The Experts below are selected from a list of 189 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

S. E. Kille - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • File: Draft-kille-mixer-rfc1327bis-02.txt MIXER (Mime Internet X.400 Enhanced Relay):
    1996
    Co-Authors: S. E. Kille
    Abstract:

    Status of this Memo This document is an Internet Draft. Internet Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its Areas, and its Working Groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet Drafts. Internet Drafts are Draft documents valid for a maximum of six months. Internet Drafts may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is not appropriate to use Internet Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as a ‘‘working Draft’ ’ or ‘‘work in progress.’’ Please check the I-D abstract listing contained in each Internet Draft directory to learn the current status of this or any other Internet Draft. NOTE: This document (version 2.3) is change-barred relative to version 2.2. Some obvious formatting errors have been introducted by this process, and these will not be present in the final version. Network Working Grou

  • File: Draft-kille-mixer-rfc1327bis-03.txt MIXER (Mime Internet X.400 Enhanced Relay):
    1996
    Co-Authors: S. E. Kille
    Abstract:

    Status of this Memo This document is an Internet Draft. Internet Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its Areas, and its Working Groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet Drafts. Internet Drafts are Draft documents valid for a maximum of six months. Internet Drafts may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is not appropriate to use Internet Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as a ‘‘working Draft’ ’ or ‘‘work in progress.’’ Please check the I-D abstract listing contained in each Internet Draft directory to learn the current status of this or any other Internet Draft. NOTE: This document (version 2.4) is change-barred relative to version 2.3. Some obvious formatting errors have been introducted by this process, and these will not be present in the final version. Network Working Grou

  • File: Draft-kille-mixer-rfc1327bis-01.txt MIXER (Mime Internet X.400 Enhanced Relay): Mapping between X.400 and RFC 822/MIME
    1995
    Co-Authors: S. E. Kille
    Abstract:

    This document is an Internet Draft. Internet Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its Areas, and its Working Groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet Drafts. Internet Drafts are Draft documents valid for a maximum of six months. Internet Drafts may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is not appropriate to use Internet Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as a ‘‘working Draft’ ’ or ‘‘work in progress.’’ Please check the I-D abstract listing contained in each Internet Draft directory to learn the current status of this or any other Internet Draft. NOTE: This document (version 2.2) is change-barred relative to version 2.1. Some obvious formatting errors have been introducted by this process, and these will not be present in the final version. Network Working Grou

Hanchieh Chao - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • experimentation and performance analysis of multi interfaced mobile router scheme
    Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2010
    Co-Authors: Xiaohua Chen, Hongke Zhang, Yaochung Chang, Hanchieh Chao
    Abstract:

    Abstract Network mobility (NEMO) aims providing seamless Internet connectivity of the whole mobile network that consists of mobile routers (MRs) and mobile network nodes (MNNs). The network moves around along with vehicles as a whole. According to NEMO basic support protocol (NEMO BSP), only one primary care of address (CoA) of MR can be registered with home agent, which will affect the handover performance. As an extension of NEMO BSP, multiple care of addresses (MCoA) registration scheme was proposed as Internet-Draft and has received extensive researches. This paper studies the Internet connectivity of mobile router (MR) on the basis stated above; MR is equipped with WLAN, CDMA and GPRS interfaces simultaneously. Concretely, a smooth handover algorithm is proposed and experimented on our platform successfully; round trip time (RTT) of each link and the handover process between different interfaces are analyzed, respectively. Furthermore, the service disruption time and packet loss ratio performances are also compared between uni-interfaced MR scheme of NEMO BSP and scheme proposed in this paper, and the results indicate that multi-interfaced scheme not only supports large area movement across heterogeneous networks of MR, it also provides a seamless handover with no packet loss and little service disruption time.

Harsha Sirisena - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • A mobility management protocol for IP-based cellular networks
    IEEE Wireless Communications, 2002
    Co-Authors: P Silva, Harsha Sirisena
    Abstract:

    Mobile IP is an IETF RFC that supports transparent host migration on the Internet. In the transition to IP-based cellular networks, it is widely agreed that Mobile IP provides an elegant solution for inter-domain, or macro- mobility management, but lacks critical aspects of mobility management needed within cellular networks. The shortcomings have led to the recent emergence of micro- mobility management protocols. This paper presents an IP- based mobility management protocol, µ-Mobile IP, based on two enhancements, proactive handoff and paging support, to an Internet Draft proposal Regional Registrations. A signaling cost analysis is used to justify the need for such enhancements. We show through simulations the protocol's suitability for supporting real-time communications.

  • a mobility management protocol for ip based cellular networks
    International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, 2001
    Co-Authors: P Silva, Harsha Sirisena
    Abstract:

    Mobile IP is an IETF RFC that supports transparent host migration on the Internet. In the transition to IP-based cellular networks, it is widely agreed that mobile IP provides an elegant solution for inter-domain, or macro-mobility management, but lacks critical aspects of mobility management needed within cellular networks. The shortcomings have led to the emergence of micro-mobility management protocols. This paper presents an IP-based mobility management protocol, /spl mu/-mobile IP, based on two enhancements, proactive handoff and paging support, to an Internet Draft proposal, Regional Registrations. A signaling cost analysis is used to justify the need for such enhancements. We show through simulations the protocol's suitability for supporting real-time communications.

