Fudenberg

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 11232 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Mathieu Faure - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • 2013: Consistency of vanishingly smooth fictitious play
    2016
    Co-Authors: Mathieu Faure
    Abstract:

    We discuss consistency of Vanishingly Smooth Fictitious Play, a strategy in the context of game theory, which can be regarded as a smooth fictitious play procedure, where the smoothing parameter is time-dependent and asymptotically vanishes. This answers a question initially raised by Drew Fudenberg and Satoru Takahashi. Key words: Smooth fictitious play; no regret; consistency; nonautonomous differential inclusions MSC2000 Subject Classification: Primary: 91B06, 62C12; Secondary: 37B26, 37B5

  • Consistency of Vanishingly Smooth Fictitious Play
    Mathematics of Operations Research, 2013
    Co-Authors: Michel Benaïm, Mathieu Faure
    Abstract:

    We discuss consistency of vanishingly smooth fictitious play, a strategy in the context of game theory, which can be regarded as a smooth fictitious play procedure, where the smoothing parameter is time dependent and asymptotically vanishes. This answers a question initially raised by Drew Fudenberg and Satoru Takahashi.

Dermot Leahy - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • strategic trade and industrial policy towards dynamic oligopolies
    The Economic Journal, 2000
    Co-Authors: Peter J Neary, Dermot Leahy
    Abstract:

    We characterise optimal trade and industrial policy in dynamic oligopolistic markets. If governments can commit to future policies, optimal first-period intervention should diverge from the profit-shifting benchmark to an extent which exactly offsets the strategic behaviour implied by Fudenberg and Tirole's "animal spirits" taxonomy of business strategies. Without government commitment, there is an additional basis for intervention, whose sign depends on the strategic substitutability between future policy and current actions. We consider a variety of applications (to R&D spillovers, consumer switching costs, etc.) and also extensions to constrained second-best policies.

  • strategic trade and industrial policy towards dynamic oligopolies
    LSE Research Online Documents on Economics, 1998
    Co-Authors: Peter J Neary, Dermot Leahy
    Abstract:

    In this paper characterise optimal trade and industrial policy in dynamic oligopolistic markets. If governments can commit to future policies, optimal first-period intervention should diverge from the profit-shifting benchmark to an extent which exactly offsets the strategic behaviour implied by Fudenberg and Tirole''s "fat cats and top dogs" taxonomy of business strategies. Without government commitment, there is an additional basis for intervention, whose sign depends on the strategic substitutability between future policy and current actions. We consider a variety of applications (to R&D spillovers, consumer switching costs, etc.) and extensions to second-best, revenue-constrained and entry-promotion policies.

Peter J Neary - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • strategic trade and industrial policy towards dynamic oligopolies
    The Economic Journal, 2000
    Co-Authors: Peter J Neary, Dermot Leahy
    Abstract:

    We characterise optimal trade and industrial policy in dynamic oligopolistic markets. If governments can commit to future policies, optimal first-period intervention should diverge from the profit-shifting benchmark to an extent which exactly offsets the strategic behaviour implied by Fudenberg and Tirole's "animal spirits" taxonomy of business strategies. Without government commitment, there is an additional basis for intervention, whose sign depends on the strategic substitutability between future policy and current actions. We consider a variety of applications (to R&D spillovers, consumer switching costs, etc.) and also extensions to constrained second-best policies.

  • strategic trade and industrial policy towards dynamic oligopolies
    LSE Research Online Documents on Economics, 1998
    Co-Authors: Peter J Neary, Dermot Leahy
    Abstract:

    In this paper characterise optimal trade and industrial policy in dynamic oligopolistic markets. If governments can commit to future policies, optimal first-period intervention should diverge from the profit-shifting benchmark to an extent which exactly offsets the strategic behaviour implied by Fudenberg and Tirole''s "fat cats and top dogs" taxonomy of business strategies. Without government commitment, there is an additional basis for intervention, whose sign depends on the strategic substitutability between future policy and current actions. We consider a variety of applications (to R&D spillovers, consumer switching costs, etc.) and extensions to second-best, revenue-constrained and entry-promotion policies.

Michel Benaïm - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

David K. Levine - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • An Approximate Dual-Self Model and Paradoxes of Choice Under Risk
    Journal of Economic Psychology, 2014
    Co-Authors: Drew Fudenberg, David K. Levine, Zacharias Maniadis
    Abstract:

    We derive a simplified version of the model of Fudenberg and Levine [2006, 2011] and show how this approximate model is useful in explaining choice under risk. We show that in the simple case of three outcomes, the model can generate indifference curves that “fan out” in the Marshack-Machina triangle, and thus can explain the well-known Allais and common ratio paradoxes that models such as prospect theory and regret theory are designed to capture. At the same time, our model is consistent with modern macroeconomic theory and evidence and generates predictions across a much wider set of domains than these models.

  • An Approximate Dual-Self Model and Paradoxes of Choice under
    2013
    Co-Authors: Drew Fudenberg, David K. Levine, Zacharias Maniadis
    Abstract:

    We derive a simplified version of the model of Fudenberg and Levine [2006, 2011] and show how this approximate model is useful in explaining choice under risk. We show that in the simple case of three outcomes, the model can generate indifference curves that “fan out ” in the Marshack-Machina triangle, and thus can explain the well-known Allais and common ratio paradoxes that models such as prospect theory and regret theory are designed to capture. At the same time, our model is consistent with modern macroeconomic theory and evidence and generates predictions across a much wider set of domains than these models

  • A Long-Run Collaboration on Long-Run Games - A Long-Run Collaboration on Long-Run Games
    2008
    Co-Authors: Drew Fudenberg, David K. Levine
    Abstract:

    This book brings together the joint work of Drew Fudenberg and David Levine (through 2008) on the closely connected topics of repeated games and reputation effects, along with related papers on more general issues in game theory and dynamic games. The unified presentation highlights the recurring themes of their work.

  • Subjective Uncertainty Over Behavior Strategies: A Correction
    Journal of Economic Theory, 2002
    Co-Authors: Eddie Dekel, Drew Fudenberg, David K. Levine
    Abstract:

    In order to model the subjective uncertainty of a player over the behavior strategies of an opponent, one must consider the player's beliefs about the opponent's play at information sets that the player thinks have probability zero. This corregendum uses “trembles†to provide a definition of the convex hull of a set of behavior strategies. This corrects a definition we gave in [E. Dekel, D. Fudenberg, and D. K. Levine, 1999, J. Econ. Theory 89, 165–185], which led to two of the solution concepts we defined there not having the properties we intended.