The Experts below are selected from a list of 11553 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
P Du Toit - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
preventive or punitive Disciplinary Measures in south african schools which should be favoured
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap, 2003Co-Authors: I J Oosthuizen, C C Wolhunter, P Du ToitAbstract:Recent research shows a major paradigm shift towards preventive and positive rather than punitive Disciplinary Measures. Since the essence of learner discipline is correctional and educational rather than punitive, this approach seems to be the correct one – especially after the abolition of corporal punishment in South African schools. However, the question remains: is there still room for punitive and reactive learner discipline in our schools? And if so, which is the better approach, and where should the emphasis be? This article endeavours to evaluate the two approaches by means of a normative framework. Rather than ruling which approach is the more successful one, the authors argue that it is not the one or the other, but rather a combination of the two approaches. One of the guiding determinants for correct decision-making is vested in maintaining a safe, harmonious and orderly environment conducive to education and learning. The decision regarding the most effective form of discipline in a particular instance should therefore be determined by the context of the situation. For example, it depends on the seriousness of the misconduct, the attitude of the learners (e.g. was it as a result of intent or negligence?), the age of the learner, the influence it had on the teaching-learning environment, et cetera.
-
preventive or punitive Disciplinary Measures in south african schools which should be favoured research article
Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship = Koers : Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap, 2003Co-Authors: I J Oosthuizen, C C Wolhuter, P Du ToitAbstract:Preventive or punitive Disciplinary Measures in South African schools : which should be favoured? Recent research shows a major paradigm shift towards preventive and positive rather than punitive Disciplinary Measures. Since the essence of learner discipline is correctional and educational rather than punitive, this approach seems to be the correct one - especially after the abolition of corporal punishment in South African schools. However, the question remains: is there still room for punitive and reactive learner discipline in our schools? And if so, which is the better approach, and where should the emphasis be? This article endeavours to evaluate the two approaches by means of a normative framework. Rather than ruling which approach is the more successful one, the authors argue that it is not the one or the other, but rather a combination of the two approaches. One of the guiding determinants for correct decision-making is vested in maintaining a safe, harmonious and orderly environment conducive to education and learning. The decision regarding the most effective form of discipline in a particular instance should therefore be determined by the context of the situation. For example, it depends on the seriousness of the misconduct, the attitude of the learners (e.g. was it as a result of intent or negligence?), the age of the learner, the influence it had on the teaching-learning environment, et cetera. Voorkomende of bestraffende dissiplinere maatreels in Suid-Afrikaanse skole : watter benadering moet voorkeur geniet? Onlangse navorsing toon dat daar 'n klemverskuiwing vanaf (be)straffende dissiplinAare maatreels is na voorkomende maatreels. Aangesien die grondslag van leerderdissipline korrigerend en opvoedend eerder as bestraffend van aard behoort te wees, blyk hierdie benadering korrek te wees - veral in die lig van die afskaffing van lyfstraf in Suid- Afrikaanse skole. Die vraag ontstaan nou onwillekeurig: is daar nog ruimte vir (be)straffende maatreels in Suid-Afrikaanse skole? Indien wel, waar moet die klem val? Ten einde 'n antwoord hierop te probeer vind, word die twee benaderings in die gang van hierdie artikel teen 'n normatiewe raamwerk afgeweeg. Op grond van sodanige oorwegings bevind die outeurs dat nie net een van die twee benaderings aangewend behoort te word nie, maar eerder 'n kombinasie daarvan. Een van die basiese determinante vir besluitneming oor die korrekte benadering in 'n gegewe situasie is die grondliggende opvoedende oogmerk: die voorsiening van 'n geborgenheidsruim wat essensieel is vir opvoedende onderwys. Die ideale benadering is dus 'n kontekstuele benadering waar oorwegings soos die erns van 'n oortreding, die gesindheid van die leerder (bv. was daar sprake van opset of nalatigheid?), die ouderdom van die leerder, die invloed wat sy optrede op die leeromgewing gehad het, ensovoorts, in ag geneem word.
George G Bear - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
school discipline in the united states prevention correction and long term social development
School Psychology Review, 1998Co-Authors: George G BearAbstract:Since the onset of public education in America, the public has expected schools to develop self-discipline among children and to use Disciplinary Measures. These two expectations continue to be sup...
I J Oosthuizen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
preventive or punitive Disciplinary Measures in south african schools which should be favoured
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap, 2003Co-Authors: I J Oosthuizen, C C Wolhunter, P Du ToitAbstract:Recent research shows a major paradigm shift towards preventive and positive rather than punitive Disciplinary Measures. Since the essence of learner discipline is correctional and educational rather than punitive, this approach seems to be the correct one – especially after the abolition of corporal punishment in South African schools. However, the question remains: is there still room for punitive and reactive learner discipline in our schools? And if so, which is the better approach, and where should the emphasis be? This article endeavours to evaluate the two approaches by means of a normative framework. Rather than ruling which approach is the more successful one, the authors argue that it is not the one or the other, but rather a combination of the two approaches. One of the guiding determinants for correct decision-making is vested in maintaining a safe, harmonious and orderly environment conducive to education and learning. The decision regarding the most effective form of discipline in a particular instance should therefore be determined by the context of the situation. For example, it depends on the seriousness of the misconduct, the attitude of the learners (e.g. was it as a result of intent or negligence?), the age of the learner, the influence it had on the teaching-learning environment, et cetera.
