The Experts below are selected from a list of 29493 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Sander Chan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
climate ambition and sustainable development for a new decade a catalytic framework
Global Policy, 2021Co-Authors: Sander Chan, Idil Boran, Harro Van Asselt, Paula Ellinger, Miriam Garcia, Thomas Hale, Lukas HermwilleAbstract:This paper examines the Global Climate Action Agenda (GCAA) and discusses options to improve sub- and non-state involvement in post-2020 climate governance. A framework that stimulates sub- and non-state Action is a necessary complement to national Governmental Action, as the latter falls short of achieving low-carbon and climate-resilient development as envisaged in the Paris Agreement. Applying design principles for an ideal-type orchestration framework, we review literature and gather expert judgements to assess whether the GCAA has been collaborative, comprehensive, evaluative and catalytic. Results show that there has been greater coordination among orchestrators, for instance in the organization of events. However, mobilization efforts remain event-driven and too little effort is invested in understanding the progress of sub- and non-state Action. Data collection has improved, although more sophisticated indicators are needed to evaluate climate and sustainable development impacts. Finally, the GCAA has recorded more Action, but relatively little by actors in developing countries. As the world seeks to recover from the COVID-19 crisis and enters a new decade of climate Action, the GCAA could make a vital contribution in challenging times by helping governments keep and enhance climate commitments; strengthening capacity for sub- and non-state Action; enabling accountability; and realizing sustainable development.
-
climate ambition and sustainable development for a new decade a catalytic framework
Social Science Research Network, 2020Co-Authors: Sander Chan, Idil Boran, Harro Van Asselt, Paula Ellinger, Miriam Garcia, Thomas Hale, Lukas Hermwille, Kennedy Mbeva, Aysem Mert, Charles RogerAbstract:This paper examines the Global Climate Action Agenda (GCAA) and discusses options to improve sub- and non-state involvement in post-2020 climate governance. A framework that stimulates sub- and non-state Action is a necessary complement to national Governmental Action, as the latter falls short of achieving low-carbon and climate-resilient development as envisaged in the Paris Agreement. Applying design principles for an ideal-type orchestration framework, we review literature and gather expert judgements to assess whether the GCAA has been collaborative, comprehensive, evaluative and catalytic. Results show that there has been greater collaboration and coordination among orchestrators, for instance, in the organization of events. However, mobilization efforts remain event-driven and too little effort is invested in understanding the progress of sub- and non-state Action. Data collection has improved, although more sophisticated indicators are needed to evaluate climate and sustainable development impacts. Finally, the GCAA has recorded more Action, but relatively little by actors in developing countries. As the world seeks to recover from the COVID-19 crisis, a post-2020 GCAA could make a vital contribution to climate Action in challenging times by helping governments keep climate and enhance commitments; strengthening capacity for sub- and non-state Action; enabling accountability; and helping to realize sustainable development.
Lukas Hermwille - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
climate ambition and sustainable development for a new decade a catalytic framework
Global Policy, 2021Co-Authors: Sander Chan, Idil Boran, Harro Van Asselt, Paula Ellinger, Miriam Garcia, Thomas Hale, Lukas HermwilleAbstract:This paper examines the Global Climate Action Agenda (GCAA) and discusses options to improve sub- and non-state involvement in post-2020 climate governance. A framework that stimulates sub- and non-state Action is a necessary complement to national Governmental Action, as the latter falls short of achieving low-carbon and climate-resilient development as envisaged in the Paris Agreement. Applying design principles for an ideal-type orchestration framework, we review literature and gather expert judgements to assess whether the GCAA has been collaborative, comprehensive, evaluative and catalytic. Results show that there has been greater coordination among orchestrators, for instance in the organization of events. However, mobilization efforts remain event-driven and too little effort is invested in understanding the progress of sub- and non-state Action. Data collection has improved, although more sophisticated indicators are needed to evaluate climate and sustainable development impacts. Finally, the GCAA has recorded more Action, but relatively little by actors in developing countries. As the world seeks to recover from the COVID-19 crisis and enters a new decade of climate Action, the GCAA could make a vital contribution in challenging times by helping governments keep and enhance climate commitments; strengthening capacity for sub- and non-state Action; enabling accountability; and realizing sustainable development.
