The Experts below are selected from a list of 104040 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Jarrett Thibodeaux - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
a Historical Era of food deserts changes in the correlates of urban supermarket location 1970 1990
Social currents, 2016Co-Authors: Jarrett ThibodeauxAbstract:Previous research on “food deserts” genErally agrees that supermarkets tend to avoid economically disadvantaged and high percent African American urban areas. Yet this litErature is largely ahistor...
-
A Historical Era of Food Deserts Changes in the Correlates of Urban Supermarket Location, 1970–1990
Social currents, 2015Co-Authors: Jarrett ThibodeauxAbstract:Previous research on “food deserts” genErally agrees that supermarkets tend to avoid economically disadvantaged and high percent African American urban areas. Yet this litErature is largely ahistor...
Michael J. Marks - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Promoting Theory-Based Perspectives in Sexual Double Standard Research
Sex Roles, 2017Co-Authors: Yuliana Zaikman, Michael J. MarksAbstract:The sexual double standard (SDS) has been a focus of research for sevEral decades. Numerous anecdotal accounts of the double standard exist, detailing its consequences and impact on women’s, as well as men’s, sexual behavior and identities. Empirical research, however, has yet to completely corroborate the degree to which the double standard pervades everyday life. The disparity between anecdotal accounts and empirical evidence related to the SDS may be the result of the partially atheoretical approach with which the SDS has traditionally been examined. The goal of the present paper is to encourage researchers to take a more theory-oriented approach to understanding the double standard. Our goal is not to provide another comprehensive litErature review or an argument for the “best” theory, but rather to promote theory-based perspectives in future SDS research. In the current paper, three theoretical perspectives—evolutionary theory, social role theory, and cognitive social learning theory—and their relevance to the SDS are discussed. We discuss four hypotheses, one related to the core tenet of the SDS itself, and three related to modErating factors, including characteristics of evaluators (i.e., gender, gender roles beliefs, and sexual history), characteristics of targets (i.e., relationship type engaged in, sexual activities participated in, and power status), and social factors (i.e., cultural background, Historical Era, and socialization agents). Existing research is also interpreted in light of one or more of the theoretical perspectives in the hopes of guiding future research.
-
Promoting Theory-Based Perspectives in Sexual Double Standard Research
Sex Roles, 2017Co-Authors: Yuliana Zaikman, Michael J. MarksAbstract:The sexual double standard (SDS) has been a focus of research for sevEral decades. Numerous anecdotal accounts of the double standard exist, detailing its consequences and impact on women’s, as well as men’s, sexual behavior and identities. Empirical research, however, has yet to completely corroborate the degree to which the double standard pervades everyday life. The disparity between anecdotal accounts and empirical evidence related to the SDS may be the result of the partially atheoretical approach with which the SDS has traditionally been examined. The goal of the present paper is to encourage researchers to take a more theory-oriented approach to understanding the double standard. Our goal is not to provide another comprehensive litErature review or an argument for the “best” theory, but rather to promote theory-based perspectives in future SDS research. In the current paper, three theoretical perspectives—evolutionary theory, social role theory, and cognitive social learning theory—and their relevance to the SDS are discussed. We discuss four hypotheses, one related to the core tenet of the SDS itself, and three related to modErating factors, including characteristics of evaluators (i.e., gender, gender roles beliefs, and sexual history), characteristics of targets (i.e., relationship type engaged in, sexual activities participated in, and power status), and social factors (i.e., cultural background, Historical Era, and socialization agents). Existing research is also interpreted in light of one or more of the theoretical perspectives in the hopes of guiding future research.
