The Experts below are selected from a list of 1773 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
J Ayan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
are there differences between households with children and without children regarding the degree of household preparedness for a disaster such as fire flood earthquake blackout or devastating act such as a terrorist attack in the community
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2004Co-Authors: I A Barata, Ingrid Llovera, M F Ward, D Miele, Andrew E Sama, S Falitz, A Rapaport, J AyanAbstract:Study objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare the level of disaster preparedness for individual households with and without children. Methods: This was a prospective survey of a convenience sample of English-speaking adults in the emergency department waiting area (includes patients and visitors) during a 3-month period in 2004. The survey asked for the following information: demographics, including number of children in the household; whether the individual had a specific disaster plan in effect for their family; knowledge of disaster plans at their place of work or their children's school or daycare center; whether they had essential supplies, medications, batteries, battery-powered radios, smoke detectors, or carbon monoxide detectors at home; and whether they had a communication plan in effect. These are current recommendations by the Department of Homeland Security and the American Red Cross. Results: A total of 414 surveys were completed by participants: 78% between the ages of 30 to 69 years, 56% female participants, 70% white, 64% married, 87% with a high school or greater level of education, 51% with children in the household, and 30% with household income greater than $100,000 per year. We obtained the following results. Fifty-five percent of households with children reported having done no specific disaster planning for the family compared with 63% of households without children ( P =.0883). Fifty-three percent of households with children compared with 46% of households without children ( P =.1782) reported changing their degree of preparedness after the blackout in the Northeast in 2003. Forty-seven percent of households with children are aware of the guidelines for household disaster preparedness compared with 45% of households without children ( P =.7329). Forty percent of households with children versus 50% of households without children have no knowledge of disaster plans at work ( P =.0344). Thirty-eight percent of participants with children in the household are not aware of their school or daycare disaster plans. Sixty-three percent of participants with children compared with 71% without children in the household ( P =.2678) have no portable easy-to-carry container with essential supplies. At home, 88% versus 83% of participants have a battery-powered radio, and 91% versus 92% of participants with and without children have a flashlight, respectively. Eighty-eight percent of participants with children versus 72% without children have a First Aid Kit at home ( P =.0097). Fifty-two percent versus 56% of participants with and without children reported having "special needs" items such as formula and medications in the house in case of an emergency. Seventy-nine percent of households with children versus 65% of households with children have a 3-day supply of food at home ( P =.0380). Seventy-six percent of households with children and 62% without children have a 3-day water supply ( P =.0509). We found that 91% of households with children versus 86% without children ( P =.1132) have smoke detectors, and 53% of households with children versus 37% without children ( P =.0009) have carbon monoxide detectors. The plan about communication strategies in case of an emergency showed that 48% of households with children versus 32% without children have a designated place to meet outside the neighborhood ( P =.0426); 37% of households with children versus 45% without children have an out-of-state family member or friend as contact, and of those with a contact, only 48% of households with children versus 50% responded that every household member knows the telephone number; in 44% of households with children versus 35% without children, every household member knows the e-mail address of that contact. Conclusion: We found that households with children seemed to be best prepared for an emergency. In comparing households with and without children, there were some statistically significant differences. Households with children have a better knowledge of work disaster plans (60% versus 50%, P =.03) and are more likely to have a designated place to meet outside the neighborhood in case of a disaster (48% versus 32%, P =.04). Households with children compared with households without children more often have a First Aid Kit at home (88% versus 72%, P =.01), a carbon monoxide detector (39% versus 27%, P =.02), and a 3-day supply of food at home (79% versus 65%, P =.04).
