The Experts below are selected from a list of 396 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Klaus Hedman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
identification of past and recent parvovirus b19 infection in immunocompetent individuals by quantitative pcr and enzyme immunoassays a dual laboratory study
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2014Co-Authors: P A C Maple, Lea Hedman, Pravesh Dhanilall, Kalle Kantola, Visa Nurmi, Maria Soderlundvenermo, Kevin E Brown, Klaus HedmanAbstract:Parvovirus B19 (B19V) is a member of the family Parvoviridae, genus Erythrovirus. B19V-specific IgG and IgM react differently against conformational and linear epitopes of VP1 and VP2 antigens, leading to the development of IgG avidity and epitope type specificity (ETS) enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for distinguishing past from recent infection. Additionally, B19V viral load determination (by quantitative PCR [qPCR]) is increasingly used in the staging of B19V infection. In this study, the utility of these methods is compared. A panel of 78 sera was jointly tested by the Virus Reference Department (VRD), London, United Kingdom, and the Haartman Institute (HI), Helsinki, Finland, using a number of EIAs, e.g., B19V-specific IgG and IgM, IgG avidity, and ETS EIAs. At VRD, the sera were also tested by a B19V viral load PCR (qPCR). By consensus analysis, 43 (55.1%) sera represented past infection, 28 (35.9%) sera represented recent infection, and 7 (9.0%) sera were indeterminate. Both VRD B19V qPCR and HI B19V VP2 IgM EIA gave the highest agreement with consensus interpretation for past or recent infection, with an overall agreement of 99% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92 to 100) and positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% (95% CI, 87 to 100). Nine sera designated as representing past infection by consensus analysis were B19V IgM positive by a commercial VRD B19V IgM EIA and B19V IgM negative by a new HI in-house B19V VP2 IgM EIA. A new VRD B19V IgG avidity EIA showed good (>95%) agreement (excluding equivocal results) with consensus interpretations for past or recent infection. Correct discrimination of past from recent B19V infection was achieved through application of qPCR or by appropriate selection of EIAs.
-
detection and differentiation of human parvovirus variants by commercial quantitative real time pcr tests
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004Co-Authors: Kati Hokynar, Klaus Hedman, Paivi Norja, Harri Laitinen, Pekka Palomaki, Antoine Garbargchenon, Annamari Ranki, Maria SoderlundvenermoAbstract:Parvovirus B19 causes a variety of diseases in humans, with outcomes ranging from asymptomatic to severe, such as chronic anemia in immunocompromised patients or fetal hydrops and death after maternal infection during pregnancy. The virus may be transmitted via plasma-derived products. According to the results of solvent-detergent safety studies, an upper limit of B19 DNA in plasma pools was recently defined. To restrict the input of B19 virus into production pools, a quantitative nucleic acid test is a prerequisite. We examined the suitability of the two commercial quantitative B19 PCR tests, LightCycler-Parvovirus B19 quantification kit (Roche Diagnostics) and RealArt Parvo B19 LC PCR (Artus) for detection, quantification, and differentiation of the three known B19 genotypes, including the newly described Erythrovirus variants (genotypes 2 and 3). The former kit was highly sensitive for genotype 1 but was not suitable for detection of genotype 2 or one of two genotype 3 strains. The latter kit detected and differentiated all three genotypes, albeit with lower sensitivity for one of the genotype-3 strains. We furthermore assessed the prevalence of the three B19 virus genotypes in blood donors, by screening pooled plasma samples derived from 140,160 Finnish blood-donor units. None of the pools contained detectable levels of B19 virus genotypes 2 or 3. The origin, mode of transmission, and clinical significance of these genotypes are unknown and deserve further study. The RealArt Parvo B19 LC PCR is suitable for detection, quantification, and differentiation of all three B19 virus genotypes in molecular and clinical research.
Ruth Laub - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
prevalence of human Erythrovirus b19 dna in healthy belgian blood donors and correlation with specific antibodies against structural and non structural viral proteins
Vox Sanguinis, 2003Co-Authors: I Thomas, M Di Giambattista, C Gerard, E Mathys, V Hougardy, B Latour, T Branckaert, Ruth LaubAbstract:Background and Objectives Human parvovirus (Erythrovirus) B19 is recognized as a major contaminant of blood and blood products. To reduce the risk of contamination, plasma-pool screening and exclusion of highly viraemic donations are recommended. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of B19 DNA in our blood-donor population, to determine the appropriate pool size to be tested (taking into account parameters such as prevalence, viral load, test sensitivity, and the efficacy of inactivation procedures), and to correlate viral loads with the serological status of donors as regards antibodies against different viral proteins. Materials and Methods Pools of different sizes were tested for B19, using a sensitive nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as well as an simple, un-nested, less sensitive PCR. Positive pools were resolved to the level of individual donations, and the viral load and serological markers were determined. Results Of 16 859 donations, 27 (one of 625) were found to be B19 DNA positive, with viral loads ranging from 102 to > 107 IU/ml. Twenty-five of the positive donations were tested for VP-specific anti-B19 antibodies, and eight (32%) were negative for both immunoglobulin (Ig)M and IgG. They were probably collected in the preseroconversion window period or from chronic carriers without detectable antibodies. We regarded the seven (28%) IgM-positive donors as being in the early phase of infection. The remaining 10 (40%) IgM-negative, IgG-positive donors were probably carriers of persistent infection (i.e. PCR positive despite the presence of IgG antibodies), as suggested by their low viral loads ( 104 IU/ml. Conclusions By testing all donations as pools of 480 by un-nested PCR, and resolving positive pools to identify the responsible donations, it is possible to ensure that the viral load in fractionation pools (5000 donations) remains < 103 IU/ml, compatible with the efficacy of inactivation procedures and complying with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations.
-
Prevalence of human Erythrovirus B19 DNA in healthy Belgian blood donors and correlation with specific antibodies against structural and non-structural viral proteins.
2003Co-Authors: I Thomas, M Di Giambattista, C Gerard, E Mathys, V Hougardy, B Latour, T Branckaert, Ruth LaubAbstract:<p><b>BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: </b>Human parvovirus (Erythrovirus) B19 is recognized as a major contaminant of blood and blood products. To reduce the risk of contamination, plasma-pool screening and exclusion of highly viraemic donations are recommended. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of B19 DNA in our blood-donor population, to determine the appropriate pool size to be tested (taking into account parameters such as prevalence, viral load, test sensitivity, and the efficacy of inactivation procedures), and to correlate viral loads with the serological status of donors as regards antibodies against different viral proteins.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS: </b>Pools of different sizes were tested for B19, using a sensitive nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as well as an simple, un-nested, less sensitive PCR. Positive pools were resolved to the level of individual donations, and the viral load and serological markers were determined.</p><p><b>RESULTS: </b>Of 16,859 donations, 27 (one of 625) were found to be B19 DNA positive, with viral loads ranging from 10(2) to > 10(7) IU/ml. Twenty-five of the positive donations were tested for VP-specific anti-B19 antibodies, and eight (32%) were negative for both immunoglobulin (Ig)M and IgG. They were probably collected in the preseroconversion window period or from chronic carriers without detectable antibodies. We regarded the seven (28%) IgM-positive donors as being in the early phase of infection. The remaining 10 (40%) IgM-negative, IgG-positive donors were probably carriers of persistent infection (i.e. PCR positive despite the presence of IgG antibodies), as suggested by their low viral loads (< 10(4) IU/ml). Fifteen out of 36 major pools contained one or more contaminated donations. Among these, 12 tested positive by nested PCR and only three by un-nested PCR, this reflecting a viral load of > 10(4) IU/ml.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b>By testing all donations as pools of 480 by un-nested PCR, and resolving positive pools to identify the responsible donations, it is possible to ensure that the viral load in fractionation pools (5000 donations) remains < 10(3) IU/ml, compatible with the efficacy of inactivation procedures and complying with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations.</p>
Maria Soderlundvenermo - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
identification of past and recent parvovirus b19 infection in immunocompetent individuals by quantitative pcr and enzyme immunoassays a dual laboratory study
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2014Co-Authors: P A C Maple, Lea Hedman, Pravesh Dhanilall, Kalle Kantola, Visa Nurmi, Maria Soderlundvenermo, Kevin E Brown, Klaus HedmanAbstract:Parvovirus B19 (B19V) is a member of the family Parvoviridae, genus Erythrovirus. B19V-specific IgG and IgM react differently against conformational and linear epitopes of VP1 and VP2 antigens, leading to the development of IgG avidity and epitope type specificity (ETS) enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for distinguishing past from recent infection. Additionally, B19V viral load determination (by quantitative PCR [qPCR]) is increasingly used in the staging of B19V infection. In this study, the utility of these methods is compared. A panel of 78 sera was jointly tested by the Virus Reference Department (VRD), London, United Kingdom, and the Haartman Institute (HI), Helsinki, Finland, using a number of EIAs, e.g., B19V-specific IgG and IgM, IgG avidity, and ETS EIAs. At VRD, the sera were also tested by a B19V viral load PCR (qPCR). By consensus analysis, 43 (55.1%) sera represented past infection, 28 (35.9%) sera represented recent infection, and 7 (9.0%) sera were indeterminate. Both VRD B19V qPCR and HI B19V VP2 IgM EIA gave the highest agreement with consensus interpretation for past or recent infection, with an overall agreement of 99% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92 to 100) and positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% (95% CI, 87 to 100). Nine sera designated as representing past infection by consensus analysis were B19V IgM positive by a commercial VRD B19V IgM EIA and B19V IgM negative by a new HI in-house B19V VP2 IgM EIA. A new VRD B19V IgG avidity EIA showed good (>95%) agreement (excluding equivocal results) with consensus interpretations for past or recent infection. Correct discrimination of past from recent B19V infection was achieved through application of qPCR or by appropriate selection of EIAs.
