Intraperitoneal

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 360 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

C. A. Jacobi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the influence of adhesion prophylactic substances and taurolidine heparin on local recurrence and Intraperitoneal tumor growth after laparoscopic assisted bowel resection of colon carcinoma in a rat model
    Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 2003
    Co-Authors: I Opitz, Chris Braumann, H Van Der Veen, B Ablassmaier, K Fuhrer, C. A. Jacobi
    Abstract:

    Backgroud: The goal of the study was to investigate the influence of adhesion prophylactic substances (Interceed/lntergel) as well as taurolidine/heparin on Intraperitoneal tumor growth and the local recurrence rate after laparoscopic cecum resection in a rat tumor model. Methods: Sixty BDIX rats were randomized in three therapy groups and one control group. A laparoscopic-assisted cecum resection was performed via three-trocar method after Intraperitoneal tumor cell application (10,000 cells) of a colon carcinoma cell line (DHD/K1/TRb) in all animals. According to the randomization, the cecum suture and a 1 × 1-cm peritoneal defect were either covered with Intergel/Interceed or 1 ml of 0.5% taurolidine 10 IU heparin. The control group underwent instillation of 1 ml 0.9% NaCl solution. After 4 weeks the animals were euthanized and Intraperitoneal tumor growth, local recurrence rate, and the number of Intraperitoneal adhesions were determined. Results: The local recurrence rate was not significantly affected by any of the substances. Nevertheless, taurolidine/heparin significantly reduced the total number and weight of Intraperitoneal metastases. The formation of adhesions was not significantly influenced by adhesion prophylaxis substances or by taurolidine/heparin. Conclusions: Taurolidine/heparin led to a significant reduction of Intraperitoneal tumor growth after Intraperitoneal application, whereas local tumor recurrence was not significantly influenced. This might be due to the number of injected tumor cells in this cell suspension model. Interceed and Intergel did not reduce Intraperitoneal tumor growth. Furthermore, adhesion formation was not reduced by any of the substances.

  • local and systemic chemotherapy with taurolidine and taurolidine heparin in colon cancer bearing rats undergoing laparotomy
    Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, 2003
    Co-Authors: Chris Braumann, J. Ordemann, F. A. Wenger, M Kilian, C. A. Jacobi
    Abstract:

    Experimental studies in the therapy of malignant abdominal tumors have shown that different cytotoxic agents suppress the Intraperitoneal tumor growth. Nevertheless, a general accepted approach to prevent tumor recurrences does not exist. Following subcutaneous and Intraperitoneal injection of 104 colon adenocarcinoma cells (DHD/K12/TRb), the influences of both taurolidine or taurolidine/heparin on Intraperitoneal and subcutaneous tumor growth was investigated in 105 rats undergoing midline laparotomy. The animals were randomized into 7 groups and operated on during 30 min. To investigate the Intraperitoneal (local) influence of either taurolidine or heparin on tumor growth, the substances were applied Intraperitoneally. Systemic and Intraperitoneal effects were evaluated after intravenous injection of the substances. Both application forms were also combined to analyze synergistic effects. Tumor weights, as well as the incidence of abdominal wound metastases, were determined four weeks after the intervention. In order to evaluate the effects of the agents, blood was taken to determine the peripheral leukocytes counts. Intraperitoneal tumor growth in rats receiving Intraperitoneal application of taurolidine (median 7.0 mg, P=0.05) and of taurolidine/heparin (median 0 mg, P=0.02) was significantly reduced when compared to the control group (median 185 mg). The simultaneous instillation of both agents also reduced the Intraperitoneal tumor growth (median 4 mg, P=0.04), while the intravenous injection of the substances caused no local effect. In contrast, the subcutaneous tumor growth did not differ among all groups. In all groups, abdominal wound recurrences were rare and did not differ. Independent of the agents and the application form, the operation itself caused a slight leukopenia shortly after the operation and a leukocytosis in the following course. Intraperitoneal therapy of either taurolidine or in combination with heparin inhibits local tumor growth and abdominal wound recurrences in rats undergoing midline laparotomy. Neither the Intraperitoneal nor the intravenous application or the combination of the two agents influenced the subcutaneous tumor growth. The substances did not alter the changes of peripheral leukocytes.

