The Experts below are selected from a list of 5583 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Amer H Zureikat - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine nab paclitaxel for neoadjuvant treatment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma
Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018Co-Authors: Mashaal Dhir, Mazen S Zenati, Ahmad Hamad, Aatur D Singhi, Nathan Bahary, Melissa E Hogg, Herbert J Zeh, Amer H ZureikatAbstract:Both FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (G-nP) are used increasingly in the neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). This study aimed to compare neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and G-nP in the treatment of resectable (R) and borderline resectable (BR) head PDA. A single-institution retrospective review of R and BR patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy after NAT with FOLFIRINOX or G-nP was performed. Comparative analysis was performed using inverse-probability-weighted (IPW) estimators. The end points of the study were overall survival (OS) and an 80% reduction in CA19-9 with NAT. In this study, 193 patients were analyzed, with 73 patients receiving FOLFIRINOX and 120 patients receiving G-nP. The median OS was 38.7 months for FOLFIRINOX versus 28.6 months for G-nP (p = 0.214). The patients who received FOLFIRINOX were younger and had fewer comorbidities, more BR disease, and larger tumors than those treated with G-nP (all p < 0.05). The two regimens were equally effective in achieving an 80% decline in CA19-9 (p = 0.8). The R0 resection rates were similar (80%), but FOLFIRINOX was associated with a reduction in pN1 disease (56% vs. 72%; p = 0.028). The receipt of adjuvant therapy was similar (74 vs. 75%; p = 0.79). In the Cox regression analysis with adjustment for baseline and treatment-related variables (FOLFIRINOX vs. G-nP, age, gender, computed tomography (CT) tumor size, BR vs. R, pre-NAT CA19-9), regimen type was not associated with a survival benefit. In the IPW analysis of 166 patients, however, the average treatment effect of FOLFIRINOX was to increase OS by 4.9 months compared with G-nP (p = 0.012). Both FOLFIRINOX and G-nP are viable options for neoadjuvant treatment of PDA. In this study, neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was associated with a 4.9-month improvement in survival compared with G-nP after adjustment for covariates.
-
FOLFIRINOX Versus Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel for Neoadjuvant Treatment of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma.
Annals of surgical oncology, 2018Co-Authors: Mashaal Dhir, Mazen S Zenati, Ahmad Hamad, Aatur D Singhi, Nathan Bahary, Melissa E Hogg, Herbert J Zeh, Amer H ZureikatAbstract:Both FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (G-nP) are used increasingly in the neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). This study aimed to compare neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and G-nP in the treatment of resectable (R) and borderline resectable (BR) head PDA. A single-institution retrospective review of R and BR patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy after NAT with FOLFIRINOX or G-nP was performed. Comparative analysis was performed using inverse-probability-weighted (IPW) estimators. The end points of the study were overall survival (OS) and an 80% reduction in CA19-9 with NAT. In this study, 193 patients were analyzed, with 73 patients receiving FOLFIRINOX and 120 patients receiving G-nP. The median OS was 38.7 months for FOLFIRINOX versus 28.6 months for G-nP (p = 0.214). The patients who received FOLFIRINOX were younger and had fewer comorbidities, more BR disease, and larger tumors than those treated with G-nP (all p
-
Outcomes with FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable and locally unresectable pancreatic cancer
Journal of surgical oncology, 2013Co-Authors: Brian A. Boone, Herbert J Zeh, Amer H Zureikat, Jennifer Steve, Alyssa M. Krasinskas, Barry C. Lembersky, Michael K. Gibson, Ronald G. Stoller, Nathan BaharyAbstract:Background Trials examining FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic cancer demonstrate higher response rates compared to gemcitabine-based regimens. There is currently limited experience with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in pancreatic cancer.
-
Outcomes with FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2013Co-Authors: Brian A. Boone, Herbert J Zeh, Amer H Zureikat, Jennifer Steve, Alyssa M. Krasinskas, Barry C. Lembersky, Michael K. Gibson, Ronald G. Stoller, Nathan BaharyAbstract:256 Background: Trials examining the use of FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma demonstrate significantly higher response rates compared to gemcitabine-based regimens. These high response rates may be particularly important for patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (LAPD), in which there is currently limited experience with FOLFIRINOX. We examined the outcomes of patients with LAPD treated with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX at our high volume clinic. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained pancreatic cancer database was used to identify patients who were recommended neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX. Clinical outcomes were reviewed. Resectability was determined using SSO criteria. Results: Between 2/2011 and 9/2012 FOLFIRINOX was recommended for 25 patients with LAPD, 13 (52%) unresectable (UR) and 12 (48%) borderline resectable (BR). Median age was 59. 4 patients (16%) either refused treatment or were lost to follow up. 21 patients (84%) we...
Nathan Bahary - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Patient-Level Meta-Analysis
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2019Co-Authors: Quisette P. Janssen, Nathan Bahary, Stefan Buettner, Mustafa Suker, Berend R. Beumer, Pietro Addeo, Philippe Bachellier, Tanios Bekaii-saab, Maria Antonietta Bali, Marc G. BesselinkAbstract:Background: FOLFIRINOX is a standard treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. The effectiveness of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) remains debated. Methods: We performed a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis on neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in patients with BRPC. Studies with BRPC patients who received FOLFIRINOX as first-line neoadjuvant treatment were included. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, resection rate, R0 resection rate, and grade III–IV adverse events. Patient-level survival outcomes were obtained from authors of the included studies and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We included 24 studies (8 prospective, 16 retrospective), comprising 313 (38.1%) BRPC patients treated with FOLFIRINOX. Most studies (n ¼ 20) presented intention-to-treat results. The median number of administered neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX cycles ranged from 4 to 9. The resection rate was 67.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] ¼ 60.1% to 74.6%), and the R0-resection rate was 83.9% (95% CI ¼ 76.8% to 89.1%). The median OS varied from 11.0 to 34.2 months across studies. Patientlevel survival data were obtained for 20 studies representing 283 BRPC patients. The patient-level median OS was 22.2 months (95% CI ¼ 18.8 to 25.6 months), and patient-level median progression-free survival was 18.0 months (95% CI ¼ 14.5 to 21.5 months). Pooled event rates for grade III–IV adverse events were highest for neutropenia (17.5 per 100 patients, 95% CI ¼ 10.3% to 28.3%), diarrhea (11.1 per 100 patients, 95% CI ¼ 8.6 to 14.3), and fatigue (10.8 per 100 patients, 95% CI ¼ 8.1 to 14.2). No deaths were attributed to FOLFIRINOX. Conclusions: This patient-level meta-analysis of BRPC patients treated with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX showed a favorable median OS, resection rate, and R0-resection rate. These results need to be assessed in a randomized trial.
-
FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine nab paclitaxel for neoadjuvant treatment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma
Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018Co-Authors: Mashaal Dhir, Mazen S Zenati, Ahmad Hamad, Aatur D Singhi, Nathan Bahary, Melissa E Hogg, Herbert J Zeh, Amer H ZureikatAbstract:Both FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (G-nP) are used increasingly in the neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). This study aimed to compare neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and G-nP in the treatment of resectable (R) and borderline resectable (BR) head PDA. A single-institution retrospective review of R and BR patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy after NAT with FOLFIRINOX or G-nP was performed. Comparative analysis was performed using inverse-probability-weighted (IPW) estimators. The end points of the study were overall survival (OS) and an 80% reduction in CA19-9 with NAT. In this study, 193 patients were analyzed, with 73 patients receiving FOLFIRINOX and 120 patients receiving G-nP. The median OS was 38.7 months for FOLFIRINOX versus 28.6 months for G-nP (p = 0.214). The patients who received FOLFIRINOX were younger and had fewer comorbidities, more BR disease, and larger tumors than those treated with G-nP (all p < 0.05). The two regimens were equally effective in achieving an 80% decline in CA19-9 (p = 0.8). The R0 resection rates were similar (80%), but FOLFIRINOX was associated with a reduction in pN1 disease (56% vs. 72%; p = 0.028). The receipt of adjuvant therapy was similar (74 vs. 75%; p = 0.79). In the Cox regression analysis with adjustment for baseline and treatment-related variables (FOLFIRINOX vs. G-nP, age, gender, computed tomography (CT) tumor size, BR vs. R, pre-NAT CA19-9), regimen type was not associated with a survival benefit. In the IPW analysis of 166 patients, however, the average treatment effect of FOLFIRINOX was to increase OS by 4.9 months compared with G-nP (p = 0.012). Both FOLFIRINOX and G-nP are viable options for neoadjuvant treatment of PDA. In this study, neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was associated with a 4.9-month improvement in survival compared with G-nP after adjustment for covariates.