-
detection and differentiation of human parvovirus variants by commercial quantitative real time pcr tests
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004Co-Authors: Kati Hokynar, Klaus Hedman, Paivi Norja, Harri Laitinen, Pekka Palomaki, Antoine Garbargchenon, Annamari Ranki, Maria SoderlundvenermoAbstract:Parvovirus B19 causes a variety of diseases in humans, with outcomes ranging from asymptomatic to severe, such as chronic anemia in immunocompromised patients or fetal hydrops and death after maternal infection during pregnancy. The virus may be transmitted via plasma-derived products. According to the results of solvent-detergent safety studies, an upper limit of B19 DNA in plasma pools was recently defined. To restrict the input of B19 virus into production pools, a quantitative nucleic acid test is a prerequisite. We examined the suitability of the two commercial quantitative B19 PCR tests, LightCycler-Parvovirus B19 quantification kit (Roche Diagnostics) and RealArt Parvo B19 LC PCR (Artus) for detection, quantification, and differentiation of the three known B19 genotypes, including the newly described Erythrovirus variants (genotypes 2 and 3). The former kit was highly sensitive for genotype 1 but was not suitable for detection of genotype 2 or one of two genotype 3 strains. The latter kit detected and differentiated all three genotypes, albeit with lower sensitivity for one of the genotype-3 strains. We furthermore assessed the prevalence of the three B19 virus genotypes in blood donors, by screening pooled plasma samples derived from 140,160 Finnish blood-donor units. None of the pools contained detectable levels of B19 virus genotypes 2 or 3. The origin, mode of transmission, and clinical significance of these genotypes are unknown and deserve further study. The RealArt Parvo B19 LC PCR is suitable for detection, quantification, and differentiation of all three B19 virus genotypes in molecular and clinical research.
I Thomas - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
prevalence of human Erythrovirus b19 dna in healthy belgian blood donors and correlation with specific antibodies against structural and non structural viral proteins
Vox Sanguinis, 2003Co-Authors: I Thomas, M Di Giambattista, C Gerard, E Mathys, V Hougardy, B Latour, T Branckaert, Ruth LaubAbstract:Background and Objectives Human parvovirus (Erythrovirus) B19 is recognized as a major contaminant of blood and blood products. To reduce the risk of contamination, plasma-pool screening and exclusion of highly viraemic donations are recommended. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of B19 DNA in our blood-donor population, to determine the appropriate pool size to be tested (taking into account parameters such as prevalence, viral load, test sensitivity, and the efficacy of inactivation procedures), and to correlate viral loads with the serological status of donors as regards antibodies against different viral proteins. Materials and Methods Pools of different sizes were tested for B19, using a sensitive nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as well as an simple, un-nested, less sensitive PCR. Positive pools were resolved to the level of individual donations, and the viral load and serological markers were determined. Results Of 16 859 donations, 27 (one of 625) were found to be B19 DNA positive, with viral loads ranging from 102 to > 107 IU/ml. Twenty-five of the positive donations were tested for VP-specific anti-B19 antibodies, and eight (32%) were negative for both immunoglobulin (Ig)M and IgG. They were probably collected in the preseroconversion window period or from chronic carriers without detectable antibodies. We regarded the seven (28%) IgM-positive donors as being in the early phase of infection. The remaining 10 (40%) IgM-negative, IgG-positive donors were probably carriers of persistent infection (i.e. PCR positive despite the presence of IgG antibodies), as suggested by their low viral loads ( 104 IU/ml. Conclusions By testing all donations as pools of 480 by un-nested PCR, and resolving positive pools to identify the responsible donations, it is possible to ensure that the viral load in fractionation pools (5000 donations) remains < 103 IU/ml, compatible with the efficacy of inactivation procedures and complying with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations.
-
Prevalence of human Erythrovirus B19 DNA in healthy Belgian blood donors and correlation with specific antibodies against structural and non-structural viral proteins.
