The Experts below are selected from a list of 71898 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Ralph L Brinster - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
germ cell transplantation from large Domestic Animals into mouse testes
Molecular Reproduction and Development, 2000Co-Authors: Ina Dobrinski, Mary R Avarbock, Ralph L BrinsterAbstract:Donor-derived spermatogenesis after spermatogonial transplantation to recipient Animals could serve as a novel approach to manipulate the male germ line in species where current methods of genetic modification are still inefficient. The objective of the present study was to investigate germ cell transplantation from boars, bulls, and stallions, which are economically important Domestic Animals, to mouse recipients. Donor testis cells (fresh, cryopreserved, or cultured for 1 month) were transplanted into testes of immunodeficient recipient mice in which endogenous spermatogenesis had been destroyed. Recipient testes were analyzed from 1 to > 12 months after transplantation for the presence of donor germ cells by donor-specific immunohistochemistry. Donor cells were present in most recipient testes with species-dependent differences in pattern and extent of colonization. Porcine donor germ cells formed chains and networks of round cells connected by intercellular bridges but later stages of donor-derived spermatogenesis were not observed. Transplanted bovine testis cells initially appeared similar but then developed predominantly into fibrous tissue within recipient seminiferous tubules. Few equine germ cells proliferated in mouse testes with no obvious difference between cells recovered from a scrotal or a cryptorchid donor testis. The pattern of colonization after transplantation of cultured cells did not resemble spermatogonial proliferation. These results indicate that fresh or cryopreserved germ cells from large Animals can colonize the mouse testis but do not differentiate beyond the stage of spermatogonial expansion. Species-specific differences in the compatibility of large animal donors and mouse recipients were detected which cannot be predicted solely on the basis of phylogenetic distance between donor and recipient species. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 57:270–279, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
-
germ cell transplantation from large Domestic Animals into mouse testes
Molecular Reproduction and Development, 2000Co-Authors: Ina Dobrinski, Mary R Avarbock, Ralph L BrinsterAbstract:Donor-derived spermatogenesis after spermatogonial transplantation to recipient Animals could serve as a novel approach to manipulate the male germ line in species where current methods of genetic modification are still inefficient. The objective of the present study was to investigate germ cell transplantation from boars, bulls, and stallions, which are economically important Domestic Animals, to mouse recipients. Donor testis cells (fresh, cryopreserved, or cultured for 1 month) were transplanted into testes of immunodeficient recipient mice in which endogenous spermatogenesis had been destroyed. Recipient testes were analyzed from 1 to > 12 months after transplantation for the presence of donor germ cells by donor-specific immunohistochemistry. Donor cells were present in most recipient testes with species-dependent differences in pattern and extent of colonization. Porcine donor germ cells formed chains and networks of round cells connected by intercellular bridges but later stages of donor-derived spermatogenesis were not observed. Transplanted bovine testis cells initially appeared similar but then developed predominantly into fibrous tissue within recipient seminiferous tubules. Few equine germ cells proliferated in mouse testes with no obvious difference between cells recovered from a scrotal or a cryptorchid donor testis. The pattern of colonization after transplantation of cultured cells did not resemble spermatogonial proliferation. These results indicate that fresh or cryopreserved germ cells from large Animals can colonize the mouse testis but do not differentiate beyond the stage of spermatogonial expansion. Species-specific differences in the compatibility of large animal donors and mouse recipients were detected which cannot be predicted solely on the basis of phylogenetic distance between donor and recipient species.
Yaping Zhang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
mitochondrial genomes of Domestic Animals need scrutiny
Molecular Ecology, 2014Co-Authors: Nini Shi, Long Fan, Yonggang Yao, Minsheng Peng, Yaping ZhangAbstract:More than 1000 complete or near-complete mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences have been deposited in GenBank for eight common Domestic Animals (cattle, dog, goat, horse, pig, sheep, yak and chicken) and their close wild ancestors or relatives, as well. Nevertheless, few efforts have been performed to evaluate the sequence data quality. Herein, we conducted a phylogenetic survey of these complete or near-complete mtDNA sequences based on mtDNA haplogroup trees for the eight Animals. We show that errors due to artificial recombination, surplus of mutations and phantom mutations do exist in 14.5% (194/1342) of mtDNA sequences and all of them should be treated with wide caution. We propose some caveats for future mtDNA studies of Domestic Animals.
