The Experts below are selected from a list of 598665 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

John T Scott - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the us federal trade commission s line of business program and Innovation Research
    Science and Public Policy, 2014
    Co-Authors: John T Scott
    Abstract:

    This paper examines how the resources of the Line of Business (LB) Program of the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) leveraged academic Research to develop understanding of science and technology policy and to point to new directions for both Research and policy. The paper provides an overview and discussion of the birth and death of the FTC LB Program and its unique LB data, the Innovation Research using the LB data, and the legacy of the program.

  • employment growth from the small business Innovation Research program
    Chapters, 2013
    Co-Authors: Albert N. Link, John T Scott
    Abstract:

    Public support for Innovation, chiefly through government programs such as the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program, has had a significant impact on fostering economic growth in the US. This collection synthesizes a decade of scholarship from Albert N. Link on the subject, specifically on small, technology-based entrepreneurial firms.

  • private investor participation and commercialization rates for government sponsored Research and development would a prediction market improve the performance of the sbir programme
    Research Papers in Economics, 2013
    Co-Authors: Albert N. Link, John T Scott
    Abstract:

    Public support for Innovation, chiefly through government programs such as the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program, has had a significant impact on fostering economic growth in the US. This collection synthesizes a decade of scholarship from Albert N. Link on the subject, specifically on small, technology-based entrepreneurial firms.

  • public private technology partnerships evaluating sbir supported Research
    Research Papers in Economics, 2013
    Co-Authors: David B Audretsch, Albert N. Link, John T Scott
    Abstract:

    Public support for Innovation, chiefly through government programs such as the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program, has had a significant impact on fostering economic growth in the US. This collection synthesizes a decade of scholarship from Albert N. Link on the subject, specifically on small, technology-based entrepreneurial firms.

  • employment growth from the small business Innovation Research program
    Small Business Economics, 2012
    Co-Authors: Albert N. Link, John T Scott
    Abstract:

    This paper investigates employment growth in small firms funded by the U.S. Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program. Using data collected by the National Research Council for each of five federal agencies, our analysis shows that on average over two-fifths of all projects retained 0 employees after completion and over one-third retained only 1 or 2 employees. Thus, on average, the direct impact of SBIR funded projects on employment is small, especially when compared to the mean number of employees in the firms. However, there are substantial cross-project differences in the number of retained employees that are explained by differences in the firms and their SBIR projects. We find across funding agencies that projects with intellectual property—patents, copyrights, trademarks, or publications—retained more employees after completion of the project. Also, we find that the public funding of Research by the SBIR program is more likely to stimulate employment when the government created a market for the products, processes, or services developed by the Research projects.

Eric Von Hippel - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • modeling a paradigm shift from producer Innovation to user and open collaborative Innovation
    Organization Science, 2011
    Co-Authors: Carliss Y. Baldwin, Eric Von Hippel
    Abstract:

    In this paper, we assess the economic viability of Innovation by producers relative to two increasingly important alternative models: Innovations by single-user individuals or firms and open collaborative Innovation. We analyze the design costs and architectures and communication costs associated with each model. We conclude that both Innovation by individual users and open collaborative Innovation increasingly compete with and may displace producer Innovation in many parts of the economy. We explain why this represents a paradigm shift with respect to Innovation Research, policy making, and practice. We discuss important implications and offer suggestions for further Research.

  • Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation
    Organization Science, 2011
    Co-Authors: Carliss Baldwin, Eric Von Hippel
    Abstract:

    In this paper we assess the economic viability of Innovation by producers relative to two increasingly important alternative models: Innovations by single user individuals or firms, and open collaborative Innovation. We analyze the design costs and architectures and communication costs associated with each model. We conclude that both Innovation by individual users and open collaborative Innovation increasingly compete with and may displace producer Innovation in many parts of the economy. We explain why this represents a paradigm shift with respect to Innovation Research, policymaking, and practice. We discuss important implications and offer suggestions for further Research. Original November 2009. This revision 2010.

Albert N. Link - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Luis Rubalcaba - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Social Innovation Research: An emerging area of Innovation studies?
    Research Policy, 2016
    Co-Authors: Robert P. Van Der Have, Luis Rubalcaba
    Abstract:

    While the adoption of Social Innovation (SI) in the governance and policy domain has fueled a rapidly expanding scholarly literature, this field has become characterized by conceptual ambiguity and a diversity of definitions and Research settings. This present situation inhibits the integration of findings. This paper traces the content, scope and relatively short history of modern social Innovation Research across disciplines by applying network and bibliometric analyses, and explores their relevance to Innovation studies. Based on data from 172 publications, we analyze scholarly works that directly address the social Innovation topic, allowing us to identify the precedence, dynamics and the current map of social Innovation Research as an emerging field of study. Our analysis suggests that the SI field is grounded in four distinct intellectual communities arising through a somewhat organized diffusion process: 1) Community Psychology; 2) Creativity Research; 3) Social and societal challenges; 4) Local development. The interest of SI in the areas of management and entrepreneurship is only very recent and is currently reflected within existing communities. We forge conceptual bridges between the two (currently very separate) domains of social Innovation and Innovation studies, and the implications of our finding for further Research and policy are also discussed.

Oliver Gassmann - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • broadening the scope of open Innovation past Research current state and future directions
    International Journal of Technology Management, 2010
    Co-Authors: Vareska Van De Vrande, Wim Vanhaverbeke, Oliver Gassmann
    Abstract:

    In this first paper of the special issue, we identify some trends in open Innovation Research by analysing how the literature on this topics has evolved since the introduction of the concept in 2003. Research on open Innovation has been mushrooming ever since and the scope has been broadened in different directions. Researchers also started to analyse open Innovation at different level of analysis from the individual actors in organisations to ecosystems and national Innovation systems. Despite the vast growth in Research on open Innovation, we identified several directions for further Research: open Innovation Research should be linked to other management areas such as marketing, HRM, change management, etc. In addition, our understanding of open Innovation could be improved if the recently developed insights could be related to the existing management theories.