The Experts below are selected from a list of 785397 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Tahir Aris - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Methodology of the National School-based Health Survey in Malaysia, 2012.
Asia-Pacific journal of public health, 2014Co-Authors: Fadhli Yusoff, Riyanti Saari, Balkish Mahadir Naidu, Noor Ani Ahmad, Azahadi Omar, Tahir ArisAbstract:The National School-Based Health Survey 2012 was a nationwide school Health Survey of students in Standard 4 to Form 5 (10-17 years of age), who were schooling in government schools in Malaysia during the period of data collection. The Survey comprised 3 subSurveys: the Global School Health Survey (GSHS), the Mental Health Survey, and the National School-Based Nutrition Survey. The aim of the Survey was to provide data on the Health status of adolescents in Malaysia toward strengthening the adolescent Health program in the country. The design of the Survey was created to fulfill the requirements of the 3 subSurveys. A 2-stage stratified sampling method was adopted in the sampling. The methods for data collection were via questionnaire and physical examination. The National School-Based Health Survey 2012 adopted an appropriate methodology for a school-based Survey to ensure valid and reliable findings.
-
methodology of the national school based Health Survey in malaysia 2012
Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 2014Co-Authors: Fadhli Yusoff, Riyanti Saari, Balkish Mahadir Naidu, Noor Ani Ahmad, Azahadi Omar, Tahir ArisAbstract:The National School-Based Health Survey 2012 was a nationwide school Health Survey of students in Standard 4 to Form 5 (10-17 years of age), who were schooling in government schools in Malaysia during the period of data collection. The Survey comprised 3 subSurveys: the Global School Health Survey (GSHS), the Mental Health Survey, and the National School-Based Nutrition Survey. The aim of the Survey was to provide data on the Health status of adolescents in Malaysia toward strengthening the adolescent Health program in the country. The design of the Survey was created to fulfill the requirements of the 3 subSurveys. A 2-stage stratified sampling method was adopted in the sampling. The methods for data collection were via questionnaire and physical examination. The National School-Based Health Survey 2012 adopted an appropriate methodology for a school-based Survey to ensure valid and reliable findings. Language: en
Rebecca Mazel - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the rand 36 item Health Survey 1 0
Health Economics, 1993Co-Authors: Ron D. Hays, Cathy D. Sherbourne, Rebecca MazelAbstract:Recently, Ware and Sherbourne published a new short-form Health Survey, the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), consisting of 36 items included in long-form measures developed for the Medical Outcomes Study. The SF-36 taps eight Health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical Health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, general mental Health, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general Health perceptions. It also includes a single item that provides an indication of perceived change in Health. The SF-36 items and scoring rules are distributed by MOS Trust, Inc. Strict adherence to item wording and scoring recommendations is required in order to use the SF-36 trademark. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 (distributed by RAND) includes the same items as those in the SF-36, but the recommended scoring algorithm is somewhat different from that of the SF-36. Scoring differences are discussed here and new T-scores are presented for the 8 multi-item scales and two factor analytically-derived physical and mental Health composite scores.
-
The rand 36‐item Health Survey 1.0
Health economics, 1993Co-Authors: Ron D. Hays, Cathy D. Sherbourne, Rebecca MazelAbstract:Recently, Ware and Sherbourne published a new short-form Health Survey, the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), consisting of 36 items included in long-form measures developed for the Medical Outcomes Study. The SF-36 taps eight Health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical Health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, general mental Health, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general Health perceptions. It also includes a single item that provides an indication of perceived change in Health. The SF-36 items and scoring rules are distributed by MOS Trust, Inc. Strict adherence to item wording and scoring recommendations is required in order to use the SF-36 trademark. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 (distributed by RAND) includes the same items as those in the SF-36, but the recommended scoring algorithm is somewhat different from that of the SF-36. Scoring differences are discussed here and new T-scores are presented for the 8 multi-item scales and two factor analytically-derived physical and mental Health composite scores.
-
The rand 36‐item Health Survey 1.0
Health Economics, 1993Co-Authors: Ron D. Hays, Cathy D. Sherbourne, Rebecca MazelAbstract:Recently, Ware and Sherbourne-super-1 published a new short‐form Health Survey, the MOS 36‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey (SF‐36), consisting of 36 items included in long‐form measures developed for the Medical Outcomes Study. The SF‐36 taps eight Health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical Health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, general mental Health, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general Health perceptions. It also includes a single item that provides an indication of perceived change in Health. The SF‐36 items and scoring rules are distributed by MOS Trust, Inc. Strict adherence to item wording and scoring recommendations is required in order to use the SF‐36 trademark. The RAND 36‐Item Health Survey 1.0 (distributed by RAND) includes the same items as those in the SF‐36, but the recommended scoring algorithm is somewhat different from that of the SF‐36. Scoring differences are discussed here and new T‐scores are presented for the 8 multi‐item scales and two factor analytically‐derived physical and mental Health composite scores.
Fadhli Yusoff - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Methodology of the National School-based Health Survey in Malaysia, 2012.
