extraterritorial extension of the U.S. law school system, and the management of post graduate degrees in law for foreign law graduates. In place of harmonization and globalization of law, the American nationalist globalization model grounded in extraterritorial competition for socialization in the laws of the domestic legal order of dominant states. The article ends with an analysis of the consequences of these competing forms of global engagement in legal education. While much of the attention on changes to the American law school environment has focused on internationalization within consensus-based and supplementary programs founded on the internationalization ideal, American law schools have also been Developing Market-based strategies that are, at their core, fundamentally inconsistent with the internationalization framework.
-
global law schools on u s models emerging models of consensus based internationalization or Markets based americanization models of global legal education
Social Science Research Network, 2011Co-Authors: Larry Cata Backer, Bret StancilAbstract:This article examines two substantially irreconcilable approaches to internationalization that are emerging in the United States. The first focuses on globalizing the law school curriculum through internationalization. This approach is congruent with emerging trends in legal education internationalization in Europe. The second approaches internationalization as a Market driven competition for influence among dominant domestic legal orders, that is, as nationalist globalization. Internationalization is understood as the extension of the influence of national law outside the national territory and is nicely illustrated by recent efforts to globalize the law school curriculum by internationalizing the conventional U.S. law school curriculum. The principle thesis is this: The global legal education community, led by the Europeans, has been constructing a vision of globalization of legal education that has as its basis the idea of harmonization and convergence of different systems and the development of a new institutional model grounded in harmonized global trends in law. The United States appears to be taking two approaches to this development. After an Introduction, Part II examines the internationalization efforts of U.S. law schools following one of five models: (1) integration; (2) segregation; (3) aggregation; (4) immersion; and (5) multi-disciplinary department models. This project seeks a newer framework for the construction of shared legal structures grounded in joint effort that is not dominated by the approaches off any one state. Part III then examines the ways in which American institutions are also working against this general trend by positing a form of nationalist globalization that has as its foundation the idea that national legal education can go global without globalizing the law taught. Nationalist globalization takes three forms: a focus on the training of lawyers for domestic service whose pedagogical methodologies can be exported, the extraterritorial extension of the U.S. law school system, and the management of post graduate degrees in law for foreign law graduates. In place of harmonization and globalization of law, the American nationalist globalization model grounded in extraterritorial competition for socialization in the laws of the domestic legal order of dominant states. The article ends with an analysis of the consequences of these competing forms of global engagement in legal education. While much of the attention on changes to the American law school environment has focused on internationalization within consensus-based and supplementary programs founded on the internationalization ideal, American law schools have also been Developing Market-based strategies that are, at their core, fundamentally inconsistent with the internationalization framework.RESUMEN BREVE: En este articulo se examina dos enfoques sustancialmente incompatibles de la internacionalizacion que estan surgiendo en los Estados Unidos. La primera se centra en la globalizacion del curriculo escolar a traves de la ley de internacionalizacion. Este enfoque es congruente con las nuevas tendencias en la internacionalizacion de la educacion legal en Europa. La internacionalizacion de los enfoques en segundo lugar como la competencia por el mercado por la influencia entre dominante ordenamientos juridicos nacionales, es decir, la globalizacion nacionalista. La internacionalizacion es entendida como la extension de la influencia de la legislacion nacional fuera del territorio nacional y esta muy bien ilustrado por los recientes esfuerzos para globalizar el curriculum escolar la ley por la internacionalizacion del derecho convencional EE.UU. curriculo escolar. La tesis de principio es el siguiente: La comunidad global de educacion legal, liderado por los europeos, ha sido la construccion de una vision de la globalizacion de la educacion juridica, que tiene como base la idea de la armonizacion y convergencia de los diferentes