-
preventive or punitive Disciplinary Measures in south african schools which should be favoured research article
Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship = Koers : Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap, 2003Co-Authors: I J Oosthuizen, C C Wolhuter, P Du ToitAbstract:Preventive or punitive Disciplinary Measures in South African schools : which should be favoured? Recent research shows a major paradigm shift towards preventive and positive rather than punitive Disciplinary Measures. Since the essence of learner discipline is correctional and educational rather than punitive, this approach seems to be the correct one - especially after the abolition of corporal punishment in South African schools. However, the question remains: is there still room for punitive and reactive learner discipline in our schools? And if so, which is the better approach, and where should the emphasis be? This article endeavours to evaluate the two approaches by means of a normative framework. Rather than ruling which approach is the more successful one, the authors argue that it is not the one or the other, but rather a combination of the two approaches. One of the guiding determinants for correct decision-making is vested in maintaining a safe, harmonious and orderly environment conducive to education and learning. The decision regarding the most effective form of discipline in a particular instance should therefore be determined by the context of the situation. For example, it depends on the seriousness of the misconduct, the attitude of the learners (e.g. was it as a result of intent or negligence?), the age of the learner, the influence it had on the teaching-learning environment, et cetera. Voorkomende of bestraffende dissiplinere maatreels in Suid-Afrikaanse skole : watter benadering moet voorkeur geniet? Onlangse navorsing toon dat daar 'n klemverskuiwing vanaf (be)straffende dissiplinAare maatreels is na voorkomende maatreels. Aangesien die grondslag van leerderdissipline korrigerend en opvoedend eerder as bestraffend van aard behoort te wees, blyk hierdie benadering korrek te wees - veral in die lig van die afskaffing van lyfstraf in Suid- Afrikaanse skole. Die vraag ontstaan nou onwillekeurig: is daar nog ruimte vir (be)straffende maatreels in Suid-Afrikaanse skole? Indien wel, waar moet die klem val? Ten einde 'n antwoord hierop te probeer vind, word die twee benaderings in die gang van hierdie artikel teen 'n normatiewe raamwerk afgeweeg. Op grond van sodanige oorwegings bevind die outeurs dat nie net een van die twee benaderings aangewend behoort te word nie, maar eerder 'n kombinasie daarvan. Een van die basiese determinante vir besluitneming oor die korrekte benadering in 'n gegewe situasie is die grondliggende opvoedende oogmerk: die voorsiening van 'n geborgenheidsruim wat essensieel is vir opvoedende onderwys. Die ideale benadering is dus 'n kontekstuele benadering waar oorwegings soos die erns van 'n oortreding, die gesindheid van die leerder (bv. was daar sprake van opset of nalatigheid?), die ouderdom van die leerder, die invloed wat sy optrede op die leeromgewing gehad het, ensovoorts, in ag geneem word.
R Friele - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
how do doctors in the netherlands perceive the impact of Disciplinary procedures and disclosure of Disciplinary Measures on their professional practice health and career opportunities a questionnaire among medical doctors who received a Disciplinary
BMJ Open, 2019Co-Authors: B S Laarman, Renee Bouwman, Anke J E De Veer, Michelle Hendriks, R FrieleAbstract:Introduction Disciplinary procedures can have serious consequences for the health, personal life and professional functioning of doctors. Until recently, specific Disciplinary Measures (reprimands) were publicly disclosed in the Netherlands. The perceived additional impact of disclosing reprimands on the professional and personal life of doctors is unclear. Methods All doctors who received a Disciplinary measure from the Dutch Disciplinary Board between July 2012 and August 2016 were invited to partake in a 60-item questionnaire concerning the respondents’ characteristics, the complaint, experience with the procedure and perceived impact of the procedure on health and professional functioning as reported by doctors themselves. The response rate was 43% (n=210). 21.4% received a reprimand (disclosed); the remainder received a warning (not disclosed). Differences between the two groups were calculated. Results Respondents with a reprimand reported significantly more negative experiences and impact on health and work than respondents with a warning. 37.8% of the doctors said their health was very good. A small percentage reported moderate-to-severe depressive complaints (3.6%), moderate-to-severe anxiety disorder (2%) or indications of burnout (10.8%). The majority reported changes in their professional practices associated with ‘defensive medicine’, such as doing more supplementary research (41%) and complying more with patients’ wishes (35%). Conclusion The Dutch Disciplinary procedure has strong negative side effects, that disclosing Measures seems to increase. Dutch Disciplinary law aims to contribute to the quality of professional practice. A safe environment is a basic condition for quality improvement and therefore, disclosure of Disciplinary Measures should be carefully considered. Disclosure of Disciplinary Measures has always been controversial and the results of this study has rekindled this debate. Recently, a majority in the Dutch House of Representatives has voted against disclosure of reprimands, leaving disclosure of reprimands a discretion of the Disciplinary board when deemed appropriate or necessary.
K J Mammen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Disciplinary Measures used in south african schools how do learners view their effectiveness
Journal of Social Sciences, 2011Co-Authors: Cosmas Maphosa, K J MammenAbstract:The study reports on learners’ views on the effectiveness of Disciplinary Measures used against them by educators in South African schools. The study was a descriptive survey that was a combination...
-
learners views on the effects of Disciplinary Measures in south african schools
Journal of Social Sciences, 2011Co-Authors: Cosmas Maphosa, K J MammenAbstract:This paper is a part of a larger study on learner indiscipline in South African schools. The study was a descriptive survey and made use of a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches....