The Experts below are selected from a list of 360 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Robert B. Diasio - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • haplotype structure defines effects of common DPYD variants c 85t c rs1801265 and c 496a g rs2297595 on dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity implication for 5 fluorouracil toxicity
    British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2021
    Co-Authors: Seid Hamzic, Robert B. Diasio, Didier Meulendijks, Steven M Offer, Stefano Fontana, Dominic Scharer, Christos T Nakas, Marc Wehrli, Stefan Schurch
    Abstract:

    AIMS The aim of this study was to identify risk variants and haplotypes that impair dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity and are, therefore, candidate risk variants for severe toxicity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. METHODS Plasma dihydrouracil/uracil (UH2 /U) ratios were measured as a population marker for DPD activity in a total of 1382 subjects from 4 independent studies. Genotype and haplotype correlations with UH2 /U ratios were assessed. RESULTS Significantly lower UH2 /U ratios (panova A (rs3918290), -46.0% for DPYD c.1679T > G (rs55886062), -37.1%, for DPYD c.2846A > T (rs67376798), and -13.2% for DPYD c.1129-5923C > G (rs75017182). An additional variant, DPYD c.496A > G (rs2297595), was also associated with lower UH2 /U ratios (P G, which consisted of the common variant c.85T > C (rs1801265) and the risk variant c.1129-5923C > G. Both haplotypes carrying c.496A > G were associated with decreased UH2 /U ratios (H3, P = .003, MD: -9.6%; H5, P = .002, MD: -16.9%). A haplotype carrying only the variant c.85T > C (H2) was associated with elevated ratios (P = .004, MD: +8.6%). CONCLUSIONS Based on our data, DPYD-c.496A > G is a strong candidate risk allele for 5-FU toxicity. Our data suggest that DPYD-c.85T > C might be protective; however, the deleterious impacts of the linked alleles c.496A > G and c.1129-5923C > G likely limit this effect in patients. The possible protective effect of c.85T > C and linkage disequilibrium with c.496A > G and c.1129-5923C > G may have hampered prior association studies and should be considered in future clinical studies.

  • gene specific variant classifier DPYD varifier to identify deleterious alleles of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase
    Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2018
    Co-Authors: Shikshya Shrestha, Steven M Offer, Cheng Zhang, Calvin R Jerde, Qian Nie, Robert B. Diasio
    Abstract:

    Deleterious variants in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD, DPYD gene) can be highly predictive of clinical toxicity to the widely prescribed chemotherapeutic 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). However, there are very limited data pertaining to the functional consequences of the >450 reported no-synonymous DPYD variants. We developed a DPYD-specific variant classifier (DPYD-Varifier) using machine learning and in vitro functional data for 156 missense DPYD variants. The developed model showed 85% accuracy and outperformed other in silico prediction tools. An examination of feature importance within the model provided additional insight into functional aspects of the DPD protein relevant to 5-FU toxicity. In the absence of clinical data for unstudied variants, prediction tools like DPYD-Varifier have great potential to individualize medicine and improve the clinical decision-making process.

  • dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene DPYD polymorphism among pts with 5 fu capecitabine cap related adverse events aes experience of 2 decades
    Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2018
    Co-Authors: Nauman S Siddiqui, Robert B. Diasio, Sneha Purvey, Ruchi Hamal, Lulu Zhang, Wasif M Saif
    Abstract:

    2576Background: DPYD gene encodes DPD, the rate-limiting enzyme responsible for catabolism of 5-FU and is responsible for > 85% of 5-FU elimination. Deficiency of DPD due to DPYD polymorphism gives...

  • histone h3k27 trimethylation modulates 5 fluorouracil resistance by inhibiting pu 1 binding to the DPYD promoter
    Cancer Research, 2016
    Co-Authors: Qian Nie, Steven M Offer, Shikshya Shrestha, Calvin R Jerde, Erin E Tapper, Garrett S Dunlap, Tarig Elraiyah, Robert B. Diasio
    Abstract:

    The antimetabolite 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is one of the most widely used chemotherapy drugs. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is a major determinant of 5-FU response and toxicity. Although DPYD variants may affect 5-FU metabolism, they do not completely explain the reported variability in DPD function or the resultant differences in treatment response. Here, we report that H3K27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) at the DPYD promoter regulated by Ezh2 and UTX suppresses DPYD expression by inhibiting transcription factor PU.1 binding, leading to increased resistance to 5-FU. Enrichment of H3K27me3 at the DPYD promoter was negatively correlated with both DPYD expression and DPD enzyme activity in peripheral blood specimens from healthy volunteers. Lastly, tumor expression data suggest that DPYD repression by Ezh2 predicts poor survival in 5-FU–treated cancers. Collectively, the findings of the present article suggest that a previously uncharacterized mechanism regulates DPD expression and may contribute to tumor resistance to 5-FU. Cancer Res; 76(21); 6362–73. ©2016 AACR.

  • abstract lb 195 the intronic DPYD variant rs75017182 correlates with a modest reduction in dpd enzyme activity
    Cancer Research, 2016
    Co-Authors: Shikshya Shrestha, Steven M Offer, Robert B. Diasio
    Abstract:

    Nearly one-third of cancer patients that receive the commonly prescribed chemotherapy drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) experience severe (grade 3+) adverse toxicity related to treatment. Approximately 1,300 deaths are directly attributed to 5-FU toxicity annually in the U.S. While three deleterious genetic variations in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) gene (DPYD) are well-established predictors of severe toxicity (i.e., *2A, p.I560S, p.D949V), they only explain 30-35% of adverse cases of 5-FU toxicity. Recently, an intronic variant (rs75017182) has been suggested to contribute to 5-FU toxicity risk by promoting the alternative splicing of DPYD. However, recent clinical studies are conflicting as to the degree to which rs75017182 affects DPD enzyme function, and it remains unclear as to the extent to which DPYD splicing is affected in carriers. The primary aim of this study was to directly determine correlations between rs75017182, DPD enzyme function, and DPYD splicing. Genotyping for rs75017182, *2A, p.I560S, and p.D949V was performed on DNA obtained from 3950 healthy participants in the Mayo Clinic Biobank. Individuals carrying one or more of the genotyped variants, as well as matched non-carriers, were asked to provide an additional blood sample that was used to measure DPYD expression, DPYD splicing relevant to rs75017182, and DPD enzyme activity (n = 204). A moderate, but significant, reduction was noted in the expression of canonically spliced DPYD in rs75017182 carriers compared to non-carriers. DPD enzyme activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was similarly reduced in rs75017182 carriers. The degree to which DPD activity was reduced in rs75017182 carriers was not as severe as was noted for carriers of the toxicity-associated variants *2A, p.I560S, or p.D949V. Collectively, our data support a model in which rs75017182 leads to alternative splicing of a fraction of primary transcripts that harbor the variant, which in turn causes a modest reduction in the levels of functional DPD enzyme. The modest phenotypes noted may partially explain some of the discrepant results noted between various clinical studies that have attempted to evaluate the variant. Citation Format: Shikshya Shrestha, Steven M. Offer, Robert B. Diasio. The intronic DPYD variant rs75017182 correlates with a modest reduction in DPD enzyme activity. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-195.

