Interdependence

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 126030 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Kuldeep Kumar - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • offshoring and the global distribution of work implications for task Interdependence theory and practice
    Journal of International Business Studies, 2009
    Co-Authors: Kuldeep Kumar, Paul C Van Fenema, Mary Ann Von Glinow
    Abstract:

    A recent Offshoring Research Network (ORN) global survey of offshoring shows that since 2004 management concerns about operational issues on achieving the benefits of offshoring have increased significantly. In this paper we examine inter-task Interdependence, a key operational determinant of inter-site interaction and communications in offshoring. We analyze existing theories of Interdependence to examine the extent to which they provide guidance for understanding the interaction and communication requirements between work segments that are offshored and distributed across the globe. Using a series of mini-cases on globally distributed work (GDW), we show how the traditional typology of Interdependence developed in the 1960s and 1970s is no longer adequate for understanding and managing task interdependencies in GDW. We propose three concepts to address this problem: integration Interdependence, “hand-offs”, and information “stickiness”. We then show how our revised typology of Interdependence enables a better understanding of the interactions and communication requirements between sites. Using this revised theory we propose guidelines for work design, and examine their implications for practical offshoring and work-distribution decisions. Implications for theory and practice for MNEs engaged in offshore relationships are discussed.

  • Offshoring and the global distribution of work: Implications for task Interdependence theory and practice
    Journal of International Business Studies, 2009
    Co-Authors: Kuldeep Kumar, Paul C Van Fenema, Mary Ann Von Glinow
    Abstract:

    A recent Offshoring Research Network (ORN) global survey of offshoring shows that since 2004 management concerns about operational issues on achieving the benefits of offshoring have increased significantly. In this paper we examine inter-task Interdependence, a key operational determinant of inter-site interaction and communications in offshoring. We analyze existing theories of Interdependence to examine the extent to which they provide guidance for understanding the interaction and communication requirements between work segments that are offshored and distributed across the globe. Using a series of mini-cases on globally distributed work (GDW), we show how the traditional typology of Interdependence developed in the 1960s and 1970s is no longer adequate for understanding and managing task interdependencies in GDW. We propose three concepts to address this problem: integration Interdependence, “hand-offs”, and information “stickiness”. We then show how our revised typology of Interdependence enables a better understanding of the interactions and communication requirements between sites. Using this revised theory we propose guidelines for work design, and examine their implications for practical offshoring and work-distribution decisions. Implications for theory and practice for MNEs engaged in offshore relationships are discussed.

Mary Ann Von Glinow - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Offshoring and the global distribution of work: Implications for task Interdependence theory and practice
    Journal of International Business Studies, 2009
    Co-Authors: Kuldeep Kumar, Paul C Van Fenema, Mary Ann Von Glinow
    Abstract:

    A recent Offshoring Research Network (ORN) global survey of offshoring shows that since 2004 management concerns about operational issues on achieving the benefits of offshoring have increased significantly. In this paper we examine inter-task Interdependence, a key operational determinant of inter-site interaction and communications in offshoring. We analyze existing theories of Interdependence to examine the extent to which they provide guidance for understanding the interaction and communication requirements between work segments that are offshored and distributed across the globe. Using a series of mini-cases on globally distributed work (GDW), we show how the traditional typology of Interdependence developed in the 1960s and 1970s is no longer adequate for understanding and managing task interdependencies in GDW. We propose three concepts to address this problem: integration Interdependence, “hand-offs”, and information “stickiness”. We then show how our revised typology of Interdependence enables a better understanding of the interactions and communication requirements between sites. Using this revised theory we propose guidelines for work design, and examine their implications for practical offshoring and work-distribution decisions. Implications for theory and practice for MNEs engaged in offshore relationships are discussed.

Mary Ann Von Glinow - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • offshoring and the global distribution of work implications for task Interdependence theory and practice
    Journal of International Business Studies, 2009
    Co-Authors: Kuldeep Kumar, Paul C Van Fenema, Mary Ann Von Glinow
    Abstract:

    A recent Offshoring Research Network (ORN) global survey of offshoring shows that since 2004 management concerns about operational issues on achieving the benefits of offshoring have increased significantly. In this paper we examine inter-task Interdependence, a key operational determinant of inter-site interaction and communications in offshoring. We analyze existing theories of Interdependence to examine the extent to which they provide guidance for understanding the interaction and communication requirements between work segments that are offshored and distributed across the globe. Using a series of mini-cases on globally distributed work (GDW), we show how the traditional typology of Interdependence developed in the 1960s and 1970s is no longer adequate for understanding and managing task interdependencies in GDW. We propose three concepts to address this problem: integration Interdependence, “hand-offs”, and information “stickiness”. We then show how our revised typology of Interdependence enables a better understanding of the interactions and communication requirements between sites. Using this revised theory we propose guidelines for work design, and examine their implications for practical offshoring and work-distribution decisions. Implications for theory and practice for MNEs engaged in offshore relationships are discussed.

Zeev Maoz - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the effects of strategic and economic Interdependence on international conflict across levels of analysis
    American Journal of Political Science, 2009
    Co-Authors: Zeev Maoz
    Abstract:

    This study develops a Social Network Analytic approach to conceptualize and measure Interdependence across levels of analysis. This framework contains several innovations. First, it integrates “sensitivity Interdependence”—the effects of changes in one state on other states—with “vulnerability Interdependence”—the opportunity costs of breaking a relationship. Second, it measures Interdependence at different levels of analysis and across multiple relationships. Third, it integrates multiple dimensions of Interdependence into a single measure. I derive hypotheses from the realist and liberal paradigms regarding the effects of strategic and economic Interdependence on monadic, dyadic, and systemic conflict. These hypotheses are tested via data on alliances, military capability, and trade. The findings provide robust support to the expectations of the liberal paradigm regarding the effects of strategic and economic Interdependence on conflict. On the other hand, the expectations of the realist paradigm are not supported. I discuss the theoretical and empirical implications of this approach.

Lindie H Liang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • breaking or making the silence how goal Interdependence and social skill predict being ostracized
    Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2015
    Co-Authors: Lance D Ferris, Ho Kwong Kwan, Flora F T Chiang, Ed Snape, Lindie H Liang
    Abstract:

    Abstract Although ostracism can have devastating consequences for employees and organizations, our understanding of what contributes to ostracism is notably limited. Drawing on and extending goal Interdependence theory, we integrate the goal Interdependence and social skill literatures to predict when individuals are likely to be ostracized. Across two studies we found that cooperative goal Interdependence reduced, while competitive goal Interdependence facilitated, being ostracized; social skill strengthened the negative impact of cooperative goal Interdependence on ostracism and neutralized the positive impact of competitive goal Interdependence on ostracism. In a third longitudinal study, we found that relationship conflict mediated the interactive effect of goal Interdependence and social skill on being ostracized. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.