-
mitochondrial genomes of Domestic Animals need scrutiny
arXiv: Populations and Evolution, 2014Co-Authors: Nini Shi, Long Fan, Yonggang Yao, Minsheng Peng, Yaping ZhangAbstract:More than 1000 complete or near-complete mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences have been deposited in GenBank for eight common Domestic Animals (i.e. cattle, dog, goat, horse, pig, sheep, yak and chicken) and their close wild ancestors or relatives. Nevertheless, few efforts have been performed to evaluate the sequence data quality, which heavily impact the original conclusion. Herein, we conducted a phylogenetic survey of these complete or near-complete mtDNA sequences based on mtDNA haplogroup trees for the eight Animals. We show that, errors due to artificial recombination, surplus of mutations, and phantom mutations, do exist in 14.5% (194/1342) of mtDNA sequences and shall be treated with wide caution. We propose some caveats for mtDNA studies of Domestic Animals in the future.
Ina Dobrinski - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
germ cell transplantation from large Domestic Animals into mouse testes
Molecular Reproduction and Development, 2000Co-Authors: Ina Dobrinski, Mary R Avarbock, Ralph L BrinsterAbstract:Donor-derived spermatogenesis after spermatogonial transplantation to recipient Animals could serve as a novel approach to manipulate the male germ line in species where current methods of genetic modification are still inefficient. The objective of the present study was to investigate germ cell transplantation from boars, bulls, and stallions, which are economically important Domestic Animals, to mouse recipients. Donor testis cells (fresh, cryopreserved, or cultured for 1 month) were transplanted into testes of immunodeficient recipient mice in which endogenous spermatogenesis had been destroyed. Recipient testes were analyzed from 1 to > 12 months after transplantation for the presence of donor germ cells by donor-specific immunohistochemistry. Donor cells were present in most recipient testes with species-dependent differences in pattern and extent of colonization. Porcine donor germ cells formed chains and networks of round cells connected by intercellular bridges but later stages of donor-derived spermatogenesis were not observed. Transplanted bovine testis cells initially appeared similar but then developed predominantly into fibrous tissue within recipient seminiferous tubules. Few equine germ cells proliferated in mouse testes with no obvious difference between cells recovered from a scrotal or a cryptorchid donor testis. The pattern of colonization after transplantation of cultured cells did not resemble spermatogonial proliferation. These results indicate that fresh or cryopreserved germ cells from large Animals can colonize the mouse testis but do not differentiate beyond the stage of spermatogonial expansion. Species-specific differences in the compatibility of large animal donors and mouse recipients were detected which cannot be predicted solely on the basis of phylogenetic distance between donor and recipient species. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 57:270–279, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
-
germ cell transplantation from large Domestic Animals into mouse testes
Molecular Reproduction and Development, 2000Co-Authors: Ina Dobrinski, Mary R Avarbock, Ralph L BrinsterAbstract:Donor-derived spermatogenesis after spermatogonial transplantation to recipient Animals could serve as a novel approach to manipulate the male germ line in species where current methods of genetic modification are still inefficient. The objective of the present study was to investigate germ cell transplantation from boars, bulls, and stallions, which are economically important Domestic Animals, to mouse recipients. Donor testis cells (fresh, cryopreserved, or cultured for 1 month) were transplanted into testes of immunodeficient recipient mice in which endogenous spermatogenesis had been destroyed. Recipient testes were analyzed from 1 to > 12 months after transplantation for the presence of donor germ cells by donor-specific immunohistochemistry. Donor cells were present in most recipient testes with species-dependent differences in pattern and extent of colonization. Porcine donor germ cells formed chains and networks of round cells connected by intercellular bridges but later stages of donor-derived spermatogenesis were not observed. Transplanted bovine testis cells initially appeared similar but then developed predominantly into fibrous tissue within recipient seminiferous tubules. Few equine germ cells proliferated in mouse testes with no obvious difference between cells recovered from a scrotal or a cryptorchid donor testis. The pattern of colonization after transplantation of cultured cells did not resemble spermatogonial proliferation. These results indicate that fresh or cryopreserved germ cells from large Animals can colonize the mouse testis but do not differentiate beyond the stage of spermatogonial expansion. Species-specific differences in the compatibility of large animal donors and mouse recipients were detected which cannot be predicted solely on the basis of phylogenetic distance between donor and recipient species.
Mary R Avarbock - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
germ cell transplantation from large Domestic Animals into mouse testes
Molecular Reproduction and Development, 2000Co-Authors: Ina Dobrinski, Mary R Avarbock, Ralph L BrinsterAbstract:Donor-derived spermatogenesis after spermatogonial transplantation to recipient Animals could serve as a novel approach to manipulate the male germ line in species where current methods of genetic modification are still inefficient. The objective of the present study was to investigate germ cell transplantation from boars, bulls, and stallions, which are economically important Domestic Animals, to mouse recipients. Donor testis cells (fresh, cryopreserved, or cultured for 1 month) were transplanted into testes of immunodeficient recipient mice in which endogenous spermatogenesis had been destroyed. Recipient testes were analyzed from 1 to > 12 months after transplantation for the presence of donor germ cells by donor-specific immunohistochemistry. Donor cells were present in most recipient testes with species-dependent differences in pattern and extent of colonization. Porcine donor germ cells formed chains and networks of round cells connected by intercellular bridges but later stages of donor-derived spermatogenesis were not observed. Transplanted bovine testis cells initially appeared similar but then developed predominantly into fibrous tissue within recipient seminiferous tubules. Few equine germ cells proliferated in mouse testes with no obvious difference between cells recovered from a scrotal or a cryptorchid donor testis. The pattern of colonization after transplantation of cultured cells did not resemble spermatogonial proliferation. These results indicate that fresh or cryopreserved germ cells from large Animals can colonize the mouse testis but do not differentiate beyond the stage of spermatogonial expansion. Species-specific differences in the compatibility of large animal donors and mouse recipients were detected which cannot be predicted solely on the basis of phylogenetic distance between donor and recipient species. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 57:270–279, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
-
germ cell transplantation from large Domestic Animals into mouse testes
Molecular Reproduction and Development, 2000Co-Authors: Ina Dobrinski, Mary R Avarbock, Ralph L BrinsterAbstract:Donor-derived spermatogenesis after spermatogonial transplantation to recipient Animals could serve as a novel approach to manipulate the male germ line in species where current methods of genetic modification are still inefficient. The objective of the present study was to investigate germ cell transplantation from boars, bulls, and stallions, which are economically important Domestic Animals, to mouse recipients. Donor testis cells (fresh, cryopreserved, or cultured for 1 month) were transplanted into testes of immunodeficient recipient mice in which endogenous spermatogenesis had been destroyed. Recipient testes were analyzed from 1 to > 12 months after transplantation for the presence of donor germ cells by donor-specific immunohistochemistry. Donor cells were present in most recipient testes with species-dependent differences in pattern and extent of colonization. Porcine donor germ cells formed chains and networks of round cells connected by intercellular bridges but later stages of donor-derived spermatogenesis were not observed. Transplanted bovine testis cells initially appeared similar but then developed predominantly into fibrous tissue within recipient seminiferous tubules. Few equine germ cells proliferated in mouse testes with no obvious difference between cells recovered from a scrotal or a cryptorchid donor testis. The pattern of colonization after transplantation of cultured cells did not resemble spermatogonial proliferation. These results indicate that fresh or cryopreserved germ cells from large Animals can colonize the mouse testis but do not differentiate beyond the stage of spermatogonial expansion. Species-specific differences in the compatibility of large animal donors and mouse recipients were detected which cannot be predicted solely on the basis of phylogenetic distance between donor and recipient species.
Xiaonong Zhou - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
tick borne pathogens and associated co infections in ticks collected from Domestic Animals in central china
Parasites & Vectors, 2014Co-Authors: Zhuo Adam Chen, Qin Liu, Jiqi Liu, Shang Xia, Xiaonong ZhouAbstract:Ticks can transmit a number of pathogens to humans and Domestic Animals. Tick borne diseases (TBDs), which may lead to organ failure and death have been recently reported in China. 98.75% of the total cases (>1000) in Henan provinces have been reported in Xinyang city. Therefore, the aims of this study were to investigate the fauna of ticks and detect the potential pathogens in ticks in Xinyang, the region of central China. Ticks were collected from 10 villages of Xinyang from April to December 2012, from Domestic Animals including sheep, cattle and dogs. Then identification of ticks and detection of tick-borne pathogens, including Babesia spp., Theileria spp., Anaplasma spp., Ehrlichia spp., Rickettsia spp., tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Leishmania infantum, were undertaken by using polymerase chain reaction assay (PCR) and sequence analysis. Moreover, the co-infection patterns of various pathogens were compared among locations where ticks were collected. A total of 308 ticks were collected. Two species of Ixodidae were found, namely Haemaphysalis longicornis (96.75%) and Rhipicephalus microplus (3.25%). Five genera of pathogens, namely Theileria spp. (3.25%), Anaplasma spp. (2.92%), Babesia spp. (1.95%), Ehrlichia spp. (2.92%) and Rickettsia spp. (0.65%), were detected in 7 villages. Co-infections by two pathogens were diagnosed in 11.11% of all infected ticks. Both human and animal pathogens were abundant in ticks in the study areas. Humans and Animals in these regions were at a high risk of exposure to piroplasmosis, since piroplasm had the highest rates of infection and co-infection in positive ticks.