Didier Meulendijks - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • haplotype structure defines effects of common DPYD variants c 85t c rs1801265 and c 496a g rs2297595 on dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity implication for 5 fluorouracil toxicity
    British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2021
    Co-Authors: Seid Hamzic, Robert B. Diasio, Didier Meulendijks, Steven M Offer, Stefano Fontana, Dominic Scharer, Christos T Nakas, Marc Wehrli, Stefan Schurch
    Abstract:

    AIMS The aim of this study was to identify risk variants and haplotypes that impair dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity and are, therefore, candidate risk variants for severe toxicity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. METHODS Plasma dihydrouracil/uracil (UH2 /U) ratios were measured as a population marker for DPD activity in a total of 1382 subjects from 4 independent studies. Genotype and haplotype correlations with UH2 /U ratios were assessed. RESULTS Significantly lower UH2 /U ratios (panova A (rs3918290), -46.0% for DPYD c.1679T > G (rs55886062), -37.1%, for DPYD c.2846A > T (rs67376798), and -13.2% for DPYD c.1129-5923C > G (rs75017182). An additional variant, DPYD c.496A > G (rs2297595), was also associated with lower UH2 /U ratios (P G, which consisted of the common variant c.85T > C (rs1801265) and the risk variant c.1129-5923C > G. Both haplotypes carrying c.496A > G were associated with decreased UH2 /U ratios (H3, P = .003, MD: -9.6%; H5, P = .002, MD: -16.9%). A haplotype carrying only the variant c.85T > C (H2) was associated with elevated ratios (P = .004, MD: +8.6%). CONCLUSIONS Based on our data, DPYD-c.496A > G is a strong candidate risk allele for 5-FU toxicity. Our data suggest that DPYD-c.85T > C might be protective; however, the deleterious impacts of the linked alleles c.496A > G and c.1129-5923C > G likely limit this effect in patients. The possible protective effect of c.85T > C and linkage disequilibrium with c.496A > G and c.1129-5923C > G may have hampered prior association studies and should be considered in future clinical studies.

  • effectiveness and safety of reduced dose fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients carrying the DPYD 2a variant a matched pair analysis
    International Journal of Cancer, 2019
    Co-Authors: Linda M. Henricks, Didier Meulendijks, Maarten J Deenen, Lisanne N Van Merendonk, Jos H Beijnen, Anthonius De Boer, Annemieke Cats, Jan H M Schellens
    Abstract:

    Carriers of the genetic DPYD*2A variant, resulting in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency, are at significantly increased risk of developing severe fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity. Upfront DPYD*2A genotype-based dose reductions improve patient safety, but uncertainty exists whether this has a negative impact on treatment effectiveness. Therefore, our study investigated effectiveness and safety of DPYD*2A genotype-guided dosing. A cohort of 40 prospectively identified heterozygous DPYD*2A carriers, treated with a ~50% reduced fluoropyrimidine dose, was identified. For effectiveness analysis, a matched pair-analysis was performed in which for each DPYD*2A carrier a matched DPYD*2A wild-type patient was identified. Overall survival and progression-free survival were compared between the matched groups. The frequency of severe (grade ≥ 3) treatment-related toxicity was compared to 1] a cohort of 1606 wild-type patients treated with full dose and 2] a cohort of historical controls derived from literature, i.e. 86 DPYD*2A variant carriers who received a full fluoropyrimidine dose. For 37 out of 40 DPYD*2A carriers, a matched control could be identified. Compared to matched controls, reduced doses did not negatively affect overall survival (median 27 months versus 24 months, p = 0.47) nor progression-free survival (median 14 months versus 10 months, p = 0.54). Risk of severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity in DPYD*2A carriers treated with reduced dose was 18%, comparable to wild-type patients (23%, p = 0.57) and significantly lower than the risk of 77% in DPYD*2A carriers treated with full dose (p < 0.001). Our study is the first to show that DPYD*2A genotype-guided dosing appears to have no negative effect on effectiveness of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, while resulting in significantly improved patient safety.

  • a cost analysis of upfront DPYD genotype guided dose individualisation in fluoropyrimidine based anticancer therapy
    European Journal of Cancer, 2019
    Co-Authors: Linda M. Henricks, Arnold Baars, Didier Meulendijks, Vincent O Dezentje, Carin A T C Lunenburg, Femke M De Man, Geert W J Frederix, Emma Kienhuis, Geert Jan Creemers, Alexander L T Imholz
    Abstract:

    Background: Fluoropyrimidine therapy including capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil can result in severe treatment-related toxicity in up to 30% of patients. Toxicity is often related to reduced activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, the main metabolic fluoropyrimidine enzyme, primarily caused by genetic DPYD polymorphisms. In a large prospective study, it was concluded that upfront DPYD-guided dose individualisation is able to improve safety of fluoropyrimidine-based therapy. In our current analysis, we evaluated whether this strategy is cost saving. Methods: A cost-minimisation analysis from a health-care payer perspective was performed as part of the prospective clinical trial (NCT02324452) in which patients prior to start of fluoropyrimidine-based therapy were screened for the DPYD variants DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G and c.1236G>A and received an initial dose reduction of 25% (c.2846A>T, c.1236G>A) or 50% (DPYD*2A, c.1679T>G). Data on treatment, toxicity, hospitalisation and other toxicity-related interventions were collected. The model compared prospective screening for these DPYD variants with no DPYD screening. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results: Expected total costs of the screening strategy were €2599 per patient compared with €2650 for non-screening, resulting in a net cost saving of €51 per patient. Results of the probabilistic sensitivity and one-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the screening strategy was very likely to be cost saving or worst case cost-neutral. Conclusions: Upfront DPYD-guided dose individualisation, improving patient safety, is cost saving or cost-neutral but is not expected to yield additional costs. These results endorse implementing DPYD screening before start of fluoropyrimidine treatment as standard of care.