I A Barata - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
are there differences between households with children and without children regarding the degree of household preparedness for a disaster such as fire flood earthquake blackout or devastating act such as a terrorist attack in the community
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2004Co-Authors: I A Barata, Ingrid Llovera, M F Ward, D Miele, Andrew E Sama, S Falitz, A Rapaport, J AyanAbstract:Study objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare the level of disaster preparedness for individual households with and without children. Methods: This was a prospective survey of a convenience sample of English-speaking adults in the emergency department waiting area (includes patients and visitors) during a 3-month period in 2004. The survey asked for the following information: demographics, including number of children in the household; whether the individual had a specific disaster plan in effect for their family; knowledge of disaster plans at their place of work or their children's school or daycare center; whether they had essential supplies, medications, batteries, battery-powered radios, smoke detectors, or carbon monoxide detectors at home; and whether they had a communication plan in effect. These are current recommendations by the Department of Homeland Security and the American Red Cross. Results: A total of 414 surveys were completed by participants: 78% between the ages of 30 to 69 years, 56% female participants, 70% white, 64% married, 87% with a high school or greater level of education, 51% with children in the household, and 30% with household income greater than $100,000 per year. We obtained the following results. Fifty-five percent of households with children reported having done no specific disaster planning for the family compared with 63% of households without children ( P =.0883). Fifty-three percent of households with children compared with 46% of households without children ( P =.1782) reported changing their degree of preparedness after the blackout in the Northeast in 2003. Forty-seven percent of households with children are aware of the guidelines for household disaster preparedness compared with 45% of households without children ( P =.7329). Forty percent of households with children versus 50% of households without children have no knowledge of disaster plans at work ( P =.0344). Thirty-eight percent of participants with children in the household are not aware of their school or daycare disaster plans. Sixty-three percent of participants with children compared with 71% without children in the household ( P =.2678) have no portable easy-to-carry container with essential supplies. At home, 88% versus 83% of participants have a battery-powered radio, and 91% versus 92% of participants with and without children have a flashlight, respectively. Eighty-eight percent of participants with children versus 72% without children have a First Aid Kit at home ( P =.0097). Fifty-two percent versus 56% of participants with and without children reported having "special needs" items such as formula and medications in the house in case of an emergency. Seventy-nine percent of households with children versus 65% of households with children have a 3-day supply of food at home ( P =.0380). Seventy-six percent of households with children and 62% without children have a 3-day water supply ( P =.0509). We found that 91% of households with children versus 86% without children ( P =.1132) have smoke detectors, and 53% of households with children versus 37% without children ( P =.0009) have carbon monoxide detectors. The plan about communication strategies in case of an emergency showed that 48% of households with children versus 32% without children have a designated place to meet outside the neighborhood ( P =.0426); 37% of households with children versus 45% without children have an out-of-state family member or friend as contact, and of those with a contact, only 48% of households with children versus 50% responded that every household member knows the telephone number; in 44% of households with children versus 35% without children, every household member knows the e-mail address of that contact. Conclusion: We found that households with children seemed to be best prepared for an emergency. In comparing households with and without children, there were some statistically significant differences. Households with children have a better knowledge of work disaster plans (60% versus 50%, P =.03) and are more likely to have a designated place to meet outside the neighborhood in case of a disaster (48% versus 32%, P =.04). Households with children compared with households without children more often have a First Aid Kit at home (88% versus 72%, P =.01), a carbon monoxide detector (39% versus 27%, P =.02), and a 3-day supply of food at home (79% versus 65%, P =.04).
