The Experts below are selected from a list of 113796 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Günter Krampen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Citation success of different publication types: a case study on all references in psychology publications from the German-Speaking Countries (D---A---CH---L---L) in 2009, 2010, and 2011
Scientometrics, 2015Co-Authors: Günter Krampen, Peter Weiland, Jürgen WiesenhütterAbstract:Scientometric data on the citation success of different publication types and publication genres in psychology publications are presented. Data refer to references that are cited in these scientific publications and that are documented in PSYNDEX, the exhaustive database of psychology publications from the German-Speaking Countries either published in German or in English language. Firstly, data analyses refer to the references that are cited in publications of 2009 versus 2010 versus 2011. With reference to all cited references, the portion of journal articles ranges from 57 to 61 %, of books from 22 to 24 %, and of book chapters from 14 to 15 %, with a rather high stability across the three publication years analysed. Secondly, data analyses refer to the numbers of cited references from the German-Speaking Countries, which are also documented in PSYNDEX. These compose about 11 % of all cited references indicating that nearly 90 % of the references cited are of international and/or interdisciplinary publications not stemming from the German-Speaking Countries. The subsample shows the proportion of journal articles, books, and chapters, and these are very similar to the percentages identified for all references that are cited. Thirdly, analyses refer to document type, scientific genre, and psychological sub-discipline of the most frequently cited references in the psychology publications. The frequency of top-cited references of books and book chapters is almost equal to that of journal articles; two-thirds of the top-cited references are non-empirical publications, only one-third are empirical publications. Top-cited references stem particularly from clinical psychology, experimental psychology, as well as tests, testing and psychometrics. In summary, the results point to the fact that citation analyses, which are limited to journal papers, tend to neglect very high portions of references that are cited in scientific publications.
-
How does scientific success relate to individual and organizational characteristics? A scientometric study of psychology researchers in the German-Speaking Countries
Scientometrics, 2013Co-Authors: Hans P. W. Bauer, Gabriel Schui, Alexander Eye, Günter KrampenAbstract:Purpose : To provide up-to-date bibliometric reference data describing the output and success of psychology researchers in the German-Speaking Countries, including lifetime publication and citation numbers, and to investigate associations of bibliometric measures with academic status and gender as well as the department characteristics of size and quota of senior researchers. Method Queried literature databases using an extensive online register of academic psychologists in the German-Speaking Countries, obtaining valid data for 85 % ( N = 1742) of the population of interest. Findings Skewed distributions for publications and citations; maximum number of German-language (=native) publications much higher than maximum number of English-language publications; relatively large part of population publishing almost exclusively in German; publication count predictable by academic status, gender, department size, and quota of senior researchers; citation count predictable by publication count, status, department size, and quota of senior researchers; department characteristics interact with individual characteristics to produce specific conditions under which publication count and citation count are higher or lower than expected: combination of female gender, small department size and large quota of senior researchers is associated with particularly increased publication count; female gender and large department size are associated with decreased publication count; high publication count, large department size and low quota of senior researchers are associated with increased citation count; low publication count and large quota of senior researchers are associated with decreased citation count. Conclusions Reference values for scientific output provided in this study provide an anchor for monitoring and international comparison; despite considerable noise in data, we show that interactions of individual and organizational characteristics are relevant for scientific success and should be investigated further, e.g. by adopting various measures of organizational diversity and tracing a population longitudinally.
-
An Extended 4-Phases-Testmodel for Clinical Trials and its Application on Clinical Psychology Publications in the German-Speaking Countries.
2011Co-Authors: Gabriel Schui, Günter KrampenAbstract:With reference to the concept of evidence-based psychotherapy, methodology of clinical psychology research focuses on the 4-phases-testmodel for clinical trials adapted from pharmacological research and evidence-based medicine. Questions: Can the literature on clinical interventions from the German-Speaking Countries be classified according to an extended 4-phases-testmodel? On which phases does research focus and how do foci shift in a time span of 30+ years (1977 to 2007). Method: All clinical psychology publications documented in PSYNDEX, the database for psychological publications from the German-Speaking Countries, were classified to the extended 4-phases-testmodel. The automated classification was inspected manually and corrected if necessary. Results: Overall, 16,741 Publications (ca. 8% of PSYNDEX) received a valid classification. Double classification was possible and allowed. Additional therapy resources like treatment manuals, Professional guidelines and self-help guides were also identified and received a dedicated classification. The figures show the absolute document counts and the longitudinal changes within relative document counts for the respective phases since 1977.