-
FOLFIRINOX Versus Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel for Neoadjuvant Treatment of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma.
Annals of surgical oncology, 2018Co-Authors: Mashaal Dhir, Mazen S Zenati, Ahmad Hamad, Aatur D Singhi, Nathan Bahary, Melissa E Hogg, Herbert J Zeh, Amer H ZureikatAbstract:Both FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (G-nP) are used increasingly in the neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). This study aimed to compare neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and G-nP in the treatment of resectable (R) and borderline resectable (BR) head PDA. A single-institution retrospective review of R and BR patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy after NAT with FOLFIRINOX or G-nP was performed. Comparative analysis was performed using inverse-probability-weighted (IPW) estimators. The end points of the study were overall survival (OS) and an 80% reduction in CA19-9 with NAT. In this study, 193 patients were analyzed, with 73 patients receiving FOLFIRINOX and 120 patients receiving G-nP. The median OS was 38.7 months for FOLFIRINOX versus 28.6 months for G-nP (p = 0.214). The patients who received FOLFIRINOX were younger and had fewer comorbidities, more BR disease, and larger tumors than those treated with G-nP (all p
-
Outcomes with FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable and locally unresectable pancreatic cancer
Journal of surgical oncology, 2013Co-Authors: Brian A. Boone, Herbert J Zeh, Amer H Zureikat, Jennifer Steve, Alyssa M. Krasinskas, Barry C. Lembersky, Michael K. Gibson, Ronald G. Stoller, Nathan BaharyAbstract:Background Trials examining FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic cancer demonstrate higher response rates compared to gemcitabine-based regimens. There is currently limited experience with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in pancreatic cancer.
-
Outcomes with FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2013Co-Authors: Brian A. Boone, Herbert J Zeh, Amer H Zureikat, Jennifer Steve, Alyssa M. Krasinskas, Barry C. Lembersky, Michael K. Gibson, Ronald G. Stoller, Nathan BaharyAbstract:256 Background: Trials examining the use of FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma demonstrate significantly higher response rates compared to gemcitabine-based regimens. These high response rates may be particularly important for patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (LAPD), in which there is currently limited experience with FOLFIRINOX. We examined the outcomes of patients with LAPD treated with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX at our high volume clinic. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained pancreatic cancer database was used to identify patients who were recommended neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX. Clinical outcomes were reviewed. Resectability was determined using SSO criteria. Results: Between 2/2011 and 9/2012 FOLFIRINOX was recommended for 25 patients with LAPD, 13 (52%) unresectable (UR) and 12 (48%) borderline resectable (BR). Median age was 59. 4 patients (16%) either refused treatment or were lost to follow up. 21 patients (84%) we...
