The Experts below are selected from a list of 451773 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Hilko Van Der Voet - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
combining exposure and effect modeling into an integrated probabilistic Environmental Risk assessment for nanoparticles
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2016Co-Authors: Rianne Jacobs, Johannes A J Meesters, Cajo J F Ter Braak, Dik Van De Meent, Hilko Van Der VoetAbstract:There is a growing need for good Environmental Risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs). Environmental Risk assessment of ENPs has been hampered by lack of data and knowledge about ENPs, their Environmental fate, and their toxicity. This leads to uncertainty in the Risk assessment. To deal with uncertainty in the Risk assessment effectively, probabilistic methods are advantageous. In the present study, the authors developed a method to model both the variability and the uncertainty in Environmental Risk assessment of ENPs. This method is based on the concentration ratio and the ratio of the exposure concentration to the critical effect concentration, both considered to be random. In this method, variability and uncertainty are modeled separately so as to allow the user to see which part of the total variation in the concentration ratio is attributable to uncertainty and which part is attributable to variability. The authors illustrate the use of the method with a simplified aquatic Risk assessment of nano-titanium dioxide. The authors' method allows a more transparent Risk assessment and can also direct further Environmental and toxicological research to the areas in which it is most needed. Environ Toxicol Chem 2016;35:2958-2967. (c) 2016 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.
-
combining exposure and effect modeling into an integrated probabilistic Environmental Risk assessment for nanoparticles
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2016Co-Authors: Rianne Jacobs, Johannes A J Meesters, Cajo J F Ter Braak, Dik Van De Meent, Hilko Van Der VoetAbstract:There is a growing need for good Environmental Risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs). Environmental Risk assessment of ENPs has been hampered by lack of data and knowledge about ENPs, their Environmental fate, and their toxicity. This leads to uncertainty in the Risk assessment. To deal with uncertainty in the Risk assessment effectively, probabilistic methods are advantageous. In the present study, the authors developed a method to model both the variability and the uncertainty in Environmental Risk assessment of ENPs. This method is based on the concentration ratio and the ratio of the exposure concentration to the critical effect concentration, both considered to be random. In this method, variability and uncertainty are modeled separately so as to allow the user to see which part of the total variation in the concentration ratio is attributable to uncertainty and which part is attributable to variability. The authors illustrate the use of the method with a simplified aquatic Risk assessment of nano-titanium dioxide. The authors' method allows a more transparent Risk assessment and can also direct further Environmental and toxicological research to the areas in which it is most needed. Environ Toxicol Chem 2016;35:2958-2967. (c) 2016 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.
Dong Cao - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
toward a framework of Environmental Risk management for co2 geological storage in china gaps and suggestions for future regulations
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2016Co-Authors: Lancui Liu, Jiutian Zhang, Dong CaoAbstract:China encourages the demonstration of carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects. In an effort to identify gaps and provide suggestions for Environmental Risk management of carbon dioxide (CO2) geological storage in China, this article presents a concise overview of potential health, safety and Environmental (HSE) Risks and Environmental management regulations for CO2 geological storage in Australia, Japan, the United States (USA), the European Union (EU), and the United Kingdom (UK). The Environmental impact assessment (EIA) experience of Shenhua Ordos Coal-to-Liquid (CTL) Project and PetroChina Jilin Oil Field enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is subsequently analyzed in light of our field investigation, and gaps in current EIA guidelines that are applicable to CO2 geological storage projects are identified. It is found that there are no specific Environmental Risk regulations suitable for CO2 storage in China, and Environmental Risk management lags behind the development of CCS technology, which presents a challenge to demonstration enterprises in terms of assessing Environmental Risk. One major challenge is the overestimation or underestimation of this Risk on the part of the enterprise, and another is a lack of applicable regulations for government sectors to supervise the Risk throughout CCS projects. Therefore, there is a pressing need for China to formulate Environmental management regulations that include Environmental Risk assessment, mandatory monitoring schemes, Environmental emergency plans, and related issues.