  • influence of Intraperitoneal and systemic application of taurolidine and taurolidine heparin during laparoscopy on Intraperitoneal and subcutaneous tumour growth in rats
    Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, 2000
    Co-Authors: Chris Braumann, Jürgen Ordemann, Peer Wildbrett, C. A. Jacobi
    Abstract:

    Background: Recent clinical and experimental studies investigated the problem and possible pathomechanisms of port-site metastases after laparoscopic resection of malignant tumours. A generally accepted approach to prevent these tumour implantations does not exist so far. Methods: After subcutaneous and Intraperitoneal injection of 104 cells of colon adenocarcinoma (DHD/K12/TRb) the influences of either taurolidine or taurolidine/heparin on Intraperitoneal and subcutaneous tumour growth were investigated in 105 rats undergoing laparoscopy with carbon dioxide. The animals were then randomised into seven groups. A pneumoperitoneum was established using carbon dioxide for 30 min (8 mmHg). Three incisions were used: median for the insufflation needle, and a right and left approach in the lower abdomen for trocars. To investigate the Intraperitoneal (local) influence of either taurolidine and heparin on tumour growth the substances were instilled Intraperitoneally. Systemic effects were expected when the substances were applied intravenously (iv). Synergistic influences were tested when both application forms were combined. The number and the weight of tumours as well as the incidence of abdominal wall and port-site metastases were determined four weeks after intervention. Blood was taken to evaluate the influences of taurolidine and heparin on systemic immunologic reactions: seven days before laparoscopy, two hours, two days, seven days, and four weeks after operation, and the peripheral lymphocytes were determined. Results: Intraperitoneal (ip) tumour weight in rats receiving taurolidine (median 7 mg) and taurolidine/heparin (0 mg) Intraperitoneally was significantly reduced when compared to the control group (52 mg) (P=0.001). There was no difference of subcutaneus tumour growth among the groups (P=0.4). Trocar recurrences were decreased when taurolidine was applied ip (3/15), ipiv (4/15), and ip in combination with heparin (4/15) in comparison to the control group (10/15). Immediately after intervention treated and untreated groups showed a peripheral lymphopenia. Conclusions: The Intraperitoneal therapy with taurolidine and the combination with heparin inhibits the Intraperitoneal tumour growth and trocar recurrences. Neither the Intraperitoneal nor the systemic application or the combination of taurolidine and heparin did reduce the subcutaneous tumour growth. The intervention caused a lymphopenia which was compensated on day two.

  • experimental study of the effect of intra abdominal pressure during laparoscopy on tumour growth and port site metastasis
    British Journal of Surgery, 1998
    Co-Authors: C. A. Jacobi, F. A. Wenger, J. Ordemann, C. N. Gutt, R. Sabat, J. M. Müller
    Abstract:

    Background The influence of raised Intraperitoneal pressure during laparoscopy on tumour growth and port site metastasis is still unknown. Methods Tumour growth of colonic adenocarcinoma DHD/K12/TRb was measured after laparoscopy with carbon dioxide at different pressures (0, 5, 10 and 15 mmHg) in a rat model. Cell kinetics were determined after incubation with carbon dioxide (0, 5, 10 and 15 mmHg) in vitro (n = 60). Additionally, tumour growth was measured subcutaneously and Intraperitoneally 4 weeks after laparoscopy at different Intraperitoneal pressures (5, 10 and 15 mmHg) (n = 100). Results In vitro tumour growth decreased significantly after incubation with carbon dioxide at 10 and 15 mmHg compared with a pressure of 0 or 5 mmHg. In vivo, mean(s.d.) Intraperitoneal tumour weight was significantly increased after laparoscopy at 5 mmHg (919(1085) mg) and at 10 mmHg (1274(1523) mg) (P < 0·05), but decreased again after laparoscopy with an Intraperitoneal pressure of 15 mmHg (731(929) mg) compared with the control group (365(353) mg) (P = 0·3). Mean(s.d.) subcutaneous tumour growth was promoted after laparoscopy at 5 mmHg (172(234) mg), at 10 mmHg (190(253) mg) and at 15 mmHg (178(194) mg) compared with controls (48(33) mg) (P < 0·05). Conclusion In vitro, raised Intraperitoneal pressure leads to suppression of tumour growth. In vivo, Intraperitoneal tumour growth is suppressed only by higher pressure (15 mmHg). Subcutaneous tumour growth is stimulated by carbon dioxide independently of the Intraperitoneal pressure. © 1998 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd

Chris Braumann - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the influence of adhesion prophylactic substances and taurolidine heparin on local recurrence and Intraperitoneal tumor growth after laparoscopic assisted bowel resection of colon carcinoma in a rat model
    Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 2003
    Co-Authors: I Opitz, Chris Braumann, H Van Der Veen, B Ablassmaier, K Fuhrer, C. A. Jacobi
    Abstract:

    Backgroud: The goal of the study was to investigate the influence of adhesion prophylactic substances (Interceed/lntergel) as well as taurolidine/heparin on Intraperitoneal tumor growth and the local recurrence rate after laparoscopic cecum resection in a rat tumor model. Methods: Sixty BDIX rats were randomized in three therapy groups and one control group. A laparoscopic-assisted cecum resection was performed via three-trocar method after Intraperitoneal tumor cell application (10,000 cells) of a colon carcinoma cell line (DHD/K1/TRb) in all animals. According to the randomization, the cecum suture and a 1 × 1-cm peritoneal defect were either covered with Intergel/Interceed or 1 ml of 0.5% taurolidine 10 IU heparin. The control group underwent instillation of 1 ml 0.9% NaCl solution. After 4 weeks the animals were euthanized and Intraperitoneal tumor growth, local recurrence rate, and the number of Intraperitoneal adhesions were determined. Results: The local recurrence rate was not significantly affected by any of the substances. Nevertheless, taurolidine/heparin significantly reduced the total number and weight of Intraperitoneal metastases. The formation of adhesions was not significantly influenced by adhesion prophylaxis substances or by taurolidine/heparin. Conclusions: Taurolidine/heparin led to a significant reduction of Intraperitoneal tumor growth after Intraperitoneal application, whereas local tumor recurrence was not significantly influenced. This might be due to the number of injected tumor cells in this cell suspension model. Interceed and Intergel did not reduce Intraperitoneal tumor growth. Furthermore, adhesion formation was not reduced by any of the substances.

  • local and systemic chemotherapy with taurolidine and taurolidine heparin in colon cancer bearing rats undergoing laparotomy
    Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, 2003
    Co-Authors: Chris Braumann, J. Ordemann, F. A. Wenger, M Kilian, C. A. Jacobi
    Abstract:

    Experimental studies in the therapy of malignant abdominal tumors have shown that different cytotoxic agents suppress the Intraperitoneal tumor growth. Nevertheless, a general accepted approach to prevent tumor recurrences does not exist. Following subcutaneous and Intraperitoneal injection of 104 colon adenocarcinoma cells (DHD/K12/TRb), the influences of both taurolidine or taurolidine/heparin on Intraperitoneal and subcutaneous tumor growth was investigated in 105 rats undergoing midline laparotomy. The animals were randomized into 7 groups and operated on during 30 min. To investigate the Intraperitoneal (local) influence of either taurolidine or heparin on tumor growth, the substances were applied Intraperitoneally. Systemic and Intraperitoneal effects were evaluated after intravenous injection of the substances. Both application forms were also combined to analyze synergistic effects. Tumor weights, as well as the incidence of abdominal wound metastases, were determined four weeks after the intervention. In order to evaluate the effects of the agents, blood was taken to determine the peripheral leukocytes counts. Intraperitoneal tumor growth in rats receiving Intraperitoneal application of taurolidine (median 7.0 mg, P=0.05) and of taurolidine/heparin (median 0 mg, P=0.02) was significantly reduced when compared to the control group (median 185 mg). The simultaneous instillation of both agents also reduced the Intraperitoneal tumor growth (median 4 mg, P=0.04), while the intravenous injection of the substances caused no local effect. In contrast, the subcutaneous tumor growth did not differ among all groups. In all groups, abdominal wound recurrences were rare and did not differ. Independent of the agents and the application form, the operation itself caused a slight leukopenia shortly after the operation and a leukocytosis in the following course. Intraperitoneal therapy of either taurolidine or in combination with heparin inhibits local tumor growth and abdominal wound recurrences in rats undergoing midline laparotomy. Neither the Intraperitoneal nor the intravenous application or the combination of the two agents influenced the subcutaneous tumor growth. The substances did not alter the changes of peripheral leukocytes.