  • DPYD genotype guided dose individualisation of fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients with cancer a prospective safety analysis
    Lancet Oncology, 2018
    Co-Authors: Linda M. Henricks, Arnold Baars, Didier Meulendijks, Vincent O Dezentje, Carin A T C Lunenburg, Femke M De Man, Geert W J Frederix, Emma Kienhuis, Geert Jan Creemers, Alexander L T Imholz
    Abstract:

    Background: Fluoropyrimidine treatment can result in severe toxicity in up to 30% of patients and is often the result of reduced activity of the key metabolic enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), mostly caused by genetic variants in the gene encoding DPD (DPYD). We assessed the effect of prospective screening for the four most relevant DPYD variants (DPYD*2A [rs3918290, c.1905+1G>A, IVS14+1G>A], c.2846A>T [rs67376798, D949V], c.1679T>G [rs55886062, DPYD*13, I560S], and c.1236G>A [rs56038477, E412E, in haplotype B3]) on patient safety and subsequent DPYD genotype-guided dose individualisation in daily clinical care. Methods: In this prospective, multicentre, safety analysis in 17 hospitals in the Netherlands, the study population consisted of adult patients (≥18 years) with cancer who were intended to start on a fluoropyrimidine-based anticancer therapy (capecitabine or fluorouracil as single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents or radiotherapy). Patients with all tumour types for which fluoropyrimidine-based therapy was considered in their best interest were eligible. We did prospective genotyping for DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G, and c.1236G>A. Heterozygous DPYD variant allele carriers received an initial dose reduction of 25% (c.2846A>T and c.1236G>A) or 50% (DPYD*2A and c.1679T>G), and DPYD wild-type patients were treated according to the current standard of care. The primary endpoint of the study was the frequency of severe (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 grade ≥3) overall fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity across the entire treatment duration. We compared toxicity incidence between DPYD variant allele carriers and DPYD wild-type patients on an intention-to-treat basis, and relative risks (RRs) for severe toxicity were compared between the current study and a historical cohort of DPYD variant allele carriers treated with full dose fluoropyrimidine-based therapy (derived from a previously published meta-analysis). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02324452, and is complete. Findings: Between April 30, 2015, and Dec 21, 2017, we enrolled 1181 patients. 78 patients were considered non-evaluable, because they were retrospectively identified as not meeting inclusion criteria, did not start fluoropyrimidine-based treatment, or were homozygous or compound heterozygous DPYD variant allele carriers. Of 1103 evaluable patients, 85 (8%) were heterozygous DPYD variant allele carriers, and 1018 (92%) were DPYD wild-type patients. Overall, fluoropyrimidine-related severe toxicity was higher in DPYD variant carriers (33 [39%] of 85 patients) than in wild-type patients (231 [23%] of 1018 patients; p=0·0013). The RR for severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity was 1·31 (95% CI 0·63–2·73) for genotype-guided dosing compared with 2·87 (2·14–3·86) in the historical cohort for DPYD*2A carriers, no toxicity compared with 4·30 (2·10–8·80) in c.1679T>G carriers, 2·00 (1·19–3·34) compared with 3·11 (2·25–4·28) for c.2846A>T carriers, and 1·69 (1·18–2·42) compared with 1·72 (1·22–2·42) for c.1236G>A carriers. Interpretation: Prospective DPYD genotyping was feasible in routine clinical practice, and DPYD genotype-based dose reductions improved patient safety of fluoropyrimidine treatment. For DPYD*2A and c.1679T>G carriers, a 50% initial dose reduction was adequate. For c.1236G>A and c.2846A>T carriers, a larger dose reduction of 50% (instead of 25%) requires investigation. Since fluoropyrimidines are among the most commonly used anticancer agents, these findings suggest that implementation of DPYD genotype-guided individualised dosing should be a new standard of care. Funding: Dutch Cancer Society.

  • standard fluoropyrimidine dosages in chemoradiation therapy result in an increased risk of severe toxicity in DPYD variant allele carriers
    European Journal of Cancer, 2018
    Co-Authors: Carin A T C Lunenburg, Linda M. Henricks, Didier Meulendijks, Jesse J Swen, Giuseppe Toffoli, Eva Dreussi, F P Peters, Marta Fiocco, Henkjan Guchelaar, Erika Cecchin
    Abstract:

    Abstract Background Prospective DPYD genotyping prevents severe fluoropyrimidine (FP)-induced toxicity by decreasing dosages in DPYD variant allele carriers. FP dosages in chemoradiation therapy (CRT) are lower than those in other FP-containing regimens. Pharmacogenetic guidelines do not distinguish between regimens, leaving physicians in doubt to apply dose reductions. Our aim was to investigate severe toxicity in DPYD variant allele carriers receiving CRT. Methods Medical records of 828 patients who received FP-based CRT were reviewed from three centres. Severe (grade ≥III) toxicity in DPYD variant allele carriers receiving upfront FP dose reductions according to pharmacogenetic dosing guidelines and DPYD variant allele carriers not receiving FP dose reductions was compared with DPYD wild-type patients receiving standard dose of FPs in CRT. Results DPYD variant allele carriers treated with standard dosages (N = 34) showed an increased risk of severe gastrointestinal (adjusted OR = 2.58, confidence interval [CI] = 1.02–6.53, P = 0.045) or severe haematological (adjusted OR = 4.19, CI = 1.32–13.25, P = 0.015) toxicity compared with wild-type patients (N = 771). DPYD variant allele carriers who received dose reductions (N = 22) showed a comparable frequency of severe gastrointestinal toxicity compared with wild-type patients, but more (not statistically significant) severe haematological toxicity. Hospitalisations for all DPYD variant allele carriers were comparable, independent of dose adjustments; however, the mean duration of hospitalisation was significantly shorter in the dose reduction group (P = 0.010). Conclusions Standard FP dosages in CRT resulted in an increased risk of severe toxicity in DPYD variant allele carriers. We advise to apply FP dose reductions according to current guidelines in DPYD variant allele carriers starting CRT.

