The Experts below are selected from a list of 3366 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Suphad Kaewphanna - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Comparisons of Amplitude Reduction of Pattern Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) and Flash VEP between Using Srinagarind Eye Patch and Commercial Eye Patch in Normal Subjects.
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand Chotmaihet thangphaet, 2015Co-Authors: Phanthipha Wongwai, Kanokpun Bumrungrachhirun, Sirinya Suwannaraj, Somkiat Asawaphureekorn, Suphad KaewphannaAbstract:Objective: To compare the difference of amplitude reduction of pattern VEP and flash VEP between occluding Eye with Srinagarind Eye Patches and commercial Eye Patches in normal subjects. Material and Method: Fifteen subjects (7 males and 8 females) who had normal Eye examinations were enrolled. Amplitude of pattern VEP was recorded for each individual subject as baseline data. Right Eyes were occluded with Srinagarind Eye Patches and fellow Eyes with commercial Eye Patches (3M) and then the VEP were retested (pattern and flash VEP). The reduction of amplitude in pattern and flash VEP was recorded. Results: The commercial Eye Patch significantly reduced the amplitude of retinal stimulation by pattern reversal stimuli on pattern VEP better than the Srinagarind Eye Patch 1.68 μV (95% CI 0.48-2.87). The commercial Eye Patch group had amplitude of retinal stimulation by light stimulation on flash VEP greater than the Srinagarind Eye Patch 3.92 μV (95% CI -9.25-1.41), but not statistically significant. There was also no report of any serious side effects in either group. Conclusion: This is the first study aiming to demonstrate the ability of the Srinagarind Eye Patch to reduce the retinal stimulation compared with the commercial Eye Patch by using the VEP test. Further study is needed to test the effectiveness of the Srinagarind Eye Patch. Keywords: Eye Patch, Occlusion, Srinagarind Eye Patch, Commercial Eye Patch, 3M Eye Patch, Amplitude of VEP reduction
-
Comparisons of Amplitude Reduction of Pattern Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) and Flash VEP between Using Srinagarind Eye Patch and Commercial Eye Patch in Normal Subjects.
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 2015Co-Authors: Phanthipha Wongwai, Kanokpun Bumrungrachhirun, Sirinya Suwannaraj, Somkiat Asawaphureekorn, Suphad KaewphannaAbstract:To compare the difference of amplitude reduction of pattern VEP and flash VEP between occluding Eye with Srinagarind Eye Patches and commercial Eye Patches in normal subjects. Fifteen subjects (7 males and 8 females) who had normal Eye examinations were enrolled. Amplitude of pattern VEP was recorded for each individual subject as baseline data. Right Eyes were occluded with Srinagarind Eye Patches and fellow Eyes with commercial Eye Patches (3M) and then the VEP were retested (pattern and flash VEP). The reduction of amplitude in pattern and flash VEP was recorded. The commercial Eye Patch significantly reduced the amplitude of retinal stimulation by pattern reversal stimuli on pattern VEP better than the Srinagarind Eye Patch 1.68 μV (95% CI 0.48-2.87). The commercial Eye Patch group had amplitude of retinal stimulation by light stimulation on flash VEP greater than the Srinagarind Eye Patch 3.92 μV (95% CI -9.25-1.41), but not statistically significant. There was also no report of any serious side effects in either group. This is the first study aiming to demonstrate the ability of the Srinagarind Eye Patch to reduce the retinal stimulation compared with the commercial Eye Patch by using the VEP test. Further study is needed to test the effectiveness of the Srinagarind Eye Patch.
Phanthipha Wongwai - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Comparisons of Amplitude Reduction of Pattern Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) and Flash VEP between Using Srinagarind Eye Patch and Commercial Eye Patch in Normal Subjects.
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand Chotmaihet thangphaet, 2015Co-Authors: Phanthipha Wongwai, Kanokpun Bumrungrachhirun, Sirinya Suwannaraj, Somkiat Asawaphureekorn, Suphad KaewphannaAbstract:Objective: To compare the difference of amplitude reduction of pattern VEP and flash VEP between occluding Eye with Srinagarind Eye Patches and commercial Eye Patches in normal subjects. Material and Method: Fifteen subjects (7 males and 8 females) who had normal Eye examinations were enrolled. Amplitude of pattern VEP was recorded for each individual subject as baseline data. Right Eyes were occluded with Srinagarind Eye Patches and fellow Eyes with commercial Eye Patches (3M) and then the VEP were retested (pattern and flash VEP). The reduction of amplitude in pattern and flash VEP was recorded. Results: The commercial Eye Patch significantly reduced the amplitude of retinal stimulation by pattern reversal stimuli on pattern VEP better than the Srinagarind Eye Patch 1.68 μV (95% CI 0.48-2.87). The commercial Eye Patch group had amplitude of retinal stimulation by light stimulation on flash VEP greater than the Srinagarind Eye Patch 3.92 μV (95% CI -9.25-1.41), but not statistically significant. There was also no report of any serious side effects in either group. Conclusion: This is the first study aiming to demonstrate the ability of the Srinagarind Eye Patch to reduce the retinal stimulation compared with the commercial Eye Patch by using the VEP test. Further study is needed to test the effectiveness of the Srinagarind Eye Patch. Keywords: Eye Patch, Occlusion, Srinagarind Eye Patch, Commercial Eye Patch, 3M Eye Patch, Amplitude of VEP reduction
-
Comparisons of Amplitude Reduction of Pattern Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) and Flash VEP between Using Srinagarind Eye Patch and Commercial Eye Patch in Normal Subjects.
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 2015Co-Authors: Phanthipha Wongwai, Kanokpun Bumrungrachhirun, Sirinya Suwannaraj, Somkiat Asawaphureekorn, Suphad KaewphannaAbstract:To compare the difference of amplitude reduction of pattern VEP and flash VEP between occluding Eye with Srinagarind Eye Patches and commercial Eye Patches in normal subjects. Fifteen subjects (7 males and 8 females) who had normal Eye examinations were enrolled. Amplitude of pattern VEP was recorded for each individual subject as baseline data. Right Eyes were occluded with Srinagarind Eye Patches and fellow Eyes with commercial Eye Patches (3M) and then the VEP were retested (pattern and flash VEP). The reduction of amplitude in pattern and flash VEP was recorded. The commercial Eye Patch significantly reduced the amplitude of retinal stimulation by pattern reversal stimuli on pattern VEP better than the Srinagarind Eye Patch 1.68 μV (95% CI 0.48-2.87). The commercial Eye Patch group had amplitude of retinal stimulation by light stimulation on flash VEP greater than the Srinagarind Eye Patch 3.92 μV (95% CI -9.25-1.41), but not statistically significant. There was also no report of any serious side effects in either group. This is the first study aiming to demonstrate the ability of the Srinagarind Eye Patch to reduce the retinal stimulation compared with the commercial Eye Patch by using the VEP test. Further study is needed to test the effectiveness of the Srinagarind Eye Patch.
Danna Shi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Bandage Lenses in the Postoperative Care for Cataract Surgery Patients: A Substitute for Eye Patch?
Journal of ophthalmology, 2018Co-Authors: Hang Song, Yan Zhang, Danna ShiAbstract:Purpose. To explore whether bandage lenses could be a safe and effective substitute for Eye Patch in the postoperative care for cataract surgery patients in terms of infection prevention, ocular impacts, and patient satisfaction. Methods. Patients who underwent cataract surgery were randomly divided into the Eye Patch group (Group A) and the bandage lens group (Group B). Bacterial culture samples were collected perioperatively from different sites. Evaluations of anterior segment condition and patient satisfaction were conducted on the first day of postoperative follow-up. Results. The positive rate of bacterial cultures in Group A was higher than that in Group B, but the difference was not statistically significant. Group B had significantly longer tear breakup time, higher tear meniscus height, and slightly better patient satisfaction than Group A. Conclusion. Bandage lenses can be used as a safe and effective substitute for Eye Patch in the postoperative care for cataract surgery patients. The Clinical Study registration number is ChiCTR-IOC-17012167 .
Kenneth M. Heilman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Eye Patching biases spatial attention after thalamic hemorrhage in a patient without spatial neglect: a case report.