sistemas y el desarrollo de un nuevo modelo institucional basado en la armonizacion de las tendencias mundiales de la ley. Los Estados Unidos parece estar tomando dos enfoques para este desarrollo. Por un lado, algunas instituciones estan participando en la internacionalizacion de la educacion. Sin embargo, las instituciones estadounidenses tambien estan trabajando en contra de esta tendencia general al plantear una forma de globalizacion que tiene como fundamento la idea de que la ensenanza del derecho nacional puede ser globalizado y el rechazo de la necesidad de crear y ensenar derecho mas alla del derecho nacional. En lugar de la armonizacion y la globalizacion del derecho, los estadounidenses de un modelo basado en la competencia extraterritorial para la socializacion de las leyes del ordenamiento juridico interno de los estados dominantes.PALABRAS CLAVE: internacionalizacion, nacionalismo, globalizacion del curriculo de derecho, enfoques pedagogicos, maestria en derecho, acreditacion de estudios de derecho al extranjero, licenciatura de abogados
Michael Yaziji - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
corporate ngo collaboration co creating new business models for Developing Markets
Long Range Planning, 2010Co-Authors: Nicolas M Dahan, Jonathan P Doh, Jennifer Oetzel, Michael YazijiAbstract:Multinational enterprises (MNEs) face a range of challenges when entering Developing countries, including the need to adapt their business models to local Markets' cultural, economic, institutional and geographic features. Where they lack the tangible resources or intangible knowledge needed to address these challenges, MNEs may consider collaborating with non-profit nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) to help facilitate new modes of value creation. In such cross-sector partnerships, parties contribute complementary capabilities along each stage of the value chain to develop products or services that neither could produce alone, creating and delivering value in novel ways while minimizing costs and risks. Our conceptualization broadens the business model concept to incorporate cross-sector collaborations, arguing such partnerships can create and deliver both social and economic value, which can be mutually reinforcing. We highlight, in particular, the competencies and resources NGOs can bring to such partnerships, including Market expertise, legitimacy with clients/customers, civil society players and governments, and access to local expertise and sourcing and distribution systems. Beyond contributing to particular value chain activities, NGOs and companies can offer missing capabilities to complete each other's business models, or even co-create new and innovative multi-organizational business models. We stress four strategic imperatives for the success of corporate-NGO Developing Market partnerships – innovative combinations of firm and NGO resources and skills; the importance of trust-building, and of fit between the two organizations' goals; and supporting and understanding the local business infrastructure and environment.
-
Corporate-NGO Collaboration: Co-creating New Business Models for Developing Markets
Long Range Planning, 2010Co-Authors: Nicolas Dahan, Jonathan P Doh, Jennifer Oetzel, Michael YazijiAbstract:Multinational enterprises (MNEs) face a range of challenges when entering Developing countries, including the need to adapt their business models to local Markets' cultural, economic, institutional and geographic features. Where they lack the tangible resources or intangible knowledge needed to address these challenges, MNEs may consider collaborating with non-profit nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) to help facilitate new modes of value creation. In such cross-sector partnerships, parties contribute complementary capabilities along each stage of the value chain to develop products or services that neither could produce alone, creating and delivering value in novel ways while minimizing costs and risks. Our conceptualization broadens the business model concept to incorporate cross-sector collaborations, arguing such partnerships can create and deliver both social and economic value, which can be mutually reinforcing. We highlight, in particular,the competencies and resources NGOs can bring to such partnerships, including Market expertise, legitimacy with clients/customers, civil society players and governments, and access to local expertise and sourcing and distribution systems. Beyond contributing to particular value chain activities, NGOs and companies can offer missing capabilities to complete each other's business models, or even co-create new and innovative multiorganizational business models. We stress four strategic imperatives for the success of corporate-NGO Developing Market partnerships e innovative combinations of firm and NGO resources and skills; the importance of trust-building, and of fit between the two organizations' goals; and supporting and understanding the local business infrastructure and environment.