Technical Centre For Agricultural And Rural Cooperation - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Simple information manuals 4
Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation, 1992Co-Authors: Technical Centre For Agricultural And Rural CooperationAbstract:Simple information manuals AGRODOKS are a series of low-priced, simple manuals on agricultural practices in the tropics which are produced by AGROMISA in conjunction with CTA, who finance the translation of the booklets. Agrodok 7, on Goat keeping in the tropics, is designed as a First-Aid Kit for those who live in isolated places and cannot easily diagnose a disease or have an analysis made of feed quality. The book covers goat breeding; raising and selection; nutrition; housing; health, diseases and parasites; goat products; and administration. A list of helpful literature is included together with useful appendices that deal with units of feed values, an example of how to calculate rations, hoof care, castration of young billy-goats, age estimation, and examples of how to keep a record card on individual goats (male as well as female) and a servicing record. Agrodok 18 deals with Protection of stored grains and pulses; it is a revised edition of the earlier Protection of stored products against insects and fungi. This booklet deals with the problems concerning losses of stored products by storage pests (moulds, insects and rodents), and is meant as a manual for those who are involved with providing information on storage to farmers and cooperatives. Descriptions of the main storage pests are given, together with preventative practices. Special attention is given to the use of natural materials in protecting storage products but there is also information on chemical treatment of stored products against pests. All sections of the books are well illustrated with simple explanatory line drawings. Beekeeping in the tropics (Agrodoc 32), First published in June 1977, was revised for the third time last year. Similarly, The preparation of dairy products, First published in 1985, was also revised last year. Goat keeping in the tropics by Carl Jansen and Kees van den Burg ISBN 9072746 39 2 Protection of stored grains and pulses by Inge de Groot ISBN 9072746 120 4 Beekeeping in the tropics compiled by P Segeren and revised by V Mulder, J Beetsma and R Sommeijer ISBN 90 72746 13 9 The preparation of dairy products by Pauline Ebing and Karin Rutgers revised by Rogier Muller and Matty Weijenberg All four books are also available in French. The Agrodok series of booklets is produced and published by Agromisa, PO Box 41 6700 AA Wageningen, THE NETHERLANDS and is available from CTASimple information manualsAGRODOKS are a series of low-priced, simple manuals on agricultural practices in the tropics which are produced by AGROMISA in conjunction with CTA, who finance the translation of the booklets. Agrodok 7, on Goat keeping in..
-
Simple information manuals 2
Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation, 1992Co-Authors: Technical Centre For Agricultural And Rural CooperationAbstract:Simple information manuals AGRODOKS are a series of low-priced, simple manuals on agricultural practices in the tropics which are produced by AGROMISA in conjunction with CTA, who finance the translation of the booklets. Agrodok 7, on Goat keeping in the tropics, is designed as a First-Aid Kit for those who live in isolated places and cannot easily diagnose a disease or have an analysis made of feed quality. The book covers goat breeding; raising and selection; nutrition; housing; health, diseases and parasites; goat products; and administration. A list of helpful literature is included together with useful appendices that deal with units of feed values, an example of how to calculate rations, hoof care, castration of young billy-goats, age estimation, and examples of how to keep a record card on individual goats (male as well as female) and a servicing record. Agrodok 18 deals with Protection of stored grains and pulses; it is a revised edition of the earlier Protection of stored products against insects and fungi. This booklet deals with the problems concerning losses of stored products by storage pests (moulds, insects and rodents), and is meant as a manual for those who are involved with providing information on storage to farmers and cooperatives. Descriptions of the main storage pests are given, together with preventative practices. Special attention is given to the use of natural materials in protecting storage products but there is also information on chemical treatment of stored products against pests. All sections of the books are well illustrated with simple explanatory line drawings. Beekeeping in the tropics (Agrodoc 32), First published in June 1977, was revised for the third time last year. Similarly, The preparation of dairy products, First published in 1985, was also revised last year. Goat keeping in the tropics by Carl Jansen and Kees van den Burg ISBN 9072746 39 2 Protection of stored grains and pulses by Inge de Groot ISBN 9072746 120 4 Beekeeping in the tropics compiled by P Segeren and revised by V Mulder, J Beetsma and R Sommeijer ISBN 90 72746 13 9 The preparation of dairy products by Pauline Ebing and Karin Rutgers revised by Rogier Muller and Matty Weijenberg All four books are also available in French. The Agrodok series of booklets is produced and published by Agromisa, PO Box 41 6700 AA Wageningen, THE NETHERLANDS and is available from CTASimple information manualsAGRODOKS are a series of low-priced, simple manuals on agricultural practices in the tropics which are produced by AGROMISA in conjunction with CTA, who finance the translation of the booklets. Agrodok 7, on Goat keeping in..
