The Experts below are selected from a list of 312 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Jessica Elton - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
a toxic trend Generational Conflict and connectivity in twitter discourse under the boomerremover hashtag
Gerontologist, 2021Co-Authors: Daniel Sipocz, Jessica D. Freeman, Jessica EltonAbstract:Background and objectives This study examines the #BoomerRemover hashtag on Twitter to understand discourses of interGenerational Conflict and unity that emerged during the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic. The research highlights Conflict and connection surrounding Generational cohorts via social media, particularly in a time of crisis. Research design and methods The study used an inductive-dominant qualitative content analysis to examine 536 tweets collected between March 9 and April 9, 2020 under #BoomerRemover. Results Data analysis revealed five forms of Conflictive Generational discourse: derogatory endorsement of the #BoomerRemover moniker, Conflict regarding the nature and origins of the moniker, Conflict surrounding the virus, political Conflict, and Generational jabs. Two forms of interGenerationally unifying discourse were identified: implicit and explicit pleas for connectivity. Discussion and implications The analysis of discourse under #BoomerRemover revealed more nuanced expressions surrounding Generational cohorts than widely reported in media outlets. Some users tweeted the hashtag in ways that reflected Conflict, with #BoomerRemover acting as a vector through which stereotypes were perpetuated and magnified. However, a number of users tweeted the hashtag to call for interGenerational connectivity, highlighting the complexity of online discourse. These results yield implications for the study of online Generational discourse, particularly in light of the unique circumstances surrounding the pandemic.
-
"A Toxic Trend"?: Generational Conflict and Connectivity in Twitter Discourse Under the #BoomerRemover Hashtag
The Gerontologist, 2020Co-Authors: Daniel Sipocz, Jessica D. Freeman, Jessica EltonAbstract:Background and objectives This study examines the #BoomerRemover hashtag on Twitter to understand discourses of interGenerational Conflict and unity that emerged during the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic. The research highlights Conflict and connection surrounding Generational cohorts via social media, particularly in a time of crisis. Research design and methods The study used an inductive-dominant qualitative content analysis to examine 536 tweets collected between March 9 and April 9, 2020 under #BoomerRemover. Results Data analysis revealed five forms of Conflictive Generational discourse: derogatory endorsement of the #BoomerRemover moniker, Conflict regarding the nature and origins of the moniker, Conflict surrounding the virus, political Conflict, and Generational jabs. Two forms of interGenerationally unifying discourse were identified: implicit and explicit pleas for connectivity. Discussion and implications The analysis of discourse under #BoomerRemover revealed more nuanced expressions surrounding Generational cohorts than widely reported in media outlets. Some users tweeted the hashtag in ways that reflected Conflict, with #BoomerRemover acting as a vector through which stereotypes were perpetuated and magnified. However, a number of users tweeted the hashtag to call for interGenerational connectivity, highlighting the complexity of online discourse. These results yield implications for the study of online Generational discourse, particularly in light of the unique circumstances surrounding the pandemic.
Daniel Sipocz - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
a toxic trend Generational Conflict and connectivity in twitter discourse under the boomerremover hashtag
Gerontologist, 2021Co-Authors: Daniel Sipocz, Jessica D. Freeman, Jessica EltonAbstract:Background and objectives This study examines the #BoomerRemover hashtag on Twitter to understand discourses of interGenerational Conflict and unity that emerged during the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic. The research highlights Conflict and connection surrounding Generational cohorts via social media, particularly in a time of crisis. Research design and methods The study used an inductive-dominant qualitative content analysis to examine 536 tweets collected between March 9 and April 9, 2020 under #BoomerRemover. Results Data analysis revealed five forms of Conflictive Generational discourse: derogatory endorsement of the #BoomerRemover moniker, Conflict regarding the nature and origins of the moniker, Conflict surrounding the virus, political Conflict, and Generational jabs. Two forms of interGenerationally unifying discourse were identified: implicit and explicit pleas for connectivity. Discussion and implications The analysis of discourse under #BoomerRemover revealed more nuanced expressions surrounding Generational cohorts than widely reported in media outlets. Some users tweeted the hashtag in ways that reflected Conflict, with #BoomerRemover acting as a vector through which stereotypes were perpetuated and magnified. However, a number of users tweeted the hashtag to call for interGenerational connectivity, highlighting the complexity of online discourse. These results yield implications for the study of online Generational discourse, particularly in light of the unique circumstances surrounding the pandemic.