Linda M. Henricks - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • effectiveness and safety of reduced dose fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients carrying the DPYD 2a variant a matched pair analysis
    International Journal of Cancer, 2019
    Co-Authors: Linda M. Henricks, Didier Meulendijks, Maarten J Deenen, Lisanne N Van Merendonk, Jos H Beijnen, Anthonius De Boer, Annemieke Cats, Jan H M Schellens
    Abstract:

    Carriers of the genetic DPYD*2A variant, resulting in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency, are at significantly increased risk of developing severe fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity. Upfront DPYD*2A genotype-based dose reductions improve patient safety, but uncertainty exists whether this has a negative impact on treatment effectiveness. Therefore, our study investigated effectiveness and safety of DPYD*2A genotype-guided dosing. A cohort of 40 prospectively identified heterozygous DPYD*2A carriers, treated with a ~50% reduced fluoropyrimidine dose, was identified. For effectiveness analysis, a matched pair-analysis was performed in which for each DPYD*2A carrier a matched DPYD*2A wild-type patient was identified. Overall survival and progression-free survival were compared between the matched groups. The frequency of severe (grade ≥ 3) treatment-related toxicity was compared to 1] a cohort of 1606 wild-type patients treated with full dose and 2] a cohort of historical controls derived from literature, i.e. 86 DPYD*2A variant carriers who received a full fluoropyrimidine dose. For 37 out of 40 DPYD*2A carriers, a matched control could be identified. Compared to matched controls, reduced doses did not negatively affect overall survival (median 27 months versus 24 months, p = 0.47) nor progression-free survival (median 14 months versus 10 months, p = 0.54). Risk of severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity in DPYD*2A carriers treated with reduced dose was 18%, comparable to wild-type patients (23%, p = 0.57) and significantly lower than the risk of 77% in DPYD*2A carriers treated with full dose (p < 0.001). Our study is the first to show that DPYD*2A genotype-guided dosing appears to have no negative effect on effectiveness of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, while resulting in significantly improved patient safety.

  • a cost analysis of upfront DPYD genotype guided dose individualisation in fluoropyrimidine based anticancer therapy
    European Journal of Cancer, 2019
    Co-Authors: Linda M. Henricks, Arnold Baars, Didier Meulendijks, Vincent O Dezentje, Carin A T C Lunenburg, Femke M De Man, Geert W J Frederix, Emma Kienhuis, Geert Jan Creemers, Alexander L T Imholz
    Abstract:

    Background: Fluoropyrimidine therapy including capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil can result in severe treatment-related toxicity in up to 30% of patients. Toxicity is often related to reduced activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, the main metabolic fluoropyrimidine enzyme, primarily caused by genetic DPYD polymorphisms. In a large prospective study, it was concluded that upfront DPYD-guided dose individualisation is able to improve safety of fluoropyrimidine-based therapy. In our current analysis, we evaluated whether this strategy is cost saving. Methods: A cost-minimisation analysis from a health-care payer perspective was performed as part of the prospective clinical trial (NCT02324452) in which patients prior to start of fluoropyrimidine-based therapy were screened for the DPYD variants DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G and c.1236G>A and received an initial dose reduction of 25% (c.2846A>T, c.1236G>A) or 50% (DPYD*2A, c.1679T>G). Data on treatment, toxicity, hospitalisation and other toxicity-related interventions were collected. The model compared prospective screening for these DPYD variants with no DPYD screening. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results: Expected total costs of the screening strategy were €2599 per patient compared with €2650 for non-screening, resulting in a net cost saving of €51 per patient. Results of the probabilistic sensitivity and one-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the screening strategy was very likely to be cost saving or worst case cost-neutral. Conclusions: Upfront DPYD-guided dose individualisation, improving patient safety, is cost saving or cost-neutral but is not expected to yield additional costs. These results endorse implementing DPYD screening before start of fluoropyrimidine treatment as standard of care.

  • DPYD genotype guided dose individualisation of fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients with cancer a prospective safety analysis
    Lancet Oncology, 2018
    Co-Authors: Linda M. Henricks, Arnold Baars, Didier Meulendijks, Vincent O Dezentje, Carin A T C Lunenburg, Femke M De Man, Geert W J Frederix, Emma Kienhuis, Geert Jan Creemers, Alexander L T Imholz
    Abstract:

    Background: Fluoropyrimidine treatment can result in severe toxicity in up to 30% of patients and is often the result of reduced activity of the key metabolic enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), mostly caused by genetic variants in the gene encoding DPD (DPYD). We assessed the effect of prospective screening for the four most relevant DPYD variants (DPYD*2A [rs3918290, c.1905+1G>A, IVS14+1G>A], c.2846A>T [rs67376798, D949V], c.1679T>G [rs55886062, DPYD*13, I560S], and c.1236G>A [rs56038477, E412E, in haplotype B3]) on patient safety and subsequent DPYD genotype-guided dose individualisation in daily clinical care. Methods: In this prospective, multicentre, safety analysis in 17 hospitals in the Netherlands, the study population consisted of adult patients (≥18 years) with cancer who were intended to start on a fluoropyrimidine-based anticancer therapy (capecitabine or fluorouracil as single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents or radiotherapy). Patients with all tumour types for which fluoropyrimidine-based therapy was considered in their best interest were eligible. We did prospective genotyping for DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G, and c.1236G>A. Heterozygous DPYD variant allele carriers received an initial dose reduction of 25% (c.2846A>T and c.1236G>A) or 50% (DPYD*2A and c.1679T>G), and DPYD wild-type patients were treated according to the current standard of care. The primary endpoint of the study was the frequency of severe (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 grade ≥3) overall fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity across the entire treatment duration. We compared toxicity incidence between DPYD variant allele carriers and DPYD wild-type patients on an intention-to-treat basis, and relative risks (RRs) for severe toxicity were compared between the current study and a historical cohort of DPYD variant allele carriers treated with full dose fluoropyrimidine-based therapy (derived from a previously published meta-analysis). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02324452, and is complete. Findings: Between April 30, 2015, and Dec 21, 2017, we enrolled 1181 patients. 78 patients were considered non-evaluable, because they were retrospectively identified as not meeting inclusion criteria, did not start fluoropyrimidine-based treatment, or were homozygous or compound heterozygous DPYD variant allele carriers. Of 1103 evaluable patients, 85 (8%) were heterozygous DPYD variant allele carriers, and 1018 (92%) were DPYD wild-type patients. Overall, fluoropyrimidine-related severe toxicity was higher in DPYD variant carriers (33 [39%] of 85 patients) than in wild-type patients (231 [23%] of 1018 patients; p=0·0013). The RR for severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity was 1·31 (95% CI 0·63–2·73) for genotype-guided dosing compared with 2·87 (2·14–3·86) in the historical cohort for DPYD*2A carriers, no toxicity compared with 4·30 (2·10–8·80) in c.1679T>G carriers, 2·00 (1·19–3·34) compared with 3·11 (2·25–4·28) for c.2846A>T carriers, and 1·69 (1·18–2·42) compared with 1·72 (1·22–2·42) for c.1236G>A carriers. Interpretation: Prospective DPYD genotyping was feasible in routine clinical practice, and DPYD genotype-based dose reductions improved patient safety of fluoropyrimidine treatment. For DPYD*2A and c.1679T>G carriers, a 50% initial dose reduction was adequate. For c.1236G>A and c.2846A>T carriers, a larger dose reduction of 50% (instead of 25%) requires investigation. Since fluoropyrimidines are among the most commonly used anticancer agents, these findings suggest that implementation of DPYD genotype-guided individualised dosing should be a new standard of care. Funding: Dutch Cancer Society.