Thierry Conroy - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine as Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer
The New England journal of medicine, 2018Co-Authors: Thierry Conroy, Jean-luc Raoul, Pascal Hammel, Mohamed Hebbar, Meher Ben Abdelghani, Alice C. Wei, Laurence Chone, Eric Francois, Pascal Artru, James Joseph BiagiAbstract:Among patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) leads to longer overall survival than gemcitabine therapy. We compared the efficacy and safety of a modified FOLFIRINOX regimen with gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. We randomly assigned 493 patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to receive a modified FOLFIRINOX regimen (oxaliplatin [85 mg per square meter of body-surface area], irinotecan [180 mg per square meter, reduced to 150 mg per square meter after a protocol-specified safety analysis], leucovorin [400 mg per square meter], and fluorouracil [2400 mg per square meter] every 2 weeks) or gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks) for 24 weeks. The primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival and safety. At a median follow-up of 33.6 months, the median disease-free survival was 21.6 months in the modified-FOLFIRINOX group and 12.8 months in the gemcitabine group (stratified hazard ratio for cancer-related event, second cancer, or death, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.73; P<0.001). The disease-free survival rate at 3 years was 39.7% in the modified-FOLFIRINOX group and 21.4% in the gemcitabine group. The median overall survival was 54.4 months in the modified-FOLFIRINOX group and 35.0 months in the gemcitabine group (stratified hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.86; P=0.003). The overall survival rate at 3 years was 63.4% in the modified-FOLFIRINOX group and 48.6% in the gemcitabine group. Adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 75.9% of the patients in the modified-FOLFIRINOX group and in 52.9% of those in the gemcitabine group. One patient in the gemcitabine group died from toxic effects (interstitial pneumonitis). Adjuvant therapy with a modified FOLFIRINOX regimen led to significantly longer survival than gemcitabine among patients with resected pancreatic cancer, at the expense of a higher incidence of toxic effects. (Funded by R&D Unicancer and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01526135 ; EudraCT number, 2011-002026-52 .).
-
Current status on the place of FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic cancer and future directions.
Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2017Co-Authors: Aurélien Lambert, Céline Gavoille, Thierry ConroyAbstract:Pancreatic cancer (PC) incidence rates are rapidly increasing in developed countries, with half the patients being metastatic at diagnosis. For decades, fluorouracil, then gemcitabine regimens were the preferred palliative first-line options for fit patients with metastatic PC. FOLFIRINOX (a combination of bolus and infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin) was introduced to clinical practice in 2010 due to the results of the phase II/III trial (PRODIGE 4/ACCORD 11) comparing FOLFIRINOX with single-agent gemcitabine as first-line treatment for patients with MPC. Median overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate were superior with FOLFIRINOX over gemcitabine and there was prolonged time to definitive deterioration in quality of life. Although FOLFIRINOX was also associated with increased toxicity, mainly febrile neutropenia and diarrhea, there has been rapid uptake of this regimen. This review closely examines optimal management and prevention of toxicities, international recommendations for first-line treatment, and use of modified FOLFIRINOX protocols. In this review, we also look at the potential benefit of FOLFIRINOX in selected groups of patients: second-line therapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, induction therapy in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced PC. Robust validation of the FOLFIRINOX regimen in these settings requires confirmation in further randomized trials.
-
An assessment of the benefit-risk balance of FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Oncotarget, 2016Co-Authors: Julien Péron, Pascal Roy, Thierry Conroy, Françoise Desseigne, Marc Ychou, Sophie Gourgou-bourgade, Trevor Stanbury, Laurent Roche, Brice Ozenne, Marc BuyseAbstract:We sought to assess the benefit-risk balance of FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We used generalized pairwise comparisons. This statistical method permits the simultaneous analysis of several prioritized outcome measures. The first priority outcome was survival time (OS). Differences in OS that exceeded two months were considered clinically relevant. The second priority outcome was toxicity. The overall treatment effect was quantified using the net chance of a better outcome, which can be interpreted as the net probability for a random patient treated in the FOLFIRINOX group to have a better overall outcome than a random patient in the gemcitabine group. In this trial 342 patients received either FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine. The net chance of a better outcome favored strongly and significantly the FOLFIRINOX group (24.7; P<.001), suggesting a favorable benefit-risk balance of FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine. The positive benefit-risk balance of FOLFIRINOX was observed throughout all sensitivity analyses. Generalized pairwise comparisons are useful to perform a quantitative assessment of the benefit-risk balance of new treatments. It provides a clinically intuitive way of comparing patients with respect to all important efficacy and toxicity outcomes. Overall the benefit-risk balance of FOLFIRINOX was strongly positive.
-
The Role of the FOLFIRINOX Regimen for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Current oncology reports, 2013Co-Authors: Thierry Conroy, Marc Ychou, Céline Gavoille, Emmanuelle Samalin, Michel DucreuxAbstract:In 2010, the FOLFIRINOX regimen (bolus and infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) emerged as a new option in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and a good performance status. However, at that time, some doubts were raised regarding safety issues. Similarly, no data on FOLFIRINOX were published in patients with unresectable/locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. This article presents the available experience with FOLFIRINOX outside clinical trials in metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients. The safety of the regimen in patients with biliary stents and in previously treated patients is also described. FOLFIRINOX usage in clinical practice, including modification of the regimen (omission of bolus 5-fluorouracil; FOLFOXIRI regimen), is also presented. These data suggest that a phase III randomized study is warranted to further explore the role of FOLFIRINOX in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
-
FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
The New England journal of medicine, 2011Co-Authors: Thierry Conroy, Françoise Desseigne, Marc Ychou, Sophie Gourgou-bourgade, Olivier Bouché, Rosine Guimbaud, Yves Bécouarn, Antoine Adenis, Jean-luc Raoul, Jaafar BennounaAbstract:Data are lacking on the efficacy and safety of a combination chemotherapy regimen consisting of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX) as compared with gemcitabine as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. We randomly assigned 342 patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1 (on a scale of 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of illness) to receive FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, 85 mg per square meter of body-surface area; irinotecan, 180 mg per square meter; leucovorin, 400 mg per square meter; and fluorouracil, 400 mg per square meter given as a bolus followed by 2400 mg per square meter given as a 46-hour continuous infusion, every 2 weeks) or gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg per square meter weekly for 7 of 8 weeks and then weekly for 3 of 4 weeks. Six months of chemotherapy were recommended in both groups in patients who had a response. The primary end point was overall survival. The median overall survival was 11.1 months in the FOLFIRINOX group as compared with 6.8 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for death, 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 0.73; P<0.001). Median progression-free survival was 6.4 months in the FOLFIRINOX group and 3.3 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for disease progression, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.59; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 31.6% in the FOLFIRINOX group versus 9.4% in the gemcitabine group (P<0.001). More adverse events were noted in the FOLFIRINOX group; 5.4% of patients in this group had febrile neutropenia. At 6 months, 31% of the patients in the FOLFIRINOX group had a definitive degradation of the quality of life versus 66% in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.70; P<0.001). As compared with gemcitabine, FOLFIRINOX was associated with a survival advantage and had increased toxicity. FOLFIRINOX is an option for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and good performance status. (Funded by the French government and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00112658.).
Herbert J Zeh - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine nab paclitaxel for neoadjuvant treatment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma
Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018Co-Authors: Mashaal Dhir, Mazen S Zenati, Ahmad Hamad, Aatur D Singhi, Nathan Bahary, Melissa E Hogg, Herbert J Zeh, Amer H ZureikatAbstract:Both FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (G-nP) are used increasingly in the neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). This study aimed to compare neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and G-nP in the treatment of resectable (R) and borderline resectable (BR) head PDA. A single-institution retrospective review of R and BR patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy after NAT with FOLFIRINOX or G-nP was performed. Comparative analysis was performed using inverse-probability-weighted (IPW) estimators. The end points of the study were overall survival (OS) and an 80% reduction in CA19-9 with NAT. In this study, 193 patients were analyzed, with 73 patients receiving FOLFIRINOX and 120 patients receiving G-nP. The median OS was 38.7 months for FOLFIRINOX versus 28.6 months for G-nP (p = 0.214). The patients who received FOLFIRINOX were younger and had fewer comorbidities, more BR disease, and larger tumors than those treated with G-nP (all p < 0.05). The two regimens were equally effective in achieving an 80% decline in CA19-9 (p = 0.8). The R0 resection rates were similar (80%), but FOLFIRINOX was associated with a reduction in pN1 disease (56% vs. 72%; p = 0.028). The receipt of adjuvant therapy was similar (74 vs. 75%; p = 0.79). In the Cox regression analysis with adjustment for baseline and treatment-related variables (FOLFIRINOX vs. G-nP, age, gender, computed tomography (CT) tumor size, BR vs. R, pre-NAT CA19-9), regimen type was not associated with a survival benefit. In the IPW analysis of 166 patients, however, the average treatment effect of FOLFIRINOX was to increase OS by 4.9 months compared with G-nP (p = 0.012). Both FOLFIRINOX and G-nP are viable options for neoadjuvant treatment of PDA. In this study, neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was associated with a 4.9-month improvement in survival compared with G-nP after adjustment for covariates.