-
toward a framework of Environmental Risk management for co 2 geological storage in china gaps and suggestions for future regulations
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2016Co-Authors: Lancui Liu, Jiutian Zhang, Dong CaoAbstract:China encourages the demonstration of carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects. In an effort to identify gaps and provide suggestions for Environmental Risk management of carbon dioxide (CO2) geological storage in China, this article presents a concise overview of potential health, safety and Environmental (HSE) Risks and Environmental management regulations for CO2 geological storage in Australia, Japan, the United States (USA), the European Union (EU), and the United Kingdom (UK). The Environmental impact assessment (EIA) experience of Shenhua Ordos Coal-to-Liquid (CTL) Project and PetroChina Jilin Oil Field enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is subsequently analyzed in light of our field investigation, and gaps in current EIA guidelines that are applicable to CO2 geological storage projects are identified. It is found that there are no specific Environmental Risk regulations suitable for CO2 storage in China, and Environmental Risk management lags behind the development of CCS technology, which presents a challenge to demonstration enterprises in terms of assessing Environmental Risk. One major challenge is the overestimation or underestimation of this Risk on the part of the enterprise, and another is a lack of applicable regulations for government sectors to supervise the Risk throughout CCS projects. Therefore, there is a pressing need for China to formulate Environmental management regulations that include Environmental Risk assessment, mandatory monitoring schemes, Environmental emergency plans, and related issues.
Rianne Jacobs - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
combining exposure and effect modeling into an integrated probabilistic Environmental Risk assessment for nanoparticles
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2016Co-Authors: Rianne Jacobs, Johannes A J Meesters, Cajo J F Ter Braak, Dik Van De Meent, Hilko Van Der VoetAbstract:There is a growing need for good Environmental Risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs). Environmental Risk assessment of ENPs has been hampered by lack of data and knowledge about ENPs, their Environmental fate, and their toxicity. This leads to uncertainty in the Risk assessment. To deal with uncertainty in the Risk assessment effectively, probabilistic methods are advantageous. In the present study, the authors developed a method to model both the variability and the uncertainty in Environmental Risk assessment of ENPs. This method is based on the concentration ratio and the ratio of the exposure concentration to the critical effect concentration, both considered to be random. In this method, variability and uncertainty are modeled separately so as to allow the user to see which part of the total variation in the concentration ratio is attributable to uncertainty and which part is attributable to variability. The authors illustrate the use of the method with a simplified aquatic Risk assessment of nano-titanium dioxide. The authors' method allows a more transparent Risk assessment and can also direct further Environmental and toxicological research to the areas in which it is most needed. Environ Toxicol Chem 2016;35:2958-2967. (c) 2016 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.
-
combining exposure and effect modeling into an integrated probabilistic Environmental Risk assessment for nanoparticles
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2016Co-Authors: Rianne Jacobs, Johannes A J Meesters, Cajo J F Ter Braak, Dik Van De Meent, Hilko Van Der VoetAbstract:There is a growing need for good Environmental Risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs). Environmental Risk assessment of ENPs has been hampered by lack of data and knowledge about ENPs, their Environmental fate, and their toxicity. This leads to uncertainty in the Risk assessment. To deal with uncertainty in the Risk assessment effectively, probabilistic methods are advantageous. In the present study, the authors developed a method to model both the variability and the uncertainty in Environmental Risk assessment of ENPs. This method is based on the concentration ratio and the ratio of the exposure concentration to the critical effect concentration, both considered to be random. In this method, variability and uncertainty are modeled separately so as to allow the user to see which part of the total variation in the concentration ratio is attributable to uncertainty and which part is attributable to variability. The authors illustrate the use of the method with a simplified aquatic Risk assessment of nano-titanium dioxide. The authors' method allows a more transparent Risk assessment and can also direct further Environmental and toxicological research to the areas in which it is most needed. Environ Toxicol Chem 2016;35:2958-2967. (c) 2016 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.
Lancui Liu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
toward a framework of Environmental Risk management for co2 geological storage in china gaps and suggestions for future regulations
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2016Co-Authors: Lancui Liu, Jiutian Zhang, Dong CaoAbstract:China encourages the demonstration of carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects. In an effort to identify gaps and provide suggestions for Environmental Risk management of carbon dioxide (CO2) geological storage in China, this article presents a concise overview of potential health, safety and Environmental (HSE) Risks and Environmental management regulations for CO2 geological storage in Australia, Japan, the United States (USA), the European Union (EU), and the United Kingdom (UK). The Environmental impact assessment (EIA) experience of Shenhua Ordos Coal-to-Liquid (CTL) Project and PetroChina Jilin Oil Field enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is subsequently analyzed in light of our field investigation, and gaps in current EIA guidelines that are applicable to CO2 geological storage projects are identified. It is found that there are no specific Environmental Risk regulations suitable for CO2 storage in China, and Environmental Risk management lags behind the development of CCS technology, which presents a challenge to demonstration enterprises in terms of assessing Environmental Risk. One major challenge is the overestimation or underestimation of this Risk on the part of the enterprise, and another is a lack of applicable regulations for government sectors to supervise the Risk throughout CCS projects. Therefore, there is a pressing need for China to formulate Environmental management regulations that include Environmental Risk assessment, mandatory monitoring schemes, Environmental emergency plans, and related issues.