-
climate ambition and sustainable development for a new decade a catalytic framework
Social Science Research Network, 2020Co-Authors: Sander Chan, Idil Boran, Harro Van Asselt, Paula Ellinger, Miriam Garcia, Thomas Hale, Lukas Hermwille, Kennedy Mbeva, Aysem Mert, Charles RogerAbstract:This paper examines the Global Climate Action Agenda (GCAA) and discusses options to improve sub- and non-state involvement in post-2020 climate governance. A framework that stimulates sub- and non-state Action is a necessary complement to national Governmental Action, as the latter falls short of achieving low-carbon and climate-resilient development as envisaged in the Paris Agreement. Applying design principles for an ideal-type orchestration framework, we review literature and gather expert judgements to assess whether the GCAA has been collaborative, comprehensive, evaluative and catalytic. Results show that there has been greater collaboration and coordination among orchestrators, for instance, in the organization of events. However, mobilization efforts remain event-driven and too little effort is invested in understanding the progress of sub- and non-state Action. Data collection has improved, although more sophisticated indicators are needed to evaluate climate and sustainable development impacts. Finally, the GCAA has recorded more Action, but relatively little by actors in developing countries. As the world seeks to recover from the COVID-19 crisis, a post-2020 GCAA could make a vital contribution to climate Action in challenging times by helping governments keep climate and enhance commitments; strengthening capacity for sub- and non-state Action; enabling accountability; and helping to realize sustainable development.
Idil Boran - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
climate ambition and sustainable development for a new decade a catalytic framework
Global Policy, 2021Co-Authors: Sander Chan, Idil Boran, Harro Van Asselt, Paula Ellinger, Miriam Garcia, Thomas Hale, Lukas HermwilleAbstract:This paper examines the Global Climate Action Agenda (GCAA) and discusses options to improve sub- and non-state involvement in post-2020 climate governance. A framework that stimulates sub- and non-state Action is a necessary complement to national Governmental Action, as the latter falls short of achieving low-carbon and climate-resilient development as envisaged in the Paris Agreement. Applying design principles for an ideal-type orchestration framework, we review literature and gather expert judgements to assess whether the GCAA has been collaborative, comprehensive, evaluative and catalytic. Results show that there has been greater coordination among orchestrators, for instance in the organization of events. However, mobilization efforts remain event-driven and too little effort is invested in understanding the progress of sub- and non-state Action. Data collection has improved, although more sophisticated indicators are needed to evaluate climate and sustainable development impacts. Finally, the GCAA has recorded more Action, but relatively little by actors in developing countries. As the world seeks to recover from the COVID-19 crisis and enters a new decade of climate Action, the GCAA could make a vital contribution in challenging times by helping governments keep and enhance climate commitments; strengthening capacity for sub- and non-state Action; enabling accountability; and realizing sustainable development.
-
climate ambition and sustainable development for a new decade a catalytic framework
Social Science Research Network, 2020Co-Authors: Sander Chan, Idil Boran, Harro Van Asselt, Paula Ellinger, Miriam Garcia, Thomas Hale, Lukas Hermwille, Kennedy Mbeva, Aysem Mert, Charles RogerAbstract:This paper examines the Global Climate Action Agenda (GCAA) and discusses options to improve sub- and non-state involvement in post-2020 climate governance. A framework that stimulates sub- and non-state Action is a necessary complement to national Governmental Action, as the latter falls short of achieving low-carbon and climate-resilient development as envisaged in the Paris Agreement. Applying design principles for an ideal-type orchestration framework, we review literature and gather expert judgements to assess whether the GCAA has been collaborative, comprehensive, evaluative and catalytic. Results show that there has been greater collaboration and coordination among orchestrators, for instance, in the organization of events. However, mobilization efforts remain event-driven and too little effort is invested in understanding the progress of sub- and non-state Action. Data collection has improved, although more sophisticated indicators are needed to evaluate climate and sustainable development impacts. Finally, the GCAA has recorded more Action, but relatively little by actors in developing countries. As the world seeks to recover from the COVID-19 crisis, a post-2020 GCAA could make a vital contribution to climate Action in challenging times by helping governments keep climate and enhance commitments; strengthening capacity for sub- and non-state Action; enabling accountability; and helping to realize sustainable development.