2003Co-Authors: I Thomas, M Di Giambattista, C Gerard, E Mathys, V Hougardy, B Latour, T Branckaert, Ruth LaubAbstract:<p><b>BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: </b>Human parvovirus (Erythrovirus) B19 is recognized as a major contaminant of blood and blood products. To reduce the risk of contamination, plasma-pool screening and exclusion of highly viraemic donations are recommended. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of B19 DNA in our blood-donor population, to determine the appropriate pool size to be tested (taking into account parameters such as prevalence, viral load, test sensitivity, and the efficacy of inactivation procedures), and to correlate viral loads with the serological status of donors as regards antibodies against different viral proteins.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS: </b>Pools of different sizes were tested for B19, using a sensitive nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as well as an simple, un-nested, less sensitive PCR. Positive pools were resolved to the level of individual donations, and the viral load and serological markers were determined.</p><p><b>RESULTS: </b>Of 16,859 donations, 27 (one of 625) were found to be B19 DNA positive, with viral loads ranging from 10(2) to > 10(7) IU/ml. Twenty-five of the positive donations were tested for VP-specific anti-B19 antibodies, and eight (32%) were negative for both immunoglobulin (Ig)M and IgG. They were probably collected in the preseroconversion window period or from chronic carriers without detectable antibodies. We regarded the seven (28%) IgM-positive donors as being in the early phase of infection. The remaining 10 (40%) IgM-negative, IgG-positive donors were probably carriers of persistent infection (i.e. PCR positive despite the presence of IgG antibodies), as suggested by their low viral loads (< 10(4) IU/ml). Fifteen out of 36 major pools contained one or more contaminated donations. Among these, 12 tested positive by nested PCR and only three by un-nested PCR, this reflecting a viral load of > 10(4) IU/ml.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b>By testing all donations as pools of 480 by un-nested PCR, and resolving positive pools to identify the responsible donations, it is possible to ensure that the viral load in fractionation pools (5000 donations) remains < 10(3) IU/ml, compatible with the efficacy of inactivation procedures and complying with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations.</p>
Sean Doyle - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
host–pathogen interactions of parvovirus B19
2015Co-Authors: Amanda Corcoran, Sean DoyleAbstract:Increased recognition of parvovirus B19 (B19), an Erythrovirus, as a significant human pathogen that causes fetal loss and severe disease in immunocompromised patients has resulted in intensive efforts to understand the pathogenesis of B19-related disease, to improve diagnostic strategy that is deployed to detect B19 infection and blood-product contamination and, finally, to elucidate the nature of the cellular immune response that is elicited by the virus in diverse patient cohorts. It is becoming clear that at least three related Erythrovirus strains (B19, A6/K71 and V9) are circulating in the general population and that viral entry into target cells is mediated by an expanding range of cellular receptors, including P antigen and -integrins. Persistent infection by B19 is emerging as a contributory factor in autoimmune disease, a hypothesis that is constrained by the detection of B19 in the skin of apparently healthy individuals. B19 infection during pregnancy may account for thousands of incidences of fetal loss per annum in Europe, North America and beyond, yet there is currently only minimal screening of pregnant women to assess serological status, and thereby risk of infection, upon becoming pregnant. Whilst major advances in diagnosis of B19 infection have taken place, including standardization of serological and DNA-based detection methodologies, blood donations that are targeted at high-risk groups are only beginning to be screened for B19 IgG an
-
advances in the biology diagnosis and host pathogen interactions of parvovirus b19
Journal of Medical Microbiology, 2004Co-Authors: Amanda Corcoran, Sean DoyleAbstract:Increased recognition of parvovirus B19 (B19), an Erythrovirus, as a significant human pathogen that causes fetal loss and severe disease in immunocompromised patients has resulted in intensive efforts to understand the pathogenesis of B19-related disease, to improve diagnostic strategy that is deployed to detect B19 infection and blood-product contamination and, finally, to elucidate the nature of the cellular immune response that is elicited by the virus in diverse patient cohorts. It is becoming clear that at least three related Erythrovirus strains (B19, A6/K71 and V9) are circulating in the general population and that viral entry into target cells is mediated by an expanding range of cellular receptors, including P antigen and β-integrins. Persistent infection by B19 is emerging as a contributory factor in autoimmune disease, a hypothesis that is constrained by the detection of B19 in the skin of apparently healthy individuals. B19 infection during pregnancy may account for thousands of incidences of fetal loss per annum in Europe, North America and beyond, yet there is currently only minimal screening of pregnant women to assess serological status, and thereby risk of infection, upon becoming pregnant. Whilst major advances in diagnosis of B19 infection have taken place, including standardization of serological and DNA-based detection methodologies, blood donations that are targeted at high-risk groups are only beginning to be screened for B19 IgG and DNA as a means of minimizing exposure of at-risk patients to the virus. It is now firmly established that a Th1-mediated cellular immune response is mounted in immunocompetent individuals, a finding that should contribute to the development of an effective vaccine to prevent B19 infection in selected high-risk groups, including sickle-cell anaemics.