The Experts below are selected from a list of 1878 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Cassandra L Pinnick - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
scrutinizing Feminist Epistemology an examination of gender in science
2003Co-Authors: Cassandra L Pinnick, Noretta Koertge, Robert F AlmederAbstract:This volume presents the first systematic evaluation of a Feminist Epistemology of science's power to transform both the practice of science and our society. Unlike existing critiques, this book questions the fundamental Feminist suggestion that purging science of alleged male biases will advance the cause of both science and by extension, social justice. The book is divided into four sections: the strange status of Feminist Epistemology, testing Feminist claims about scientific practice, philosophical and political critiques of Feminist Epistemology, and future prospects of Feminist Epistemology. Each of the essays-most of which are original to this text-directly confronts the very idea that there could be a Feminist Epistemology or philosophy of science. Rather than attempting to deal in detail with all of the philosophical views that fall under the general rubric of Feminist Epistemology, the contributors focus on positions that provide the most influential perspectives on science. Not all of the authors agree amongst themselves, of course, but each submits Feminist theories to careful scrutiny.
-
Feminist Epistemology implications for philosophy of science
Philosophy of Science, 1994Co-Authors: Cassandra L PinnickAbstract:This article examines the best contemporary arguments for a Feminist Epistemology of scientific knowledge as found in recent works by S. Harding. I argue that no Feminist Epistemology of science is worthy of the name, because such an Epistemology fails to escape well-known vicissitudes of epistemic relativism. But Feminist Epistemology merits attention from philosophers of science because it is part of a larger relativist turn in the social sciences and humanities that now aims to extend its critique to science, and Harding's "standpoint feminism" is the best-developed case. She attempts to make new use of discredited philosophical ideas concerning underdetermination, Planck's Hypothesis, and the role of counterfactuals in historical studies of science.
Clare Hemmings - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
GENERATIONAL DILEMMAS: A Response to Iris van der Tuin's ‘“Jumping Generations”: On Second- and Third-wave Feminist Epistemology’
Australian Feminist Studies, 2009Co-Authors: Clare HemmingsAbstract:Iris van der Tuin is surely right that Feminist theorists need to challenge our linear generationalism, both in how we tell the story of the recent past and in how we occupy the present; a vibrant future for Feminist Epistemology depends on this.
-
generational dilemmas a response to iris van der tuin s jumping generations on second and third wave Feminist Epistemology
Australian Feminist Studies, 2009Co-Authors: Clare HemmingsAbstract:Iris van der Tuin is surely right that Feminist theorists need to challenge our linear generationalism, both in how we tell the story of the recent past and in how we occupy the present; a vibrant future for Feminist Epistemology depends on this.
Åsa Andersson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Knowing Women : Proceedings of Nordic Network for Postgraduate Students in Feminist Epistemology and Feminist Philosophy of Science
1995Co-Authors: Hildur Kalman, Åsa AnderssonAbstract:Knowing Women : Proceedings of Nordic Network for Postgraduate Students in Feminist Epistemology and Feminist Philosophy of Science
-
Conditions of Our Knowing : Proceedings of Nordic Network for Postgraduate Students in Feminist Epistemology and Feminist Philosophy of Science
1995Co-Authors: Hildur Kalman, Åsa AnderssonAbstract:Conditions of Our Knowing : Proceedings of Nordic Network for Postgraduate Students in Feminist Epistemology and Feminist Philosophy of Science
Sandra Lozano Rubio - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
gender thinking in the making Feminist Epistemology and gender archaeology
Norwegian Archaeological Review, 2011Co-Authors: Sandra Lozano RubioAbstract:In this paper I suggest that gender archaeology has followed the three main Feminist epistemologies as described by Sandra Harding (1986): Feminist empiricism, standpoint theory, and Feminist postmodernism. I explore the main principles of these orientations and discuss their use in gender archaeology, offering examples from Norwegian, Spanish and North American contexts. My purpose is to trace a genealogy of gender archaeology from the point of view of Epistemology that will reveal its Feminist character. Even though it has been developed within the processual and post-processual contexts of archaeology, a review of its epistemological principles will show that gender archaeology must be situated within a wider Feminist framework.
Cynthia B Dillard - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the substance of things hoped for the evidence of things not seen examining an endarkened Feminist Epistemology in educational research and leadership
International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 2000Co-Authors: Cynthia B DillardAbstract:This article explores the cultural genesis and meanings of the lives of three African-American women leaders/researchers and disrupts and unsettles the taken-for-granted notions surrounding the very goals and purposes of educational research. By examining the life notes of these women, the author develops an endarkened Feminist Epistemology, which embodies a distinguishably different cultural standpoint, located in the intersection/overlap of the culturally constructed socializations of race, gender, and other identities and the historical and contemporary contexts of oppressions and resistance for African-American women.
