The Experts below are selected from a list of 21504 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Guo Ying - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Governance Culture and Governance Institution
Journal of Guangzhou City Polytechnic, 2008Co-Authors: Guo YingAbstract:As the foundation of corporate Governance culture,corporate Governance Institution is a creative system which regulates people's natural attribute,and governs mature contracts.As the sublimation of corporate Governance Institution,corporate Governance culture,on the other hand,is an autogenous system which regulates people's social attribute and governs immature contracts.Their relationship is complementary and substitutable.Therefore,it will work well when the design of corporate Governance Institution is integrated with corporate Governance culture.
-
The analysis of the relationship of corporate Governance culture and Governance Institution
Journal of Guangzhou City Polytechnic, 2007Co-Authors: Guo YingAbstract:As the base of corporate Governance culture,corporate Governance Institution is a created system which adjusts people's nature attribute and governs perfect contracts.As the sublimation of corporate Governance Institution,corpotate Governance culture is an autogeny system which adjusts people's social attribute and governs unperfect comtracts.So their relationship is substitube and complementarity.
Nurul Wahilah Abdul Latif - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Validating the dynamic relationship between technological innovation and economic growth in Malaysia
International Journal of Technological Learning Innovation and Development, 2019Co-Authors: Hussain Ali Bekhet, Nurul Wahilah Abdul LatifAbstract:Technological innovation is a dynamic growth factor to achieve sustainable development. This study aims to explore the long- and short-run relationship between technological innovation and Malaysia's sustainable growth from 1980 to 2015. Augmented Cobb-Douglas production function is used to scale the technological innovation and economic growth link. The F-bounds test and VECM Granger causality are employed. The dynamic relationships among the gross domestic product, capital, employment, electricity consumption, technological innovation, technological innovation squared and Governance Institution quality variables; and the nonlinear relationship between technological innovation and economic growth are studied. The study confirms the existence of long-run relationship among the variables and the link between technological innovation and economic growth has an inverted U-shape. Also, technological innovation, technological innovation squared, and Governance Institution quality Granger-cause economic growth in the long and short run, together with capital, employment and electricity consumption. Therefore, continuous plans and policies are very much needed to drive technological innovation evolution in Malaysia, so the tide is slowly turning.
-
The impact of technological innovation and Governance Institution quality on Malaysia's sustainable growth: Evidence from a dynamic relationship
Technology in Society, 2018Co-Authors: Hussain Ali Bekhet, Nurul Wahilah Abdul LatifAbstract:Abstract Technological innovation integrated with strategic policies is vital for sustainable growth. This study aims to highlight the importance of technological innovation and Governance Institution quality on Malaysia's sustainable growth from 1985 through 2015. The dynamic relationships among gross domestic product, capital, employment, electricity consumption, technological innovation, Governance Institution quality, and the interaction of technological innovation and Governance Institution quality are examined. The augmented production function, F-bound, dynamic ordinary least squares, and Granger causality tests are utilized. The results confirm the dynamic relationship among the above variables. In the long run, unidirectional causality runs from Governance Institution quality and technological innovation-Governance Institution quality toward Malaysia's financial development. However, in the short run, there is bidirectional causality between financial development and economic growth. The interaction between technological innovation and Governance Institution quality has a significant positive impact on Malaysia's economy in the long run. Also, capital, employment, and electricity consumption have a positive significant impact on economic growth in the long run. These three variables are vital growth inputs and should be accompanied by technological innovation and Governance Institution quality. Well-planned and relevant policies can boost technological progress in Malaysia, slowly yet surely.