  • influence of Intraperitoneal and systemic application of taurolidine and taurolidine heparin during laparoscopy on Intraperitoneal and subcutaneous tumour growth in rats
    Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, 2000
    Co-Authors: Chris Braumann, Jürgen Ordemann, Peer Wildbrett, C. A. Jacobi
    Abstract:

    Background: Recent clinical and experimental studies investigated the problem and possible pathomechanisms of port-site metastases after laparoscopic resection of malignant tumours. A generally accepted approach to prevent these tumour implantations does not exist so far. Methods: After subcutaneous and Intraperitoneal injection of 104 cells of colon adenocarcinoma (DHD/K12/TRb) the influences of either taurolidine or taurolidine/heparin on Intraperitoneal and subcutaneous tumour growth were investigated in 105 rats undergoing laparoscopy with carbon dioxide. The animals were then randomised into seven groups. A pneumoperitoneum was established using carbon dioxide for 30 min (8 mmHg). Three incisions were used: median for the insufflation needle, and a right and left approach in the lower abdomen for trocars. To investigate the Intraperitoneal (local) influence of either taurolidine and heparin on tumour growth the substances were instilled Intraperitoneally. Systemic effects were expected when the substances were applied intravenously (iv). Synergistic influences were tested when both application forms were combined. The number and the weight of tumours as well as the incidence of abdominal wall and port-site metastases were determined four weeks after intervention. Blood was taken to evaluate the influences of taurolidine and heparin on systemic immunologic reactions: seven days before laparoscopy, two hours, two days, seven days, and four weeks after operation, and the peripheral lymphocytes were determined. Results: Intraperitoneal (ip) tumour weight in rats receiving taurolidine (median 7 mg) and taurolidine/heparin (0 mg) Intraperitoneally was significantly reduced when compared to the control group (52 mg) (P=0.001). There was no difference of subcutaneus tumour growth among the groups (P=0.4). Trocar recurrences were decreased when taurolidine was applied ip (3/15), ipiv (4/15), and ip in combination with heparin (4/15) in comparison to the control group (10/15). Immediately after intervention treated and untreated groups showed a peripheral lymphopenia. Conclusions: The Intraperitoneal therapy with taurolidine and the combination with heparin inhibits the Intraperitoneal tumour growth and trocar recurrences. Neither the Intraperitoneal nor the systemic application or the combination of taurolidine and heparin did reduce the subcutaneous tumour growth. The intervention caused a lymphopenia which was compensated on day two.

Yutaka Yonemura - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

J. Ordemann - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • local and systemic chemotherapy with taurolidine and taurolidine heparin in colon cancer bearing rats undergoing laparotomy
    Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, 2003
    Co-Authors: Chris Braumann, J. Ordemann, F. A. Wenger, M Kilian, C. A. Jacobi
    Abstract:

    Experimental studies in the therapy of malignant abdominal tumors have shown that different cytotoxic agents suppress the Intraperitoneal tumor growth. Nevertheless, a general accepted approach to prevent tumor recurrences does not exist. Following subcutaneous and Intraperitoneal injection of 104 colon adenocarcinoma cells (DHD/K12/TRb), the influences of both taurolidine or taurolidine/heparin on Intraperitoneal and subcutaneous tumor growth was investigated in 105 rats undergoing midline laparotomy. The animals were randomized into 7 groups and operated on during 30 min. To investigate the Intraperitoneal (local) influence of either taurolidine or heparin on tumor growth, the substances were applied Intraperitoneally. Systemic and Intraperitoneal effects were evaluated after intravenous injection of the substances. Both application forms were also combined to analyze synergistic effects. Tumor weights, as well as the incidence of abdominal wound metastases, were determined four weeks after the intervention. In order to evaluate the effects of the agents, blood was taken to determine the peripheral leukocytes counts. Intraperitoneal tumor growth in rats receiving Intraperitoneal application of taurolidine (median 7.0 mg, P=0.05) and of taurolidine/heparin (median 0 mg, P=0.02) was significantly reduced when compared to the control group (median 185 mg). The simultaneous instillation of both agents also reduced the Intraperitoneal tumor growth (median 4 mg, P=0.04), while the intravenous injection of the substances caused no local effect. In contrast, the subcutaneous tumor growth did not differ among all groups. In all groups, abdominal wound recurrences were rare and did not differ. Independent of the agents and the application form, the operation itself caused a slight leukopenia shortly after the operation and a leukocytosis in the following course. Intraperitoneal therapy of either taurolidine or in combination with heparin inhibits local tumor growth and abdominal wound recurrences in rats undergoing midline laparotomy. Neither the Intraperitoneal nor the intravenous application or the combination of the two agents influenced the subcutaneous tumor growth. The substances did not alter the changes of peripheral leukocytes.

  • experimental study of the effect of intra abdominal pressure during laparoscopy on tumour growth and port site metastasis
    British Journal of Surgery, 1998
    Co-Authors: C. A. Jacobi, F. A. Wenger, J. Ordemann, C. N. Gutt, R. Sabat, J. M. Müller
    Abstract:

    Background The influence of raised Intraperitoneal pressure during laparoscopy on tumour growth and port site metastasis is still unknown. Methods Tumour growth of colonic adenocarcinoma DHD/K12/TRb was measured after laparoscopy with carbon dioxide at different pressures (0, 5, 10 and 15 mmHg) in a rat model. Cell kinetics were determined after incubation with carbon dioxide (0, 5, 10 and 15 mmHg) in vitro (n = 60). Additionally, tumour growth was measured subcutaneously and Intraperitoneally 4 weeks after laparoscopy at different Intraperitoneal pressures (5, 10 and 15 mmHg) (n = 100). Results In vitro tumour growth decreased significantly after incubation with carbon dioxide at 10 and 15 mmHg compared with a pressure of 0 or 5 mmHg. In vivo, mean(s.d.) Intraperitoneal tumour weight was significantly increased after laparoscopy at 5 mmHg (919(1085) mg) and at 10 mmHg (1274(1523) mg) (P < 0·05), but decreased again after laparoscopy with an Intraperitoneal pressure of 15 mmHg (731(929) mg) compared with the control group (365(353) mg) (P = 0·3). Mean(s.d.) subcutaneous tumour growth was promoted after laparoscopy at 5 mmHg (172(234) mg), at 10 mmHg (190(253) mg) and at 15 mmHg (178(194) mg) compared with controls (48(33) mg) (P < 0·05). Conclusion In vitro, raised Intraperitoneal pressure leads to suppression of tumour growth. In vivo, Intraperitoneal tumour growth is suppressed only by higher pressure (15 mmHg). Subcutaneous tumour growth is stimulated by carbon dioxide independently of the Intraperitoneal pressure. © 1998 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd

F. A. Wenger - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • local and systemic chemotherapy with taurolidine and taurolidine heparin in colon cancer bearing rats undergoing laparotomy
    Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, 2003
    Co-Authors: Chris Braumann, J. Ordemann, F. A. Wenger, M Kilian, C. A. Jacobi
    Abstract:

    Experimental studies in the therapy of malignant abdominal tumors have shown that different cytotoxic agents suppress the Intraperitoneal tumor growth. Nevertheless, a general accepted approach to prevent tumor recurrences does not exist. Following subcutaneous and Intraperitoneal injection of 104 colon adenocarcinoma cells (DHD/K12/TRb), the influences of both taurolidine or taurolidine/heparin on Intraperitoneal and subcutaneous tumor growth was investigated in 105 rats undergoing midline laparotomy. The animals were randomized into 7 groups and operated on during 30 min. To investigate the Intraperitoneal (local) influence of either taurolidine or heparin on tumor growth, the substances were applied Intraperitoneally. Systemic and Intraperitoneal effects were evaluated after intravenous injection of the substances. Both application forms were also combined to analyze synergistic effects. Tumor weights, as well as the incidence of abdominal wound metastases, were determined four weeks after the intervention. In order to evaluate the effects of the agents, blood was taken to determine the peripheral leukocytes counts. Intraperitoneal tumor growth in rats receiving Intraperitoneal application of taurolidine (median 7.0 mg, P=0.05) and of taurolidine/heparin (median 0 mg, P=0.02) was significantly reduced when compared to the control group (median 185 mg). The simultaneous instillation of both agents also reduced the Intraperitoneal tumor growth (median 4 mg, P=0.04), while the intravenous injection of the substances caused no local effect. In contrast, the subcutaneous tumor growth did not differ among all groups. In all groups, abdominal wound recurrences were rare and did not differ. Independent of the agents and the application form, the operation itself caused a slight leukopenia shortly after the operation and a leukocytosis in the following course. Intraperitoneal therapy of either taurolidine or in combination with heparin inhibits local tumor growth and abdominal wound recurrences in rats undergoing midline laparotomy. Neither the Intraperitoneal nor the intravenous application or the combination of the two agents influenced the subcutaneous tumor growth. The substances did not alter the changes of peripheral leukocytes.

  • experimental study of the effect of intra abdominal pressure during laparoscopy on tumour growth and port site metastasis
    British Journal of Surgery, 1998
    Co-Authors: C. A. Jacobi, F. A. Wenger, J. Ordemann, C. N. Gutt, R. Sabat, J. M. Müller
    Abstract:

    Background The influence of raised Intraperitoneal pressure during laparoscopy on tumour growth and port site metastasis is still unknown. Methods Tumour growth of colonic adenocarcinoma DHD/K12/TRb was measured after laparoscopy with carbon dioxide at different pressures (0, 5, 10 and 15 mmHg) in a rat model. Cell kinetics were determined after incubation with carbon dioxide (0, 5, 10 and 15 mmHg) in vitro (n = 60). Additionally, tumour growth was measured subcutaneously and Intraperitoneally 4 weeks after laparoscopy at different Intraperitoneal pressures (5, 10 and 15 mmHg) (n = 100). Results In vitro tumour growth decreased significantly after incubation with carbon dioxide at 10 and 15 mmHg compared with a pressure of 0 or 5 mmHg. In vivo, mean(s.d.) Intraperitoneal tumour weight was significantly increased after laparoscopy at 5 mmHg (919(1085) mg) and at 10 mmHg (1274(1523) mg) (P < 0·05), but decreased again after laparoscopy with an Intraperitoneal pressure of 15 mmHg (731(929) mg) compared with the control group (365(353) mg) (P = 0·3). Mean(s.d.) subcutaneous tumour growth was promoted after laparoscopy at 5 mmHg (172(234) mg), at 10 mmHg (190(253) mg) and at 15 mmHg (178(194) mg) compared with controls (48(33) mg) (P < 0·05). Conclusion In vitro, raised Intraperitoneal pressure leads to suppression of tumour growth. In vivo, Intraperitoneal tumour growth is suppressed only by higher pressure (15 mmHg). Subcutaneous tumour growth is stimulated by carbon dioxide independently of the Intraperitoneal pressure. © 1998 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd