The Experts below are selected from a list of 258 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Cabo De Sao Tomé - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Length-Weight Relationship of Small Pelagic Fish Species of the Southeast and South Brazilian Exclusive Economic Zone
2020Co-Authors: Cabo De Sao ToméAbstract:The length-weight relationship (LWR) parameters of 23 small pelagic fish species (belonging to 13 families) from the South-Southeast Brazilian Exclusive Economic Zone in 1996 and 1997 are presented. The b values varied between 2.72 and 3.53. The samples for this study were collected during hydroacoustic surveys covering an area of 700 000 km 2
C L D B R Wongtschowski - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
length weight relationship of small pelagic fish species of the southeast and south brazilian Exclusive Economic Zone
Naga, 2000Co-Authors: R A Bernardes, C L D B R WongtschowskiAbstract:The length-weight relationship (LWR) parameters of 23 small pelagic fish species (belonging to 13 families) from the south-southeast Brazilian Exclusive Economic Zone in 1996 and 1997 are presented. The b values varied between 2.72 and 3.53. The samples for this study were collected during hydroacoustic surveys covering an area of 700 000 square km.
Rognvaldur Hannesson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Exclusive Economic Zone
Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences#R##N#Encyclopedia of Energy Natural Resource and Environmental Economics, 2013Co-Authors: Rognvaldur HannessonAbstract:The Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) is explained and its history is outlined. Since the 1700s, territorial waters were usually limited to 3 nautical miles from shore. In the 1900s, this began to unravel, especially after the Truman Proclamation of 1945, which asserted federal ownership of all resources on and underneath the sea bed on the continental shelf of the United States. Three conferences on the law of the sea, under the auspices of the United Nations, dealt with offshore jurisdiction and finally resulted in recognition of the 200-mile EEZ. This arrangement has provided the necessary jurisdictional framework for offshore petroleum extraction and for fisheries management based on fish quotas. International Fisheries Management problems are discussed, both (1) where fish stocks migrate between EEZs of different countries and (2) in high seas fisheries.
-
the Exclusive Economic Zone and Economic development in the pacific island countries
Marine Policy, 2008Co-Authors: Rognvaldur HannessonAbstract:The Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) became accepted internationally in the 1970s. This transferred resource wealth to the coastal states establishing such Zones. The history of the EEZ is reviewed, and its impact on the Economic development of the Pacific island states considered. The growth performance and the tuna fishery development of these states are reviewed and possible causes of limited success discussed. The use of trust funds to increase the resource wealth of the Pacific island states is briefly considered.
R A Bernardes - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
length weight relationship of small pelagic fish species of the southeast and south brazilian Exclusive Economic Zone
Naga, 2000Co-Authors: R A Bernardes, C L D B R WongtschowskiAbstract:The length-weight relationship (LWR) parameters of 23 small pelagic fish species (belonging to 13 families) from the south-southeast Brazilian Exclusive Economic Zone in 1996 and 1997 are presented. The b values varied between 2.72 and 3.53. The samples for this study were collected during hydroacoustic surveys covering an area of 700 000 square km.
Dirk Zeller - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Marine Fisheries in Bulgaria's Exclusive Economic Zone, 1950–2013
Frontiers in Marine Science, 2017Co-Authors: Çetin Keskin, Aylin Ulman, K. Zylich, Violin S. Raykov, Georgi M. Daskalov, Daniel Pauly, Dirk ZellerAbstract:The aim of this study is to reconstruct the total historic catch of Bulgarian marine fisheries in their Exclusive Economic Zone for the time period 1950-2013, including unreported landings, discards, recreational and subsistence catches from the ecosystem. The landings data officially reported by Bulgaria to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations for the Mediterranean and Black Seas (FAO Area 37) were revised in line with all available information. The reconstructed total catch for 1950-2013 was 1.7 times the (adjusted) baseline data reported by Bulgaria to FAO and 1.5 times the unadjusted data as reported by FAO. This study revealed major deficiencies which exist in the officially reported Bulgarian catch data, foremost being the large amount of unreported industrial catches, especially for the last two decades. Furthermore, the exclusion of some fisheries sectors, notably the absence of data on the subsistence and recreational fisheries in reported data are also noteworthy.
-
the marine fisheries in bulgaria s Exclusive Economic Zone 1950 2013
Frontiers in Marine Science, 2017Co-Authors: Çetin Keskin, Aylin Ulman, K. Zylich, Violin S. Raykov, Georgi M. Daskalov, Daniel Pauly, Dirk ZellerAbstract:The aim of this study is to reconstruct the total historic catch of Bulgarian marine fisheries in their Exclusive Economic Zone for the time period 1950-2013, including unreported landings, discards, recreational and subsistence catches from the ecosystem. The landings data officially reported by Bulgaria to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations for the Mediterranean and Black Seas (FAO Area 37) were revised in line with all available information. The reconstructed total catch for 1950-2013 was 1.7 times the (adjusted) baseline data reported by Bulgaria to FAO and 1.5 times the unadjusted data as reported by FAO. This study revealed major deficiencies which exist in the officially reported Bulgarian catch data, foremost being the large amount of unreported industrial catches, especially for the last two decades. Furthermore, the exclusion of some fisheries sectors, notably the absence of data on the subsistence and recreational fisheries in reported data are also noteworthy.