P Silva - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • A mobility management protocol for IP-based cellular networks
    IEEE Wireless Communications, 2002
    Co-Authors: P Silva, Harsha Sirisena
    Abstract:

    Mobile IP is an IETF RFC that supports transparent host migration on the Internet. In the transition to IP-based cellular networks, it is widely agreed that Mobile IP provides an elegant solution for inter-domain, or macro- mobility management, but lacks critical aspects of mobility management needed within cellular networks. The shortcomings have led to the recent emergence of micro- mobility management protocols. This paper presents an IP- based mobility management protocol, µ-Mobile IP, based on two enhancements, proactive handoff and paging support, to an Internet Draft proposal Regional Registrations. A signaling cost analysis is used to justify the need for such enhancements. We show through simulations the protocol's suitability for supporting real-time communications.

  • a mobility management protocol for ip based cellular networks
    International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, 2001
    Co-Authors: P Silva, Harsha Sirisena
    Abstract:

    Mobile IP is an IETF RFC that supports transparent host migration on the Internet. In the transition to IP-based cellular networks, it is widely agreed that mobile IP provides an elegant solution for inter-domain, or macro-mobility management, but lacks critical aspects of mobility management needed within cellular networks. The shortcomings have led to the emergence of micro-mobility management protocols. This paper presents an IP-based mobility management protocol, /spl mu/-mobile IP, based on two enhancements, proactive handoff and paging support, to an Internet Draft proposal, Regional Registrations. A signaling cost analysis is used to justify the need for such enhancements. We show through simulations the protocol's suitability for supporting real-time communications.

Francetelecom Orange - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • DHC Internet-Draft Intended status: Standards Track
    2013
    Co-Authors: D. Migault, Francetelecom Orange, W. Cloetens, C. Griffiths, R. Weber
    Abstract:

    DHCP DNS Public Authoritative Server Option Draft-mglt-dhc-public-authoritative-server-option-00.txt The home network naming architecture as described in [I-D.mglt-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation] requires a complex naming configuration on the CPE. This configuration MAY not be handled easily by the average end user. Furthermore, such misconfiguration MAY result in making home network unreachable. This document proposes a DHCP option that provides the CPE all necessary parameters to set up the home network naming architecture. First, this DHCP option provides automatic configuration and avoids most end users ’ misconfigurations. Most average end users may not require specific configuration, and their ISP default configuration MAY fully address their needs. In that case, the naming homenet architecture configuration will be completely transparent to the end users. Then, saving naming configuration outside the CPE, makes it resilient to change of CPE or CPE upgrades. Such configuration may also be configured by the end user, via the customer area of their ISP

  • HOMENET Internet-Draft Intended status: Standards Track
    2013
    Co-Authors: D. Migault, Francetelecom Orange, W. Cloetens, C. Griffiths, R. Weber
    Abstract:

    DHCP DNS Public Authoritative Server Options Draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-00.txt The home network naming architecture as described in [I-D.mglt-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation] requires a complex naming configuration on the CPE. This configuration MAY not be handled easily by the average end user. Furthermore, such misconfiguration MAY result in making home network unreachable. This document proposes a DHCP options that provide the CPE all necessary parameters to set up the home network naming architecture. First, this DHCP options provide automatic configuration and avoid most end users ’ misconfiguration. Most average end users may not require specific configuration, and their ISP default configuration MAY fully address their needs. In that case, the naming homenet architecture configuration will be completely transparent to the end users. Then, saving naming configuration outside the CPE, makes it resilient to change of CPE or CPE upgrades. Such configuration may also be configured by the end user, via the customer area of their ISP

  • IPv6 Home Network Naming Delegation Architecture", Internet-Draft Draft-mglt-homenet-naming-delegation-00
    2012
    Co-Authors: W. Cloetens, D. Migault, P. Lemordant, Francetelecom Orange
    Abstract:

    Draft-mglt-homenet-naming-delegation-00.txt This document describes the Naming Delegation Architecture that makes IPv6 Home Network globally reachable with Names or Fully Qualified Domain Names (FQDN). In this architecture, the Customer Premise Equipment (CPE) acts as the DNS Authoritative Server of the Home Network also called the Delegated DNS Server. The Naming Delegation is configured between the Delegated DNS Server and the Delegating DNS Server managed by the ISP. The use case considered in this document is an End User that subscribes its ISP a specific Delegated Domain for its Home Network. This document describes how the CPE automatically sets the Naming Delegation between the Delegating and Delegated DNS Server. The Naming Delegation is requested by the CPE. The CPE DHCP Client and the ISP DHCP Server exchange DHCP Options to properly set th