Jürgen Wiesenhütter - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Citation success of different publication types: a case study on all references in psychology publications from the German-Speaking Countries (D---A---CH---L---L) in 2009, 2010, and 2011
Scientometrics, 2015Co-Authors: Günter Krampen, Peter Weiland, Jürgen WiesenhütterAbstract:Scientometric data on the citation success of different publication types and publication genres in psychology publications are presented. Data refer to references that are cited in these scientific publications and that are documented in PSYNDEX, the exhaustive database of psychology publications from the German-Speaking Countries either published in German or in English language. Firstly, data analyses refer to the references that are cited in publications of 2009 versus 2010 versus 2011. With reference to all cited references, the portion of journal articles ranges from 57 to 61 %, of books from 22 to 24 %, and of book chapters from 14 to 15 %, with a rather high stability across the three publication years analysed. Secondly, data analyses refer to the numbers of cited references from the German-Speaking Countries, which are also documented in PSYNDEX. These compose about 11 % of all cited references indicating that nearly 90 % of the references cited are of international and/or interdisciplinary publications not stemming from the German-Speaking Countries. The subsample shows the proportion of journal articles, books, and chapters, and these are very similar to the percentages identified for all references that are cited. Thirdly, analyses refer to document type, scientific genre, and psychological sub-discipline of the most frequently cited references in the psychology publications. The frequency of top-cited references of books and book chapters is almost equal to that of journal articles; two-thirds of the top-cited references are non-empirical publications, only one-third are empirical publications. Top-cited references stem particularly from clinical psychology, experimental psychology, as well as tests, testing and psychometrics. In summary, the results point to the fact that citation analyses, which are limited to journal papers, tend to neglect very high portions of references that are cited in scientific publications.
Marc Eulerich - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Bibliometric analysis of corporate governance research in German-Speaking Countries: applying bibliometrics to business research using a custom-made database
Scientometrics, 2018Co-Authors: Dirk Tunger, Marc EulerichAbstract:The objective of the present study on corporate governance research in German-Speaking Countries is to portray the networks in this field, identify the central sources and actors, and establish the relations between individual subdisciplines. The present paper therefore uses bibliometric and network analysis to investigate business research literature in the leading journals in German-Speaking Countries. As none of the major citation databases could be used for the bibliometric analysis given the subject area under investigation, the first step was to create a bibliometric database for the planned evaluation. Using this as a basis, bibliometric evaluations were then carried out with a focus on co-citation analysis. This analysis was based on an evaluation of over 10,000 references in 267 source documents. This identified the key publications on business research in German-Speaking Countries that have a particularly strong influence on the subject of corporate governance. The various key areas were clustered according to similarity and visualized in a network.
Ines W. Jindra - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The emerging ‘science of social work’ in the United States and German-Speaking Countries: A comparison:
International Social Work, 2017Co-Authors: Ines W. JindraAbstract:The aim of this article is to begin a comparison between an emerging ‘science of social work’ in the United States and German-Speaking Countries (Switzerland, Germany, and Austria), with the intent...
Horst Dilling - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Design of the ICD-10 field trial of the Diagnostic Criteria for Research in German-Speaking Countries
Psychopathology, 1996Co-Authors: R. D. Stieglitz, C.p. Malchow, Harald J. Freyberger, Horst DillingAbstract:The design of the international multicentric field trial on ICD-10, chapter V (F) ‘Mental and Behavioural Disorders (including disorders of psychological development): Diagnostic Criteria for Research’ including some modifications for the study in German-Speaking Countries is described. The different stages of the study, the assessment instruments, and the database are presented.
-
Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of psychoactive substances (F1). Results from the ICD-10 field trial of the Diagnostic Criteria for Research in German-Speaking Countries.
Psychopathology, 1996Co-Authors: Heidi Müssigbrodt, Volker Dittmann, Horst Dilling, Kurt MeszarosAbstract:The results of the ICD-10 Diagnostic Criteria for Research (DCR) field trial in German-Speaking Countries concerning section F1 (mental and behavioural disorders due to use of psychoactive substances) show a comparatively sufficient level of acceptance. The subjective assessment of the diagnostic process and the chance-corrected interrater reliability (kappa = 0.70) are below average but quite acceptable, which is possibly due to the study design as well as the high comorbidity of disorders in this field. However, interrater reliability based on the strictly defined operationalized criteria of the DCR improved markedly compared to earlier ICD-10 field trials in German-Speaking Countries.