Larry Cata Backer - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
global law schools on u s models emerging models of consensus based internationalization or Markets based americanization models of global legal education
Revista de educación y derecho = Education and law review, 2011Co-Authors: Larry Cata Backer, Bret StancilAbstract:This article examines two substantially irreconcilable approaches to internationalization that are emerging in the United States. The first focuses on globalizing the law school curriculum through internationalization. This approach is congruent with emerging trends in legal education internationalization in Europe. The second approaches internationalization as a Market driven competition for influence among dominant domestic legal orders, that is, as nationalist globalization. Internationalization is understood as the extension of the influence of national law outside the national territory and is nicely illustrated by recent efforts to globalize the law school curriculum by internationalizing the conventional U.S. law school curriculum. The principle thesis is this: The global legal education community, led by the Europeans, has been constructing a vision of globalization of legal education that has as its basis the idea of harmonization and convergence of different systems and the development of a new institutional model grounded in harmonized global trends in law. The United States appears to be taking two approaches to this development. After an Introduction, Part II examines the internationalization efforts of U.S. law schools following one of five models: (1) integration; (2) segregation; (3) aggregation; (4) immersion; and (5) multi-disciplinary department models. This project seeks a newer framework for the construction of shared legal structures grounded in joint effort that is not dominated by the approaches off any one state. Part III then examines the ways in which American institutions are also working against this general trend by positing a form of nationalist globalization that has as its foundation the idea that national legal education can go global without globalizing the law taught. Nationalist globalization takes three forms: a focus on the training of lawyers for domestic service whose pedagogical methodologies can be exported, the extraterritorial extension of the U.S. law school system, and the management of post graduate degrees in law for foreign law graduates. In place of harmonization and globalization of law, the American nationalist globalization model grounded in extraterritorial competition for socialization in the laws of the domestic legal order of dominant states. The article ends with an analysis of the consequences of these competing forms of global engagement in legal education. While much of the attention on changes to the American law school environment has focused on internationalization within consensus-based and supplementary programs founded on the internationalization ideal, American law schools have also been Developing Market-based strategies that are, at their core, fundamentally inconsistent with the internationalization framework.
-
global law schools on u s models emerging models of consensus based internationalization or Markets based americanization models of global legal education
Social Science Research Network, 2011Co-Authors: Larry Cata Backer, Bret StancilAbstract:This article examines two substantially irreconcilable approaches to internationalization that are emerging in the United States. The first focuses on globalizing the law school curriculum through internationalization. This approach is congruent with emerging trends in legal education internationalization in Europe. The second approaches internationalization as a Market driven competition for influence among dominant domestic legal orders, that is, as nationalist globalization. Internationalization is understood as the extension of the influence of national law outside the national territory and is nicely illustrated by recent efforts to globalize the law school curriculum by internationalizing the conventional U.S. law school curriculum. The principle thesis is this: The global legal education community, led by the Europeans, has been constructing a vision of globalization of legal education that has as its basis the idea of harmonization and convergence of different systems and the development of a new institutional model grounded in harmonized global trends in law. The United States appears to be taking two approaches to this development. After an Introduction, Part II examines the internationalization efforts of U.S. law schools following one of five models: (1) integration; (2) segregation; (3) aggregation; (4) immersion; and (5) multi-disciplinary department models. This project seeks a newer framework for the construction of shared legal structures grounded in joint effort that is not dominated by the approaches off any one state. Part III then examines the ways in which American institutions are also working against this general trend by positing a form of nationalist globalization that has as its foundation the idea that national legal education can go global without globalizing the law taught. Nationalist globalization takes three forms: a focus on the training of lawyers for domestic service whose pedagogical methodologies can be exported, the extraterritorial extension of the U.S. law school system, and the management of post graduate degrees in law for foreign law graduates. In place of harmonization and globalization of law, the American nationalist globalization model grounded in extraterritorial competition for socialization in the laws of the domestic legal order of dominant states. The article ends with an analysis of the consequences of these competing forms of global engagement in legal education. While much of the attention on changes to the American law school environment has focused on internationalization within consensus-based and supplementary programs founded on the internationalization ideal, American law schools have also been Developing Market-based strategies that are, at their core, fundamentally inconsistent with the internationalization framework.RESUMEN BREVE: En este articulo se examina dos enfoques sustancialmente incompatibles de la internacionalizacion que estan surgiendo en los Estados Unidos. La primera se centra en la globalizacion del curriculo escolar a traves de la ley de internacionalizacion. Este enfoque es congruente con las nuevas tendencias en la internacionalizacion de la educacion legal en Europa. La internacionalizacion de los enfoques en segundo lugar como la competencia por el mercado por la influencia entre dominante ordenamientos juridicos nacionales, es decir, la globalizacion nacionalista. La internacionalizacion es entendida como la extension de la influencia de la legislacion nacional fuera del territorio nacional y esta muy bien ilustrado por los recientes esfuerzos para globalizar el curriculum escolar la ley por la internacionalizacion del derecho convencional EE.UU. curriculo escolar. La tesis de principio es el siguiente: La comunidad global de educacion legal, liderado por los europeos, ha sido la construccion de una vision de la globalizacion de la educacion juridica, que tiene como base la idea de la armonizacion y convergencia de los diferentes sistemas y el desarrollo de un nuevo modelo institucional basado en la armonizacion de las tendencias mundiales de la ley. Los Estados Unidos parece estar tomando dos enfoques para este desarrollo. Por un lado, algunas instituciones estan participando en la internacionalizacion de la educacion. Sin embargo, las instituciones estadounidenses tambien estan trabajando en contra de esta tendencia general al plantear una forma de globalizacion que tiene como fundamento la idea de que la ensenanza del derecho nacional puede ser globalizado y el rechazo de la necesidad de crear y ensenar derecho mas alla del derecho nacional. En lugar de la armonizacion y la globalizacion del derecho, los estadounidenses de un modelo basado en la competencia extraterritorial para la socializacion de las leyes del ordenamiento juridico interno de los estados dominantes.PALABRAS CLAVE: internacionalizacion, nacionalismo, globalizacion del curriculo de derecho, enfoques pedagogicos, maestria en derecho, acreditacion de estudios de derecho al extranjero, licenciatura de abogados
David Melzer - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the current landscape for direct to consumer genetic testing legal ethical and policy issues
Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 2008Co-Authors: Stuart Hogarth, Gail Javitt, David MelzerAbstract:This review surveys the Developing Market for direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic tests and examines the range of companies and tests available, the regulatory landscape, the concerns raised about DTC testing, and the calls for enhanced oversight. We provide a comparative overview of the situation, particularly in the United States and Europe, by exploring the regulatory frameworks for medical devices and clinical laboratories. We also discuss a variety of other mechanisms such as general controls on advertising and consumer law mechanisms.
-
the current landscape for direct to consumer genetic testing legal ethical and policy issues
Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 2008Co-Authors: Stuart Hogarth, Gail Javitt, David MelzerAbstract:This review surveys the Developing Market for direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic tests and examines the range of companies and tests available, the regulatory landscape, the concerns raised about DTC testing, and the calls for enhanced oversight. We provide a comparative overview of the situation, particularly in the United States and Europe, by exploring the regulatory frameworks for medical devices and clinical laboratories. We also discuss a variety of other mechanisms such as general controls on advertising and consumer law mechanisms.
Glenyth Nasvadi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the safety of vehicles imported from right hand drive vehicle configuration countries when operated in a left hand drive vehicle environment
Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2009Co-Authors: Peter J Cooper, Wayne Meckle, Glenyth NasvadiAbstract:Vehicles over 15 years of age imported into Canada are exempt from complying with Canadian Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (CMVSS) applicable to their years of production. This has led to a Developing Market for older imported vehicles in British Columbia (BC). But while mechanical inspections are carried out on such vehicles before they can be registered in BC, vehicles from countries that drive on the left side of the road (such as Japan) retain their right-hand-drive (RHD) control configuration. The concern with these vehicles is two-fold: first, does the RHD configuration lead to increased risk of crash involvement; and second, are these vehicles inferior in comparison to built-for-Canada vehicles of a similar age, with respect to occupant protection potential? In this study three separate methodologies were utilized in approaching these concerns: a relative crash culpability analysis where RHD and left-hand-drive (LHD) crash rates were compared for the same group of drivers; a survival analysis where time-to-first-crash was compared between RHD and LHD drivers: and a multiple regression model where RHD vehicle driver risk was compared to that of a similarly constituted comparison group of LHD vehicle drivers. The results of all three analyses were consistent. RHD vehicles had a significantly greater risk of at-fault crash involvement over that of similar LHD vehicles. However, crashes involving RHD vehicles were no more severe than those involving LHD vehicles only.