  • standard fluoropyrimidine dosages in chemoradiation therapy result in an increased risk of severe toxicity in DPYD variant allele carriers
    European Journal of Cancer, 2018
    Co-Authors: Carin A T C Lunenburg, Linda M. Henricks, Didier Meulendijks, Jesse J Swen, Giuseppe Toffoli, Eva Dreussi, F P Peters, Marta Fiocco, Henkjan Guchelaar, Erika Cecchin
    Abstract:

    Abstract Background Prospective DPYD genotyping prevents severe fluoropyrimidine (FP)-induced toxicity by decreasing dosages in DPYD variant allele carriers. FP dosages in chemoradiation therapy (CRT) are lower than those in other FP-containing regimens. Pharmacogenetic guidelines do not distinguish between regimens, leaving physicians in doubt to apply dose reductions. Our aim was to investigate severe toxicity in DPYD variant allele carriers receiving CRT. Methods Medical records of 828 patients who received FP-based CRT were reviewed from three centres. Severe (grade ≥III) toxicity in DPYD variant allele carriers receiving upfront FP dose reductions according to pharmacogenetic dosing guidelines and DPYD variant allele carriers not receiving FP dose reductions was compared with DPYD wild-type patients receiving standard dose of FPs in CRT. Results DPYD variant allele carriers treated with standard dosages (N = 34) showed an increased risk of severe gastrointestinal (adjusted OR = 2.58, confidence interval [CI] = 1.02–6.53, P = 0.045) or severe haematological (adjusted OR = 4.19, CI = 1.32–13.25, P = 0.015) toxicity compared with wild-type patients (N = 771). DPYD variant allele carriers who received dose reductions (N = 22) showed a comparable frequency of severe gastrointestinal toxicity compared with wild-type patients, but more (not statistically significant) severe haematological toxicity. Hospitalisations for all DPYD variant allele carriers were comparable, independent of dose adjustments; however, the mean duration of hospitalisation was significantly shorter in the dose reduction group (P = 0.010). Conclusions Standard FP dosages in CRT resulted in an increased risk of severe toxicity in DPYD variant allele carriers. We advise to apply FP dose reductions according to current guidelines in DPYD variant allele carriers starting CRT.

  • letter regarding zhao et al entitled DPYD gene polymorphisms are associated with risk and chemotherapy prognosis in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia
    Tumor Biology, 2017
    Co-Authors: Maarten J Deenen, Linda M. Henricks, Gabe S Sonke, Jan H M Schellens, Didier Meulendijks
    Abstract:

    Zhao et al. investigated the association between germline genetic polymorphisms in DPYD, the gene encoding dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, and (1) the risk of developing pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia and (2) outcome of acute lymphoblastic leukemia following the treatment with 5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX). The authors found that the common DPYD variant c.85T>C (rs1801265, DPYD*9A) was significantly associated with (1) risk of developing pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia, (2) complete response rate, (3) event-free survival, and (4) treatment-related toxicity. The authors conclude that patients carrying the c.85T>C C allele have an increased risk of developing acute lymphoblastic leukemia and have inferior outcome, and that DPYD c.85T>C can be used as a guide for individualized treatment and the decision to utilize 5-fluorouracil in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. In our view, the published article gives rise to multiple critical issues regarding the study's rationale and the methodology used, which strongly question the validity of the authors' conclusions.

Carlo R Largiader - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • rs895819 in mir27a improves the predictive value of DPYD variants to identify patients at risk of severe fluoropyrimidine associated toxicity
    International Journal of Cancer, 2016
    Co-Authors: Didier Meulendijks, Linda M. Henricks, Maarten J Deenen, Tanja K Froehlich, Ursula Amstutz, Carlo R Largiader, Jos H Beijnen, Anthonius De Boer, Annemieke Cats
    Abstract:

    The objective of this study was to determine whether genotyping of MIR27A polymorphisms rs895819A>G and rs11671784C>T can be used to improve the predictive value of DPYD variants to identify patients at risk of severe fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity (FP-toxicity). Patients treated previously in a prospective study with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy were genotyped for rs895819 and rs11671784, and DPYD c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G, c.1129-5923C>G and c.1601G>A. The predictive value of MIR27A variants for early-onset grade ≥3 FP-toxicity, alone or in combination with DPYD variants, was tested in multivariable logistic regression models. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed, including previously published data. A total of 1,592 patients were included. Allele frequencies of rs895819 and rs11671784 were 0.331 and 0.020, respectively. In DPYD wild-type patients, MIR27A variants did not affect risk of FP-toxicity (OR 1.3 for ≥1 variant MIR27A allele vs. none, 95% CI: 0.87-1.82, p = 0.228). In contrast, in patients carrying DPYD variants, the presence of ≥1 rs895819 variant allele was associated with increased risk of FP-toxicity (OR 4.9, 95% CI: 1.24-19.7, p = 0.023). Rs11671784 was not associated with FP-toxicity (OR 2.9, 95% CI: 0.47-18.0, p = 0.253). Patients carrying a DPYD variant and rs895819 were at increased risk of FP-toxicity compared to patients wild type for rs895819 and DPYD (OR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.27-4.37, p = 0.007), while patients with a DPYD variant but without a MIR27A variant were not (OR 0.3 95% CI: 0.06-1.17, p = 0.081). In meta-analysis, rs895819 remained significantly associated with FP-toxicity in DPYD variant allele carriers, OR 5.4 (95% CI: 1.83-15.7, p = 0.002). This study demonstrates the clinical validity of combined MIR27A/DPYD screening to identify patients at risk of severe FP-toxicity.