Harro Van Asselt - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
climate ambition and sustainable development for a new decade a catalytic framework
Global Policy, 2021Co-Authors: Sander Chan, Idil Boran, Harro Van Asselt, Paula Ellinger, Miriam Garcia, Thomas Hale, Lukas HermwilleAbstract:This paper examines the Global Climate Action Agenda (GCAA) and discusses options to improve sub- and non-state involvement in post-2020 climate governance. A framework that stimulates sub- and non-state Action is a necessary complement to national Governmental Action, as the latter falls short of achieving low-carbon and climate-resilient development as envisaged in the Paris Agreement. Applying design principles for an ideal-type orchestration framework, we review literature and gather expert judgements to assess whether the GCAA has been collaborative, comprehensive, evaluative and catalytic. Results show that there has been greater coordination among orchestrators, for instance in the organization of events. However, mobilization efforts remain event-driven and too little effort is invested in understanding the progress of sub- and non-state Action. Data collection has improved, although more sophisticated indicators are needed to evaluate climate and sustainable development impacts. Finally, the GCAA has recorded more Action, but relatively little by actors in developing countries. As the world seeks to recover from the COVID-19 crisis and enters a new decade of climate Action, the GCAA could make a vital contribution in challenging times by helping governments keep and enhance climate commitments; strengthening capacity for sub- and non-state Action; enabling accountability; and realizing sustainable development.
-
climate ambition and sustainable development for a new decade a catalytic framework
Social Science Research Network, 2020Co-Authors: Sander Chan, Idil Boran, Harro Van Asselt, Paula Ellinger, Miriam Garcia, Thomas Hale, Lukas Hermwille, Kennedy Mbeva, Aysem Mert, Charles RogerAbstract:This paper examines the Global Climate Action Agenda (GCAA) and discusses options to improve sub- and non-state involvement in post-2020 climate governance. A framework that stimulates sub- and non-state Action is a necessary complement to national Governmental Action, as the latter falls short of achieving low-carbon and climate-resilient development as envisaged in the Paris Agreement. Applying design principles for an ideal-type orchestration framework, we review literature and gather expert judgements to assess whether the GCAA has been collaborative, comprehensive, evaluative and catalytic. Results show that there has been greater collaboration and coordination among orchestrators, for instance, in the organization of events. However, mobilization efforts remain event-driven and too little effort is invested in understanding the progress of sub- and non-state Action. Data collection has improved, although more sophisticated indicators are needed to evaluate climate and sustainable development impacts. Finally, the GCAA has recorded more Action, but relatively little by actors in developing countries. As the world seeks to recover from the COVID-19 crisis, a post-2020 GCAA could make a vital contribution to climate Action in challenging times by helping governments keep climate and enhance commitments; strengthening capacity for sub- and non-state Action; enabling accountability; and helping to realize sustainable development.
Anthony Leiserowitz - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
discussing global warming leads to greater acceptance of climate science
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019Co-Authors: Matthew H Goldberg, Edward Maibach, Sander Van Der Linden, Anthony LeiserowitzAbstract:Climate change is an urgent global issue, with demands for personal, collective, and Governmental Action. Although a large body of research has investigated the influence of communication on public engagement with climate change, few studies have investigated the role of interpersonal discussion. Here we use panel data with 2 time points to investigate the role of climate conversations in shaping beliefs and feelings about global warming. We find evidence of reciprocal causality. That is, discussing global warming with friends and family leads people to learn influential facts, such as the scientific consensus that human-caused global warming is happening. In turn, stronger perceptions of scientific agreement increase beliefs that climate change is happening and human-caused, as well as worry about climate change. When assessing the reverse causal direction, we find that knowing the scientific consensus further leads to increases in global warming discussion. These findings suggest that climate conversations with friends and family enter people into a proclimate social feedback loop.