-
Simple information manuals 3
Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation, 1992Co-Authors: Technical Centre For Agricultural And Rural CooperationAbstract:Simple information manuals AGRODOKS are a series of low-priced, simple manuals on agricultural practices in the tropics which are produced by AGROMISA in conjunction with CTA, who finance the translation of the booklets. Agrodok 7, on Goat keeping in the tropics, is designed as a First-Aid Kit for those who live in isolated places and cannot easily diagnose a disease or have an analysis made of feed quality. The book covers goat breeding; raising and selection; nutrition; housing; health, diseases and parasites; goat products; and administration. A list of helpful literature is included together with useful appendices that deal with units of feed values, an example of how to calculate rations, hoof care, castration of young billy-goats, age estimation, and examples of how to keep a record card on individual goats (male as well as female) and a servicing record. Agrodok 18 deals with Protection of stored grains and pulses; it is a revised edition of the earlier Protection of stored products against insects and fungi. This booklet deals with the problems concerning losses of stored products by storage pests (moulds, insects and rodents), and is meant as a manual for those who are involved with providing information on storage to farmers and cooperatives. Descriptions of the main storage pests are given, together with preventative practices. Special attention is given to the use of natural materials in protecting storage products but there is also information on chemical treatment of stored products against pests. All sections of the books are well illustrated with simple explanatory line drawings. Beekeeping in the tropics (Agrodoc 32), First published in June 1977, was revised for the third time last year. Similarly, The preparation of dairy products, First published in 1985, was also revised last year. Goat keeping in the tropics by Carl Jansen and Kees van den Burg ISBN 9072746 39 2 Protection of stored grains and pulses by Inge de Groot ISBN 9072746 120 4 Beekeeping in the tropics compiled by P Segeren and revised by V Mulder, J Beetsma and R Sommeijer ISBN 90 72746 13 9 The preparation of dairy products by Pauline Ebing and Karin Rutgers revised by Rogier Muller and Matty Weijenberg All four books are also available in French. The Agrodok series of booklets is produced and published by Agromisa, PO Box 41 6700 AA Wageningen, THE NETHERLANDS and is available from CTASimple information manualsAGRODOKS are a series of low-priced, simple manuals on agricultural practices in the tropics which are produced by AGROMISA in conjunction with CTA, who finance the translation of the booklets. Agrodok 7, on Goat keeping in..
-
Simple information manuals 1
Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation, 1992Co-Authors: Technical Centre For Agricultural And Rural CooperationAbstract:Simple information manuals AGRODOKS are a series of low-priced, simple manuals on agricultural practices in the tropics which are produced by AGROMISA in conjunction with CTA, who finance the translation of the booklets. Agrodok 7, on Goat keeping in the tropics, is designed as a First-Aid Kit for those who live in isolated places and cannot easily diagnose a disease or have an analysis made of feed quality. The book covers goat breeding; raising and selection; nutrition; housing; health, diseases and parasites; goat products; and administration. A list of helpful literature is included together with useful appendices that deal with units of feed values, an example of how to calculate rations, hoof care, castration of young billy-goats, age estimation, and examples of how to keep a record card on individual goats (male as well as female) and a servicing record. Agrodok 18 deals with Protection of stored grains and pulses; it is a revised edition of the earlier Protection of stored products against insects and fungi. This booklet deals with the problems concerning losses of stored products by storage pests (moulds, insects and rodents), and is meant as a manual for those who are involved with providing information on storage to farmers and cooperatives. Descriptions of the main storage pests are given, together with preventative practices. Special attention is given to the use of natural materials in protecting storage products but there is also information on chemical treatment of stored products against pests. All sections of the books are well illustrated with simple explanatory line drawings. Beekeeping in the tropics (Agrodoc 32), First published in June 1977, was revised for the third time last year. Similarly, The preparation of dairy products, First published in 1985, was also revised last year. Goat keeping in the tropics by Carl Jansen and Kees van den Burg ISBN 9072746 39 2 Protection of stored grains and pulses by Inge de Groot ISBN 9072746 120 4 Beekeeping in the tropics compiled by P Segeren and revised by V Mulder, J Beetsma and R Sommeijer ISBN 90 72746 13 9 The preparation of dairy products by Pauline Ebing and Karin Rutgers revised by Rogier Muller and Matty Weijenberg All four books are also available in French. The Agrodok series of booklets is produced and published by Agromisa, PO Box 41 6700 AA Wageningen, THE NETHERLANDS and is available from CTAGoat keeping in the tropics by Carl Jansen and Kees van den Burg ISBN 9072746 39 2 Protection of stored grains and pulses by Inge de Groot ISBN 9072746 120 4 Beekeeping in the tropics compiled by P Segeren and revised by V Mulder, J Beetsma a