  • clinical relevance of DPYD variants c 1679t g c 1236g a hapb3 and c 1601g a as predictors of severe fluoropyrimidine associated toxicity a systematic review and meta analysis of individual patient data
    Lancet Oncology, 2015
    Co-Authors: Didier Meulendijks, Linda M. Henricks, Gabe S Sonke, Maarten J Deenen, Tanja K Froehlich, Ursula Amstutz, Carlo R Largiader, Barbara A Jennings, A M Marinaki, Jeremy D Sanderson
    Abstract:

    Summary Background The best-known cause of intolerance to fluoropyrimidines is dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency, which can result from deleterious polymorphisms in the gene encoding DPD ( DPYD ), including DPYD *2A and c.2846A>T. Three other variants— DPYD c.1679T>G, c.1236G>A/HapB3, and c.1601G>A—have been associated with DPD deficiency, but no definitive evidence for the clinical validity of these variants is available. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the clinical validity of c.1679T>G, c.1236G>A/HapB3, and c.1601G>A as predictors of severe fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity. Methods We did a systematic review of the literature published before Dec 17, 2014, to identify cohort studies investigating associations between DPYD c.1679T>G, c.1236G>A/HapB3, and c.1601G>A and severe (grade ≥3) fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity in patients treated with fluoropyrimidines (fluorouracil, capecitabine, or tegafur-uracil as single agents, in combination with other anticancer drugs, or with radiotherapy). Individual patient data were retrieved and analysed in a multivariable analysis to obtain an adjusted relative risk (RR). Effect estimates were pooled by use of a random-effects meta-analysis. The threshold for significance was set at a p value of less than 0·0167 (Bonferroni correction). Findings 7365 patients from eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. DPYD c.1679T>G was significantly associated with fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity (adjusted RR 4·40, 95% CI 2·08–9·30, p A/HapB3 (1·59, 1·29–1·97, p A and fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity was not significant (adjusted RR 1·52, 95% CI 0·86–2·70, p=0·15). Analysis of individual types of toxicity showed consistent associations of c.1679T>G and c.1236G>A/HapB3 with gastrointestinal toxicity (adjusted RR 5·72, 95% CI 1·40–23·33, p=0·015; and 2·04, 1·49–2·78, p DPYD *2A and c.2846A>T were also significantly associated with severe fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity (adjusted RR 2·85, 95% CI 1·75–4·62, p Interpretation DPYD variants c.1679T>G and c.1236G>A/HapB3 are clinically relevant predictors of fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity. Upfront screening for these variants, in addition to the established variants DPYD *2A and c.2846A>T, is recommended to improve the safety of patients with cancer treated with fluoropyrimidines. Funding None.

  • predicting 5 fluorouracil toxicity dpd genotype and 5 6 dihydrouracil uracil ratio
    Pharmacogenomics, 2014
    Co-Authors: Johanna Sistonen, Tanja K Froehlich, André B. P. Kuilenburg, Barbara Buchel, Dominic Kummer, Stefano Fontana, Markus Joerger, Carlo R Largiader
    Abstract:

    Aim: Decreased DPD activity is a major cause of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) toxicity, but known reduced-function variants in the DPD gene (DPYD) explain only a part of DPD-related 5-FU toxicities. Here, we evaluated the baseline (pretherapeutic) plasma 5,6-dihydrouracil:uracil (UH2:U) ratio as a marker of DPD activity in the context of DPYD genotypes. Materials & methods: DPYD variants were genotyped and plasma U, UH2 and 5-FU concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in 320 healthy blood donors and 28 cancer patients receiving 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Results: Baseline UH2:U ratios were strongly correlated with generally low and highly variable U concentrations. Reduced-function DPYD variants were only weakly associated with lower baseline UH2:U ratios. However, the interindividual variability in the UH2:U ratio was reduced and a stronger correlation between ratios and 5-FU exposure was observed in cancer patients during 5-FU administration. Conclusion: These results sugg...

  • clinical importance of risk variants in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene for the prediction of early onset fluoropyrimidine toxicity
    International Journal of Cancer, 2014
    Co-Authors: Tanja K Froehlich, Ursula Amstutz, Stefan Aebi, Markus Joerger, Carlo R Largiader
    Abstract:

    We investigated the clinical relevance of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD) variants to predict severe early-onset fluoropyrimidine (FP) toxicity, in particular of a recently discovered haplotype hapB3 and a linked deep intronic splice site mutation c.1129-5923C>G. Selected regions of DPYD were sequenced in prospectively collected germline DNA of 500 patients receiving FP-based chemotherapy. Associations of DPYD variants and haplotypes with hematologic, gastrointestinal, infectious, and dermatologic toxicity in therapy cycles 1-2 and resulting FP-dose interventions (dose reduction, therapy delay or cessation) were analyzed accounting for clinical and demographic covariates. Fifteen additional cases with toxicity-related therapy delay or cessation were retrospectively examined for risk variants. The association of c.1129-5923C>G/hapB3 (4.6% carrier frequency) with severe toxicity was replicated in an independent prospective cohort. Overall, c.1129-5923G/hapB3 carriers showed a relative risk of 3.74 (RR, 95% CI = 2.30-6.09, p = 2 × 10(-5)) for severe toxicity (grades 3-5). Of 31 risk variant carriers (c.1129-5923C>G/hapB3, c.1679T>G, c.1905+1G>A or c.2846A>T), 11 (all with c.1129-5923C>G/hapB3) experienced severe toxicity (15% of 72 cases, RR = 2.73, 95% CI = 1.61-4.63, p = 5 × 10(-6)), and 16 carriers (55%) required FP-dose interventions. Seven of the 15 (47%) retrospective cases carried a risk variant. The c.1129-5923C>G/hapB3 variant is a major contributor to severe early-onset FP toxicity in Caucasian patients. This variant may substantially improve the identification of patients at risk of FP toxicity compared to established DPYD risk variants (c.1905+1G>A, c.1679T>G and c.2846A>T). Pre-therapeutic DPYD testing may prevent 20-30% of life-threatening or lethal episodes of FP toxicity in Caucasian patients.

  • dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene variation and severe 5 fluorouracil toxicity a haplotype assessment
    Pharmacogenomics, 2009
    Co-Authors: Ursula Amstutz, Simone Farese, Stefan Aebi, Carlo R Largiader
    Abstract:

    Aims: The importance of polymorphisms in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD) for the prediction of severe toxicity in 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy is still unclear. This study aims to assess the predictive value of DPYD variation with respect to previously described DPYD variants for 5-FU toxicity. It represents the first analysis of the gene at the haplotype level, also capturing potentially important genetic variation located outside the coding regions of DPYD. Materials & methods: The entire coding sequence and exon-flanking intronic regions of DPYD were sequenced in 111 cancer patients receiving fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. DPYD haplotypes were inferred and their associations with severe 5-FU toxicity were assessed. Results: None of the previously described deleterious variants (IVS14+1G>A, c.2846A>T and c.1679T>G) were detected in 24 patients who experienced severe 5-FU toxicity. A potential association was observed between a haplotype containing three novel intronic p...

Carin A T C Lunenburg - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • dutch pharmacogenetics working group dpwg guideline for the gene drug interaction of DPYD and fluoropyrimidines
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2020
    Co-Authors: Carin A T C Lunenburg, Cathelijne H Van Der Wouden, Marga Nijenhuis, Mandy Crommentuijnvan H Rhenen, Nienke J De Boerveger, Anne Marie Buunk, Elisa J F Houwink, Hans Mulder, Gerard A Rongen, Ron H N Van Schaik
    Abstract:

    Despite advances in the field of pharmacogenetics (PGx), clinical acceptance has remained limited. The Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) aims to facilitate PGx implementation by developing evidence-based pharmacogenetics guidelines to optimize pharmacotherapy. This guideline describes the starting dose optimization of three anti-cancer drugs (fluoropyrimidines: 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine and tegafur) to decrease the risk of severe, potentially fatal, toxicity (such as diarrhoea, hand-foot syndrome, mucositis or myelosuppression). Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD, encoded by the DPYD gene) enzyme deficiency increases risk of fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity. The DPYD-gene activity score, determined by four DPYD variants, predicts DPD activity and can be used to optimize an individual's starting dose. The gene activity score ranges from 0 (no DPD activity) to 2 (normal DPD activity). In case it is not possible to calculate the gene activity score based on DPYD genotype, we recommend to determine the DPD activity and adjust the initial dose based on available data. For patients initiating 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine: subjects with a gene activity score of 0 are recommended to avoid systemic and cutaneous 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine; subjects with a gene activity score of 1 or 1.5 are recommended to initiate therapy with 50% the standard dose of 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine. For subjects initiating tegafur: subjects with a gene activity score of 0, 1 or 1.5 are recommended to avoid tegafur. Subjects with a gene activity score of 2 (reference) should receive a standard dose. Based on the DPWG clinical implication score, DPYD genotyping is considered "essential", therefore directing DPYD testing prior to initiating fluoropyrimidines.

  • a cost analysis of upfront DPYD genotype guided dose individualisation in fluoropyrimidine based anticancer therapy
    European Journal of Cancer, 2019
    Co-Authors: Linda M. Henricks, Arnold Baars, Didier Meulendijks, Vincent O Dezentje, Carin A T C Lunenburg, Femke M De Man, Geert W J Frederix, Emma Kienhuis, Geert Jan Creemers, Alexander L T Imholz
    Abstract:

    Background: Fluoropyrimidine therapy including capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil can result in severe treatment-related toxicity in up to 30% of patients. Toxicity is often related to reduced activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, the main metabolic fluoropyrimidine enzyme, primarily caused by genetic DPYD polymorphisms. In a large prospective study, it was concluded that upfront DPYD-guided dose individualisation is able to improve safety of fluoropyrimidine-based therapy. In our current analysis, we evaluated whether this strategy is cost saving. Methods: A cost-minimisation analysis from a health-care payer perspective was performed as part of the prospective clinical trial (NCT02324452) in which patients prior to start of fluoropyrimidine-based therapy were screened for the DPYD variants DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G and c.1236G>A and received an initial dose reduction of 25% (c.2846A>T, c.1236G>A) or 50% (DPYD*2A, c.1679T>G). Data on treatment, toxicity, hospitalisation and other toxicity-related interventions were collected. The model compared prospective screening for these DPYD variants with no DPYD screening. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results: Expected total costs of the screening strategy were €2599 per patient compared with €2650 for non-screening, resulting in a net cost saving of €51 per patient. Results of the probabilistic sensitivity and one-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the screening strategy was very likely to be cost saving or worst case cost-neutral. Conclusions: Upfront DPYD-guided dose individualisation, improving patient safety, is cost saving or cost-neutral but is not expected to yield additional costs. These results endorse implementing DPYD screening before start of fluoropyrimidine treatment as standard of care.