-
toward a framework of Environmental Risk management for co 2 geological storage in china gaps and suggestions for future regulations
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2016Co-Authors: Lancui Liu, Jiutian Zhang, Dong CaoAbstract:China encourages the demonstration of carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects. In an effort to identify gaps and provide suggestions for Environmental Risk management of carbon dioxide (CO2) geological storage in China, this article presents a concise overview of potential health, safety and Environmental (HSE) Risks and Environmental management regulations for CO2 geological storage in Australia, Japan, the United States (USA), the European Union (EU), and the United Kingdom (UK). The Environmental impact assessment (EIA) experience of Shenhua Ordos Coal-to-Liquid (CTL) Project and PetroChina Jilin Oil Field enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is subsequently analyzed in light of our field investigation, and gaps in current EIA guidelines that are applicable to CO2 geological storage projects are identified. It is found that there are no specific Environmental Risk regulations suitable for CO2 storage in China, and Environmental Risk management lags behind the development of CCS technology, which presents a challenge to demonstration enterprises in terms of assessing Environmental Risk. One major challenge is the overestimation or underestimation of this Risk on the part of the enterprise, and another is a lack of applicable regulations for government sectors to supervise the Risk throughout CCS projects. Therefore, there is a pressing need for China to formulate Environmental management regulations that include Environmental Risk assessment, mandatory monitoring schemes, Environmental emergency plans, and related issues.
Dik Van De Meent - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
combining exposure and effect modeling into an integrated probabilistic Environmental Risk assessment for nanoparticles
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2016Co-Authors: Rianne Jacobs, Johannes A J Meesters, Cajo J F Ter Braak, Dik Van De Meent, Hilko Van Der VoetAbstract:There is a growing need for good Environmental Risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs). Environmental Risk assessment of ENPs has been hampered by lack of data and knowledge about ENPs, their Environmental fate, and their toxicity. This leads to uncertainty in the Risk assessment. To deal with uncertainty in the Risk assessment effectively, probabilistic methods are advantageous. In the present study, the authors developed a method to model both the variability and the uncertainty in Environmental Risk assessment of ENPs. This method is based on the concentration ratio and the ratio of the exposure concentration to the critical effect concentration, both considered to be random. In this method, variability and uncertainty are modeled separately so as to allow the user to see which part of the total variation in the concentration ratio is attributable to uncertainty and which part is attributable to variability. The authors illustrate the use of the method with a simplified aquatic Risk assessment of nano-titanium dioxide. The authors' method allows a more transparent Risk assessment and can also direct further Environmental and toxicological research to the areas in which it is most needed. Environ Toxicol Chem 2016;35:2958-2967. (c) 2016 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.
-
combining exposure and effect modeling into an integrated probabilistic Environmental Risk assessment for nanoparticles
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2016Co-Authors: Rianne Jacobs, Johannes A J Meesters, Cajo J F Ter Braak, Dik Van De Meent, Hilko Van Der VoetAbstract:There is a growing need for good Environmental Risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs). Environmental Risk assessment of ENPs has been hampered by lack of data and knowledge about ENPs, their Environmental fate, and their toxicity. This leads to uncertainty in the Risk assessment. To deal with uncertainty in the Risk assessment effectively, probabilistic methods are advantageous. In the present study, the authors developed a method to model both the variability and the uncertainty in Environmental Risk assessment of ENPs. This method is based on the concentration ratio and the ratio of the exposure concentration to the critical effect concentration, both considered to be random. In this method, variability and uncertainty are modeled separately so as to allow the user to see which part of the total variation in the concentration ratio is attributable to uncertainty and which part is attributable to variability. The authors illustrate the use of the method with a simplified aquatic Risk assessment of nano-titanium dioxide. The authors' method allows a more transparent Risk assessment and can also direct further Environmental and toxicological research to the areas in which it is most needed. Environ Toxicol Chem 2016;35:2958-2967. (c) 2016 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.