Tim Buthe - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
global private Governance lessons from a national model of setting standards in accounting
Law and contemporary problems, 2005Co-Authors: Walter Mattli, Tim ButheAbstract:I INTRODUCTION Numerous recent studies have documented the increase of global Governance by international organizations, formal and informal transgovernmental networks, hybrid public-private Institutional arrangements, and entirely private transnational Institutions. (1) These bodies establish general rules and make specific decisions with which other actors comply, based on the recognition by the latter of the authority of the former. (2) In the domestic context, such rule- and decisionmaking authority is embedded in a system of administrative law, that is, a system of Institutionalized procedural and substantive norms. It assures those who are affected by the regulator's decisions that they will enjoy "procedural participation" (that is, that their views will be heard and considered, for instance through notice-and-comment procedures); that decisions will be taken in a transparent manner on the basis of disclosed reasons and in compliance with norms of proportionality, means-ends rationality, and the like; and that the decisions are subject to review by a judicial or another independent body on request. (3) In short, administrative law mechanisms ensure accountability. They have a long history and tradition at the domestic level without an apparent counterpart at the international or global level. (4) Yet globalization of rulemaking need not necessarily entail losing such safeguards: based on an extensive and detailed mapping of current administrative practice of global Governance organizations and networks, Kingsbury, Krisch, and Stewart suggest that a global administrative law is not only possible but in the process of being created, and they open a normative-prescriptive debate over the forms that global administrative law might take. We seek to contribute to this timely debate by presenting a positive political analysis of global Governance, both theoretically and in a particular empirical context. Such a positive analysis, we submit, should precede deliberation about which administrative norms and mechanisms can and should be instituted, because a discussion of effective remedies presupposes a clear understanding of actual deficiencies and their causes. To gain such an understanding, we ask a series of analytical questions: Why is rulemaking authority implicitly granted or explicitly delegated to an international or transnational body? What are the consequences of such a delegation of authority for the domestic and international distribution of power and resources (including information and expertise)? Why do some actors rather than others supply such Governance? Do all those who are affected in a given realm have a voice in the Governance Institution (and ff not, why not)? And what are the prospects for the comprehensive adoption and the likely effectiveness of administrative law procedures? Scholars of administrative law have tended to shy away from such questions, preferring detailed accounts of administrative procedures and normative discourse over positive political analysis. Positive analysis, however, is very much needed: lack of participation and accountability may be caused not just by exclusion or non-transparent procedures, but also by ignorance, information deficits, erroneous beliefs, or collective action dilemmas. The creation of notice-and-comment procedures, for example, will achieve little when the problem is ignorance or a lack of technical expertise by the subjects of a particular Governance arrangement. Greater procedural transparency and formal rules guaranteeing procedural inclusion of all affected parties may be in vain if those parties' participation is in fact prevented by collective action problems. Positive analysis of new or changing administrative law mechanisms and procedures at both the national and global levels therefore also offers tools for assessing the effectiveness and desirability of competing Institutional designs for administrative law. …
Hussain Ali Bekhet - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Validating the dynamic relationship between technological innovation and economic growth in Malaysia
International Journal of Technological Learning Innovation and Development, 2019Co-Authors: Hussain Ali Bekhet, Nurul Wahilah Abdul LatifAbstract:Technological innovation is a dynamic growth factor to achieve sustainable development. This study aims to explore the long- and short-run relationship between technological innovation and Malaysia's sustainable growth from 1980 to 2015. Augmented Cobb-Douglas production function is used to scale the technological innovation and economic growth link. The F-bounds test and VECM Granger causality are employed. The dynamic relationships among the gross domestic product, capital, employment, electricity consumption, technological innovation, technological innovation squared and Governance Institution quality variables; and the nonlinear relationship between technological innovation and economic growth are studied. The study confirms the existence of long-run relationship among the variables and the link between technological innovation and economic growth has an inverted U-shape. Also, technological innovation, technological innovation squared, and Governance Institution quality Granger-cause economic growth in the long and short run, together with capital, employment and electricity consumption. Therefore, continuous plans and policies are very much needed to drive technological innovation evolution in Malaysia, so the tide is slowly turning.