Jane Allen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Managing a Tropical Environment: State Development in Early Historical‐Era Kedah, Malaysia
Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 2008Co-Authors: Jane AllenAbstract:A coastal, trade-based state flourished in Kedah, Peninsular Malaysia, between approximately A.D. 700 and 1500. The structure of that state grew primarily out of redistributive economic structures that had been developed to control internal and external exchange across a very heterogeneous landscape of inland forests, mountains, hills, wooded stream interfluves, and coastal estuaries. Internal and then external exchange developed as a dendritic, bulking and redistributive network along the area's streams, which provided the best transportation routes between inland forests and the coast. This redistributive economic system was closely controlled from the coastal trade center, which became the state's political center, the base from which the ruler and permanent officials closely controlled trade, other internal activities, and also relations with foreign visitors. The system was hetErarchical, with unranked intEractions at the upstream end of the network and peer polity relations between Kedah and foreign polities; in between these endpoints, the redistributive exchange system and the state that developed out of it formed a closely integrated hiErarchy.
Yuliana Zaikman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Promoting Theory-Based Perspectives in Sexual Double Standard Research
Sex Roles, 2017Co-Authors: Yuliana Zaikman, Michael J. MarksAbstract:The sexual double standard (SDS) has been a focus of research for sevEral decades. Numerous anecdotal accounts of the double standard exist, detailing its consequences and impact on women’s, as well as men’s, sexual behavior and identities. Empirical research, however, has yet to completely corroborate the degree to which the double standard pervades everyday life. The disparity between anecdotal accounts and empirical evidence related to the SDS may be the result of the partially atheoretical approach with which the SDS has traditionally been examined. The goal of the present paper is to encourage researchers to take a more theory-oriented approach to understanding the double standard. Our goal is not to provide another comprehensive litErature review or an argument for the “best” theory, but rather to promote theory-based perspectives in future SDS research. In the current paper, three theoretical perspectives—evolutionary theory, social role theory, and cognitive social learning theory—and their relevance to the SDS are discussed. We discuss four hypotheses, one related to the core tenet of the SDS itself, and three related to modErating factors, including characteristics of evaluators (i.e., gender, gender roles beliefs, and sexual history), characteristics of targets (i.e., relationship type engaged in, sexual activities participated in, and power status), and social factors (i.e., cultural background, Historical Era, and socialization agents). Existing research is also interpreted in light of one or more of the theoretical perspectives in the hopes of guiding future research.
-
Promoting Theory-Based Perspectives in Sexual Double Standard Research
Sex Roles, 2017Co-Authors: Yuliana Zaikman, Michael J. MarksAbstract:The sexual double standard (SDS) has been a focus of research for sevEral decades. Numerous anecdotal accounts of the double standard exist, detailing its consequences and impact on women’s, as well as men’s, sexual behavior and identities. Empirical research, however, has yet to completely corroborate the degree to which the double standard pervades everyday life. The disparity between anecdotal accounts and empirical evidence related to the SDS may be the result of the partially atheoretical approach with which the SDS has traditionally been examined. The goal of the present paper is to encourage researchers to take a more theory-oriented approach to understanding the double standard. Our goal is not to provide another comprehensive litErature review or an argument for the “best” theory, but rather to promote theory-based perspectives in future SDS research. In the current paper, three theoretical perspectives—evolutionary theory, social role theory, and cognitive social learning theory—and their relevance to the SDS are discussed. We discuss four hypotheses, one related to the core tenet of the SDS itself, and three related to modErating factors, including characteristics of evaluators (i.e., gender, gender roles beliefs, and sexual history), characteristics of targets (i.e., relationship type engaged in, sexual activities participated in, and power status), and social factors (i.e., cultural background, Historical Era, and socialization agents). Existing research is also interpreted in light of one or more of the theoretical perspectives in the hopes of guiding future research.
Daniel P. Thompson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Schillebeeckx on the development of doctrine
Theological Studies, 2001Co-Authors: Daniel P. ThompsonAbstract:Because of the shifts in his fundamental understanding of epistemology, salvation, and revelation, Edward Schillebeeckx argues that an appropriate understanding of the development of doctrine no longer locates doctrinal continuity in the preservation or logical development of earlier doctrinal language. Rather, he argues that doctrinal development authentically arises from a critical translation of Christian experience from one Historical Era to the next.