-
FOLFIRINOX Versus Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel for Neoadjuvant Treatment of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma.
Annals of surgical oncology, 2018Co-Authors: Mashaal Dhir, Mazen S Zenati, Ahmad Hamad, Aatur D Singhi, Nathan Bahary, Melissa E Hogg, Herbert J Zeh, Amer H ZureikatAbstract:Both FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (G-nP) are used increasingly in the neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). This study aimed to compare neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and G-nP in the treatment of resectable (R) and borderline resectable (BR) head PDA. A single-institution retrospective review of R and BR patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy after NAT with FOLFIRINOX or G-nP was performed. Comparative analysis was performed using inverse-probability-weighted (IPW) estimators. The end points of the study were overall survival (OS) and an 80% reduction in CA19-9 with NAT. In this study, 193 patients were analyzed, with 73 patients receiving FOLFIRINOX and 120 patients receiving G-nP. The median OS was 38.7 months for FOLFIRINOX versus 28.6 months for G-nP (p = 0.214). The patients who received FOLFIRINOX were younger and had fewer comorbidities, more BR disease, and larger tumors than those treated with G-nP (all p
-
Outcomes with FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable and locally unresectable pancreatic cancer
Journal of surgical oncology, 2013Co-Authors: Brian A. Boone, Herbert J Zeh, Amer H Zureikat, Jennifer Steve, Alyssa M. Krasinskas, Barry C. Lembersky, Michael K. Gibson, Ronald G. Stoller, Nathan BaharyAbstract:Background Trials examining FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic cancer demonstrate higher response rates compared to gemcitabine-based regimens. There is currently limited experience with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in pancreatic cancer.
-
Outcomes with FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2013Co-Authors: Brian A. Boone, Herbert J Zeh, Amer H Zureikat, Jennifer Steve, Alyssa M. Krasinskas, Barry C. Lembersky, Michael K. Gibson, Ronald G. Stoller, Nathan BaharyAbstract:256 Background: Trials examining the use of FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma demonstrate significantly higher response rates compared to gemcitabine-based regimens. These high response rates may be particularly important for patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (LAPD), in which there is currently limited experience with FOLFIRINOX. We examined the outcomes of patients with LAPD treated with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX at our high volume clinic. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained pancreatic cancer database was used to identify patients who were recommended neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX. Clinical outcomes were reviewed. Resectability was determined using SSO criteria. Results: Between 2/2011 and 9/2012 FOLFIRINOX was recommended for 25 patients with LAPD, 13 (52%) unresectable (UR) and 12 (48%) borderline resectable (BR). Median age was 59. 4 patients (16%) either refused treatment or were lost to follow up. 21 patients (84%) we...
