Graduate Work

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 264 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Robert J. Le Roy - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Alan Nankervis - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Conceptualising Graduate Work Readiness: Theories, Concepts and Implications for Practice and Research
    Work Organization and Employment, 2018
    Co-Authors: Verma Prikshat, Alan Nankervis, John Burgess, Subas P. Dhakal
    Abstract:

    This chapter discusses the conceptualization of Graduate Work-readiness (GWR) and outlines the theoretical underpinnings associated with developing these conceptualisations. The chapter develops the Work-Related Integrated Competence Model (WRICM) as a comprehensive representation of the competency sets required by Graduates to meet the expectations of the multiple stakeholders associated with the Graduate transition process. The chapter evaluates the measurement of GWR using the WRICM models and compares it to other models used to measure GWR. The implications and possibilities of the WRICM model are then outlined. The proposed model provides a comprehensive foundation for evaluating GWR and for informing practice and policy around developing GWR attributes.

  • Mapping Stakeholders of Graduate Work-Readiness (GWR)
    Work Organization and Employment, 2018
    Co-Authors: Alan Nankervis, Verma Prikshat, Subas P. Dhakal
    Abstract:

    Using stakeholder theory this chapter maps and identifies the key stakeholders associated with the process and evaluation of GWR. From a shared value perspective three key stakeholder groups are identified: higher education institutions who are responsible for developing the GWR attributes of their Graduates; governments who are responsible for financing education and ensuring that there is an effective and efficient functioning of the labour market, including meeting current and future skill needs of the economy; and employers who require trained and accredited Graduates that possess those attributes that enable them to transition into current and future job vacancies.

  • Graduate Work-Readiness Challenges in Indonesia—Findings from a Multiple Stakeholder Study
    Work Organization and Employment, 2018
    Co-Authors: Soegeng Priyono, Alan Nankervis
    Abstract:

    This chapter provides an overview of Work-readiness challenges in the context of Indonesian labour market. The chapter presents findings of qualitative research on stakeholders’ perspectives of the Work-readiness related issues. In addition, two case studies on innovative ways to overcome Work-readiness challenges are discussed before making concluding remarks.

  • Graduate Work-readiness challenges in the Asia-Pacific region and the role of HRM
    Equality Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 2018
    Co-Authors: Prikshat Verma, Alan Nankervis, Soegeng Priyono, Noorziah Moh’d Saleh, Julia Connell, John Burgess
    Abstract:

    The purpose of this paper is to focus on Graduate Work-readiness challenges in three Asia Pacific economies (Malaysia, Indonesia and Australia), and the roles of three main stakeholders (government, employers and industry) in the process. The intention of the paper is to design a stakeholder-oriented HRM model to address the identified Graduate Work-readiness challenges.,A qualitative triangulation method comprising interviews and focus groups was used with participant samples for each country – Australia (19), Indonesia (19) and Malaysia (15). Stakeholder-oriented HRM theory underpins the conceptual frameWork for the paper.,All three countries are currently experiencing difficulties attracting Graduates with the required portfolio of qualifications, skills and personal capabilities. The reported effects include: constraints on national economic growth, future production structures, and long-term socio-economic development. Based on a review of the Work-readiness and stakeholder-oriented HRM theory literature, it is posited that Graduate Work-readiness challenges can be effectively addressed by HR professionals in partnership with other key stakeholders.,The study sought the input of only three stakeholder groups for ascertaining Graduate Work readiness challenges, there is a strong case to include other groups including students/parents and secondary schools.,Bridging the Graduate skills gap between government, employers and educational institutions is an important area in which HR professionals can contribute by reducing the mismatch between demand and supply through influencing and balancing the interests and goals of key stakeholders.,This study makes a contribution to the extant literature as it explores the role of HR professionals in relation to a multiple stakeholder strategy to address these challenges in the less-explored Asia Pacific region.

  • Graduate Work-readiness in Asia Pacific economies : A review of the literature
    Transitions from Education to Work, 2017
    Co-Authors: Alan Nankervis, Verma Prikshat, Roslyn Cameron
    Abstract:

    This chapter provides an overview of the relevant literature on the challenges faced by many Asia Pacific nations with respect to Graduate 'Work-readiness' in their labour markets, and their impacts on future economic growth and social development strategies. It presents several explanations and models of Work-readiness, together with a discussion of stakeholder theory as an analytical frameWork for an examination of the key players associated with its antecedents and consequences. The extent of the Graduate Work-readiness challenge in Vietnam has been highlighted by recent research by Montague who noted that Vietnam has an over-supply of available labour but an under-supply of quality skilled employees. Stakeholder theory suggests that all labour market policies and strategies involve multiple stakeholders, with similar and diverse interests, and that the key role in their management is to continually balance these interests in order to achieve the greater good, whether the primary objective is profitability or merely survival and growth.

Rebecca Peabody - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Tony Graduate Work in Literature Academic Dean
    The Unruly PhD, 2014
    Co-Authors: Rebecca Peabody
    Abstract:

    I went to grad school for so many different reasons. Throughout school, I enjoyed literature more than any other subject, and talking about it, critiquing it, and interpreting it were always really interesting to me. My lit classes as an undergrad were great; I loved most of them, and was still excited about the ones that I didn’t like, because I thought I could probably improve upon them. So, I always felt a pull in that direction—I wanted to be a professor. Also, I went to three different colleges during my undergrad career, so I didn’t feel like I’d had the experience that other people had and I wanted it. I’d always wanted to travel internationally—maybe spend some time going to school in Europe or Ireland—and I thought grad school might be a way to do that. I suppose I just wasn’t ready to be done with school yet, to be frank. But I also got a lot of encouragement from my professors and it seemed like a good way to pursue a couple of different intersecting interests, and still make progress toward a career.