  • DPYD genotype guided dose individualisation of fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients with cancer a prospective safety analysis
    Lancet Oncology, 2018
    Co-Authors: Linda M. Henricks, Arnold Baars, Didier Meulendijks, Vincent O Dezentje, Carin A T C Lunenburg, Femke M De Man, Geert W J Frederix, Emma Kienhuis, Geert Jan Creemers, Alexander L T Imholz
    Abstract:

    Background: Fluoropyrimidine treatment can result in severe toxicity in up to 30% of patients and is often the result of reduced activity of the key metabolic enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), mostly caused by genetic variants in the gene encoding DPD (DPYD). We assessed the effect of prospective screening for the four most relevant DPYD variants (DPYD*2A [rs3918290, c.1905+1G>A, IVS14+1G>A], c.2846A>T [rs67376798, D949V], c.1679T>G [rs55886062, DPYD*13, I560S], and c.1236G>A [rs56038477, E412E, in haplotype B3]) on patient safety and subsequent DPYD genotype-guided dose individualisation in daily clinical care. Methods: In this prospective, multicentre, safety analysis in 17 hospitals in the Netherlands, the study population consisted of adult patients (≥18 years) with cancer who were intended to start on a fluoropyrimidine-based anticancer therapy (capecitabine or fluorouracil as single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents or radiotherapy). Patients with all tumour types for which fluoropyrimidine-based therapy was considered in their best interest were eligible. We did prospective genotyping for DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G, and c.1236G>A. Heterozygous DPYD variant allele carriers received an initial dose reduction of 25% (c.2846A>T and c.1236G>A) or 50% (DPYD*2A and c.1679T>G), and DPYD wild-type patients were treated according to the current standard of care. The primary endpoint of the study was the frequency of severe (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 grade ≥3) overall fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity across the entire treatment duration. We compared toxicity incidence between DPYD variant allele carriers and DPYD wild-type patients on an intention-to-treat basis, and relative risks (RRs) for severe toxicity were compared between the current study and a historical cohort of DPYD variant allele carriers treated with full dose fluoropyrimidine-based therapy (derived from a previously published meta-analysis). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02324452, and is complete. Findings: Between April 30, 2015, and Dec 21, 2017, we enrolled 1181 patients. 78 patients were considered non-evaluable, because they were retrospectively identified as not meeting inclusion criteria, did not start fluoropyrimidine-based treatment, or were homozygous or compound heterozygous DPYD variant allele carriers. Of 1103 evaluable patients, 85 (8%) were heterozygous DPYD variant allele carriers, and 1018 (92%) were DPYD wild-type patients. Overall, fluoropyrimidine-related severe toxicity was higher in DPYD variant carriers (33 [39%] of 85 patients) than in wild-type patients (231 [23%] of 1018 patients; p=0·0013). The RR for severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity was 1·31 (95% CI 0·63–2·73) for genotype-guided dosing compared with 2·87 (2·14–3·86) in the historical cohort for DPYD*2A carriers, no toxicity compared with 4·30 (2·10–8·80) in c.1679T>G carriers, 2·00 (1·19–3·34) compared with 3·11 (2·25–4·28) for c.2846A>T carriers, and 1·69 (1·18–2·42) compared with 1·72 (1·22–2·42) for c.1236G>A carriers. Interpretation: Prospective DPYD genotyping was feasible in routine clinical practice, and DPYD genotype-based dose reductions improved patient safety of fluoropyrimidine treatment. For DPYD*2A and c.1679T>G carriers, a 50% initial dose reduction was adequate. For c.1236G>A and c.2846A>T carriers, a larger dose reduction of 50% (instead of 25%) requires investigation. Since fluoropyrimidines are among the most commonly used anticancer agents, these findings suggest that implementation of DPYD genotype-guided individualised dosing should be a new standard of care. Funding: Dutch Cancer Society.

  • standard fluoropyrimidine dosages in chemoradiation therapy result in an increased risk of severe toxicity in DPYD variant allele carriers
    European Journal of Cancer, 2018
    Co-Authors: Carin A T C Lunenburg, Linda M. Henricks, Didier Meulendijks, Jesse J Swen, Giuseppe Toffoli, Eva Dreussi, F P Peters, Marta Fiocco, Henkjan Guchelaar, Erika Cecchin
    Abstract:

    Abstract Background Prospective DPYD genotyping prevents severe fluoropyrimidine (FP)-induced toxicity by decreasing dosages in DPYD variant allele carriers. FP dosages in chemoradiation therapy (CRT) are lower than those in other FP-containing regimens. Pharmacogenetic guidelines do not distinguish between regimens, leaving physicians in doubt to apply dose reductions. Our aim was to investigate severe toxicity in DPYD variant allele carriers receiving CRT. Methods Medical records of 828 patients who received FP-based CRT were reviewed from three centres. Severe (grade ≥III) toxicity in DPYD variant allele carriers receiving upfront FP dose reductions according to pharmacogenetic dosing guidelines and DPYD variant allele carriers not receiving FP dose reductions was compared with DPYD wild-type patients receiving standard dose of FPs in CRT. Results DPYD variant allele carriers treated with standard dosages (N = 34) showed an increased risk of severe gastrointestinal (adjusted OR = 2.58, confidence interval [CI] = 1.02–6.53, P = 0.045) or severe haematological (adjusted OR = 4.19, CI = 1.32–13.25, P = 0.015) toxicity compared with wild-type patients (N = 771). DPYD variant allele carriers who received dose reductions (N = 22) showed a comparable frequency of severe gastrointestinal toxicity compared with wild-type patients, but more (not statistically significant) severe haematological toxicity. Hospitalisations for all DPYD variant allele carriers were comparable, independent of dose adjustments; however, the mean duration of hospitalisation was significantly shorter in the dose reduction group (P = 0.010). Conclusions Standard FP dosages in CRT resulted in an increased risk of severe toxicity in DPYD variant allele carriers. We advise to apply FP dose reductions according to current guidelines in DPYD variant allele carriers starting CRT.

  • evaluation of clinical implementation of prospective DPYD genotyping in 5 fluorouracil or capecitabine treated patients
    Pharmacogenomics, 2016
    Co-Authors: Carin A T C Lunenburg, Henkjan Guchelaar, Maurice C Van Staveren, Hans Gelderblom, Jesse J Swen
    Abstract:

    Aim: Fluoropyrimidines are commonly used anti-cancer drugs, but lead to severe toxicity in 10–30% of patients. Prospective DPYD screening identifies patients at risk for toxicity and leads to a safer treatment with fluoropyrimidines. This study evaluated the routinely application of prospective DPYD screening at the Leiden University Medical Center. Methods: Prospective DPYD screening as part of routine patient care was evaluated by retrospectively screening databases and patient files to determine genotype, treatment, dose recommendations and dose adjustments. Results: 86.9% of all patients with a first fluoropyrimidine prescription were screened. Fourteen out of 275 patients (5.1%) carried a DPYD variant and received a 25–50% dose reduction recommendation. None of the patients with a DPYD variant treated with a reduced dose developed toxicities. Conclusion: Prospective DPYD screening can be implemented successfully in a real world clinical setting, is well accepted by physicians and results in low toxicity.