The Experts below are selected from a list of 765 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Griswold Terry - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Figure 1 from: Orr MC, Griswold TL (2015) A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Townsendiella (Apidae, Nomadinae, Townsendiellini), with the description of a new species from Pinnacles National Park. ZooKeys 546: 87-104. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.546.6443
2015Co-Authors: Orr Michael, Griswold TerryAbstract:Figure 1 - The male maxillary palp of a Townsendiella Ensifera sp. n. (BBSL331567) and b Townsendiella pulchra (BBSL209492). The length of the terminal, fifth segment in Townsendiella Ensifera sp. n. well exceeds that of the terminal, sixth segment in Townsendiella pulchra, likely due to the fusion of the fifth and sixth segments in the former. This character is reflected in both sexes. The scale bar represents 0.75 mm
-
Figure 4 from: Orr MC, Griswold TL (2015) A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Townsendiella (Apidae, Nomadinae, Townsendiellini), with the description of a new species from Pinnacles National Park. ZooKeys 546: 87-104. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.546.6443
2015Co-Authors: Orr Michael, Griswold TerryAbstract:Figure 4 - The male genitalia of a Townsendiella Ensifera sp. n. (BBSL259479) and b Townsendiella pulchra (BBL340294). Dorsal view of genital capsule and gonostylus. The scale bar represents 0.25 mm
-
Figure 5 from: Orr MC, Griswold TL (2015) A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Townsendiella (Apidae, Nomadinae, Townsendiellini), with the description of a new species from Pinnacles National Park. ZooKeys 546: 87-104. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.546.6443
2015Co-Authors: Orr Michael, Griswold TerryAbstract:Figure 5 - The male genitalia of a Townsendiella Ensifera sp. n. (BBSL259415) and b Townsendiella pulchra (BBSL349670). Lateral view of gonocoxite, with focus on setae. The scale bar represents 0.25 mm
-
Figures 6-8 from: Orr MC, Griswold TL (2015) A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Townsendiella (Apidae, Nomadinae, Townsendiellini), with the description of a new species from Pinnacles National Park. ZooKeys 546: 87-104. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.546.6443
2015Co-Authors: Orr Michael, Griswold TerryAbstract:Figures 6-8 - General appearance of the female Townsendiella Ensifera sp. n. holotype (BBSL331869). 6 Anterior view of face 7 Dorsal view of body 8 Lateral view of body. All scale bars represent 0.25 mm
-
Figure 3 from: Orr MC, Griswold TL (2015) A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Townsendiella (Apidae, Nomadinae, Townsendiellini), with the description of a new species from Pinnacles National Park. ZooKeys 546: 87-104. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.546.6443
2015Co-Authors: Orr Michael, Griswold TerryAbstract:Figure 3 - The female T5 of a Townsendiella Ensifera sp. n. (BBSL331869) and b Townsendiella rufiventris (BBSL209499). The latter has a distinctly impressed, finely-pitted, and tessellate lunule medially in the pseudopygidial area, a feature unique within Townsendiella. The scale bar represents 0.5 mm
Orr Michael - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Figure 1 from: Orr MC, Griswold TL (2015) A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Townsendiella (Apidae, Nomadinae, Townsendiellini), with the description of a new species from Pinnacles National Park. ZooKeys 546: 87-104. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.546.6443
2015Co-Authors: Orr Michael, Griswold TerryAbstract:Figure 1 - The male maxillary palp of a Townsendiella Ensifera sp. n. (BBSL331567) and b Townsendiella pulchra (BBSL209492). The length of the terminal, fifth segment in Townsendiella Ensifera sp. n. well exceeds that of the terminal, sixth segment in Townsendiella pulchra, likely due to the fusion of the fifth and sixth segments in the former. This character is reflected in both sexes. The scale bar represents 0.75 mm
-
Figure 4 from: Orr MC, Griswold TL (2015) A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Townsendiella (Apidae, Nomadinae, Townsendiellini), with the description of a new species from Pinnacles National Park. ZooKeys 546: 87-104. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.546.6443
2015Co-Authors: Orr Michael, Griswold TerryAbstract:Figure 4 - The male genitalia of a Townsendiella Ensifera sp. n. (BBSL259479) and b Townsendiella pulchra (BBL340294). Dorsal view of genital capsule and gonostylus. The scale bar represents 0.25 mm
-
Figure 5 from: Orr MC, Griswold TL (2015) A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Townsendiella (Apidae, Nomadinae, Townsendiellini), with the description of a new species from Pinnacles National Park. ZooKeys 546: 87-104. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.546.6443
2015Co-Authors: Orr Michael, Griswold TerryAbstract:Figure 5 - The male genitalia of a Townsendiella Ensifera sp. n. (BBSL259415) and b Townsendiella pulchra (BBSL349670). Lateral view of gonocoxite, with focus on setae. The scale bar represents 0.25 mm
-
Figures 6-8 from: Orr MC, Griswold TL (2015) A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Townsendiella (Apidae, Nomadinae, Townsendiellini), with the description of a new species from Pinnacles National Park. ZooKeys 546: 87-104. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.546.6443
2015Co-Authors: Orr Michael, Griswold TerryAbstract:Figures 6-8 - General appearance of the female Townsendiella Ensifera sp. n. holotype (BBSL331869). 6 Anterior view of face 7 Dorsal view of body 8 Lateral view of body. All scale bars represent 0.25 mm
-
Figure 3 from: Orr MC, Griswold TL (2015) A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Townsendiella (Apidae, Nomadinae, Townsendiellini), with the description of a new species from Pinnacles National Park. ZooKeys 546: 87-104. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.546.6443
2015Co-Authors: Orr Michael, Griswold TerryAbstract:Figure 3 - The female T5 of a Townsendiella Ensifera sp. n. (BBSL331869) and b Townsendiella rufiventris (BBSL209499). The latter has a distinctly impressed, finely-pitted, and tessellate lunule medially in the pseudopygidial area, a feature unique within Townsendiella. The scale bar represents 0.5 mm
Ana Maria Aparecida Guaraldo - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Parasite survey in mouse and rat colonies of Brazilian laboratory animal houses kept under differents sanitary barrier conditions
Arquivo Brasileiro De Medicina Veterinaria E Zootecnia, 2000Co-Authors: Rovilson Gilioli, Lenira Aparecida Guaraldo De Andrade, Luiz Augusto Corrêa Passos, F.a. Silva, Daniele Masselli Rodrigues, Ana Maria Aparecida GuaraldoAbstract:A parasitological study was undertaken to determine the health status of 15 mouse and 10 rat colonies bred in 18 Brazilian laboratory animal houses maintained under different sanitary barrier conditions which supply animals for teaching, research purposes and manufacture of biological products for medical or veterinary use. Parasitological methods were used for diagnosis of mites, lices, helminthes and protozoan parasites. A questionnaire was answered by institutions with the intention to obtain information about the existence of barriers against infections and of regular sanitary monitoring program of their colonies. The questionnaire data show that the majority of the animal houses investigated do not possess an efficient sanitary barrier system able to keep animals under controlled health sanitary conditions. Ecto and endoparasite infections are widespread in the colonies and multiple infections were common in animals from most facilities investigated. The prevalences of parasites detected among the mouse and rat colonies of the laboratory animal houses investigated were: Myocoptes musculinus (46.6%), Myobia musculi (26.6%), Radfordia Ensifera (13.3%), Syphacia obvelata (86.6%), Aspiculuris tetraptera (60.0%), Hymenolepis nana (53.3%), Spironucleus muris (80.0%), Tritrichomonas muris (80.0%), Giardia muris (66.0%), Entamoeba muris (20.0%), Eimeria sp. (13.3%), Hexamastix muris (26.6%), Poliplax spinulosa (30.0%), Poliplax serrata (10.0%), Radfordia Ensifera (30.0%), Syphacia muris (80.0%), Hymenolepis nana (40.0%), Trichosomoides crassicauda (55.5%), Spironucleus muris (90.0%), Tritrichomonas muris (80.0%), Giardia muris (60.0%), Entamoeba muris (80.0%), Eimeria sp. (60.0%) and Hexamastix muris (60.0%).
-
Parasite survey in mouse and rat colonies of Brazilian laboratory animal houses kept under differents sanitary barrier conditions Estudo de parasitos em colônias de ratos e de camundongos em biotérios brasileiros mantidos sob diferentes condições de
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 2000Co-Authors: Rovilson Gilioli, Lenira Aparecida Guaraldo De Andrade, Luiz Augusto Corrêa Passos, F.a. Silva, Daniele Masselli Rodrigues, Ana Maria Aparecida GuaraldoAbstract:A parasitological study was undertaken to determine the health status of 15 mouse and 10 rat colonies bred in 18 Brazilian laboratory animal houses maintained under different sanitary barrier conditions which supply animals for teaching, research purposes and manufacture of biological products for medical or veterinary use. Parasitological methods were used for diagnosis of mites, lices, helminthes and protozoan parasites. A questionnaire was answered by institutions with the intention to obtain information about the existence of barriers against infections and of regular sanitary monitoring program of their colonies. The questionnaire data show that the majority of the animal houses investigated do not possess an efficient sanitary barrier system able to keep animals under controlled health sanitary conditions. Ecto and endoparasite infections are widespread in the colonies and multiple infections were common in animals from most facilities investigated. The prevalences of parasites detected among the mouse and rat colonies of the laboratory animal houses investigated were: Myocoptes musculinus (46.6%), Myobia musculi (26.6%), Radfordia Ensifera (13.3%), Syphacia obvelata (86.6%), Aspiculuris tetraptera (60.0%), Hymenolepis nana (53.3%), Spironucleus muris (80.0%), Tritrichomonas muris (80.0%), Giardia muris (66.0%), Entamoeba muris (20.0%), Eimeria sp. (13.3%), Hexamastix muris (26.6%), Poliplax spinulosa (30.0%), Poliplax serrata (10.0%), Radfordia Ensifera (30.0%), Syphacia muris (80.0%), Hymenolepis nana (40.0%), Trichosomoides crassicauda (55.5%), Spironucleus muris (90.0%), Tritrichomonas muris (80.0%), Giardia muris (60.0%), Entamoeba muris (80.0%), Eimeria sp. (60.0%) and Hexamastix muris (60.0%).Um estudo parasitológico foi realizado para verificar as condições de saúde de 15 colônias de camundongos e 10 colônias de ratos produzidos em 18 biotérios de instituições brasileiras que fornecem animais para ensino, pesquisa e produção de imunobiológicos de uso médico ou veterinário. Métodos parasitológicos foram utilizados para diagnóstico de ácaros, piolhos, helmintos e protozoários parasitos. Um questionário foi respondido pelas instituições com o intuito de obter informações sobre a existência de barreiras contra infecções e programa de fiscalização sanitária de suas colônias. Os dados do questionário mostram que a maioria dos biotérios analisados não possui um sistema de barreiras sanitárias eficiente capaz de manter animais sob condições sanitárias controladas. Infecções por ecto e endoparasitos são generalizadas nas colônias e a associação de infecções múltiplas foi comum na maioria dos animais dos biotérios analisados. A prevalência dos parasitos detectados entre as colônias de camundongos e de ratos investigadas foi: Myocoptes musculinus (46,6%), Myobia musculi (26,6%), Radfordia Ensifera (13,3%), Syphacia obvelata (86,6%), Aspiculuris tetraptera (60,0%), Hymenolepis nana (53,3%), Spironucleus muris (80,0%), Tritrichomonas muris (80,0%), Giardia muris (66,0%), Entamoeba muris (20,0%), Eimeria sp. (13,3%), Hexamastix muris (26,6%), Poliplax spinulosa (30,0%), Poliplax serrata (10,0%), Radfordia Ensifera (30,0%), Syphacia muris (80,0%), Hymenolepis nana (40,0%), Trichosomoides crassicauda (55,5%), Spironucleus muris (90,0%), Tritrichomonas muris (80,0%), Giardia muris (60,0%), Entamoeba muris (80,0%), Eimeria sp. (60,0%) e Hexamastix muris (60,0%)
Pereira, Marcelo Ribeiro - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
New Nemobiinae taxa (Orthoptera: Grylloidea) in forest patch of Atlantic Forest, Minas Gerais, Brazil
UFV, 2008Co-Authors: Pereira, Marcelo RibeiroAbstract:Atualmente existem cerca de 25 mil espécies válidas para a ordem Orthoptera, que está dividida em duas subordens: Caelifera e Ensifera. Dentre os Orthoptera que habitam a serapilheira de florestas neotropicais, a subfamília Nemobiinae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Grylloidea: Trigonidiidae) tem se mostrado como uma das mais abundantes. Atualmente são conhecidas 293 espécies deste grupo, distribuídas em seis tribos e 51 gêneros, sendo que deste total apenas sete têm sua ocorrência registrada para o Brasil (Argizala Walker, 1869; Hemigryllus Saussure, 1877; Pteronemobius Jacobson & Bianchi, 1904; Hygronemobius Hebard, 1915; Zucchiella de Mello, 1990; Phoremia Desutter-Grandcolas, 1993 e Amanayara de Mello & Jacomini, 1994). Para o estado de Minas Gerais, apenas três dos sete gêneros (Amanayara, Phoremia e Zucchiella) tiveram sua ocorrência confirmada, mas nenhuma nova espécie havia sido descrita. Neste trabalho, são descritas três novas espécies para o gênero Amanayara, duas para Phoremia e uma para Zucchiella, todas encontradas em remanescentes de Mata Atlântica do estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil, ampliando assim, a distribuição destes três gêneros. Juntamente com as descrições, são apresentados mapas de distribuição e chaves taxonômicas para cada gênero.Nowadays about 25,000 valid species are known for the order Orthoptera, which is divided in two suborders: Caelifera and Ensifera. The subfamily Nemobiinae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Grylloidea: Trigonidiidae) has been the most abundant group among the Orthoptera that inhabits the Neotropical forest litter. For this group 293 valid species are known, distributed in six tribes and 51 genera; however only seven genera have their occurrence registered for Brazil (Argizala Walker, 1869; Hemigryllus Saussure, 1877; Pteronemobius Jacobson & Bianchi, 1904; Hygronemobius Hebard, 1915; Zucchiella De Mello, 1990; Phoremia Desutter-Grandcolas, 1993 and Amanayara of Mello & Jacomini, 1994). In the State of Minas Gerais only three of these seven genera (Amanayara, Phoremia and Zucchiella) had their occurrence confirmed, but no new species had been described yet. In this work, are described three new species for the genus Amanayara, two for Phoremia and one for Zucchiella, all found at the Atlantic Forest remnants of Minas Gerais, increasing the biogeographical distribution of these three genera. Together with the descriptions, distribution maps and taxonomic keys for the genera are presented.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológic
-
New Nemobiinae taxa (Orthoptera: Grylloidea) in forest patch of Atlantic Forest, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 2008Co-Authors: Pereira, Marcelo RibeiroAbstract:Atualmente existem cerca de 25 mil espécies válidas para a ordem Orthoptera, que está dividida em duas subordens: Caelifera e Ensifera. Dentre os Orthoptera que habitam a serapilheira de florestas neotropicais, a subfamília Nemobiinae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Grylloidea: Trigonidiidae) tem se mostrado como uma das mais abundantes. Atualmente são conhecidas 293 espécies deste grupo, distribuídas em seis tribos e 51 gêneros, sendo que deste total apenas sete têm sua ocorrência registrada para o Brasil (Argizala Walker, 1869; Hemigryllus Saussure, 1877; Pteronemobius Jacobson & Bianchi, 1904; Hygronemobius Hebard, 1915; Zucchiella de Mello, 1990; Phoremia Desutter-Grandcolas, 1993 e Amanayara de Mello & Jacomini, 1994). Para o estado de Minas Gerais, apenas três dos sete gêneros (Amanayara, Phoremia e Zucchiella) tiveram sua ocorrência confirmada, mas nenhuma nova espécie havia sido descrita. Neste trabalho, são descritas três novas espécies para o gênero Amanayara, duas para Phoremia e uma para Zucchiella, todas encontradas em remanescentes de Mata Atlântica do estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil, ampliando assim, a distribuição destes três gêneros. Juntamente com as descrições, são apresentados mapas de distribuição e chaves taxonômicas para cada gênero.Nowadays about 25,000 valid species are known for the order Orthoptera, which is divided in two suborders: Caelifera and Ensifera. The subfamily Nemobiinae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Grylloidea: Trigonidiidae) has been the most abundant group among the Orthoptera that inhabits the Neotropical forest litter. For this group 293 valid species are known, distributed in six tribes and 51 genera; however only seven genera have their occurrence registered for Brazil (Argizala Walker, 1869; Hemigryllus Saussure, 1877; Pteronemobius Jacobson & Bianchi, 1904; Hygronemobius Hebard, 1915; Zucchiella De Mello, 1990; Phoremia Desutter-Grandcolas, 1993 and Amanayara of Mello & Jacomini, 1994). In the State of Minas Gerais only three of these seven genera (Amanayara, Phoremia and Zucchiella) had their occurrence confirmed, but no new species had been described yet. In this work, are described three new species for the genus Amanayara, two for Phoremia and one for Zucchiella, all found at the Atlantic Forest remnants of Minas Gerais, increasing the biogeographical distribution of these three genera. Together with the descriptions, distribution maps and taxonomic keys for the genera are presented