François Ghiringhelli - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Baseline splenic volume as a surrogate marker of FOLFIRINOX efficacy in advanced pancreatic carcinoma
Oncotarget, 2018Co-Authors: Anne Aarnink, Corentin Richard, Caroline Truntzer, Julie Vincent, Leila Bengrine, Angélique Vienot, Christophe Borg, François GhiringhelliAbstract:// Anne Aarnink 1 , Corentin Richard 2 , Caroline Truntzer 2 , Julie Vincent 1 , Leila Bengrine 1 , Angelique Vienot 3 , Christophe Borg 3, 5 and Francois Ghiringhelli 1, 2, 4, 5 1 Department of Medical Oncology, Center Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France 2 Platform of Transfer in Oncology, Besancon University Hospital, Besancon, France 3 Department of Medical Oncology, Besancon University Hospital, Besancon, France 4 INSERM, Unit 1231, Besancon, France 5 University of Bourgogne-Franche-Comte, Besancon, France Correspondence to: Francois Ghiringhelli, email: fghiringhelli@cgfl.fr Keywords: advanced pancreatic carcinoma; splenic volume; biomarker; FOLFIRINOX Received: December 17, 2017 Accepted: April 27, 2018 Published: May 22, 2018 ABSTRACT Background: The FOLFIRINOX regimen is the standard first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (aPDAC). However, because of its potential toxicity, predictive biomarkers could help clinical decision-making. Methods: A cohort of 97 aPDAC patients treated with first-line FOLFIRINOX were studied. The association between splenic volume and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using univariate and multivariable Cox analyses. The external validation cohort was composed of 117 patients treated with Gemcitabine and 52 patients treated with FOLFIRINOX. Results: In the training cohort, the splenic volume of 97 patients was measured at baseline and at the end of therapy. The spleen size increased in 81% of patients, with at least a 50% increase in 27% of patients. Baseline splenomegaly predicted PFS (HR 1.812, 95% CI = [1.036–3.169]; p = 0.03) and OS (HR 1.983, 95% CI = [1.085–3.624]; p = 0.02) in the training cohort. These results were then validated in an external cohort of patients who were treated with FOLFIRINOX excluding those in the control cohort who were treated with gemcitabine. In a multivariate model based on the CoxBoost method, the following were selected as predictive markers of FOLFIRINOX efficacy (AUC = 0.81): performance status, liver metastasis, baseline Ca199 and CEA levels and baseline splenomegaly. The predictive ability of the model was validated in the external cohort that was also treated with FOLFIRINOX. Conclusions: Baseline splenomegaly is a predictive marker of a poor response to FOLFIRINOX in aPDAC and remained predictive when associated with other clinical variables.
-
Baseline splenic volume as a surrogate marker of FOLFIRINOX efficacy in advanced pancreatic carcinoma
Oncotarget, 2018Co-Authors: Anne Aarnink, Corentin Richard, Caroline Truntzer, Julie Vincent, Leila Bengrine, Angélique Vienot, Christophe Borg, François GhiringhelliAbstract:Background: The FOLFIRINOX regimen is the standard first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (aPDAC). However, because of its potential toxicity, predictive biomarkers could help clinical decision-making. Methods: A cohort of 97 aPDAC patients treated with first-line FOLFIRINOX were studied. The association between splenic volume and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using univariate and multivariable Cox analyses. The external validation cohort was composed of 117 patients treated with Gemcitabine and 52 patients treated with FOLFIRINOX. Results: In the training cohort, the splenic volume of 97 patients was measured at baseline and at the end of therapy. The spleen size increased in 81% of patients, with at least a 50% increase in 27% of patients. Baseline splenomegaly predicted PFS (HR 1.812, 95% CI = [1.036–3.169]; p = 0.03) and OS (HR 1.983, 95% CI = [1.085–3.624]; p = 0.02) in the training cohort. These results were then validated in an external cohort of patients who were treated with FOLFIRINOX excluding those in the control cohort who were treated with gemcitabine. In a multivariate model based on the CoxBoost method, the following were selected as predictive markers of FOLFIRINOX efficacy (AUC = 0.81): performance status, liver metastasis, baseline Ca199 and CEA levels and baseline splenomegaly. The predictive ability of the model was validated in the external cohort that was also treated with FOLFIRINOX. Conclusions: Baseline splenomegaly is a predictive marker of a poor response to FOLFIRINOX in aPDAC and remained predictive when associated with other clinical variables.