-
"A Toxic Trend"?: Generational Conflict and Connectivity in Twitter Discourse Under the #BoomerRemover Hashtag
The Gerontologist, 2020Co-Authors: Daniel Sipocz, Jessica D. Freeman, Jessica EltonAbstract:Background and objectives This study examines the #BoomerRemover hashtag on Twitter to understand discourses of interGenerational Conflict and unity that emerged during the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic. The research highlights Conflict and connection surrounding Generational cohorts via social media, particularly in a time of crisis. Research design and methods The study used an inductive-dominant qualitative content analysis to examine 536 tweets collected between March 9 and April 9, 2020 under #BoomerRemover. Results Data analysis revealed five forms of Conflictive Generational discourse: derogatory endorsement of the #BoomerRemover moniker, Conflict regarding the nature and origins of the moniker, Conflict surrounding the virus, political Conflict, and Generational jabs. Two forms of interGenerationally unifying discourse were identified: implicit and explicit pleas for connectivity. Discussion and implications The analysis of discourse under #BoomerRemover revealed more nuanced expressions surrounding Generational cohorts than widely reported in media outlets. Some users tweeted the hashtag in ways that reflected Conflict, with #BoomerRemover acting as a vector through which stereotypes were perpetuated and magnified. However, a number of users tweeted the hashtag to call for interGenerational connectivity, highlighting the complexity of online discourse. These results yield implications for the study of online Generational discourse, particularly in light of the unique circumstances surrounding the pandemic.
Jessica D. Freeman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
a toxic trend Generational Conflict and connectivity in twitter discourse under the boomerremover hashtag
Gerontologist, 2021Co-Authors: Daniel Sipocz, Jessica D. Freeman, Jessica EltonAbstract:Background and objectives This study examines the #BoomerRemover hashtag on Twitter to understand discourses of interGenerational Conflict and unity that emerged during the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic. The research highlights Conflict and connection surrounding Generational cohorts via social media, particularly in a time of crisis. Research design and methods The study used an inductive-dominant qualitative content analysis to examine 536 tweets collected between March 9 and April 9, 2020 under #BoomerRemover. Results Data analysis revealed five forms of Conflictive Generational discourse: derogatory endorsement of the #BoomerRemover moniker, Conflict regarding the nature and origins of the moniker, Conflict surrounding the virus, political Conflict, and Generational jabs. Two forms of interGenerationally unifying discourse were identified: implicit and explicit pleas for connectivity. Discussion and implications The analysis of discourse under #BoomerRemover revealed more nuanced expressions surrounding Generational cohorts than widely reported in media outlets. Some users tweeted the hashtag in ways that reflected Conflict, with #BoomerRemover acting as a vector through which stereotypes were perpetuated and magnified. However, a number of users tweeted the hashtag to call for interGenerational connectivity, highlighting the complexity of online discourse. These results yield implications for the study of online Generational discourse, particularly in light of the unique circumstances surrounding the pandemic.