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2004Co-Authors: Anna M. Barrett, Gregory P. Crucian, Kenneth M. HeilmanAbstract:Abstract Barrett AM, Crucian GP, Heilman KM. Eye Patching biases spatial attention after thalamic hemorrhage in a patient without spatial neglect: a case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1017–20. Monocular Patching has been advocated as a treatment for spatial neglect. Eye Patching, however, is also reported to increase spatial bias. Thus, Patching brain injury patients for ocular conditions may also impair their attention. To learn if an Eye Patch may induce asymmetric attention in a patient without spatial neglect, we tested a woman with diplopia after a left thalamic-intraventricular hemorrhage. She had no spatial neglect on bedside attention tasks. Using a laser pointer, she bisected a blank space at near (279mm) and far (914mm) distances under 3 conditions: unPatched and wearing a right or left Eye Patch. UnPatched, she showed no bias. She erred further leftward with right Patching at both distances. Right Eye Patching appeared to induce neglect of right space when the patient performed this task. With left Patching, leftward error tended to increase in near space only. Clinicians prescribing Eye Patches to patients with brain injury even for purely ocular indications, should evaluate them for spatial neglect once the Patch is in place.
Somkiat Asawaphureekorn - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Comparisons of Amplitude Reduction of Pattern Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) and Flash VEP between Using Srinagarind Eye Patch and Commercial Eye Patch in Normal Subjects.
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand Chotmaihet thangphaet, 2015Co-Authors: Phanthipha Wongwai, Kanokpun Bumrungrachhirun, Sirinya Suwannaraj, Somkiat Asawaphureekorn, Suphad KaewphannaAbstract:Objective: To compare the difference of amplitude reduction of pattern VEP and flash VEP between occluding Eye with Srinagarind Eye Patches and commercial Eye Patches in normal subjects. Material and Method: Fifteen subjects (7 males and 8 females) who had normal Eye examinations were enrolled. Amplitude of pattern VEP was recorded for each individual subject as baseline data. Right Eyes were occluded with Srinagarind Eye Patches and fellow Eyes with commercial Eye Patches (3M) and then the VEP were retested (pattern and flash VEP). The reduction of amplitude in pattern and flash VEP was recorded. Results: The commercial Eye Patch significantly reduced the amplitude of retinal stimulation by pattern reversal stimuli on pattern VEP better than the Srinagarind Eye Patch 1.68 μV (95% CI 0.48-2.87). The commercial Eye Patch group had amplitude of retinal stimulation by light stimulation on flash VEP greater than the Srinagarind Eye Patch 3.92 μV (95% CI -9.25-1.41), but not statistically significant. There was also no report of any serious side effects in either group. Conclusion: This is the first study aiming to demonstrate the ability of the Srinagarind Eye Patch to reduce the retinal stimulation compared with the commercial Eye Patch by using the VEP test. Further study is needed to test the effectiveness of the Srinagarind Eye Patch. Keywords: Eye Patch, Occlusion, Srinagarind Eye Patch, Commercial Eye Patch, 3M Eye Patch, Amplitude of VEP reduction
-
Comparisons of Amplitude Reduction of Pattern Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) and Flash VEP between Using Srinagarind Eye Patch and Commercial Eye Patch in Normal Subjects.
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 2015Co-Authors: Phanthipha Wongwai, Kanokpun Bumrungrachhirun, Sirinya Suwannaraj, Somkiat Asawaphureekorn, Suphad KaewphannaAbstract:To compare the difference of amplitude reduction of pattern VEP and flash VEP between occluding Eye with Srinagarind Eye Patches and commercial Eye Patches in normal subjects. Fifteen subjects (7 males and 8 females) who had normal Eye examinations were enrolled. Amplitude of pattern VEP was recorded for each individual subject as baseline data. Right Eyes were occluded with Srinagarind Eye Patches and fellow Eyes with commercial Eye Patches (3M) and then the VEP were retested (pattern and flash VEP). The reduction of amplitude in pattern and flash VEP was recorded. The commercial Eye Patch significantly reduced the amplitude of retinal stimulation by pattern reversal stimuli on pattern VEP better than the Srinagarind Eye Patch 1.68 μV (95% CI 0.48-2.87). The commercial Eye Patch group had amplitude of retinal stimulation by light stimulation on flash VEP greater than the Srinagarind Eye Patch 3.92 μV (95% CI -9.25-1.41), but not statistically significant. There was also no report of any serious side effects in either group. This is the first study aiming to demonstrate the ability of the Srinagarind Eye Patch to reduce the retinal stimulation compared with the commercial Eye Patch by using the VEP test. Further study is needed to test the effectiveness of the Srinagarind Eye Patch.