Ingrid Llovera - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
are there differences between households with children and without children regarding the degree of household preparedness for a disaster such as fire flood earthquake blackout or devastating act such as a terrorist attack in the community
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2004Co-Authors: I A Barata, Ingrid Llovera, M F Ward, D Miele, Andrew E Sama, S Falitz, A Rapaport, J AyanAbstract:Study objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare the level of disaster preparedness for individual households with and without children. Methods: This was a prospective survey of a convenience sample of English-speaking adults in the emergency department waiting area (includes patients and visitors) during a 3-month period in 2004. The survey asked for the following information: demographics, including number of children in the household; whether the individual had a specific disaster plan in effect for their family; knowledge of disaster plans at their place of work or their children's school or daycare center; whether they had essential supplies, medications, batteries, battery-powered radios, smoke detectors, or carbon monoxide detectors at home; and whether they had a communication plan in effect. These are current recommendations by the Department of Homeland Security and the American Red Cross. Results: A total of 414 surveys were completed by participants: 78% between the ages of 30 to 69 years, 56% female participants, 70% white, 64% married, 87% with a high school or greater level of education, 51% with children in the household, and 30% with household income greater than $100,000 per year. We obtained the following results. Fifty-five percent of households with children reported having done no specific disaster planning for the family compared with 63% of households without children ( P =.0883). Fifty-three percent of households with children compared with 46% of households without children ( P =.1782) reported changing their degree of preparedness after the blackout in the Northeast in 2003. Forty-seven percent of households with children are aware of the guidelines for household disaster preparedness compared with 45% of households without children ( P =.7329). Forty percent of households with children versus 50% of households without children have no knowledge of disaster plans at work ( P =.0344). Thirty-eight percent of participants with children in the household are not aware of their school or daycare disaster plans. Sixty-three percent of participants with children compared with 71% without children in the household ( P =.2678) have no portable easy-to-carry container with essential supplies. At home, 88% versus 83% of participants have a battery-powered radio, and 91% versus 92% of participants with and without children have a flashlight, respectively. Eighty-eight percent of participants with children versus 72% without children have a First Aid Kit at home ( P =.0097). Fifty-two percent versus 56% of participants with and without children reported having "special needs" items such as formula and medications in the house in case of an emergency. Seventy-nine percent of households with children versus 65% of households with children have a 3-day supply of food at home ( P =.0380). Seventy-six percent of households with children and 62% without children have a 3-day water supply ( P =.0509). We found that 91% of households with children versus 86% without children ( P =.1132) have smoke detectors, and 53% of households with children versus 37% without children ( P =.0009) have carbon monoxide detectors. The plan about communication strategies in case of an emergency showed that 48% of households with children versus 32% without children have a designated place to meet outside the neighborhood ( P =.0426); 37% of households with children versus 45% without children have an out-of-state family member or friend as contact, and of those with a contact, only 48% of households with children versus 50% responded that every household member knows the telephone number; in 44% of households with children versus 35% without children, every household member knows the e-mail address of that contact. Conclusion: We found that households with children seemed to be best prepared for an emergency. In comparing households with and without children, there were some statistically significant differences. Households with children have a better knowledge of work disaster plans (60% versus 50%, P =.03) and are more likely to have a designated place to meet outside the neighborhood in case of a disaster (48% versus 32%, P =.04). Households with children compared with households without children more often have a First Aid Kit at home (88% versus 72%, P =.01), a carbon monoxide detector (39% versus 27%, P =.02), and a 3-day supply of food at home (79% versus 65%, P =.04).
M F Ward - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
are there differences between households with children and without children regarding the degree of household preparedness for a disaster such as fire flood earthquake blackout or devastating act such as a terrorist attack in the community
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2004Co-Authors: I A Barata, Ingrid Llovera, M F Ward, D Miele, Andrew E Sama, S Falitz, A Rapaport, J AyanAbstract:Study objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare the level of disaster preparedness for individual households with and without children. Methods: This was a prospective survey of a convenience sample of English-speaking adults in the emergency department waiting area (includes patients and visitors) during a 3-month period in 2004. The survey asked for the following information: demographics, including number of children in the household; whether the individual had a specific disaster plan in effect for their family; knowledge of disaster plans at their place of work or their children's school or daycare center; whether they had essential supplies, medications, batteries, battery-powered radios, smoke detectors, or carbon monoxide detectors at home; and whether they had a communication plan in effect. These are current recommendations by the Department of Homeland Security and the American Red Cross. Results: A total of 414 surveys were completed by participants: 78% between the ages of 30 to 69 years, 56% female participants, 70% white, 64% married, 87% with a high school or greater level of education, 51% with children in the household, and 30% with household income greater than $100,000 per year. We obtained the following results. Fifty-five percent of households with children reported having done no specific disaster planning for the family compared with 63% of households without children ( P =.0883). Fifty-three percent of households with children compared with 46% of households without children ( P =.1782) reported changing their degree of preparedness after the blackout in the Northeast in 2003. Forty-seven percent of households with children are aware of the guidelines for household disaster preparedness compared with 45% of households without children ( P =.7329). Forty percent of households with children versus 50% of households without children have no knowledge of disaster plans at work ( P =.0344). Thirty-eight percent of participants with children in the household are not aware of their school or daycare disaster plans. Sixty-three percent of participants with children compared with 71% without children in the household ( P =.2678) have no portable easy-to-carry container with essential supplies. At home, 88% versus 83% of participants have a battery-powered radio, and 91% versus 92% of participants with and without children have a flashlight, respectively. Eighty-eight percent of participants with children versus 72% without children have a First Aid Kit at home ( P =.0097). Fifty-two percent versus 56% of participants with and without children reported having "special needs" items such as formula and medications in the house in case of an emergency. Seventy-nine percent of households with children versus 65% of households with children have a 3-day supply of food at home ( P =.0380). Seventy-six percent of households with children and 62% without children have a 3-day water supply ( P =.0509). We found that 91% of households with children versus 86% without children ( P =.1132) have smoke detectors, and 53% of households with children versus 37% without children ( P =.0009) have carbon monoxide detectors. The plan about communication strategies in case of an emergency showed that 48% of households with children versus 32% without children have a designated place to meet outside the neighborhood ( P =.0426); 37% of households with children versus 45% without children have an out-of-state family member or friend as contact, and of those with a contact, only 48% of households with children versus 50% responded that every household member knows the telephone number; in 44% of households with children versus 35% without children, every household member knows the e-mail address of that contact. Conclusion: We found that households with children seemed to be best prepared for an emergency. In comparing households with and without children, there were some statistically significant differences. Households with children have a better knowledge of work disaster plans (60% versus 50%, P =.03) and are more likely to have a designated place to meet outside the neighborhood in case of a disaster (48% versus 32%, P =.04). Households with children compared with households without children more often have a First Aid Kit at home (88% versus 72%, P =.01), a carbon monoxide detector (39% versus 27%, P =.02), and a 3-day supply of food at home (79% versus 65%, P =.04).