Guaraldo A.m.a. - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Estudo de parasitos em colônias de ratos e de camundongos em biotérios brasileiros mantidos sob diferentes condições de barreiras sanitárias
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Escola de Veterinária, 2000Co-Authors: Gilioli R., Andrade L.a.g., Passos L.a.c., Silva F.a., Rodrigues D.m., Guaraldo A.m.a.Abstract:A parasitological study was undertaken to determine the health status of 15 mouse and 10 rat colonies bred in 18 Brazilian laboratory animal houses maintained under different sanitary barrier conditions which supply animals for teaching, research purposes and manufacture of biological products for medical or veterinary use. Parasitological methods were used for diagnosis of mites, lices, helminthes and protozoan parasites. A questionnaire was answered by institutions with the intention to obtain information about the existence of barriers against infections and of regular sanitary monitoring program of their colonies. The questionnaire data show that the majority of the animal houses investigated do not possess an efficient sanitary barrier system able to keep animals under controlled health sanitary conditions. Ecto and endoparasite infections are widespread in the colonies and multiple infections were common in animals from most facilities investigated. The prevalences of parasites detected among the mouse and rat colonies of the laboratory animal houses investigated were: Myocoptes musculinus (46.6%), Myobia musculi (26.6%), Radfordia Ensifera (13.3%), Syphacia obvelata (86.6%), Aspiculuris tetraptera (60.0%), Hymenolepis nana (53.3%), Spironucleus muris (80.0%), Tritrichomonas muris (80.0%), Giardia muris (66.0%), Entamoeba muris (20.0%), Eimeria sp. (13.3%), Hexamastix muris (26.6%), Poliplax spinulosa (30.0%), Poliplax serrata (10.0%), Radfordia Ensifera (30.0%), Syphacia muris (80.0%), Hymenolepis nana (40.0%), Trichosomoides crassicauda (55.5%), Spironucleus muris (90.0%), Tritrichomonas muris (80.0%), Giardia muris (60.0%), Entamoeba muris (80.0%), Eimeria sp. (60.0%) and Hexamastix muris (60.0%).Um estudo parasitológico foi realizado para verificar as condições de saúde de 15 colônias de camundongos e 10 colônias de ratos produzidos em 18 biotérios de instituições brasileiras que fornecem animais para ensino, pesquisa e produção de imunobiológicos de uso médico ou veterinário. Métodos parasitológicos foram utilizados para diagnóstico de ácaros, piolhos, helmintos e protozoários parasitos. Um questionário foi respondido pelas instituições com o intuito de obter informações sobre a existência de barreiras contra infecções e programa de fiscalização sanitária de suas colônias. Os dados do questionário mostram que a maioria dos biotérios analisados não possui um sistema de barreiras sanitárias eficiente capaz de manter animais sob condições sanitárias controladas. Infecções por ecto e endoparasitos são generalizadas nas colônias e a associação de infecções múltiplas foi comum na maioria dos animais dos biotérios analisados. A prevalência dos parasitos detectados entre as colônias de camundongos e de ratos investigadas foi: Myocoptes musculinus (46,6%), Myobia musculi (26,6%), Radfordia Ensifera (13,3%), Syphacia obvelata (86,6%), Aspiculuris tetraptera (60,0%), Hymenolepis nana (53,3%), Spironucleus muris (80,0%), Tritrichomonas muris (80,0%), Giardia muris (66,0%), Entamoeba muris (20,0%), Eimeria sp. (13,3%), Hexamastix muris (26,6%), Poliplax spinulosa (30,0%), Poliplax serrata (10,0%), Radfordia Ensifera (30,0%), Syphacia muris (80,0%), Hymenolepis nana (40,0%), Trichosomoides crassicauda (55,5%), Spironucleus muris (90,0%), Tritrichomonas muris (80,0%), Giardia muris (60,0%), Entamoeba muris (80,0%), Eimeria sp. (60,0%) e Hexamastix muris (60,0%)