  • Rodrigo Graduate Work in American Studies Registered Nurse
    The Unruly PhD, 2014
    Co-Authors: Rebecca Peabody
    Abstract:

    Graduate school was an idea that came from my underGraduate mentors. They thought that I had an interesting voice and as a student of color, some interesting perspectives, and could potentially be a leader. They didn’t think I should just let it all go when I finished my underGraduate program. Honestly, I had other aspirations at the time and I was kind of skeptical. Not about whether or not I could do the Work, I just wasn’t sure if I should be doing that Work. It ended up being kind of a crapshoot. I wasn’t sure that I’d get into any of the schools my mentors were recommending, but thought I’d apply and see what happened. I wasn’t sure where my music career was going or what I wanted to do next. I wasn’t sure if I should keep trying to “make it” or if I should take academia off the back burner and see where it might go. To my dismay I got a lot of acceptance letters, and they were offering me money. I decided, maybe this wasn’t in my thoughts until recently, but maybe I need to give it a shot. Then I decided, if I’m going to do this then I’m really going to do this. You think I have the goods, let me see if I have the goods. The desire and the motivation were both kind of a conscious decision, and it all came together right when I started grad school.

  • Jason Graduate Work in German Studies and Cinema Studies Financial Services
    The Unruly PhD, 2014
    Co-Authors: Rebecca Peabody
    Abstract:

    The expectations, when I was growing up, weren’t necessarily to go to grad school—but to go to a good school, more generally. My parents were probably a bit troubled by the fact that I wasn’t very serious about school during my first few years in college. I was really focused when it came to the stuff that I liked, but I totally blew off the stuff that I didn’t like. In my sophomore year I decided I was going to be a history major—my parents’ first question was like, “What are you going to do with that?” I initially thought, okay, yeah, law school, something like that. But then I got serious about it in my junior year. I really got into the stuff I was studying, and started thinking about grad school and about going into academia. I think my parents were open to it. They probably assumed I would go on in something, since my sister went to law school, but they certainly didn’t put pressure on me. But when I got my master’s degree paid for, and then I got into PhD programs at really prestigious schools, they were like, “We don’t care what you’re doing, it’s just great; keep it up!”

Peter Bernath - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Soegeng Priyono - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Graduate Work-Readiness Challenges in Indonesia—Findings from a Multiple Stakeholder Study
    Work Organization and Employment, 2018
    Co-Authors: Soegeng Priyono, Alan Nankervis
    Abstract:

    This chapter provides an overview of Work-readiness challenges in the context of Indonesian labour market. The chapter presents findings of qualitative research on stakeholders’ perspectives of the Work-readiness related issues. In addition, two case studies on innovative ways to overcome Work-readiness challenges are discussed before making concluding remarks.

  • Graduate Work-readiness challenges in the Asia-Pacific region and the role of HRM
    Equality Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 2018
    Co-Authors: Prikshat Verma, Alan Nankervis, Soegeng Priyono, Noorziah Moh’d Saleh, Julia Connell, John Burgess
    Abstract:

    The purpose of this paper is to focus on Graduate Work-readiness challenges in three Asia Pacific economies (Malaysia, Indonesia and Australia), and the roles of three main stakeholders (government, employers and industry) in the process. The intention of the paper is to design a stakeholder-oriented HRM model to address the identified Graduate Work-readiness challenges.,A qualitative triangulation method comprising interviews and focus groups was used with participant samples for each country – Australia (19), Indonesia (19) and Malaysia (15). Stakeholder-oriented HRM theory underpins the conceptual frameWork for the paper.,All three countries are currently experiencing difficulties attracting Graduates with the required portfolio of qualifications, skills and personal capabilities. The reported effects include: constraints on national economic growth, future production structures, and long-term socio-economic development. Based on a review of the Work-readiness and stakeholder-oriented HRM theory literature, it is posited that Graduate Work-readiness challenges can be effectively addressed by HR professionals in partnership with other key stakeholders.,The study sought the input of only three stakeholder groups for ascertaining Graduate Work readiness challenges, there is a strong case to include other groups including students/parents and secondary schools.,Bridging the Graduate skills gap between government, employers and educational institutions is an important area in which HR professionals can contribute by reducing the mismatch between demand and supply through influencing and balancing the interests and goals of key stakeholders.,This study makes a contribution to the extant literature as it explores the role of HR professionals in relation to a multiple stakeholder strategy to address these challenges in the less-explored Asia Pacific region.

  • “The perfect storm” : Constraints on Indonesian economic growth posed by Graduate Work-readiness challenges
    Transitions from Education to Work, 2017
    Co-Authors: Soegeng Priyono, Alan Nankervis
    Abstract:

    This chapter explores the dilemmas facing Indonesia as it strives to become a competitive Southeast Asian economy, with the advantages of a stable political system and the demographic dividend of a large and relatively young potential Workforce. It discusses the nature and characteristics of the Indonesian labour market; government policies, and the structure of the education system. The chapter then discusses the particular Graduate Work-readiness challenges faced by Indonesian employers and educational institutions, and their causes; and a range of practical strategies which have been developed to address these challenges. Indonesia is one of the few countries in the world which has a Ministry of Religious Affairs within the government. The majority of the populations are Muslim, mostly moderates, and the majorities are of the Sunni denomination. According to Asian Development Bank (ADB) analyses, 'slow jobs growth and high levels of labour under-utilisation' threaten both Indonesia's future economic development and its ability to match labour demand and supply.