Asia-Pacific journal of public health, 2014Co-Authors: Fadhli Yusoff, Riyanti Saari, Balkish Mahadir Naidu, Noor Ani Ahmad, Azahadi Omar, Tahir ArisAbstract:The National School-Based Health Survey 2012 was a nationwide school Health Survey of students in Standard 4 to Form 5 (10-17 years of age), who were schooling in government schools in Malaysia during the period of data collection. The Survey comprised 3 subSurveys: the Global School Health Survey (GSHS), the Mental Health Survey, and the National School-Based Nutrition Survey. The aim of the Survey was to provide data on the Health status of adolescents in Malaysia toward strengthening the adolescent Health program in the country. The design of the Survey was created to fulfill the requirements of the 3 subSurveys. A 2-stage stratified sampling method was adopted in the sampling. The methods for data collection were via questionnaire and physical examination. The National School-Based Health Survey 2012 adopted an appropriate methodology for a school-based Survey to ensure valid and reliable findings.
-
methodology of the national school based Health Survey in malaysia 2012
Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 2014Co-Authors: Fadhli Yusoff, Riyanti Saari, Balkish Mahadir Naidu, Noor Ani Ahmad, Azahadi Omar, Tahir ArisAbstract:The National School-Based Health Survey 2012 was a nationwide school Health Survey of students in Standard 4 to Form 5 (10-17 years of age), who were schooling in government schools in Malaysia during the period of data collection. The Survey comprised 3 subSurveys: the Global School Health Survey (GSHS), the Mental Health Survey, and the National School-Based Nutrition Survey. The aim of the Survey was to provide data on the Health status of adolescents in Malaysia toward strengthening the adolescent Health program in the country. The design of the Survey was created to fulfill the requirements of the 3 subSurveys. A 2-stage stratified sampling method was adopted in the sampling. The methods for data collection were via questionnaire and physical examination. The National School-Based Health Survey 2012 adopted an appropriate methodology for a school-based Survey to ensure valid and reliable findings. Language: en
John Brazier - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey and Its Use in Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation
PharmacoEconomics, 1995Co-Authors: John BrazierAbstract:The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey is a brief self-administered questionnaire that generates scores across 8 dimensions of Health. It has been found to be reliable, and valid in terms of criteria such as agreement with clinical diagnosis and disease severity, but its underlying values have not been tested against patient preferences.
Cathy D. Sherbourne - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the rand 36 item Health Survey 1 0
Health Economics, 1993Co-Authors: Ron D. Hays, Cathy D. Sherbourne, Rebecca MazelAbstract:Recently, Ware and Sherbourne published a new short-form Health Survey, the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), consisting of 36 items included in long-form measures developed for the Medical Outcomes Study. The SF-36 taps eight Health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical Health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, general mental Health, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general Health perceptions. It also includes a single item that provides an indication of perceived change in Health. The SF-36 items and scoring rules are distributed by MOS Trust, Inc. Strict adherence to item wording and scoring recommendations is required in order to use the SF-36 trademark. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 (distributed by RAND) includes the same items as those in the SF-36, but the recommended scoring algorithm is somewhat different from that of the SF-36. Scoring differences are discussed here and new T-scores are presented for the 8 multi-item scales and two factor analytically-derived physical and mental Health composite scores.
-
The rand 36‐item Health Survey 1.0
Health economics, 1993Co-Authors: Ron D. Hays, Cathy D. Sherbourne, Rebecca MazelAbstract:Recently, Ware and Sherbourne published a new short-form Health Survey, the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), consisting of 36 items included in long-form measures developed for the Medical Outcomes Study. The SF-36 taps eight Health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical Health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, general mental Health, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general Health perceptions. It also includes a single item that provides an indication of perceived change in Health. The SF-36 items and scoring rules are distributed by MOS Trust, Inc. Strict adherence to item wording and scoring recommendations is required in order to use the SF-36 trademark. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 (distributed by RAND) includes the same items as those in the SF-36, but the recommended scoring algorithm is somewhat different from that of the SF-36. Scoring differences are discussed here and new T-scores are presented for the 8 multi-item scales and two factor analytically-derived physical and mental Health composite scores.
-
The rand 36‐item Health Survey 1.0
Health Economics, 1993Co-Authors: Ron D. Hays, Cathy D. Sherbourne, Rebecca MazelAbstract:Recently, Ware and Sherbourne-super-1 published a new short‐form Health Survey, the MOS 36‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey (SF‐36), consisting of 36 items included in long‐form measures developed for the Medical Outcomes Study. The SF‐36 taps eight Health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical Health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, general mental Health, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general Health perceptions. It also includes a single item that provides an indication of perceived change in Health. The SF‐36 items and scoring rules are distributed by MOS Trust, Inc. Strict adherence to item wording and scoring recommendations is required in order to use the SF‐36 trademark. The RAND 36‐Item Health Survey 1.0 (distributed by RAND) includes the same items as those in the SF‐36, but the recommended scoring algorithm is somewhat different from that of the SF‐36. Scoring differences are discussed here and new T‐scores are presented for the 8 multi‐item scales and two factor analytically‐derived physical and mental Health composite scores.
-
the mos 36 item short form Health Survey sf 36
1992Co-Authors: John E. Ware, Cathy D. SherbourneAbstract:The SF-36® Health Survey is a 36-item instrument. The SF-36® Health Survey measures the following eight Health concepts, which are relevant across age, disease, and treatment groups: Physical functioning; role limitations due to physical Health problems; bodily pain; general Health; vitality (energy/fatigue); social functioning; role limitations due to emotional problems; and mental Health (psychological distress and psychological well being). Both standard (4-week) and acute (1-week) recall versions are available. The Surveys standardized scoring system yields a profile of eight Health scores, two summary measures, and a self-evaluated change in Health status.