-
The impact of technological innovation and Governance Institution quality on Malaysia's sustainable growth: Evidence from a dynamic relationship
Technology in Society, 2018Co-Authors: Hussain Ali Bekhet, Nurul Wahilah Abdul LatifAbstract:Abstract Technological innovation integrated with strategic policies is vital for sustainable growth. This study aims to highlight the importance of technological innovation and Governance Institution quality on Malaysia's sustainable growth from 1985 through 2015. The dynamic relationships among gross domestic product, capital, employment, electricity consumption, technological innovation, Governance Institution quality, and the interaction of technological innovation and Governance Institution quality are examined. The augmented production function, F-bound, dynamic ordinary least squares, and Granger causality tests are utilized. The results confirm the dynamic relationship among the above variables. In the long run, unidirectional causality runs from Governance Institution quality and technological innovation-Governance Institution quality toward Malaysia's financial development. However, in the short run, there is bidirectional causality between financial development and economic growth. The interaction between technological innovation and Governance Institution quality has a significant positive impact on Malaysia's economy in the long run. Also, capital, employment, and electricity consumption have a positive significant impact on economic growth in the long run. These three variables are vital growth inputs and should be accompanied by technological innovation and Governance Institution quality. Well-planned and relevant policies can boost technological progress in Malaysia, slowly yet surely.
Walter Mattli - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
global private Governance lessons from a national model of setting standards in accounting
Law and contemporary problems, 2005Co-Authors: Walter Mattli, Tim ButheAbstract:I INTRODUCTION Numerous recent studies have documented the increase of global Governance by international organizations, formal and informal transgovernmental networks, hybrid public-private Institutional arrangements, and entirely private transnational Institutions. (1) These bodies establish general rules and make specific decisions with which other actors comply, based on the recognition by the latter of the authority of the former. (2) In the domestic context, such rule- and decisionmaking authority is embedded in a system of administrative law, that is, a system of Institutionalized procedural and substantive norms. It assures those who are affected by the regulator's decisions that they will enjoy "procedural participation" (that is, that their views will be heard and considered, for instance through notice-and-comment procedures); that decisions will be taken in a transparent manner on the basis of disclosed reasons and in compliance with norms of proportionality, means-ends rationality, and the like; and that the decisions are subject to review by a judicial or another independent body on request. (3) In short, administrative law mechanisms ensure accountability. They have a long history and tradition at the domestic level without an apparent counterpart at the international or global level. (4) Yet globalization of rulemaking need not necessarily entail losing such safeguards: based on an extensive and detailed mapping of current administrative practice of global Governance organizations and networks, Kingsbury, Krisch, and Stewart suggest that a global administrative law is not only possible but in the process of being created, and they open a normative-prescriptive debate over the forms that global administrative law might take. We seek to contribute to this timely debate by presenting a positive political analysis of global Governance, both theoretically and in a particular empirical context. Such a positive analysis, we submit, should precede deliberation about which administrative norms and mechanisms can and should be instituted, because a discussion of effective remedies presupposes a clear understanding of actual deficiencies and their causes. To gain such an understanding, we ask a series of analytical questions: Why is rulemaking authority implicitly granted or explicitly delegated to an international or transnational body? What are the consequences of such a delegation of authority for the domestic and international distribution of power and resources (including information and expertise)? Why do some actors rather than others supply such Governance? Do all those who are affected in a given realm have a voice in the Governance Institution (and ff not, why not)? And what are the prospects for the comprehensive adoption and the likely effectiveness of administrative law procedures? Scholars of administrative law have tended to shy away from such questions, preferring detailed accounts of administrative procedures and normative discourse over positive political analysis. Positive analysis, however, is very much needed: lack of participation and accountability may be caused not just by exclusion or non-transparent procedures, but also by ignorance, information deficits, erroneous beliefs, or collective action dilemmas. The creation of notice-and-comment procedures, for example, will achieve little when the problem is ignorance or a lack of technical expertise by the subjects of a particular Governance arrangement. Greater procedural transparency and formal rules guaranteeing procedural inclusion of all affected parties may be in vain if those parties' participation is in fact prevented by collective action problems. Positive analysis of new or changing administrative law mechanisms and procedures at both the national and global levels therefore also offers tools for assessing the effectiveness and desirability of competing Institutional designs for administrative law. …
