Expert Evidence

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 3450 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Haozhen Zhao - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • CSIR at TREC 2008 Expert Search Task : Modeling Expert Evidence in Expert Search Modeling Expert Evidence in Expert Search
    CSIR at TREC 2008 Expert Search Task, 2008
    Co-Authors: Jiepu Jiang, Wei Lu, Haozhen Zhao
    Abstract:

    In this paper, we described our method for the Expert search task in TREC 2008. First, we proposed an adaption to the language modeling method for Expert search, which considers the probability of query generation separate- ly using each kind of Expert Evidence (full name, abbreviated name, and email address). Current Expert search models can be easily integrated into our method. Our experiments indicated that our method can make use of the ambiguous evi- dence in Expert search (abbreviated name), which often casued a drop in effects in other methods. Besides, we also used a probabilistic measure to detect phrase in query, but it did not make better effectiveness. Keywords: Expert search, Expert Evidence, language modeling method. 1

  • CSIR at TREC 2008 Expert search task: Modeling Expert Evidence in Expert search
    NIST Special Publication, 2008
    Co-Authors: Jiepu Jiang, Wei Lu, Haozhen Zhao
    Abstract:

    In this paper, we described our method for the Expert search task in TREC 2008. First, we proposed an adaption to the language modeling method for Expert search, which considers the probability of query generation separately using each kind of Expert Evidence (full name, abbreviated name, and email address). Current Expert search models can be easily integrated into our method. Our experiments indicated that our method can make use of the ambiguous Evidence in Expert search (abbreviated name), which often casued a drop in effects in other methods. Besides, we also used a probabilistic measure to detect phrase in query, but it did not make better effectiveness.

Jiepu Jiang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • CSIR at TREC 2008 Expert Search Task : Modeling Expert Evidence in Expert Search Modeling Expert Evidence in Expert Search
    CSIR at TREC 2008 Expert Search Task, 2008
    Co-Authors: Jiepu Jiang, Wei Lu, Haozhen Zhao
    Abstract:

    In this paper, we described our method for the Expert search task in TREC 2008. First, we proposed an adaption to the language modeling method for Expert search, which considers the probability of query generation separate- ly using each kind of Expert Evidence (full name, abbreviated name, and email address). Current Expert search models can be easily integrated into our method. Our experiments indicated that our method can make use of the ambiguous evi- dence in Expert search (abbreviated name), which often casued a drop in effects in other methods. Besides, we also used a probabilistic measure to detect phrase in query, but it did not make better effectiveness. Keywords: Expert search, Expert Evidence, language modeling method. 1

  • CSIR at TREC 2008 Expert search task: Modeling Expert Evidence in Expert search
    NIST Special Publication, 2008
    Co-Authors: Jiepu Jiang, Wei Lu, Haozhen Zhao
    Abstract:

    In this paper, we described our method for the Expert search task in TREC 2008. First, we proposed an adaption to the language modeling method for Expert search, which considers the probability of query generation separately using each kind of Expert Evidence (full name, abbreviated name, and email address). Current Expert search models can be easily integrated into our method. Our experiments indicated that our method can make use of the ambiguous Evidence in Expert search (abbreviated name), which often casued a drop in effects in other methods. Besides, we also used a probabilistic measure to detect phrase in query, but it did not make better effectiveness.

Wei Lu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • CSIR at TREC 2008 Expert Search Task : Modeling Expert Evidence in Expert Search Modeling Expert Evidence in Expert Search
    CSIR at TREC 2008 Expert Search Task, 2008
    Co-Authors: Jiepu Jiang, Wei Lu, Haozhen Zhao
    Abstract:

    In this paper, we described our method for the Expert search task in TREC 2008. First, we proposed an adaption to the language modeling method for Expert search, which considers the probability of query generation separate- ly using each kind of Expert Evidence (full name, abbreviated name, and email address). Current Expert search models can be easily integrated into our method. Our experiments indicated that our method can make use of the ambiguous evi- dence in Expert search (abbreviated name), which often casued a drop in effects in other methods. Besides, we also used a probabilistic measure to detect phrase in query, but it did not make better effectiveness. Keywords: Expert search, Expert Evidence, language modeling method. 1

  • CSIR at TREC 2008 Expert search task: Modeling Expert Evidence in Expert search
    NIST Special Publication, 2008
    Co-Authors: Jiepu Jiang, Wei Lu, Haozhen Zhao
    Abstract:

    In this paper, we described our method for the Expert search task in TREC 2008. First, we proposed an adaption to the language modeling method for Expert search, which considers the probability of query generation separately using each kind of Expert Evidence (full name, abbreviated name, and email address). Current Expert search models can be easily integrated into our method. Our experiments indicated that our method can make use of the ambiguous Evidence in Expert search (abbreviated name), which often casued a drop in effects in other methods. Besides, we also used a probabilistic measure to detect phrase in query, but it did not make better effectiveness.

Artur Appazov - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • The Challenge of Expert Evidence and Rational Decision-Making
    Expert Evidence and International Criminal Justice, 2016
    Co-Authors: Artur Appazov
    Abstract:

    The perplexity of Expert Evidence lies in its dichotomous nature, which generates confusion for the court. One the one hand, the court needs to exert a degree of control over Expert Evidence, just as it does in relation to factual Evidence. Yet, on the other hand, the court needs to defer to its authoritative statements.

  • Expert Evidence in Domestic Jurisdictions
    Expert Evidence and International Criminal Justice, 2016
    Co-Authors: Artur Appazov
    Abstract:

    Given the hundreds of years of practice and legal thought, procedural devices addressing the issue of quality of Expert Evidence in international criminal trials might already be available in national jurisdictions. They might not be as readily employed in these jurisdictions due to various historical reasons, but ideas stemming from the lessons learned still exist. As a procedural environment that was initially founded as a mixture of traditions, international criminal proceedings have a unique opportunity to marry the best ‘combinable’ practices in relation to Expert Evidence.

  • Expert Evidence in International Criminal Trials
    Expert Evidence and International Criminal Justice, 2016
    Co-Authors: Artur Appazov
    Abstract:

    On 20 November 1945, only six and a half months after Germany surrendered in World War II, leading German officials were brought to trial before the International Military Tribunal, the best known of the post-World War II military tribunals. After much debate, 24 defendants were selected to represent the Nazi diplomatic, economic, political, and military leadership. Robert Jackson, the American chief prosecutor at the IMT, decided to base his case primarily on the vast number of documents written by the Nazis themselves, rather than on eyewitness testimony, so that the trial would be based on reliable Evidence and avoid accusations of reliance on potentially biased witness accounts. The legal documents of the IMT contain few references to the court’s reliance on Expert Evidence. The notable absence of Experts may be explained by the overall epistemic circumstances of the trials—the leadership level of perpetrators, the gravity of the crimes committed and, of course, the abundance of documentary Evidence—which served to make Expert participation unnecessary. The quality and probative value of the accessible non-Expert Evidence was highly likely to prove the guilt of the defendants beyond reasonable doubt.

  • Expert Evidence and International Criminal Justice
    2016
    Co-Authors: Artur Appazov
    Abstract:

    Introduction and context.- Expert Evidence in international criminal trials.- The challenge of Expert Evidence and rational decision-making.- Expert Evidence in domestic jurisdictions.- Conclusion.

Joyce Manna Janto - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Related terms

Expert Evidence - 15 days free trial to Access Experts & Abstracts