-
"A Toxic Trend"?: Generational Conflict and Connectivity in Twitter Discourse Under the #BoomerRemover Hashtag
The Gerontologist, 2020Co-Authors: Daniel Sipocz, Jessica D. Freeman, Jessica EltonAbstract:Background and objectives This study examines the #BoomerRemover hashtag on Twitter to understand discourses of interGenerational Conflict and unity that emerged during the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic. The research highlights Conflict and connection surrounding Generational cohorts via social media, particularly in a time of crisis. Research design and methods The study used an inductive-dominant qualitative content analysis to examine 536 tweets collected between March 9 and April 9, 2020 under #BoomerRemover. Results Data analysis revealed five forms of Conflictive Generational discourse: derogatory endorsement of the #BoomerRemover moniker, Conflict regarding the nature and origins of the moniker, Conflict surrounding the virus, political Conflict, and Generational jabs. Two forms of interGenerationally unifying discourse were identified: implicit and explicit pleas for connectivity. Discussion and implications The analysis of discourse under #BoomerRemover revealed more nuanced expressions surrounding Generational cohorts than widely reported in media outlets. Some users tweeted the hashtag in ways that reflected Conflict, with #BoomerRemover acting as a vector through which stereotypes were perpetuated and magnified. However, a number of users tweeted the hashtag to call for interGenerational connectivity, highlighting the complexity of online discourse. These results yield implications for the study of online Generational discourse, particularly in light of the unique circumstances surrounding the pandemic.
Anne Verjus - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Generational Conflict in revolutionary France: widows, inheritance practices, and the "victory" of sons
William and Mary quarterly, 2013Co-Authors: Denise Zara Davidson, Anne VerjusAbstract:Although the language of individualism permeated the legal and political systems created during the French Revolution, kinship and friendship networks continued to determine access to positions of power, and the self-interested individual never had much resonance beyond the realm of discourse. Adult sons nonetheless found that they held new legal and symbolic power, which changed the nature of their relationships with preceding generations. Revolutionary transformations in family law and later under Napoléon Bonaparte did not address the situation of widows, but the combination of other laws with the rhetoric of the all-powerful male individual separate from the responsibilities of lineage limited widows' ability to defend their rights. Two cases where adult sons entered into Conflict with their widowed mothers illustrate the significance of these changes. These cases shed light on some unexplored consequences of the revolution for the family, revealing how the younger generation benefited relative to their elders. The French case in turn relates to other parts of the globe as the Napoleonic Code, which helped to enshrine this new system, served as a model for legal codes throughout Latin America and in the French Empire
-
Generational Conflict in Revolutionary France: Widows, Inheritance Practices, and the “Victory” of Sons
The William and Mary Quarterly, 2013Co-Authors: Denise Zara Davidson, Anne VerjusAbstract:"Although the language of individualism permeated the legal and political systems created during the French Revolution, kinship and friendship networks continued to determine access to positions of power, and the self-interested individual never had much resonance beyond the realm of discourse. Adult sons nonetheless found that they held new legal and symbolic power, which changed the nature of their relationships with preceding generations. Revolutionary transformations in family law and later under Napoleon Bonaparte did not address the situation of widows, but the combination of other laws with the rhetoric of the all-powerful male individual separate from the responsibilities of lineage limited widows' ability to defend their rights. Two cases where adult sons entered into Conflict with their widowed mothers illustrate the significance of these changes. These cases shed light on some unexplored consequences of the revolution for the family, revealing how the younger generation benefited relative to their elders. The French case in turn relates to other parts of the globe as the Napoleonic Code, which helped to enshrine this new system, served as a model for legal codes throughout Latin America and in the French Empire"
Clive Glaser - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Youth and generation in South African history
Safundi, 2018Co-Authors: Clive GlaserAbstract:AbstractIn recent years, “the youth” have captured (or perhaps recaptured) public attention in South Africa. This paper reflects on South Africa’s experience of Generational Conflict and places it in the broader context of South African history. After attempting to define “youth,” this paper makes two key points. First, far from being a recent development, Generational tension has been a continuous feature of Southern African history since at least the late nineteenth century. Second, organized political mobilization is not the way this tension usually manifests itself. Mass youth politics is a specific phenomenon, which needs to be explained historically rather than assumed. The paper focuses on three historical examples to illustrate this: early migrant labor in South Africa, the formation of urban youth gangs, and the sustained youth uprising from 1976 until the early 1990s. It concludes with a tentative attempt to draw some parallels between that phase of rebellion and recent student upheavals.
-
Youth and generation in South African history
Safundi, 2018Co-Authors: Clive GlaserAbstract:In recent years, “the youth” have captured (or perhaps recaptured) public attention in South Africa. This paper reflects on South Africa’s experience of Generational Conflict and places it in the b...